Wumbo

@NoteNeeded Midcurve take " BUt, LoOk aT tHe ScieNce!" DST is superior for anyone with a life.

Standard Time People: Here’s the data and evidence behind permanent standard time. Daylight Saving Time People: bUt i LIkE iT

@thatcat4lyst @Brokeindollars @ddofinternet It's 13.99

@Brokeindollars @ddofinternet For everyone saying oh get regular premium, umm no? I'm not paying 24 dollars a month for music when I can pay 5 and just use an AdBlock + revanced on mobile

If you pay for Spotify, but refuse to pay for YouTube premium, I got some life changing news for you…

@LeVeonBell Teslas do this shit automatically. Pmo, but usually it's not the driver, just the car.

if you are a person that presses your brakes on the highway every few feet when there is nobody in front of you can you please explain to me why you do that because I don’t understand ..

@geoffkeighley It's funny that everyone knows how this is going to end, even the company, but they'll still do this shit anyway because why not.

Phil Spencer is retiring as the CEO of Microsoft Gaming effective immediately. Asha Sharma from Microsoft will take over as CEO. Sarah Bond will depart Xbox.

@Luiggi0_ @DanFriedman81 Think it's the blue haired types

@DanFriedman81 I mean, big publishers were making great games also when there were over 1000+ employees. What really ruined them was replacing creative directors/ lead dev with shithead corpo managers from finance and other industries obsessed with revenue. That's what we need to get rid of.

I don't think the industry and games journalists understand how little gamers care about what is happening to the games industry right now. The 40-person studio that made "Expedition 33" is comprised of former Ubisoft developers. Ubisoft hasn't made a game as good as "Expedition 33" in at least ten years. Ubisoft employs 17,000 people. If all of them lose their jobs and some of those people manage to form even a single small studio that makes a game as good as "Expedition 33," then we one more great game to play than we would have had otherwise, because Ubisoft will never make a great game. Great games are not Ubisoft's business model and that is why Ubisoft is unsalvageable. What is happening in the games industry right now is not the destruction of anything that deserves to be preserved. We are seeing the inevitable collapse of giant corporate studios that make mediocre games that nobody wants to play.

@imelizabethlane It's her eyes

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

BREAKING: President Trump formally terminating rules that forced car makers into putting start-stop feature into vehicles.

@WatcherGuru Why wouldn't you just trade it directly? What's the point of this shit

JUST IN: Polymarket launches 5-Minute Bitcoin Price markets.

@esaagar Goynip

18 million Americans are smoking weed 21+ days a month This is a full blown addiction crisis that even the NYT now says: "It’s Time for America to Admit That It Has a Marijuana Problem"

@bgdbythesea @KillaXBT Midcurve. Number go down then number go up. Don't overthink it.

@KillaXBT Too many people on the TL think this is going to happen. We all know what that means...

You're are not ready. 🤷‍♂️ $BTC

@intocryptoverse Please no

In 2018, this is the day BTC found a low at just below $6k. That low more or less held until Q4. Let's see what BTC does here? Could we be repeating, just 10x higher?

@AdrianoFeria Also risky pivoting to AI, could pay off, but at this point I think risk>reward. The time to pivot was a year ago. Hashrate dumps, the ones that survive are mining at near 0 cost and thrive, the others go bankrupt or operate at a loss using debt to survive => Commence new cycle

Let me state a few obvious things about crypto that BTC proponents do not want to acknowledge: 1. BTC mining companies are absolutely fcked. 2. MSTR is the only meaningful BTC treasury. It carries almost $9B in debt and generates zero cash flow. 3. ETH staking is thriving. The staking queue is the longest it has ever been. 4. BMNR has zero debt and actually generates cash flow. 5. BTC’s value proposition as “digital gold” is not delivering. BTC’s primary fundamental metric is its own price, and it is failing as gold is holding relatively well after a massive rally. 6. This is not only bad for investor sentiment, it also directly impacts miner sustainability. A BTC mining industry meltdown could easily create a negative feedback loop. 7. Meanwhile, Ethereum continues consolidating its position as the internet of finance, and within that system, ETH remains the most desirable digital store of value. 8. If BTC’s price does not recover quickly, we are likely to see capitulation among BTC mining companies. Many will be forced to pivot into an already saturated AI market or remain in crypto by transitioning into ETH treasuries, as BMNR and a few others have already done. 9. Financiers are increasingly unlikely to extend more credit to Saylor under these conditions, and if he cannot roll over MSTR’s debt, it would very likely trigger a BTC death spiral given all of the above. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

@camoufurage Yep, POS fucked eth

lets be real ethereum wouldve hit 12k had the chain stayed on PoW very few understand

@devchart 200w sma then 300w

Only the weekly 200 EMA can save $BTC now. The last time it bounced from it was in september 2023 bottom... Pray for the save this time again!

@TheProfInvestor Survival>Profit

Why position sizing matters: Say you have a $50,000 account. You put 20% into one stock - $10,000. The stock drops 12%. You’re down $1,200. That’s 2.4% gone from your entire portfolio in a single move. Now change just one thing. You size it at 8% instead - $4,000. Same 12% drop. Loss is $480. That’s less than 1% of the account. If you’re learning, learn position sizing early. It saves more accounts than any indicator ever will.

@HeroDividend Yo mama

What is stopping Bitcoin from heading to $0?

@DeItaone Wow, someone actually more retarded then us.

TREASURY SAYS IT CANNOT BAIL OUT BITCOIN Senator Sherman asked if the Treasury could intervene to “bail out Bitcoin.” Treasury Secretary Bessent responded that he has no authority to use taxpayer dollars to buy the cryptocurrency.

@Crypto_McKenna 1000-1500.

Tom Lee has suffered enough possibly 1800 but this looks mostly done in terms of downside.

@BitMasterK 👏Never👏Take👏Loans👏out👏in👏a👏bull market👏👏👏👏👏

Forced into selling more stocks today with margin & my $BTC Loan. Gave myself a little more room here but still way too close for comfort. This is embarrassing but I want to be transparent & hope no one else takes on way too much leverage like I did. Stay safe!

@intocryptoverse .02 on the ratio puts eth at $1000 if Bitcoin gets to $50k..... Run it all back. 🤣. My bags are too heavy for this shit.

$ETH chilling at a modest $2100. Life not as good.