Bobby Cray

@RickWMiller1 @FatherAltman Funny, that is exactly what Father is doing…not you. Father is quite capable of discerning how and what to say to protect the flock.

@BobbyCray3 @FatherAltman Always refute bad and false arguments, especially made against the Catholic Church. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

THANK YOU, FAT DOLAN, FOR CONFIRMING HOW COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT YOU ARE TO THE REAL CATHOLIC CHURCH. Fat Dolan dared to wave in our faces something that looked like a jelly donut even as he said we had to to learn to fast like Muslims. NO, Fat Dolan, we need to learn to fast like Jesus. Muslims pig out during the nights of Ramadan, and studies show they eat even more calories per day than during the rest of the year. That's not the way Catholics fast, Dolan, but then, clearly you don't know the first thing about it. MEMO TO DOLAN: You are a fraud of a Catholic Shepherd, you have NOT condemned the Pachamama popes, you have NOT publicly condemned pro-abort politicians and have committed sacrilege by allowing them to receive Holy Communion, and ... the list is long, Dolan. YOU BETRAYED AND ABANDONED THE FLOCK during the Covid Hoax and you and your lavender mafia have NOT repented (St. John the Baptist demands evidence of your repentance.) YOU. ARE. IRRELEVANT.

@Melania12gG @unhealthytruth Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach did an “Honor Walk” with the man being wheeled through the hallways to the OR to remove his organs. Everyone cheered as he went to his death. Inconceivable. Despicable. In my opinion, criminal. How much did the hospital make $$$ off his organs???

@unhealthytruth How many people have hospitals killed to get their organs? This is just awful. Never be an organ donor!

“Danielle Gallegos, a 38‑year‑old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, regained consciousness just as she was about to undergo an organ donation procedure an event that has sparked widespread concerns about medical ethics and protocols. She was admitted to Presbyterian Hospital in Albuquerque in 2022 after a life threatening health emergency left her in a coma. Doctors determined her condition as non-recoverable and informed her family that there was no hope of recovery. With a heavy heart, her family agreed to donate her organs, a decision they believed honored her values and could save lives. However, as preparations for the organ retrieval began, Gallegos’s sisters noticed unexpected signs of tears rolling down her cheeks and faint physical responses. Despite reassurances from the organ donation team that these were involuntary reflexes, her family insisted something was not right. Their instincts proved correct. On the very day of the scheduled surgery, Gallegos responded to a command to blink. This stunning moment prompted the medical team to cancel the procedure immediately. She went on to make a significant recovery and is now alive, speaking out about her experience.” m.economictimes.com/news/internati…

@CatholicSOTC Cardinal Dolan, I’m sorry but your Protestantism is showing and it’s a scandal to actual Catholics world wide. I pray for your conversion.

Cardinal Dolan “wholeheartedly” agrees with last week’s rejection of Carrie Prejean Boller’s plea to defend her upholding of Catholic teaching on Zionism. lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-…

@RickWMiller1 @FatherAltman No need to follow Father if you’re offend by his tone. lol.

Your post can create a scandal. The scandal it creates (especially to converts) This is the bigger problem. 1. It makes the Church look like chaos, not authority. A convert sees: a priest attacking a cardinal as a fraud no clear standard for who speaks for the Church Conclusion: “If even priests don’t submit to bishops, why should I?” 2. It suggests truth is decided by volume, not authority. The loudest voice yelling “heretic” appears to set the rules. Conclusion: “This looks like Protestant-style fragmentation, not a unified Church.” 3. It contradicts the Church’s claim to holiness. The Church teaches: disciplined speech respect for persons ordered authority Then a priest publicly: mocks insults accuses recklessly Conclusion: “If this is how leaders behave, the moral claims ring hollow.” 4. It weaponizes religion for outrage. Instead of drawing people to Christ, it: feeds anger creates factions turns theology into tribal warfare Conclusion: “This feels like politics, not the Body of Christ.” This isn’t Catholic correction, it’s abusive, reckless, and scandalous. Publicly insulting bishops, throwing around charges like “fraud” and “sacrilege” without precision, and turning prudential disagreements into betrayals violates charity and damages the Church you claim to defend. Stop. Correct with truth, discipline, and respect, or don’t pretend it’s fidelity to the faith.

@RickWMiller1 @Joseph_DeMarzo @CarriePrejean1 You surely were hired by the bishops to make this comment? Father’s post was spot on.

🔥 Claim 1: Removal was likely due to her comments Father, this rests on speculation, not evidence. You replace a “plausible” narrative while dismissing Bishop Robert Barron, who cited concrete concerns about conduct. Catholic teaching forbids rash judgment and assigning motives without proof (CCC 2477). Conjecture cannot override stated reasons. 🔥 Claim 2: Her intervention was “fitting” for the meeting It was not. The commission’s purpose is to promote and defend religious liberty under the First Amendment—protecting individuals from discrimination or coercion based on religion. Instead of staying within that scope, she introduced ideological and geopolitical arguments (Zionism, Gaza, Israel policy). That is outside the mission of the meeting. Even valid concerns must be raised within proper scope and with charity (CCC 2478). This did neither. 🔥 Claim 3: Her comments were justified by “mass killing” claims Again, this moves outside the purpose of the meeting. A religious liberty commission is not tasked with adjudicating contested wartime narratives. Presenting disputed geopolitical claims as settled moral facts exceeds both the forum and a priest’s role, and risks misforming consciences. 🔥 Claim 4: She was helping address antisemitism No, this shifted the focus away from the stated purpose. Addressing antisemitism means confronting hatred and discrimination against Jews. Redirecting that discussion into critiques of Israeli military actions, especially in a confrontational manner, imports external political issues into a forum meant for religious liberty, thereby confusing rather than clarifying. 🔥 Claim 5: “Catholics are not Zionists” This is not Catholic doctrine, and again it was raised outside the scope of the meeting. The Church binds Catholics to no position on Zionism. Turning a prudential political stance into a sweeping religious identity claim,mespecially in a setting not meant for such declarations, improperly binds consciences and misuses the forum. 🔥 Claim 6: Rejecting Zionism must be protected to avoid Catholic persecution This argument introduces a hypothetical political concern that is outside the commission’s stated task. The body exists to address actual violations of religious liberty, not speculative future scenarios tied to geopolitical debates. This again imports ideology into a forum meant for rights protection, not political forecasting. 🔥 Claim 7: Her actions were courageous witness Catholic virtue requires prudence (CCC 1806). Bringing ideological political arguments into a forum where they do not belong, and doing so confrontationally, is not witness, it is imprudent escalation outside the purpose of the meeting. Courage detached from prudence is not virtue. 🔥 Claim 8: Full endorsement as a priest is appropriate By endorsing both her content and her method, you affirm repeated departures from the meeting’s purpose. This risks politicizing the priesthood, not by teaching moral principles, but by validating ideological arguments introduced in the wrong forum. A priest’s role is to form consciences, not to endorse out-of-scope political interventions. 🔥 Bottom line At every point, the same issue remains: •speculation replaces evidence •ideology replaces mission •and political arguments are inserted outside the purpose of the meeting Catholic teaching requires: 👉 truth without conjecture 👉 speech within proper scope 👉 prudence with charity 👉 and clarity about what belongs in a given forum What you defend is not just content, it it is a pattern of bringing ideological politics into a setting where they do not belong, and then calling it virtue.

In recent days, @CarriePrejean1, a Catholic, was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty. She was not given notice as to why she was removed, but it is highly plausible that it was because of comments she made during a hearing. I wish to note both a question she asked and a statement she made. In essence, one of the questions she asked was whether a person who is not a Zionist is therefore antisemitic. The statement she made was that Catholics are not Zionists. Bishop Robert Barron posted on X that she was removed for “browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes.” I must disagree with this statement, having viewed the meeting myself. The purpose of the meeting is to promote religious liberty and to speak out against discrimination and injustice against any person, whether Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise. Defense of religious liberty under the First Amendment is the defense of all human life. Her comment was fitting for the meeting, and for the following reason. Carrie asked an important question, which was directed to Yitzchok Frankel. She asked whether one could reject antisemitism and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, reject political Zionism, or not support the political state of Israel. Carrie was fulfilling her duty as a member of the board in speaking not only for the protection of Jews, but also for Palestinians. It is also a fair question to ask in light of the thousands of Palestinians who have been killed since October 7. As Catholics, we decry the killing of all innocent human life. Her comment and question were also fitting in helping the committee address the evil of antisemitism. In other words, her words can be interpreted as a caution that, in light of evil antisemitic actions, one must not resort to uncontrolled violence against Palestinians in Gaza. There is a fire that was lit, and she was simply pointing out that another fire has been lit, and one cannot put out fire with fire. She wished to hold all persons accountable for violence against innocent human life. Furthermore, defining terms is crucial in arriving at proper justice for all. In resolving the issue of antisemitism, it is important to define exactly what that constitutes. It is not foreign to public discussion to speak of Christian Zionism as it pertains to the present conflict in Iran. She, as a defender of all faiths, must be able to defend her own. That she did courageously in noting that Catholics are in fact not Zionists, and that this should not be remotely part of the definition of antisemitism. The reason this is important is that if rejection of Zionism is equated with antisemitism, it opens the door to the persecution of Catholics, or of people in general. Since this language is part of the current political context when speaking about Israel’s actions, it is just that Catholics, having their own religious liberty under the First Amendment, be able to disagree with religiously or politically motivated actions which do not reflect what it means to be Catholic. Otherwise, we run the risk, as a nation, of gaslighting Catholics as antisemitic, which would itself be a form of religious persecution. The committee cannot serve the purpose of defending religious liberty by denying it to another group, namely Catholics. Therefore, I support Carrie as a fellow Catholic and American for her bravery, and I am proud of her. In fact, she was recently awarded the Catholic Champion Award at the Catholics for Catholics Prayer for America Gala only a few days ago. Countless Catholics from all over the country viewed this moment, where Catholics came together in solidarity to pray for our nation and to support fellow Catholics in responding to our Lord’s command: “Let your light shine.”

@FatherAltman Barron does not believe in the apparitions of Fatima. When asked he said it was a private revelation and he wasn’t obliged to believe (he forgot it was the largest PUBLIC miracle)?

Barron is a heretic ("Jesus is just the privileged way" and "dare we hope Hell is a lonely place"). HE IS A FRAUD OF A CATHOLIC SHEPHERD. How dare he not support Carrie, and then BEAR FALSE WITNESS by characterizing her questioning with inflammatory negative adjectives. ARE YOU SICK OF HIM AND HIS "BROTHER BISHOPS" YET?

@CforCatholics Patrick Coffin did a good investigative report looking for evidence of Kirk’s death (there’s zero). Peggy Hall has a library of videos showing the psyop. Kirk was not killed. He was in on that plot. Candace knows.

Catholics for Catholics paid a special tribute to American hero Charlie Kirk at the Catholic Prayer for America Gala in DC. Charlie’s legacy reminds us that Christ has to be at the center of our family, society and nation. Long live our dear friend Charlie Kirk.

HUGE: The mainstream media is now covering Alexis Lorenze's horrific vaccine injury. Fox News 11 Los Angeles calls what Alexis suffered an “extreme adverse reaction.” “Alexis says she ultimately agreed to the hospital's requirement of receiving three vaccines: meningitis, pneumonia and tetanus. Within 10 minutes, she had an extreme adverse reaction.” Nurse Angela, who has honorably stayed at Alexis's bedside, reports, “She lost vision in both eyes. She started bleeding out of her nose, she started vomiting, and then these purple patches under her skin started appearing at the top of her head, and then just started spreading. And it's now covering pretty much all of her body.” Fox News 11 tried contacting UCI Medical Center for comment, but “despite repeated calls and e mails, UCI Media Relations has not responded.” Thankfully, “Alexis is slowly getting better. She has regained vision in both eyes ... It could take several weeks before she is well enough to be released.”

@BasedSamParker @PrincipledProg1 Where is Charlie? He sure as heck didn’t get shot.

@PrincipledProg1 Sure looks like it

BREAKING Incredible admission: Andrew Kolvet reveals he didn't want the public to find out about Charlie's change of mind regarding israel. I'm (almost) speechless.

@BasedSamParker Charlie’s alive so the fact you still spread propaganda he isn’t makes you unreliable

@HoaryHead1611 @TaylorRMarshall You have to learn theology. Your mocking and better than thou attitude do nothing to change the truth. I say this out of charity. The Protestants whine is tiring

@BobbyCray3 @TaylorRMarshall Hey, cath sock account, I don't bow before them or serve them in religious practices, or hold them to be a representative of a spirit or god. You need to deal with the 2nd Commandment and stop trying to find loopholes

Does your church veil the crucifix and all images today (fifth Sunday of Lent)?

@T_Lawler93 How many boosters are you on now?

@FatherAltman When you sheeple going to wake up and leave the Catholic Church and return to Christ?

PURE PRPAGANDA. Why is it that the pathetic people at the "National Catholic Prayer breakfast" had to make a point that anti-semitism is evil - AS IF, among all the things Catholics should be concerned with or worried about, it's the Zionist card players??? MEMO TO CATHOLICS EVERYWHERE: The anti-Catholic and anti-Christian bigotry of Israel is satanic. THE STATE OF ISRAEL IS OUR ENEMY. And they block any public discourse on their evil by playing their stupid "anti-semite" card. Dear family, they over-played their hand and WE ARE DONE. WE ARE SICK SND TIRED OF THEIR ANTI-CATHOLIC BIGOTRY. But, of course, they actually do control the media, and they control most politicians as well. KEEP THE ONE TRUE FAITH. WE EITHER ARE FOR JESUS OR AGAINST HIM. ISRAEL IS NOT FOR JESUS. FIGURE IT OUT.

@wingman714 @FatherAltman Haha

@HoaryHead1611 @TaylorRMarshall Please go about your home today and destroy every photo of a family member on display

@TaylorRMarshall It should destroy those filthy idols

@FreedomCat71 @TaylorRMarshall @LxxLatin But you listen to Taylor… makes sense. You probably think Kirk is dead?

@TaylorRMarshall @LxxLatin I don't go to a pagan church, so this doesn't apply.

@PR4Him @calvinrobinson @McCormickProf Funny how Protestant means=protest the Church

This is why Catholicism is no different from any Protestant church. You claim to be the “One True Church” but pick and choose which Popes and church fathers you “follow”. Wes Huff said it best as to why he’s Protestant…(not a direct quote) it’s the closest to the early church and its teachings.

Speaking to the Jewish community in Rome, Pope John Paul II made crystal clear the teaching of the Catholic Church on 1) the brotherhood of Jews and Christians; 2) the sinfulness of anti-Jewish hatred and prejudice; and 3) the irrevocability of God's covenant with the Jewish people: "The Jewish religion is not 'extrinsic' to us, but in a certain way is 'intrinsic' to our own religion. With Judaism therefore we have a relationship which we do not have with any other religion. You are our dearly beloved brothers and, in a certain way, you are our elder brothers. On the basis of this brotherhood renewed by Christ, the Church rejects every form of discrimination and anti-Semitism. She condemns them as contrary to the very spirit of Christianity. She deplores all hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism directed against the Jews at any time and by anyone.... The covenant between God and the Jewish people has never been revoked. 'The gifts and the call of God are irrevocable' (Rom 11:29).

The great E. Michael Jones eviscerates Dolan. JESUS criticized the Jews. Go read the Gospels, and pay attention to John Ch. 8. So don't tell us we cannot criticize Jews. PERIOD.

@EMichaelJones1 @CarnivoreErik @BishopBarron Thank you MJ!

His Excellency @BishopBarron makes a fool of himself by pretending that tweeting CIA propaganda and ADL talking points is the same as proclaiming the Gospel.

@BishopBarron Your comment is not going over too well in the court of Catholic Truth. You who said you didn’t have to believe in Fatima because it was a private revelation… I ask this in all seriousness… are you an infiltrator?

Over the past several weeks, Carrie Prejean Boller has complained that she was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty because of her Catholic beliefs, and she has called out myself and other Catholic members of the commission for not defending her. This is absurd. Mrs. Prejean Boller was not dismissed for her religious convictions but rather for her behavior at a gathering of the Commission last month: browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes. The Catholic position on matters of “Zionism,” to which I fully subscribe, is as follows: all forms of antisemitism are to be unequivocally condemned; the state of Israel has a right to exist; but the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism. If Mrs. Prejean Boller were dismissed for holding these beliefs, it is difficult to understand why I am still a member of the Commission. To paint herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice or to claim that her religious liberty has been denied is simply preposterous.

@FatherAltman Love when I hear truth spoken!

Bolsheviks/Zionists killed over 60 million Christians between 1917-1946. As we speak they are targeting, killing and ethnically cleansing Christians in the Holy Land ad surrounding countries. So. Bottom line. The Zionists can take their "anti-semite" card and shove it straight up where the sun don't shine. It's time 2.8 billion Christians stand up and oppose the 16.9 million Zionists in the world. FIGURE IT OUT, dear family. Zionists crucified Jesus. Nothing has changed.