Giles Bointon

@D_R_Berger @PepeIrish @FFT1776 What a dreamer!!Decent!! What about his massive corruption with Ukraine and Chinese bribes and that was whilst he was still lucid.

@BointonGiles @PepeIrish @FFT1776 There was plenty damming in the Epstein files. Biden was a more decent man than Trump. He didn’t believe in using the power of the presidency for retribution, unlike Trump.

After exhaustive research, I was able to locate the people who released the Epstein files. 1. President Trump

@D_R_Berger @PepeIrish @FFT1776 The clamor and interest in the Epstein files grew during Biden’s tenure as the Dems grew desperate to stop Trump by ANY means. They knew there was nothing damming about Trump or THEY WOULD HAVE RELEASED THE FILES.

@PepeIrish @FFT1776 You just can’t handle the truth. Trump had 5 years and never released the files. The DOJ was forced to release the files with the passage of a veto proof law that required all files released by 12/19/2025. The DOJ violated the law by not releasing all the files by the deadline.

@ChrisNBama @AndreasShrugged @charlesmurray What? Like not taking a salary?

@AndreasShrugged @charlesmurray Not just pardons, everything Trump does as president is for self enrichment.

I have made no secret of my view of Trump-the-man, but I have also come to acknowledge that many of the things he is doing are good. With that has come a "that's just Trump being Trump" reaction to a lot of things that I used to see as serious mental instability. His recent Greenland statements feel like something next-level crazy.

@Lancealotin @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Not sure if that’s a word. Add illiteracy to profound lack of scientific understanding.

@BointonGiles @MAGAVortex @JunkScience That's ok thanks - I can see the bullcrat here even if you can't!

2025 was not one of the warmest years "on record." It was actually one of the coldest years "on record." wmo.int/media/news/wmo…

@Lancealotin @MAGAVortex @JunkScience It looks as if you are a low level political hack who really doesn’t understand science. Let me know if you need guidance.

@BointonGiles @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Happer for instance may be a professor - and a very clever one - but he is not a climate scientist - he is a specialist in atomic physics etc. If you have a list of actual climate scientists that deny man made global warming - please pass it on!

@Lancealotin @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Lance- you are so deluded. Climate scientists are the equivalent of general studies. Low level drones coming up with the answers they are paid for. Climate science is based around Astrophysics and geophysics. Maybe you can come up with a ‘Climate Scientist’ with credentials?

@Lancealotin @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Are internationally published. tenured professors from Princeton, MIT etc and winners of the Nobel physics prize nutters? What a massive fail that you don’t even know who they are. Are you a Bot?

@BointonGiles @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Is that a list of nutters - cos that is what it looks like lol!

@Lancealotin @MAGAVortex @JunkScience Hey Lance, you need to listen to Prof Happer, Prof Koonin, Prof Lindzen, Prof Curry, Prof Christy, Prof Plimer, Prof Itoh, Prof Clauser, …….. I could go on.

@MAGAVortex @JunkScience Dude - it's getting warmer - the thermometers all agree - deal with it!

@JD_in_VA @FoxNews How do you know? Are you on the ground with a clipboard?

@FoxNews A tiny amount of the fentanyl and cocaine coming into the US is coming through Venezuela. Most of it is coming through Mexico. Are we going to invade it next? This was to get control of Venezuelan oil.

PRESIDENT TRUMP announces to the American people: "Maduro and [wife Cilia] Flores have been indicted in the Southern District of New York … for their campaign of deadly narco-terrorism against the United States and its citizens."

@davidsmosspiggy @RogerPielkeJr You get your scientific data from looking out of the window?

@RogerPielkeJr Um well I live on the east coast of Australia so the mainstream science prediction of more frequent more extreme events is holding up - and this is just the start. It not like climate change has finished…. & I prefer the reduced air pollution from less polluting energy sources

Well look at that . . .

@perilsofbirding @afneil Sorry Simon, You are looking in all the wrong places. Net zero is quite clearly on the way out. It’s yesterday’s news. COP30 was a major embarrassment. There have been 30 COP’s and the CO2 level has steadily risen over that time. Let’s give them MORE taxes.

@BointonGiles @afneil Ok Giles, black is white, up is down and researchers in 120+ nations have co-ordinated to fake climate change. And all the animals & plants on the planet are in on it, which is why you only have to LOOK OUT THE WINDOW to see massive ecosystem reorganisation from novel climates 🤡

No it doesn’t. It’s an excuse for left wingers like you to extend the power of the state and boss us about.

@GarethSarjeant @perilsofbirding @afneil Well the BBC will not allow sceptics a voice. If you are a ‘true believer’ you might think that is a good thing but that is against free speech.

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil It's hard to believe that organisations earning hundreds of billions of profit combined can't afford to put out any propaganda in their own interests.

@Fuzzy_LogicX @perilsofbirding @afneil You clearly have no idea how eminent these people are. Big Oil funding is microscopic compared to government funding to come up with the politically correct eco answers.

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil Sorry, that’s 5 people claiming they’re not paid by oil companies. Can you show what evidence they provide and why you believe it disproves the mountains of evidence showing climate change?

@Fuzzy_LogicX @perilsofbirding @afneil I have just referred another alarmist to an App called ‘inconvenient’ facts by Gregory Whitestone. He lists 60 pages of data, research and evidence from published papers. They reveal all the evidence you seek. I suspect you won’t look as it will destroy your illusions.

@JG_Jonno @perilsofbirding @afneil Well I have just the thing for you. There is an app called ‘inconvenient facts’. The author is Gregory Whitestone who is a geologist. There are 60 detailed graphs, data and sources from published papers. It takes seconds to download. No excuses for not looking!

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil I don’t want a list of people, I want the rigorous scientific studies they must have performed to back up their thesis. That’s how science works - not pontificating without evidence, you have to do the work. So show that work.

@JG_Jonno @perilsofbirding @afneil You are not of the real world. When 2 physics Nobel Laureates state that global warming is insignificant, coupled with many tenured professors around the world, (which I am happy to list) say catastrophrophism has no place, maybe you should listen.

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil So your unevidenced thesis is all scientists are inherently corrupt. If so, why hasn’t the fossil fuel industry with its billions bribed loads of such scientists to fake up a bunch of studies that support your position? The answer is they aren’t corrupt & the data is reality.

@Fuzzy_LogicX @perilsofbirding @afneil I think your logic is indeed fuzzy. Some of the very best naysayers such as Professors Happer, Koonin, Lindzen, Curry, Christy’s, declare NO money from ‘Big Oil’. It’s another alarmist myth.

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil This is literally not how science works. All papers have to be peer reviewed, which is why science has advanced humanity and bizarre conspiracies have never gotten anyone anywhere

@GarethSarjeant @perilsofbirding @afneil It doesn’t matter what they say as they will not be published.

@BointonGiles @perilsofbirding @afneil What do the climate scientists who are funded by the oil multinationals and those funded by the oil producing nations say?

@perilsofbirding @afneil I absolutely understand how climate research works. If a team of researchers showed that climate change was less significant, it would not be published. Naivety Maximus.

@BointonGiles @afneil If a team of researchers were to genuinely find evidence that climate change was less significantly than researchers thought it would be a career defining study that propelled them to the top of academia. All your comment shows is you also don’t know how scientific research works

@BenArchiba99083 @_ClimateCraze Saying they are not fake does not make them true.

@_ClimateCraze Saying they are fake doesnt make them fake.

Repeating faked hockey-stick graphs does not make them less faked.