BollockDagger

692 posts

BollockDagger banner
BollockDagger

BollockDagger

@BollockDagger9

Millions must Go. Psalm 144.1 Enjoyer. Nationalist.

Katılım Mayıs 2026
84 Takip Edilen43 Takipçiler
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@nativistconcern @DarkReactions99 Ah the new trend in nationalism, jump from RB to demonstrate how much of a nationalist you are, then post about how you actually called it months ago to avoid the fell for it again lable. 'i called it, never was on board, best strategy now is to attack RB'. Fucking gay.
English
1
0
1
13
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@AngloBrython @LordLongshanksV @sarah02022020 Good stance. Based on policy and the policy is based. Rupert hasn't 'attacked his base' he's constantly defended the most radical part of in the face of MSM taunts. Didn't realise people were so thin skinned, I thought it was a leftist trait to be permanently offended?
English
1
0
2
13
Paul
Paul@AngloBrython·
@LordLongshanksV @sarah02022020 Seems to be a few 'influencers' attacks on here recently your right. I couldn't really care what is said, I'm Restore based on policy.
English
2
1
6
47
Paul
Paul@AngloBrython·
Jumped after the first bit of hardship, I bet his crypto wallet is bulging.
Connor Tomlinson@Con_Tomlinson

Thoughts on Restore and Reform after this week: If Restore Britain amounts to nothing more than a pressure campaign, then it has served its purpose. It forced Reform to adopt a more resilient posture against attacks from the media, strengthen their deportation and demographic policies, turn away more Tory defectors, and reflect on how they lost thousands of canvassers and every Zoomer with an organic following. Reform took notice, though few will admit it publicly. Restore was founded as a non-partisan movement. I was there. It has achieved its goal after converting into a political party. There was a window of opportunity where Restore could have become the equivalent of Reform in 2024: pick up single-digit seats, sustain the narrative of national renewal should Reform underperform in government, and provide experience to a generation of exuberant Gen Z politicians. That window is closing. Structural problems, weak candidates, and blasé decision-making has stalled, possibly squandered, that opportunity. A shame, as there's still a lot of great talent, people, and goodwill there. I'm sure they can fulfil their potential in future. As I warned Reform in late 2024, if they had refused to estrange their base, this wouldn't be a problem. I'm not laying flowers at Restore's grave, but this is what my instincts are telling me. Those instincts tend to be good, and that's why I have an audience who listens to my takes. People won't like that I'm saying it, but I won't be anything but honest. We should be in the business of forcing political parties to do what we want. Take your own side. That means rewarding things we like, and punishing things we don't. To that end, third-party institutions will need to draft legislation, and train up lawyers and civil servants, so that Reform doesn't allocate insufficient resources to the task in its rush to get ready to govern. That will also stop some of the squeamishness of some in Reform from further contaminating the agenda, because we don't have time for half measures. Reform will also be forced to resolve it's contradictions, stop being so inauthentic, improve its policy offering, and put up better candidates. Otherwise, they will keep underperforming in elections, despite their poll lead, and won't win — or will fulfill many Conservatives' fantasies of a post-election pact. And they will have nobody to blame for that but themselves. Can Reform be trusted? They have a credibility deficit to correct. Most of the Tory defectors were a mistake. Some are baked in. Others could be dropped. Reform don't understand digital media. They say they do, but they don't. They have learned too late that inconsistent messaging is a liability when people can post your contradictory statements side-by-side on social media. It's not like how Westminster briefings or TV studios could be used to target different audiences in the 90s - 2010s. Some of the senior figures also come across as inauthentic. It's like they're selling the right on accepting a softer version of what's possible rather than putting a positive vision forward. Farage is strongest when he looks like an advocate for our people, not making excuses for why he can't be. Seems like he's clocked that, but he needs to acknowledge why he felt like he couldn't before. (Also he needs to stop Cameo. It's cringe.) Zia gets this. Reform will have to subject their candidates to interviews from the right. Not controlled environments with proscribed topics. They're going to have to be honest, say "We thought we had to say this, but politics is different now..." Pass the Steven Edginton test next time around. As their underperformance in by-elections show, negative campaigns and fears of higher taxes are not better at mobilising low-propensity voters than the vitalism of the Trump 2024 campaign was. They need a different vibe than 70s-90s TV nostalgia. Butlins / Surprise Surprise / Only Fools and Horses is aura poison to anyone under 30.

English
7
6
16
547
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@RestoreBolton @HazelAppleyard Around 1995 we were 95% indigenous population. Living memory for a lot of people and a palatable, feasible thing to aim for when you sell remigration to the wider public, just set a target of back to how it was 30 years ago. 'Return to 95' is my little slogan.
English
0
0
0
12
Ian Neasham (Bolton, Restore Britain)
You see, I am of a very similar age to you. Pre Tony Blair, how was it for you? 70's, 80's, 90's were all great for the most part. Were we a one ethnic country? We were not. There were people here who moved to work, who spoke English, who integrated, who were part of our cohesive society and contributed. What we have now is nowhere near that. If we could roll back time to pre-1997, I would be more than happy. Multiculturalism, up to a point has and did work. I would say we were a shining example of that, right up until it didn't work and we were flooded.
English
8
2
22
354
Hazel Appleyard
Hazel Appleyard@HazelAppleyard·
Rupert Lowe now has “no problem with a multicultural society”. It was fun while it lasted. If you need me I’ll be living in a trailer park in a red state in the US hiding from multiculturalism.
English
140
20
491
34.1K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@_BasedCow_ There's every chance you'll get large scale violence post political solution anyway Outside interests will almost certainly attempt to de rail it by stirring up the radical nons who won't accept millions going This means we can crack down harder, be prepared for strife either way
English
0
0
0
12
Based Cow
Based Cow@_BasedCow_·
I truly hope that a political solution exists but I'm quickly losing hope. I don't want to see large-scale violence, I've never been about that. Remigration is the peaceful option. This is why it's so sad hearing Rupert obliterating his support. It was stupid.
English
7
4
41
638
Connor Tomlinson
Connor Tomlinson@Con_Tomlinson·
Thoughts on Restore and Reform after this week: If Restore Britain amounts to nothing more than a pressure campaign, then it has served its purpose. It forced Reform to adopt a more resilient posture against attacks from the media, strengthen their deportation and demographic policies, turn away more Tory defectors, and reflect on how they lost thousands of canvassers and every Zoomer with an organic following. Reform took notice, though few will admit it publicly. Restore was founded as a non-partisan movement. I was there. It has achieved its goal after converting into a political party. There was a window of opportunity where Restore could have become the equivalent of Reform in 2024: pick up single-digit seats, sustain the narrative of national renewal should Reform underperform in government, and provide experience to a generation of exuberant Gen Z politicians. That window is closing. Structural problems, weak candidates, and blasé decision-making has stalled, possibly squandered, that opportunity. A shame, as there's still a lot of great talent, people, and goodwill there. I'm sure they can fulfil their potential in future. As I warned Reform in late 2024, if they had refused to estrange their base, this wouldn't be a problem. I'm not laying flowers at Restore's grave, but this is what my instincts are telling me. Those instincts tend to be good, and that's why I have an audience who listens to my takes. People won't like that I'm saying it, but I won't be anything but honest. We should be in the business of forcing political parties to do what we want. Take your own side. That means rewarding things we like, and punishing things we don't. To that end, third-party institutions will need to draft legislation, and train up lawyers and civil servants, so that Reform doesn't allocate insufficient resources to the task in its rush to get ready to govern. That will also stop some of the squeamishness of some in Reform from further contaminating the agenda, because we don't have time for half measures. Reform will also be forced to resolve it's contradictions, stop being so inauthentic, improve its policy offering, and put up better candidates. Otherwise, they will keep underperforming in elections, despite their poll lead, and won't win — or will fulfill many Conservatives' fantasies of a post-election pact. And they will have nobody to blame for that but themselves. Can Reform be trusted? They have a credibility deficit to correct. Most of the Tory defectors were a mistake. Some are baked in. Others could be dropped. Reform don't understand digital media. They say they do, but they don't. They have learned too late that inconsistent messaging is a liability when people can post your contradictory statements side-by-side on social media. It's not like how Westminster briefings or TV studios could be used to target different audiences in the 90s - 2010s. Some of the senior figures also come across as inauthentic. It's like they're selling the right on accepting a softer version of what's possible rather than putting a positive vision forward. Farage is strongest when he looks like an advocate for our people, not making excuses for why he can't be. Seems like he's clocked that, but he needs to acknowledge why he felt like he couldn't before. (Also he needs to stop Cameo. It's cringe.) Zia gets this. Reform will have to subject their candidates to interviews from the right. Not controlled environments with proscribed topics. They're going to have to be honest, say "We thought we had to say this, but politics is different now..." Pass the Steven Edginton test next time around. As their underperformance in by-elections show, negative campaigns and fears of higher taxes are not better at mobilising low-propensity voters than the vitalism of the Trump 2024 campaign was. They need a different vibe than 70s-90s TV nostalgia. Butlins / Surprise Surprise / Only Fools and Horses is aura poison to anyone under 30.
English
342
93
1.1K
142.8K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@doukhobour @Con_Tomlinson I find it hard to believe that all of Ruperts pots are written (invented) by someone else and not read by Rupert? I understand people in charge of his social media writing out a post that he's dictated, expressed etc, but I don't buy they are written at will unapproved
English
2
0
0
47
russian peasant, gulag escape artist
@Con_Tomlinson Did you know that Rupert's posts were being written by some impersonator who differed with Rupert ideologically? I'm shocked that this was the case. Rupert should never have abdicated his voice. It seems like Restore is not a serious party. Very sad.
English
3
0
7
490
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@Con_Tomlinson Nige will read a message for 50 quid, he's got 5 million stuffed in his back pocket and you take his 'shift to the right' seriously? Uniparty runs through reform like letters through a stick of rock I'm not voting for the reform jewish alliance and the next leader called mohamed
English
1
1
8
528
Zoomer
Zoomer@ZoomerHistorian·
Rupert’s ‘I don’t care’ attitude has very quickly turned into completely shitting the bed over that Daily Mail article The disappointment in the man himself continues despite the overall vision of the party not changing. Everyone else has been excellent, but in the social media age, and especially with a new party, one can only have so many boomerisms because your support base completely evaporates and the vision means jack shit no matter how great the policies and eventual succession of the party looks Genuine record breaking demolition job here from Rupert. If he felt that throwing in a few civnat comments would make him look less extreme (no doubt the civic nationalist faction have been in his ear relentlessly) then he’ll quickly find out that this strategy will only succeed in turning his party into Advance UK in terms of vote share and meme status It’s very clear what’s happened here, he’s been spooked by being painted as far right and the civic nationalists are encouraging him to dial it back. It’s salvageable, but he’s dug himself a huge hole with his support base, who’ve already been fucked over so many times before and have zero tolerance for this nonsense. Going to be an interesting few weeks. Make or break, and every crisis brings an opportunity. Our faction usually wins these and gets further concessions. Charlie Downes as deputy leader would be a major reassurance for the future and a great act of goodwill.
Hugh Anthony@TheHughAnthony

“I have no problem with a multicultural society as long as people integrate.” Can we just be honest and admit this man is a Tory? It’s getting boring now, every other day he promotes immigration one way or another and people are deaf to it.

English
227
209
3.5K
181.3K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@Steve_Laws_ "Rupert should say sorry to me" Not a good look. You haven't been 'attacked' he's faced MSM pressure to disavow you and lads throwing up Romans, but he never has feeling 'attacked' is overdramatic hyperbole/feminine energy.
English
0
0
1
364
Steve Laws 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Rupert needs to: Apologise for his attack on the party membership. Stop the boomer nonsense he's waffling in interviews. Promote Charlie to deputy leader. Promote remigration. That's the bare minimum we expect from him. If he won't do it, then we'll need a new vehicle.
English
322
322
5.1K
109.6K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@DarkReactions99 The thing is people won't just 'check out' They'll go full anti Restore posting to justify their decision and work towards creating a self fulfilling prophecy for nothing more than an 'I told you so' People are addicted to 'i called it' so they'll deliberately fuck something up
English
3
0
6
312
BollockDagger retweetledi
Dark Reactions
Dark Reactions@DarkReactions99·
Restore Britain has 140,000 members. if you wanna check out and give up, fine. The party has already reached critical mass. EthnoNationalists make up a tiny proportion of that. You either stop crying and go to war, or you accept defeat and lose the party to the likes of Tommy Robinson and the jews.
Steve Laws 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿@Steve_Laws_

Rupert needs to: Apologise for his attack on the party membership. Stop the boomer nonsense he's waffling in interviews. Promote Charlie to deputy leader. Promote remigration. That's the bare minimum we expect from him. If he won't do it, then we'll need a new vehicle.

English
26
5
42
4K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@RestoreTyneside @ChadwickChad198 @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain @Harry_pitt @Sargon_of_Akkad @Landeur @HistoryBro1 @Luca_Johnson96 @CraigHouston_ @frankwrighter @WooshVibe @W4Restore Some of those that jumped will now go full anti Restore posting. They'll do this to justify their decision, for clicks, for group herd mentality as this is the 'new thing' 'Nationalists' will now work against RB for nothing more than an 'I told you so' self fulfilling prophecy
English
1
0
0
8
Restore Tyneside
Restore Tyneside@RestoreTyneside·
Could everyone please watch the full context of the clip and, comment on the conditional clause “If they integrate” We know, both @RupertLowe10 and Restore Britain’s integration criteria. I agree with the criteria. What Rupert says is: I have no problem with multiculturalism, if they integrate. This, at the same time means: If they don’t integrate, I do have a problem with multiculturalism. Restore Britain’s acceptable integration criteria precludes, apart from the explicitly named groups in the mass deportations paper, millions upon millions of foreigners. It seems to me that there are people losing their minds, over an out of context, group of words, that they are misunderstanding to mean that Rupert Lowe is an advocate for multiculturalism. He clearly is opposed to multiculturalism. What do you guys think? 🤷🫡🇬🇧
English
145
29
146
24.7K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@whitepilledpage I'm just going by what you posted on a public platform. Never actually a big enough supporter to join, cool. Anyway, don't want to keep you from your new full time anti Restore Britain attack vector. All the best.
English
0
0
2
49
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@NaughtiestGoy @Tony_Restore Has a jewish great grandfather, doesn't claim to be jewish, just has some jewish relatives. 1/8th jewish I'll take that for the MSM coverage we'll get for rape gang victims and all the good he's done for that cause. Let's hope you're 100% pure.
English
0
0
0
4
Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
I wish I could find something to disagree with here, but it’s obviously correct. ‘I don’t care’ is simply not true. The articles have spooked him, regardless of what was posted on social media.
Zoomer@ZoomerHistorian

Rupert’s ‘I don’t care’ attitude has very quickly turned into completely shitting the bed over that Daily Mail article The disappointment in the man himself continues despite the overall vision of the party not changing. Everyone else has been excellent, but in the social media age, and especially with a new party, one can only have so many boomerisms because your support base completely evaporates and the vision means jack shit no matter how great the policies and eventual succession of the party looks Genuine record breaking demolition job here from Rupert. If he felt that throwing in a few civnat comments would make him look less extreme (no doubt the civic nationalist faction have been in his ear relentlessly) then he’ll quickly find out that this strategy will only succeed in turning his party into Advance UK in terms of vote share and meme status It’s very clear what’s happened here, he’s been spooked by being painted as far right and the civic nationalists are encouraging him to dial it back. It’s salvageable, but he’s dug himself a huge hole with his support base, who’ve already been fucked over so many times before and have zero tolerance for this nonsense. Going to be an interesting few weeks. Make or break, and every crisis brings an opportunity. Our faction usually wins these and gets further concessions. Charlie Downes as deputy leader would be a major reassurance for the future and a great act of goodwill.

English
39
25
643
15K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@LambBegetWolves @ABridgen HAARP is much more likely than Easy Jet secretly spraying chemicals. I feel chemtrails is 'the look over there' state approved conspiracy (YouTube docs on it been up for years) while the real manipulation attempts go on elsewhere
English
0
0
0
20
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
What do you make of this ? What is going on here ?
English
183
582
1.6K
56.2K
BollockDagger
BollockDagger@BollockDagger9·
@HC_AlwaysRight @Landeur Rupert has been publicly arguing with journalists to be interviewed. Nobody is 'keeping him away', you've just made that up
English
1
0
0
31
🩵🄷🄰🅈🄻🄴🅈🩵
@Landeur Alistair has portrayed Rupert as someone he isn't, it was always going to come out... that's why Rupert has been kept away from doing interviews.
English
2
0
13
266