Buchadon
3.1K posts





















From $30 billion to $1.5 trillion, people have been telling me that Tesla is overvalued. I’ve held while watching people blow their faces off shorting the stock. And I still think we are just getting started.

🔥Sharing our SpaceX/TSLA analysis as shared with subscribers on December 10, 2025 when TSLA traded at $451. (the following as posted / no edits) *** That's the post I was hoping I never had to write 😢 WARNING: THIS ASSUMES A SPACEX IPO IS HAPPENING WHICH HAS NOT YET BEEN CONFIRMED. If a SpaceX (and possibly xAI) IPO happens: likely short- and long-term TSLA impacts Short-term (0–12 months): Narrative shock + capital rotation risk 1. Narrative dilution Tesla’s valuation depends heavily on narrative dominance. If SpaceX IPO chatter grows, the “Elon ecosystem narrative bandwidth” gets split. Retail investors have limited attention, and large parts of the Tesla bull case are community-driven. So yes — dilution of focus is a real effect. 2. Capital rotation Retail investors — especially concentrated TSLA holders — may view SpaceX as: 2.1 “The next Tesla” 2.2 Less execution risk than Tesla’s FSD/robotics trajectory [SpaceX viewed as having monopoly] 2.3 Higher growth ceiling (Starlink, launch dominance, Mars narrative, etc.) This creates real selling pressure because TSLA’s retail ownership is unusually high and unusually engaged. Even a small % rotation could hit the stock hard because of point #3… 3. High valuation = high sensitivity At ~200× forward earnings (my number, please review my report which accounts for successful CC rollout); TSLA is priced for perfection. Stock giving up 50x clicks would mean stock would stake a long time to deliver attractive returns from current. A competing Elon investment vehicle siphoning even a small amount of capital can: 3.1 Increase volatility (flipping TSLA/SX could emerge) 3.2 Weaken dips (lower lows) 3.3 Reduce momentum during macro upswings (the large spikes many of use took advantage of could permanently reduce). Narratives drive multiples, and a new Elon-led hypergrowth IPO directly competes for narrative oxygen. There is a limited supply of oxygen in the stock market. ************************************ Medium-term (12–24 months): Community fragmentation + influencer realignment 4. The “Elon community” splits The TSLA community is more “Elon-aligned” than most realize. In other words, the so-called "Tesla Community" is really a "Elon-Community". A SpaceX IPO would: 4.1 Create a new retail tribe. 4.2 Shift influencers, YouTubers, and X personalities to split coverage. 4.3 Reduce Tesla narrative concentration. 4.4 Decrease the emotional loyalty that keeps some investors all-in TSLA. Even if Tesla continues executing, the community becomes less monolithic. A weaker cult-like community = a less durable retail bid. 5. Influence migration Many TSLA creators are not really “Tesla analysts”; they are Elon evangelists. Let's be honest. They’d inevitably: 5.1 Diversify into SpaceX content. 5.2 Allocate attention toward what gets more engagement 5.3 Potentially drive a new cycle of comparative narratives (“SpaceX is the real growth story now”) This absolutely creates “sour aftertaste” risk for some TSLA loyalists. Retail is psychologically sensitive to feeling “less special.” Calculated investors anticipate this effect which amplifies it. ************************************ Long-term (2+ years): Two diverging paths 6. Negative long-term scenario (for TSLA) If FSD or Optimus underdeliver (or are slower than the hype curve), while: 6.1 SpaceX Starship is succeeding. 6.2 Starlink continues scaling globally (penetrating mass market, which is the inevitable next step) 6.3 SpaceX revenue growth exceeds Tesla’s …then gradual capital migration away from TSLA toward SpaceX becomes a structural trend. Retail could perceive Tesla as: 6.4 less exciting (it's very hard to compete with Space-excitement. Not even humanoids doing chores can compete with Space-excitement). 6.5 more “mundane manufacturing”. 6.6 slower growth. 6.7 less Elon-involved (he stated countless times that his focus was SpaceX). A SpaceX IPO and SpaceX's life as a public company would only draw more time. This repeats the “Elon is distracted” overhang you referenced (whether true or not does not matter). 7. Neutral or positive long-term scenario If Tesla actually delivers: 7.1 profitable robotaxi network 7.2 scalable Optimus labor 7.3 breakthrough AI margins Then Tesla may benefit from: 7.4 broadened Elon ecosystem interest 7.5 a general AI/space Elonsphere bull market 7.6 cross-pollinated attention 7.7 better capital access (although likely not needed) In this scenario, Tesla survives narrative dilution because fundamentals become narrative replacement. But Tesla needs to execute for this to be the case. Bottom line: >Tesla's is currently too far away from the fundamentals despite assuming strong CC rollout. >SpaceX is a real threat to TSLA investors' returns over the next 12-18 months. Again, we don't know yet whether a SpaceX IPO is coming but there is no doubt in my mind it would leave a permanent mark on the TSLA investment case. Don't shoot the messenger.












