Boon Tee

4.3K posts

Boon Tee

Boon Tee

@BoonTeeEng

Investor

Singapore Katılım Ocak 2012
553 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
Anyone want to listen to me talking about Nvidia for one hour? I start with what Nvidia does and explain GPUs, showing how they've grown beyond just graphics. I compare GPUs with CPUs and ASICs, dive into Nvidia's main focuses, its supply chain, and how its GPUs stay useful over time. I also look at how Nvidia keeps innovating and whether it can stay ahead of competitors. Near the end, I wrap up with a quick look at its financial health and how much it's worth. $NVDA youtu.be/85W0tJg3pHA
YouTube video
YouTube
Boon Tee tweet media
English
5
2
48
7.3K
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
Private credit is not the next 2008 The headlines right now are wild. Morgan Stanley gated redemptions. BlackRock, Blackstone, Blue Owl hit with withdrawal pressure. Fitch says the U.S. private credit default rate hit a record 9.2% in 2025. JPMorgan marked down software-linked collateral. Sounds terrifying. But here's what's actually happening. Three things are real: Liquidity mismatch is real. These funds hold loans that can't be sold fast, yet promise investors regular redemption windows. That works until everyone heads for the exit at once. Morgan Stanley said it clearly: they gated to avoid fire sales. That's not a crisis. That's the structure working as designed under stress. Valuation opacity is real. Private credit doesn't trade on an exchange. Marks are model-based and updated slowly. When JPMorgan starts questioning collateral values, it signals that the whole market is re-examining what these portfolios are actually worth. Borrower stress is real. Record defaults. Rising PIK usage. Weak cash flows meeting high rates. When a borrower capitalises interest instead of paying it, the problem isn't solved. It's deferred. Two things are overblown: "AI will destroy every software-backed loan." No. S&P itself said it doesn't expect AI to trigger a wave of sector-wide downgrades. Some lenders will get hurt. Most won't. "This is 2007 all over again." A gated fund operating within its own terms is not the collapse of the banking system. Stress, repricing and investor anxiety are serious. They are not a solvency crisis. The skill worth developing right now: reading past the headline to ask one question. Is this article describing a real balance-sheet problem, or turning a contained event into a panic story? That filter will save you from bad decisions in every market cycle, not just this one. What's the most overblown financial headline you've seen this year?
Boon Tee tweet media
English
0
0
0
159
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
MoffettNathanson estimates that YouTube brought in some $62.3 billion in revenue across 2025
Boon Tee tweet media
English
0
0
2
161
Boon Tee retweetledi
*Walter Bloomberg
*Walter Bloomberg@DeItaone·
UBS: NVIDIA TOO STRONG TO STAY STUCK UBS says it’s “hard to see” why NVIDIA stock remains flat despite exceptional fundamentals. Analyst Timothy Arcuri highlighted stronger-than-expected revenue guidance, surging demand, and backlog extending into 2027, with potential for $100B quarterly revenue. UBS maintains a Buy rating and $245 price target, expecting growth to re-accelerate and drive the stock higher.
English
57
58
613
96.6K
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
Do you think this is an outlier, or will it become a trend?
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
1
290
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
Nvidia 📈
Português
0
0
2
220
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
$NVDA next quarter outlook
Boon Tee tweet media
English
0
0
1
313
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
$NVDA Quarterly Revenue Trend
Boon Tee tweet media
English
0
0
3
303
Cage Free Rooster
Cage Free Rooster@CageFreeRooster·
@BoonTeeEng Ok. I don’t disagree with your points. I do try to find a balance between both. Do DCA with low portion of cash and when stock price dips, I double down on DCA.
English
1
0
1
11
Cage Free Rooster
Cage Free Rooster@CageFreeRooster·
I watched @BoonTeeEng's discussion on Bagholder Pod post debate with Mr Loo. Thought it would be clearer to just use the term "DCA" to describe the regular investment strategy rather than "lump sum". Lump sum investing is characterised by large amount of cash (relative to portfolio) and infrequent deployment. If you are talking about using your monthly salary or even regular 1-2X bonus to deploy every time you receive them, it is considered Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA).
English
1
0
1
134
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
Actually, when I created the first video, I was not intending to compare against DCA. Mr. Loo’s strategy is about crash buying, meaning waiting for a market drawdown before deploying capital. My approach is very simple: deploy whatever capital you have immediately. I call this “lump sum” because the money is invested in one go once it becomes available. In this context, the amount is not important. Whether you have $1,000 or $100,000, you can run a backtest on these two strategies and compare the returns. That is the whole point. In case you missed my Substack post, I also clarified that my own real-life investing approach resembles DCA rather than a single large investment, simply because I receive my salary on a monthly basis.
Boon Tee tweet media
English
1
0
0
33
Cage Free Rooster
Cage Free Rooster@CageFreeRooster·
I retract my statement that lump sum is large amount. While technically you are not wrong using that terminology, you are making very little distinction from DCA, which Mr Loo probably don’t see the difference. To a lay person, I see that as DCA when you put your monthly paycheck regularly into investment. For the purpose of the debate, it should be just DCA versus crash buying. That would be clearer. Otherwise it would be “DCA lump sum” versus “Crash buying lump sum”. Both are lump sum buying so that why use 'lump sum'?
English
1
0
1
24
Boon Tee retweetledi
Adam Khoo
Adam Khoo@adamkhootrader·
If Apple shares dropped near to $0. I would buy up all the shares, own 100% of the company, fire Tim Cook and make myself chairman and CEO. I would collect $112 billion in net profits every year and give all my friends free iPhones and MacBooks for life. If Bitcoin dropped to near $0, what would I do with it if I bought all the bitcoins in the world ? Stare at the cute computer code? That is the difference between a productive asset and a non productive asset
English
977
413
9.1K
1.4M
Chicken Little
Chicken Little@Chicky_Think·
Market is red. Conventional advice: Don't look at red portfolio. I say: Look at your portfolio. Reflect on your feeling. Is it anger? Anxiety? Heart beat accelerate? Tempt to sell and remove the pain? I tell you : It is normal feeling. This is how our ancestors survive - avoid pain and danger. Run far and fast. But this is not how investing works. You need to be a contrarian, face it and control your emotions. That is the price to pay - not some secret info to front-run everyone else. And for one to learn something, he has to face it, not avoid it. Eg to learn about money, swimming or even coding - do you face it upfront, make mistakes and learn? Or does one continue to think, hide head in sand and pretend nothing happen? Obviously, making failure and continuous practice improves skillset. This is how I accelerate investing journey. Open that red portfolio ( currently down a few model Y 😂 ), be aware of my feelings, reflect and grow as an investor. Be better, not a chicken (little).
English
1
1
8
407
Boon Tee
Boon Tee@BoonTeeEng·
$AAPL capex went down last quarter
Boon Tee tweet media
English
0
0
3
420