@KostBenjamin @schemesymcplots @nntaleb That was a very persuasive argument mister "Expert on Persuasion"
English
Bob
1.2K posts
Marshmallowbrains did not get that the firing of TuckerC is in perfect accordance w/libertarian principles.
As explained in #SkinInTheGame, libertatians favor torts over regulations: disinformation & its harm were controlled by the free market, not by the state via censorship.
English
@CliffordAsness Aha, I see that the paper was published in Fall 2003 but the blurb must be written later
English
@CliffordAsness I’m confused how the article is dated 1 September, 2003. Am I missing something?
English
@rony_marwa @levelsio I’m sorry but this is the kind of attitude the original tweet derides. Use your Google skills to find the posting and reach out with a message describing why you’re the perfect fit.
English
@levelsio I want to work with you. Let me know if the job is available
English
I know people complain a lot about how hard it is to find a (remote) job in tech
But when I post a job and see applicants, 95% of people don't even read the job post or follow the instructions
So I think if you simply actually put the effort in you probably 20x your odds
English
@robvliet De vlek heet Attje. Maar dat zie je morgenavond wel
Nederlands
Dutch central bank informs the public on crypto: “Well-known cryptos are Bitcoin, Ether and Etherium” 😳
dnb.nl/en/innovations…
English
@data_question No need to guess:
> isTRUE
function (x)
is.logical(x) && length(x) == 1L && !is.na(x) && x
<bytecode: 0x0000000015114848>
<environment: namespace:base>
English
Options:
(Answer at: answer.saral.club/qna/edf1353b-2…
Signup for more ques at saral.club)
1. FALSE TRUE
2. FALSE FALSE
3. NA NA
4. NULL NULL
English
Bob retweetledi
Vanaf de komende maandag om 22:15 op de kijkbuis: Planet Finance.
Zes afleveringen over de financiële handel: short sellers, commodity handel, cat bonds, fx handel van miss Watanabes etc
vpro@vpro
Slapend rijk worden of werkend arm blijven? 'Planet Finance' is een onvoorspelbare en veelal ondoorzichtige wereld waar geld te verdienen is als je denkt te weten wat de toekomst brengt. Vanaf maandag 16 januari wekelijks om 22.15 uur op NPO 2.
Nederlands
English
@AlexanderGerko @EvgenyGaevoy They did top the BitMEX leaderboard at some point. They must have had some skill.
English
Agree with the “in the beginning” assessment - our perception was always they were more likely into directional bets than traditional liquidity provision. But I don’t get why they kept it on ftx, there was enough liquidity without them surely
Doug Colkitt@0xdoug
1/ Very rough and speculative sketch of what I increasingly think happened at FTX as more info comes out… The central question is where did the money go? Yes malfeasance and fraud is necessary, but at one point in the cycle cash actually has to go out the door
English
3/ Let’s rewind to 2017/18. Alameda the prop firm is a big fish in a little pond. They’re mediocre traders (there’s a video of SBF bragging about how their quoter latency is down to something like two seconds). But crypto is still a weird asset class that most won’t touch
English
1/ Very rough and speculative sketch of what I increasingly think happened at FTX as more info comes out…
The central question is where did the money go? Yes malfeasance and fraud is necessary, but at one point in the cycle cash actually has to go out the door
English
@HideNotSlide If Alameda had blown up, he could just have walked away? Creditors can only seize so much if Alameda made a few bad bets.
English
Would Alameda have taken FTX down with it even if Sam hadnt lent it customer funds?
English
@RichardYannow @scottastevenson @wpenman I believe some of the long winded middle game shuffling top engines do is inscrutable even for Magnus. The evaluation of some end games using a table base is also beyond human players
English
@scottastevenson @wpenman 99% of the time he can, yes. Even if a GM misses a tactic at first, they usually understand why it works as soon as they see the first move. In other cases, they can clearly explain the pros and cons behind each candidate move, but don't know which ends up better evaluated.
English
As neural networks better at chess, they become more illegible: you can't explain why they make the moves they do in words
This will happen in the world at large as we approach singularity: you won't be able to explain in words why anyone does what they do
English
@nkreu113r @gbrl_dick What percentage of this thread can say what’s wrong with this formula?
English
i used to think that i was capable of going into finance & the fact that i hadnt was just evidence of my bright, creative & fundamentally anti-authoritarian disposition. thanks to people who post options pricing math on twitter i now unfortunately know thats untrue & i’m just mid
English