BowlofColdSoup

217 posts

BowlofColdSoup

BowlofColdSoup

@BowlofColdStew

Biologically advanced to be better than your tipical garden snail

I live in my house Katılım Mayıs 2018
25 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@Hens_chknrice Take a break and come back when you can come back, no need to push yourself, twitter is an echo chamber after all.
English
0
0
0
1
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@LegendOJ1_RBLX To add to this, I think it would be correct if you (or any high ranking member of your group who is the person updating the game) would have to go through age check every time they update said game.
English
0
0
0
2
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@LegendOJ1_RBLX Condos make money, that's why they make them, it's not for the love of the game. And they have income. The only group that doesn't have electronic disposable income are kids, thus negatively impacting kids since condo owners won't be affected. You think they do that much for 5$?
English
1
0
0
3
Owen
Owen@LegendOJ1_RBLX·
People don't realize that we can't have nice things when people abuse them. We either let bad actors make games freely or we put up walls to deter them from doing so, pretty simple. The Roblox community talks and yells a lot but rarely proposes meaningful solutions to the child safety issues on the platform. And it's not as straightforward as "hiring more mods". Roblox has not taken away anyone's ability to create games freely - you can still make games for personal enjoyment without any age verification. This was how I and many others started as a young dev, just making games for the fun of it, not caring about having any players at all. For those who have games that have players, the likelihood of a game with any CCU at all making at least $5 a month to cover the Roblox Plus costs is actually pretty high. Most people who have games that have any players will most likely be able to afford Roblox Plus just from the game's revenue alone. Not to mention Roblox Plus is actually a pretty good-looking subscription anyway. The perks seem actually meaningful unlike the current Premium situation. People should see it as just another cost of running a business, no different to the money that already goes towards advertising or hiring devs. It's also worth noting that anyone in the DevEx program already has their ID verified, and if people are worried about having to verify their ID but they want to make games that make them money, they must realize that ID verification is already a requirement to cash that revenue out. To be able to publish games to kids, I fully agree with the type of vetting process that Roblox is proposing. The sole reason that bad actors slip through the cracks so often right now is because of a lack of vetting. It's unfortunate that it has to come to this, but these requirements will undoubtedly deter many bad actors who publish inappropriate content to kids. The one thing about this update that needs some more thought is the lengthy process of getting your game approved for All Ages. Realistically, most Roblox devs are going to be making games that kids will play. To restrict games to ages 16+ by default and have devs wait potentially WEEKS to be accessible to their target audience is a pretty annoying process. I think there is room to streamline this process as it seems like the only thing I can argue with about the whole change. Overall, this change shouldn't be as controversial as it has become. It's the easiest way to stop new inappropriate material surfacing on the platform. Will people still slip through the cracks? Sure, it can't be perfect and some people are willing to take the risk. But it will deter a lot of people who would've otherwise been free to publish that type of content. There are definitely flaws, but I think people underestimate Roblox's willingness to change things based on backlash. We should work together to come up with alternatives and fixes to these flaws rather than storming with pitchforks. On a final note though, I think most of this anger comes from Roblox constantly changing stuff rather than coming up with one policy that they stick to. It's like they rush features out then add the clarification and fixes later when people are already mad. They need to think through things more thoroughly and be more engaged with the community to gather an opinion on changes before they go live. It's no secret in Roblox's history that people don't like sudden changes, and the spree of sudden changes recently has really riled people up.
RTC@Roblox_RTC

Roblox is changing the eligibility to upload games on the platform. To publish for all ages, you now need: - Roblox Plus; - ID Verification & Age Check; - 2-Step Verification enabled; - and have your account in "good standing". Roblox will additionally run games through trials to ensure engagement is legitimate and not from fake or bot accounts. To publish for Ages 16+ & Trusted Friends, you now need: - An account in "good standing"; - An age check; and - An account that is at least 2 days old. Any user on the platform, whether they meet any of the requirements, can still publish games for personal use. Roblox is stating they chose this requirements because "most creators already meet many of the criteria" and it will "make it more difficult for bad actors to bypass our moderation systems". Lastly, Roblox will make that transition by providing 100,000 users with a Free Roblox Plus subscription for 6 months. To be eligible, a user may have a minimum of 100 hours of total playtime on their game in the past month & no major violations of Roblox's Community Standards.

English
23
20
157
9.6K
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@wiindshocker I don't really agree to agreeing with death threats or encouraging suicide.
English
0
0
0
2
rand
rand@wiindshocker·
> “Zeal should kill himself” Gets so hard I pass out
Darmstandiy@kasawagi

@HelloItsVG dw the "Zeal should kill himself rn and i wont listen to anyone that might consider that he is 1% less guilty" people wont listen to this

English
4
3
34
1.1K
The Gimmick
The Gimmick@IsHoneyOutYet·
why does bbn make cosmetics like 10x more crusty
The Gimmick tweet media
English
19
19
826
20.5K
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@IslemZedou40372 Some games are too complicated to play on mobile. There is no 'monster hunter' or 'dark souls' mobile, right?
English
0
0
0
3
THE QUILLBOY
THE QUILLBOY@IslemZedou40372·
Still relevant to this day
THE QUILLBOY tweet media
English
23
124
1.1K
14.9K
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@Expoteur Evidence is not conclusive enough to incriminate either side.
English
0
0
0
6
︎ ︎
︎ ︎@Expoteur·
So Roblox is avoiding the word pressure, which means they know about the situation, but they aren't taking down the game or zeal's account?
English
6
3
82
987
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@wiindshocker Yeah (imo). I think you can forget during serious topics, and except for the Zeal arsenal situation (in which he played alone), I don't think any of them have gotten on the platform recently.
English
0
0
0
5
rand
rand@wiindshocker·
Would it be nitpicky of me to say it’s suspicious that Zerum hasn’t unfriended Zeal yet on Roblox or
English
12
52
1K
18.6K
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@IckyVickyRblx Also the app is supposedly made for six year olds. That's their primary audience. They want young people on there. Roblox wouldn't agree with parents pulling away their children from the platform (thus blaming Roblox).
English
0
0
0
5
Icky Vicky
Icky Vicky@IckyVickyRblx·
Can we stop putting the blame on Roblox and start putting the blame on irresponsible parents like why is a 6 year old on Roblox
English
4
0
12
151
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@IckyVickyRblx Sorry if I came off as mean or rude, don't wish to disrespect, I just dislike false dichotomies.
English
0
0
0
4
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@IckyVickyRblx That's like saying, imo, Ex: 'you didn't help your friend when they were walking alone at night, so they deserved to be killed' when people did get killed for being alone. It's unsafe, but I think you should also blame city infrastructure and stuff like that.
English
1
0
0
5
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@MaximumADHD Yeah, but condo games exist because they make money, so anyone talking about 'the subscription service is to protect children' is lying since the only group without disposable electronic income is... children. They're removing young devs, which is why people hate the update (me2)
English
0
0
0
5
Max ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Max ¯\_(ツ)_/¯@MaximumADHD·
Rumor: Roblox is no longer free to make games on. Fact: This is false, you can still use Roblox Studio for free and publish games on your account. They just aren't immediately available for people under the age of 16 unless you go through the safety screening thing.
English
8
8
186
7.3K
Max ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Max ¯\_(ツ)_/¯@MaximumADHD·
I hate what this community has become, honest to god. You are required to follow the doomer mob mentality narrative, and get called a bootlicker for even remotely trying to inject some nuance into the conversation. Here's a real bold hot take for you guys: Roblox is not dying.
English
46
64
778
25.1K
Mi🧋
Mi🧋@Milkshake2077·
@MysticsDarling_ The fact that even if Zeal is innocent (he is not), he would still need to beat the homophobia, transphobia, racism, ableism and grooming allegations alongside Zerum and Kat 👀 And most of the dev team leaved or leaked the game main code, so yeah Pressure is beyond saving
English
4
6
77
1.1K
BowlofColdSoup
BowlofColdSoup@BowlofColdStew·
@Wowsoepik @wiindshocker Huh? Playing arsenal on your PC = no suicide attempt? How can you confirm that? Are you sure that there was no attempt? The video was scheduled, hence the name, and now, only a copy (posted later) exists. Given, from what I heard, he attempted arm slitting, it is possible he...
English
1
0
0
31
rand
rand@wiindshocker·
I find it really funny when people say my tweets made zeal attempt as if most of my tweets werent made AFTER the attempt
English
4
0
47
619