Brett Weinstein

3.8K posts

Brett Weinstein

Brett Weinstein

@BrettWeinstein

I'm not @bretweinstein learn to spell

Katılım Mayıs 2011
475 Takip Edilen929 Takipçiler
Glug Glug Radio
Glug Glug Radio@Refuse2Lockdown·
@BrettWeinstein let's hold her accountable while she's in office. Trials for US war criminals. And Brett you're right, both Washington and Israel Googled the hospital, surgeons, shooter, and gun days in advance. Hard evidence these govs murdered a lawful US citizen.
English
1
0
0
19
Viva Frei
Viva Frei@thevivafrei·
I am not yet where Brett’s tweet leads, but everyone replying “there’s a mountain of evidence Tyler Robinson killed Charlie” is missing the point. I personally believe Tyler Robinson did pull the trigger. But I also believe others had advanced knowledge. I have asked the question who was in those discord chats. Were there any intelligence assets / agents / CHS in any of those discord chats. Who made the decision not to cover the roof. These are basic questions, the importance of which were amplified after Butler. Tyler could have pulled the trigger AND it IS a LIHOP - let it happen on purpose by not covering the roof, inadequate campus security, etc. I would sooner believe it was activists who disagreed with Charlie’s politics (they would find plenty of sympathizers on an activist college campus) than “Israel”. But a LIHOP for political reasons is not beyond possibility at all. And the fact that Tyler Robinson in fact pulled the trigger would not resolve the issues of: -who was in the discord chats. -who had advanced knowledge that something would happen. -why did the campus not have proper security covering the roofs. Just a few questions that have not been answered. And from what I understand, there has been a strategic decision not to complicate the investigation so that they can at least get a conviction against Tyler Robinson. You can disagree with @BretWeinstein’s post or whatever you think it is suggesting, but simply asserting “Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger” does not resolve the outstanding questions.
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein

On June 18th, I had a text exchange with Charlie Kirk. He said he was spending two full days at the White House trying to persuade President Trump not to initiate a war with Iran. Given that Charlie was close with the President and that he represented a large constituency essential to Trump, and given that many proponents of the war with Iran saw a U.S. attack as urgently necessary to the survival of Israel, it is reasonable to wonder if his refusal to back down from his steadfast opposition somehow resulted in his murder. A good investigation could have settled the matter. What we got only increases the reason for concern. Asking this question may be unforgivable, but it is in no way unreasonable. Charlie was in a strong position to keep us from doing what we have now done, and the timing of his death removed him from the equation and likely changed the course of history--as Charlie himself worried it might.

English
370
93
1.1K
285.9K
Natural Selection
Natural Selection@_threadkiller_·
@thevivafrei Dude, fuck off with this bullshit. He very clearly insinuated that Donald Trump had Charlie Kirk assassinated to clear the way for an Iranian invasion nine months later. Fuck. @BrettWeinstein eternally and fuck any of you grifters running cover for him. 🤮😡
English
3
0
0
41
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
Throwing Charlie under the bus to cover your own ass is gross The only thing this proves is that Charlie was getting very bad information (like from frequent guest Douglas Macgregor) and didn’t really understand geopolitics in any depth
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein

On June 18th, I had a text exchange with Charlie Kirk. He said he was spending two full days at the White House trying to persuade President Trump not to initiate a war with Iran. Given that Charlie was close with the President and that he represented a large constituency essential to Trump, and given that many proponents of the war with Iran saw a U.S. attack as urgently necessary to the survival of Israel, it is reasonable to wonder if his refusal to back down from his steadfast opposition somehow resulted in his murder. A good investigation could have settled the matter. What we got only increases the reason for concern. Asking this question may be unforgivable, but it is in no way unreasonable. Charlie was in a strong position to keep us from doing what we have now done, and the timing of his death removed him from the equation and likely changed the course of history--as Charlie himself worried it might.

English
30
18
265
11.2K
Healthy Skeptic
Healthy Skeptic@healthyskeptic_·
@gummibear737 Weinstein is a liar, plain and simple, he will tell any lie to try to support his absurd views @BrettWeinstein Lets hear from Erica or people who were actually close to Kirk
English
1
0
1
69
Mrs Bebe J
Mrs Bebe J@MrsBebeJ1·
I was grateful & honored to have watched @TuckerCarlson tonight, Listening to @BrettWeinstein was masterful, I can only speak for myself, been overwhelmed w/ feelings over the current state of our USA. it was a gift to hear someone help navigate things I have felt.🙏🏾🇺🇸 TY
GIF
English
1
0
0
9
Glug Glug Radio
Glug Glug Radio@Refuse2Lockdown·
@FiorellaIsabelM @yopasta @CriticalPPod @ChadWilson2020 @jimmy_dore @BrettWeinstein @ggreenwald @aaronjmate @kthalps @MaxBlumenthal @JamarlThomas @LeeCamp @RaniaKhalek @joerogan @rustyrockets @richimedhurst @jacksonhinklle Brett replied. If the rest of y'all media folk tagged don't want new prog leadership then maybe you really are homeless. So keep claiming that then. I tried. Don't worry the base will be represented. Chicago! There's enough people tagged you ARE on record.
English
2
0
0
30
Fiorella Isabel
Fiorella Isabel@FiorellaIsabelM·
The Predatory Elite's New Technocratic World Order & the Dismantling of Nations From cartel propaganda to the siege of Latin America and the targeting of Iran, competition for minerals in the age of AI digital surveillance and Big Tech is forging a new capital order. @VanessaBeeley and I dive into a sobering assessment of a world under simultaneous siege—from the tightening grip of Washington’s hegemonic targeting in Latin America to the intricate military encirclement of Iran in West Asia, all against the backdrop of Cuba’s desperate wait for Russian oil, Mexico’s cartel violence, and Syria’s transformation into a Takfiri stronghold. The painted reality depicts a portrait of the broken dream of a multipolar world order that’s failed to materialize into any meaningful counterweight to Western and Zionist expansionism in the incoming Pax Judaica. While headlines focus on isolated incidents to fuel narratives and distractions from reality, there’s a clear, coordinated assault on sovereignty, a grueling fight for resources, and human dignity is ever the more at stake across the Global South. … We conclude the discussions with a grim assessment of humanity’s trajectory toward neo-feudalism—a world where populations are reduced to data points and labor units for a tiny predator class enabled by AI surveillance and technocratic control. Pointing to Gaza as the emerging template, the world is engaging in genocide accompanied by biometric experimentation, population reduction is justified as counter-terrorism, and there’s the systematic erasure of Palestinian land through West Bank settlement expansion. Even progressive-sounding initiatives like BRICS have been compromised by member states pursuing narrow capital interests rather than genuine solidarity. Yet amidst the darkness, we both believe in a thread of hope: the recognition that collective action from the ground-up remains possible. “There’s a lot of us and there are very few of them,” I remind listeners, pointing to the EU’s blocking of weapons shipments to Israel, that organized resistance can succeed. The question is whether enough people will recognize their common predicament before the forces of extraction complete their project of global domination. Links in comments
Fiorella Isabel tweet media
English
23
48
112
52K
AF Post
AF Post@AFpost·
Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson discuss the theory that Israel eliminated Charlie Kirk to advance war with Iran. Follow: @AFpost
English
82
500
4.7K
203K
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Bret Weinstein drops a massive bombshell: Benjamin Netanyahu immediately denied responsibility for the assassination of Charlie Kirk before anyone even asked. It was a mafia style message to terrify anyone opposing Israel's war in Iran.
English
296
2.7K
14.9K
652.2K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
I believe we have entered the endgame. For the true elites, hiding crimes is no longer a priority, either because they can't do it, or because it no longer matters. We have to decide that we will not accept a new form of slavery. And we have to be willing to die on that hill.
English
856
3.4K
22.8K
807.4K
Valerie Anne Smith
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970·
🚨Game-changing insight from Dr. Ben Bikman: Forget obsessing over LDL—your triglyceride-to-HDL ratio is the BEST indicator of insulin resistance & heart health! Divide your triglycerides by your HDL (both in mg/dL). - Under ~1.5? You're insulin sensitive—great sign! - Over 1.5? Red flag—time to rethink carbs, prioritize protein/fat & cut refined sugars. High ratio = higher risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, metabolic syndrome. Low ratio = fantastic metabolic flexibility. Check your latest labs—what's your TG/HDL? Drop it below 👇
English
116
529
2K
149.7K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
We need a secure, decentralized, denationalized cryptocurrency. The problem with discussing Bitcoin in this context: It is impossible to distinguish those who believe in it and are therefore invested, from those who are invested in it and therefore believe.
English
1.2K
80
1.5K
299.3K
Lizzie Liz
Lizzie Liz@LizzieLizbc·
@BrettWeinstein, I'd expect more rigour from you on this. Your opening observation — that you can't distinguish belief-driven investment from investment-driven belief — isn't a Bitcoin problem. It's a description of conviction in any asset, any ideology, any field. Gold holders believe in gold. Tesla investors believe in Tesla. Scientists who dedicate careers to a theory believe in that theory. Skin in the game and conviction are inseparable. That's not a flaw in discourse — it's how commitment works. Framing this as uniquely disqualifying for Bitcoin is the kind of argument that sounds penetrating but collapses under ten seconds of reflection. You know this. Your follow-up is more concerning. You say Bitcoin may be "already compromised" and that Bitcoiners are preventing discussion of alternatives. Compromised how? Name the vulnerability. Identify the failure. The network has operated since 2009 with near-perfect uptime, a mathematically fixed supply, and no central point of control. If you're going to make a claim like that to 200K+ followers, the intellectual standard you've built your reputation on demands you back it up. And the suggestion that Bitcoin "takes up all the oxygen" from alternative cryptocurrencies — that's not Bitcoin's fault. That's the market telling you something. Thousands of alternatives have launched. None have matched Bitcoin's decentralisation, security, or network effect. The oxygen goes where the fire is. You opened by saying we need a secure, decentralised, denationalised cryptocurrency. We have one. It's been running for 16 years. The question isn't whether it exists — it's whether you've done the work to understand why it's the one that survived. I say this with respect: your audience trusts you to think things through before you post. This one needed another draft.
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein

We need a secure, decentralized, denationalized cryptocurrency. The problem with discussing Bitcoin in this context: It is impossible to distinguish those who believe in it and are therefore invested, from those who are invested in it and therefore believe.

English
1
0
0
45

Keşfet

@Refuse2Lockdown @DNIGabbard @TonypFauci4jail @_threadkiller_ @thevivafrei @BretWeinstein @TechFrontier007 @healthyskeptic_