WAGMI Capital MGMT 💎⚡

Welp. Grok has my number, shrug

TESLA has been dead money for 5 years....

Netflix MMA is Temu UFC

@Alice_MiaX Well....

@Alice_MiaX Rousey by submission. No way around it, losing 100lb for a fight will affect cardio and stamina. But tbh, after the Tyson/Paul thing on Netflix, I wouldn't be surprised if they treat it as a cash grab and it's pretty boring. I think Rousey will have the most to prove tho $.02

Ronda Rousey vs Gina Carano on Netflix! Okay… who’s actually winning this fight tonight?

@TJTheWheelDeal 49, 42 under 60

How low? How low? How low can she go??

@CorySwan And they should, Trump is the shitcoin president

Are senate Dems going to block the Clarity Act if it doesn't include language to halt Trump family crypto grift?

@rameses45 @Alice_MiaX Same same

@BringLogicBack @Alice_MiaX That is my thoughts exactly. I feel the fight has already been predetermined and is a money grab. If they actually fight I’ll be surprised.

Strategy Bros™️ hate to hear it, but your money would have been better off parked in SPY than MSTR for the last two years. And during that time Bitcoin hit ATHs and Strategy had more Bitcoin than ever before. Bitcoin per share is meaningless drivel. Just buy and hold Bitcoin.

@AlpacaBlitz @saylor 😆😆😆😅😅😅😭😭😭😭😭😭 You would have more money parking it in SPY for the last two years. And during that time Bitcoin hit ATHs and Strategy had more Bitcoin than ever. YOU have fun staying poor, chump. I'll compare PNL any day 🥱

@BringLogicBack @saylor HFSP

WAGMI

Lmao, that's hardcore cope. "He's not flip flopping, he's evolving!" Whatever you need to tell yourself, guy, but it's not me who is naive. My views on Bitcoin haven't changed at all since I first learned about it, much less have I ever told anyone it was worthless and going away soon. "You were not a bitcoiner when you popped out of the womb" is room temperature IQ hyperbole. I was in my 30s when it was invented. By all the shares you want to, watch your money disappear, I literally dgaf

That’s not “self-contradictory.” Those examples reflect evolving views over time. For example, you were not a Bitcoiner when you popped out of the womb. And I’m sure you wouldn’t call your own views “self-contradictory” since you don’t think the same way now than you did a decade ago. The ownership comment is a red herring but I’ll engage with it anyway. They have legal title and ownership of their BTC. They own it by the same legal standard by which any company or person owns anything. You’re conflating “ownership” with “possession” in a very naive way. Pretty moronic comments for someone with the handle “bring logic back” tbh.

You didn't answer my question. Exclamation points and all caps as a substitute for a cogent argument... shocking. As a shareholder, do you want to make money or do you want Strategy to have more Bitcoin? They are clearly not the same thing...as strategy had more Bitcoin and Bitcoin was at all time highs while Strategy was down 50%. Why? If you are an investor, you should want your investments to increase in value and Saylor is single handedly preventing that from happening. It's not a good company, no matter how many Bitcoin they buy.

@BringLogicBack @saylor There it is!! You don't value a company with a strong balance sheet! Your posts are gonna look EXTREMELY SILLY a few years from now when Strategy is 10 to 100 times bigger than it is and they have the largest stack of Bitcoin of any single entity!

@BrettMark911 @saylor Bitcoin per share is a meaningless made up term. How do you benefit from Strategy owning Bitcoin?

@BringLogicBack @saylor What about his claim to constantly accrete more Bitcoin per share over time? Surely you must see that as a HUGE benefit to his shareholders! Isn't that what really matters? I don't care if he uses tax-code to sell some BTC at a loss to get MORE btc!

@CornishWaves @saylor Feel free to read through my comments here where I've already explained it twice now

@BringLogicBack @saylor How did you come to this conclusion? Is there a basis behind it? Or is this just a dim view of humanity?

Like.... you want a dissertation? Before 2020 he didn't even know anything about Bitcoin and said it wouldn't be around long... even though it had already been a decade. He flip flopped about the mnav they would dilute under, he flip flopped on his claims about how much his buys would push the price of Bitcoin, he flip flopped about selling Bitcoin. Strategy doesn't even own their Bitcoin, it's not in their custody.

@BringLogicBack @saylor What has he said that’s self-contradictory? Also…who owns Strategy’s Bitcoin? Saylor?

@BrettMark911 @saylor He flip flops on every single thing he claims. The mnav that he will dilute by, the debt, selling Bitcoin, he is not an honest actor.

@BringLogicBack @saylor How is he "fooling people?" Everything Strategy does has been filed and approved by the SEC! Please elaborate.

@CornishWaves @saylor No. He wants your money to buy Bitcoin with. There's no other plan.

I don't think this is what he's doing. I don't think he's an evil psychopath. From all the hours of listening to him, Breedlove Saylor series, loads of presentations and podcasts, I really think he cares about changing things for the better, but only for those that listen and learn.

I'm not sure how what I said could be construed as not wanting certain people to buy Bitcoin when I was clearly saying that only fools give other people money to buy Bitcoin with instead of just buying it themselves. Saylor will say anything -- no matter how ridiculous or self contradictory -- to keep the faucet running.

@BringLogicBack @saylor Perhaps we should have a centralized committee that determines who can and cannot buy Bitcoin. Your thoughts?

@tradesbysci 🧢🧢🧢

most people panic when the numbers stop looking pretty..

@LFlies69 @saylor

@BringLogicBack @saylor Haha, that's super clever

Strategy to repurchase $1.5 billion principal amount of 2029 convertible notes. $MSTR $STRC strategy.com/press/strategy…