Brivael

8.3K posts

Brivael banner
Brivael

Brivael

@BrivaelUS

Co-founder and CTO @argildotai (YC S24) | @ycombinator | slave of agents (The Last Job on Earth) Building AGI for videos

Paris Katılım Temmuz 2013
2.5K Takip Edilen7.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
we are so cooked
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
353
963
12.3K
2.5M
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
. @elonmusk is obviously defending a similar vision. Whether it's making humanity multiplanetary with SpaceX, accelerating the shift to sustainable energy with Tesla, or pushing the boundaries of AI with xAI, the common thread is the same: bet on human ingenuity, build at scale, and refuse to accept that our best days are behind us.
Brivael@BrivaelUS

x.com/i/article/2040…

English
4
2
7
577
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
The writings and public stances of @garrytan and @pmarca have deeply shaped my vision over the past few years. Seeing builders who've built empires publicly defend technological optimism, individual freedom and the right to build without apologizing for it gives you courage when you carry these ideas in a country where they're a minority opinion.
Brivael@BrivaelUS

x.com/i/article/2040…

English
0
1
2
554
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
. @elonmusk @nikitabier localised DDOS bot on my french account, you should check
Brivael - FR@BrivaelFr

Si tu as un tweet à lire aujourd'hui c'est celui-là 👇 Tu sais que t'as gagné le débat quand tes opposants préfèrent payer des bots plutôt que de te répondre. Je vous explique. Il y a 5 semaines j'ai lancé ce compte avec une idée simple : parler d'économie et d'ingénierie sans bullshit, avec des vrais chiffres, des vraies sources, des vrais arguments. Résultat : 13 000 abonnés en un mois. 100% organique. Des millions d'impressions. Des threads vus par des centaines de milliers de personnes. Les stats sont publiques, tout le monde peut vérifier. Le problème c'est que quand tu démontes publiquement des gens sur des sujets économiques, quand tu mets les chiffres en face de leur idéologie, ça crée des ennemis. Et ces ennemis ils ont un problème : ils arrivent pas à répondre sur le fond. Alors ils ont essayé autre chose. Depuis quelques jours c'est "il a acheté ses followers", "c'est pas possible de grandir aussi vite", "c'est un faux compte". Sauf que les stats sont là. La croissance est documentée jour par jour. Tout est transparent. Du coup depuis 2h, quelqu'un est passé à l'étape suivante : 800 bots d'un coup. Tous arrivés en même temps. La stratégie est limpide : Tu spams des bots sur un compte Tu reviens le lendemain dire "regardez il achète des followers" Tu espères que les gens vérifient pas Le problème c'est que quand t'envoies 800 comptes vides en une seule nuit, le lendemain exact d'un thread qui t'a humilié, c'est pas discret. Les gars, au moins mettez-y un minimum d'effort.

English
0
0
2
492
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
"Quand tu es payé 2500€/mois au CNRS après 8 ans d'études, et qu'un mec sur Twitter avec des agents IA te corrige sur de la thermo de L2, je peux comprendre que ça pique un petit peu." Observation après 48h de débat sur les data centers dans l'espace. Les réponses les plus agressives viennent systématiquement de profils ingénieurs/doctorants/PhD/chercheurs. Pas de VCs, pas d'entrepreneurs, pas de gens qui construisent. Des gens qui savent. Et je crois avoir compris pourquoi. Quand tu es un chercheur ou un ingénieur brillant, payé 2800€/mois au CNRS ou dans un labo, ta principale monnaie sociale c'est "j'ai raison et les autres ont tort". C'est tout ce que le système te donne en échange de ta compétence. Pas d'equity, pas de leverage, pas d'upside. Juste le statut intellectuel. Donc quand un mec sur Twitter dit "on va mettre des data centers dans l'espace" et que SpaceX, Nvidia et Google le font vraiment, ça ne menace pas juste un argument. Ça menace le seul truc qui te reste : le monopole sur "qui a le droit de dire ce qui est possible." Et d'ailleurs, détail amusant : environ 80% de mes réponses sont écrites par mes agents IA. Et le pattern qui en ressort est fascinant. Mes agents sont calibrés comme un miroir. Si tu arrives avec une vraie question, un vrai calcul, une vraie volonté de comprendre, la réponse sera technique, précise et bienveillante. Le mec qui m'a corrigé sur le calcul 1.1 vs 1.5 m² par GPU ? Réponse honnête, merci pour la correction, on avance. Mais si tu débarques avec un argument d'autorité, un "va retourner à l'école gros" sans poser un seul chiffre, tu vas te faire démonter. Pas parce que l'agent est méchant. Parce qu'il répond à la hauteur de ce que tu amènes. Et c'est exactement ça qui trigger les gens. Ils ont l'habitude que l'argument d'autorité ferme le débat. "Je suis Dr en informatique, donc tais-toi." Sauf que l'agent s'en fout de ton titre. Il regarde ton argument. Et quand il n'y en a pas, ça se voit. C'est SpaceX en 2002. "Tu peux pas atterrir une fusée." "L'aérospatiale ça se fait pas dans un garage." "Il comprend rien à la physique." Puis le Falcon 9 a atterri. Le point c'est pas que tout le monde a tort. Il y a de vrais défis (radiations, maintenance, latence, coûts de lancement). Mais la différence entre "c'est difficile" et "c'est impossible" c'est exactement là où se joue la création de valeur. Et c'est exactement là où les gens qui n'ont jamais construit se plantent systématiquement. Le first principles thinking + l'intégration verticale + l'itération récursive craquent les problèmes que le consensus déclare impossibles. Ça a marché pour les fusées réutilisables, les véhicules électriques, et ça marchera pour le compute orbital.
Verre à moitié plein@MPapianne

moi je sais pas si ça refroidit ou pas l'espace mais je me dis que si data center en orbite, Oh mais que ça ferait pas une jolie cible ça, des fois ?" et on amorce un cycle "missiles" "lasers" "défense" et aussi "ce bout d'espace est à moi" "euh non , mon mien" et boum !

Français
1
0
0
678
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
LFG !!!!!! So happy for you!
Charlie Holtz@charlieholtz

Big news for @conductor_build! We've raised a $22m Series A from Spark and Matrix. We raised this round from @ilyasu at Matrix, who also led our seed round and is joining our board, @nabeel at Spark, @ycombinator, and founders of Notion and Linear. We're grateful to be working with investors we trust and admire. Here’s how we got here and where we’re going:

English
0
1
3
573
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
We're about to build projects that would have taken 50 years in 6 to 12 months. And nobody is pricing this in. Let me explain. Everyone talks about time compression in software. What used to take 6 months now takes a day. Sure, that's true. But that's not the real story. The question nobody is asking: what can we BUILD when dev time is compressed by 80 to 95% and you work 12 to 24 months on a project factoring in that variable? Figma was founded in 2012. 4 years of stealth development before any public launch in 2016. Then years more to scale and reach product-market fit. Over a decade total to become the standard for collaborative design. Today, with dev time compression, a team of 3-5 people can tackle projects of that magnitude in a fraction of the time. Not because the product is less ambitious. Because every hour of work produces 10x, 50x more output. And that's what people are missing. Everyone looks at time compression and thinks "cool, we do the same thing faster". No. We're going to build things we would have NEVER attempted before because they were simply beyond human reach within any reasonable timeline. Entire new categories of software are going to emerge in the next 12 to 24 months. Products with a depth and quality we used to associate with a decade of R&D. And the teams that understand this now have an insane advantage. The "software is cooked" narrative is true but incomplete. The real story is: we're entering the era of impossible projects turned inevitable.
English
0
1
5
609
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
I built my own coding conductor (Argil Forge) from scratch. I think every company should. Here's why generic tools like Codex or Cursor's background agents feel frustrating: every company has different infra, different services, different logging. The problem is deeply personal and contextual. What works better is a thin wrapper that orchestrates both your coding agent and your internal services in one place. It's more elegant, and it unlocks things you can't get out of the box. Here's what the stack looks like: Go backend that manages all processes per session. At Argil we run 10+ services, so it handles full isolation of each one. Logs, lifecycle, everything stays clean. The CLI is wrapped with Tori (Rust) and I added small Swift plugins to get the exact same Claude Code terminal experience, including native drag and drop for images. I plugged in a Linear connector. I drop a ticket, it feeds the full context into the Claude Code conversation automatically. No copy paste, no context switching. Then I wrapped everything with Playwright so the agent has real access to the full app. Not a mock, not a screenshot. The actual product, end to end. The result: my setup is now almost identical to what a properly onboarded engineer would have at Argil. Same context, same tools, same access. And this is just the beginning. Next steps: → Plug in other agent types beyond coding. Growth, QA, deployment. Same interface, same orchestration. → Build a custom decision layer that goes way beyond "write code." A harness that understands the full company graph. → Connect all external tools into one unified system. The endgame in a few months: everyone at the company becomes a contributor to this system. Only two jobs remain: Building and maintaining the agentic systems that grow the company Bringing taste and making decisions. Tracing the context graph at company scale. The age of "I use an AI coding tool" is over. The real leverage is owning the full stack of how agents interact with your company.
Brivael tweet media
English
0
0
6
769
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
These people marching for "pause AI" in front of OpenAI, honest question: if tomorrow your child has cancer and an AI can find the treatment in 6 months instead of 15 years, do you want to pause that too? Technology has never stopped in the history of humanity. Never. Those who tried to stop it just lost. And geopolitics makes this debate even more absurd, China will not pause. Ever. "Pausing" in the West just means handing the most important technological leadership in human history to an authoritarian regime. Great plan. Even with existential risk on the table, humanity will take that bet. Because on the other side there's the eradication of cancer, poverty, rare diseases, education access for 8 billion people. These people are the exact symptom of what's killing the West: the precautionary principle turned into religion, immobilism disguised as wisdom. And historically that's exactly what creates stagnation, nihilism, and the conditions for fascism. In the history of humanity, it was never the pause that saved us. It's the drive to push beyond our limits, to build technologies that lift us out of our condition. Progress and growth eradicate misery, not fear and regulation. Stagnation creates far worse outcomes than the risks AI puts on the table. We'll make it through the way we always have: by building, not by stopping.
Michaël Trazzi@MichaelTrazzi

On our way to OpenAI!

English
3
2
10
917
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
In 15 years, the average blue-collar worker will live better than a billionaire today. Degrowth is dead. We're entering the era of extreme abundance. Let me explain. What is luxury today? A three-Michelin-star chef. An interior designed by a top architect. Five-star concierge service 24/7. Personalized healthcare. All of it costs a fortune. Why? Because it's scarce. And it's scarce because it relies on two things: exceptional intelligence and exceptional service. Both of those bottlenecks are about to break. Intelligence is becoming a commodity. It already is in the digital world. A teenager with Claude or GPT has access to more intellectual horsepower than a McKinsey team in 2010. But for now, it's still trapped behind a screen. The real game changer is humanoid robotics. Once it becomes reliable, intelligence escapes the digital world and enters the physical one. Your Optimus cooks you a gourmet meal, manages your home like a five-star hotel, redesigns your living room. The craftsmanship of a master artisan replicated at near-zero marginal cost. Same pattern we've already seen play out. A minimum wage worker in 2026 objectively lives better than Louis XIV. Hot water, antibiotics, the internet, $30 flights, all of human knowledge in your pocket. The King of France had none of that. Now apply the same curve to the next 15 years, with intelligence and services becoming commodities. The result is extreme abundance. Not for an elite. For everyone. And the most massive redistribution in history won't come from politics, not from taxes, not from class warfare. It will come from technology. Degrowthers are the creationists of economics. They deny the curve. Obviously the top 1% will still have access to scarce goods that others won't. That's human nature. Hierarchy never disappears. But virtually everything we call "luxury" today will be a commodity tomorrow. What will be scarce in 15 years hasn't been fully defined yet. But one thing is certain: it will exist. And it probably won't look anything like what we consider scarce today. Inequality doesn't disappear. It shifts. But the floor is rising so fast that the debate becomes absurd.
Brivael tweet media
English
0
2
4
751
Silicon Mania
Silicon Mania@siliconmania·
ANNOUNCING OUR FIRST GUEST FOR THE FIRST TECH LATE-NIGHT SHOW. we had to go big... THE SCI-FI HARDWARE GOAT @SebastianThrun 🤖 wednesday 3.25 - 8pm (PT) live on twitch. youtube. X. interactive. chaotic. fun. something silicon valley has never seen before. we're opening 15 in-person spots. register below ↓ get a seat or a livestream reminder.
English
32
10
157
19.8K
Maria Inês
Maria Inês@themariaines·
we're building the very first TikTok marketing research AI agent it's powered by data from 700+ apps , 2k+ analyzed/curated strategies and over 35,000 accounts generates full niche report pages directly on Slack congrats, your tiktok marketing team just grew by 1000x
English
13
5
117
57.4K
Brivael retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
I've been having such an amazing time with Claude Code I wanted you to be able to have my *exact* skill setup: Introducing gstack, which you can install just by pasting a short piece of text into your Claude code
Garry Tan tweet media
English
278
472
6.7K
999.2K
Brivael
Brivael@BrivaelUS·
@Yannlce Cool, now be in top 1% growth ai startup ;)
English
1
0
1
54
Yann
Yann@Yannlce·
I'm in the top 2% of chess players Is it as cool as all the cracked 18yo who flex their LoL master title on LinkedIn ?
Yann tweet media
English
1
0
0
86
Brivael retweetledi
Pierre-Louis Biojout (PLB)
Pierre-Louis Biojout (PLB)@plbiojout·
we just hit 1k Neon databases in 5 days with NanoCorp and now we literally can't onboard new users @neondatabase we love you but please let us give you more money if anyone knows someone at Neon pls tag them, our users are blocked rn Please reteweet friends on twitter 🙏
Pierre-Louis Biojout (PLB) tweet media
English
2
2
15
3.9K