Raine (Taylor’s Version)

9.3K posts

Raine (Taylor’s Version) banner
Raine (Taylor’s Version)

Raine (Taylor’s Version)

@Brixwoof

All Too Well (10 min), Blank Space, Long Live

Katılım Mart 2017
720 Takip Edilen195 Takipçiler
OopsIAteTheCat
OopsIAteTheCat@OppsIAteTheCat·
@StitchySherry @AmyKremer It's unfortunate that the Supreme Court ruling came down two days after early voting started in GA. Many are pointing fingers at Kemp, but their frustration is misplaced.
English
1
0
0
12
Amy Kremer
Amy Kremer@AmyKremer·
So SC and GA are the 2 states who are not redrawing the maps for 2026… The others are have moved, or are moving, to redraw their maps: ✅ Alabama ✅ Florida ✅ Louisiana ✅ Mississippi ✅ Tennessee ✅ Texas
English
149
512
1.2K
15.8K
Raine (Taylor’s Version)
@FurkanGozukara Koreans make great pastries: but then at every Korean bakery near me they individually package them in plastic. Every wonderful croissant becomes a mushy soft mess within a few hours
English
0
0
3
489
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Absolute bombshell in the culinary world. South Korea just went to Paris and WON the global baking competition, beating the French at their own game. Korean bakers are taking European styles and adding local twists. The new kings of bread!
English
152
1.4K
12.5K
983.8K
David Schwartz
David Schwartz@DavidSchwartz70·
Zohran Mamdani is being heckled right now at a press conference in Brooklyn, NY, by someone whose words I can't hear, but watch how he's dealing with it. Mamdani has the unique skill of knowing how to handle and walk into every room and engage with people, no matter how toxic they are or how their feelings are against him. And many times, make them feel heard. Elected officials, nonprofit and religious leaders, advocates, and activists on both sides of the political spectrum who met with him told me that. Don't take my word for it, President Trump is pretty public about it. That's why he's currently the mayor of New York City. If you don't like his politics or you're like me, who opposed his candidacy and is still troubled by some of his actions and statements, then don't take this post the wrong way; read into it how you should be better to communicate your message. Yes, putting ego aside for any public figure is not easy.
English
510
2.4K
19.7K
2.7M
Raine (Taylor’s Version)
@TAK121300 @Jebailey Often for international flights RT economy is like $700 per seat versus $5000 per seat for first class. If you’re two people sharing this, that’s $2100 total versus $10000 total
English
0
0
0
106
Tyler Knutson
Tyler Knutson@TAK121300·
@Jebailey If you’re paying for essentially 3 seats this isn’t gonna change shit. Rich people will do it. No one else would be able to afford it
English
1
0
7
3K
Marc
Marc@mnnurse10·
@samstein @Lauren_V_Egan Kamala Harris is attractive and Trump looks like a chewed up pumpkin, let’s be serious here .?
English
1
0
40
557
Sam Stein
Sam Stein@samstein·
NEW: In their frantic efforts to win back power, Democrats are warning up to something more... primal: Why not just run hotter candidates? These convos are really happening. And there is real science behind it. via @Lauren_V_Egan thebulwark.com/p/thirst-traps…
English
226
90
1.2K
2.3M
Raine (Taylor’s Version)
@smarkstrickland @mavsmarie Lmao are you people capable of speaking at all without your insane obsession with gender. It’s so weird. You show how literally STUPID you are when you just eat their talking points and regurgitate them.
English
0
0
0
11
Mark Strickland
Mark Strickland@smarkstrickland·
@mavsmarie So you believe that Talarico will tax billionaires, which will lower prices and make your life better? I have more than six genders and twelve boys playing girl sports that will tell you it won’t. He has no experience, he has no plan to help you.
English
2
0
0
252
Raine (Taylor’s Version)
@cnni You need to do a story on how horrible Qatar Airlines - they’re stranding people all over the world and have no way to rebook. Horrible horrible customer service you need to cover this
English
0
0
0
70
CNN International
CNN International@cnni·
Arab states in the Persian Gulf tried to prevent a US-Israeli strike on Iran. Now, as Tehran retaliates, their own territories are under fire. cnn.it/3NfeNbL
English
56
56
374
50.8K
Secretary Kennedy
Secretary Kennedy@SecKennedy·
I’ve teamed up with @KidRock to deliver two simple messages to the American people: GET ACTIVE + EAT REAL FOOD.
English
12K
10.5K
60.4K
14.2M
Joe
Joe@electionsjoe·
@DRvulupa As of right now I'm pretty open to most people who aren't Newsom, Shapiro, Harris, and Pete.
English
5
2
30
639
Bombfunk
Bombfunk@OW_Mercy_Only·
Who’s tryna be my valentine
Bombfunk tweet media
English
16
8
302
6.1K
Raine (Taylor’s Version)
Raine (Taylor’s Version)@Brixwoof·
@Vibutler_ I’m team AOC / OSSOFF in either order. Unfortunately Kamala likely is seen as going backwards when we should be moving away from prior admins and inspiring hope with new faces
English
0
0
1
132
Sea 海洋 🌊
Sea 海洋 🌊@Lea97141·
@RealDonKeith There is no “r” sound in Japanese, they use “L” sound instead: Beer -> bee lu Hotel -> Ho te lu
English
20
2
31
20.3K
Don Keith
Don Keith@RealDonKeith·
🤣Japanese people trying to pronounce “refrigerator.”
English
393
1.1K
11.9K
1.2M
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.
Thomas Massie tweet mediaThomas Massie tweet media
English
1.9K
9.4K
62.7K
2.4M
Policy Puppet
Policy Puppet@sock_puppet1787·
@earlyvotedata Lotta polls showing Dems at max 45, 46%. I’m not seeing a lot that are 48% or above, something interesting to look at
English
2
0
9
231
All Creatures Rescue
All Creatures Rescue@AllCreaturesTO·
No she needs to be fired for searching for clout by using/filming someone’s personal struggles. Yes even if the person is not featured - this is a private moment that shouldn’t be publicly posted. The caretakers we’ve all been told to worship and who are “underpaid” are turning into horrible grifters we would be better without
English
26
0
11
11.6K
Jonathan Slater
Jonathan Slater@slater57649·
This girl needs a raise
English
182
3.3K
42.6K
693.7K
Cheryl B
Cheryl B@Cheryl707·
@JanetMillsforME Thirty years of reason and good judgment. One if the few in congress who isn’t married to ideology. You would be just another partisan puppet.
English
8
0
3
790
Janet Mills
Janet Mills@JanetMillsforME·
Thirty years of concern. Never enough courage.
English
473
4.2K
19K
1.8M
Ethan C7
Ethan C7@ECaliberSeven·
Some basic midterm math: - Georgia is Trump+2.2 - Incumbency is worth ~3% on average - Under the current D+6 generic ballot, GA will on average be ~7.5% bluer than 2024. AKA, even before considering candidate quality, we should be expecting Ossoff to win reelection by 8%.
Dj@DjsokeSpeaking

I’ve been seeing a lot of “Ossoff +4/+5” hypothetical scenarios GA was R+2.2 vs R+1.5 nationally in 2024, almost in line with the national result. Ossoff’s a reasonably strong incumbent too So I’m saying we need to think bigger 🙂‍↕️

English
36
53
694
185K
Zachary Donnini
Zachary Donnini@ZacharyDonnini·
@aethelamerican @TonerousHyus Possible, but I think a lot of people underestimate how much of a better place he's in with Black voters than Pete/Shapiro due to his ties to the Southern Dem political establishment
English
4
1
58
2.4K
Zachary Donnini
Zachary Donnini@ZacharyDonnini·
I do think there’s a plausible best-case rollout for Ossoff where first its: “Wow, he just won Georgia by 5.” Then, two months later: “Oh, he’s running for president.” That’s a pretty clean momentum arc, and Democratic primary voters are always hyper-focused on electability.
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022

.@Polymarket - Jon Ossoff's odds of winning the 2028 Democratic primary have doubled since early January 🔵 Newsom: 26% (-12) 🔵 AOC: 9% (-2) 🔵 Ossoff: 6% (+3) 🔵 Shapiro: 5% (+1) 🔵 Harris: 5% (+1) 🔵 Pete: 5% 🔵 Beshear: 3% 🔵 Pritzker: 3% 🔵 Whitmer: 3% 🔵 Kelly: 3%

English
35
18
400
148.5K