
Bruce Hunter
25.2K posts

Bruce Hunter
@BruceHunterJr
Directly related to George Washington via his grandparents Nothing I say is legal or financial advice
United States Katılım Temmuz 2020
251 Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

The "Citizen’s 25" Proposal: A Jury Duty for Congress
Washington is stuck in a cycle of careerism and donor interests. My fix? Expand Congress by 25% with seats filled by random lottery. How it works:
The Lotto: 135 new seats are filled by a random draw of everyday citizens (like Jury Duty).
The Choice: It’s voluntary. If you’re picked, you can say "No thank you," and we re-draw.
The Terms: One term only. You get the same pay and benefits as elected officials, then you return to your life. No re-election means no fundraising and no corporate masters.
The Role: These members act as the "Common Sense Filter," voting on bills without the pressure of party bosses or special interests.
Why it works:
Breaks the Gridlock: You can't buy a representative who isn't running for re-election.
True Representation: Real teachers, mechanics, and nurses sitting next to career politicians.
Accountability: It forces Congress to pass laws that "regular people" actually understand and support.
We trust citizens to decide life or death in a jury box—it’s time we trust them to vote on a budget.
#FixCongress #Sortition #CitizenLegislators #PoliticalReform @RepThomasMassie
English


@Hitchslap1 I believe cell phones should be banned in elementary school and middle school.
I believe that high School should be reduced from 4 years to 2 years.
Then the two years taken out of high school should be supplanted by vocational mentor type schooling.
English

A recent study in India found that banning cell phones led to increased scores for lower-performing students.
Do you think American schools should ban cell phones?

Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil
On the other hand, a recent large-scale experimental study in India found that banning cell phones led to GPA catch-up for lower-performing students. The average effect size was 8.6% of a standard deviation, which is in-line with the rest of the significant results in this lit.
English

If you are able to afford AI every month and leverage it then you are in the wealthy class.
In my opinion you are going to see the cost of AI increase by 10x in the next two years; Creating an ever-increasing divide between richer and the poor.
You may be able to afford AI now but not for long.
English

@VincentSco72192 I completely agree. It would increase the velocity of money.
Remember income tax is purposeful oppression. They can print money out of thin air and then they tax your income, tax your purchases, tax your home and so on.
They don't care about you. They want to control you.
English

Remove the income tax and you will see 50% GDP overnight.
Real relief is not a little extra in the check.
No, it’s removing the burden of keeping records and giving the government our hard earned money
They. print. it.
What the hell do they need us for?
Obviously, deficits don’t matter for them.
The White House@WhiteHouse
Small business owners are hardworking, resilient, and finally treated right by the Trump administration. "You're essentially the most important factor, business wise, in the whole country." - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
English
Bruce Hunter retweetledi

@Mangini01 @Gavin74918272 @Octopusrpl @InvestWithD I once had more than 1,000 BTC. I'm down to less than 1 now. I once had 40,000 ETH. I think I'm down to less than 2 now. :/
English

You are 100% correct. Infact I've always said you still need to understand the input (Prompt) -> and understand the output(LLM Response).
This is why you see Seniors do so well and 10x in many cases. However, we have turned off the Senior to Jr mentioring lever.
When the Seniors age out, where are you going to get Jrs rising to Seniors in shops with the input and output knowledge? You better hope that AI can cover this loss of understanding.
English

I’m coming to the conclusion that the biggest challenge for Enterprise AI, and AI in general , as of now, is that it’s still impossible to make sure that everyone gets the same answer to the same question, every time.
Which is a great response to the doomers. AI doesn’t know the consequences of its output.
Judgement and the ability to challenge AI output is becoming increasingly necessary, and valuable.
Which makes domain knowledge more valuable by the second.
Am I wrong ?
English


@Hitchslap1 Depends. Context here matters.
They are rare cases, of course.
English








