Steve Brunswick

Sex difference is only important in a tiny number of instances (private spaces, attraction, sport, etc). Most claimed differences are outdated stereotypes. Feminists fight to keep the important and eliminate the outdated. TRAs fight to destroy the important and keep the outdated.

@HelenWebberley Loony.

As I keep saying, some women have a penis and that is 100% OK.

@PepsiAl252865 @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT Good. Keep believing that. The less you understand those you disagree with, the greater their advantage.

@BrunswickSteve @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT It's not a false narrative because you say so. And I guarantee you it's nothing good that motivated people to oppose the demands of the trans movement, especially when a lot of manipulation is involved into doing so.

I wish society was kind to trans people. I wish it was normalised to be trans. I wish we wouldn’t have to fight so hard to be ourselves. I wish we wouldn’t have to be so strong just to keep going. I wish our voices would be amplified and listened to.

@PepsiAl252865 @trundistroyer @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT No verifiable science says this. Indeed, there is no science that demonstrates it is even a genuine characteristics. Recall that there are dozens of gender identities. Show me any science that says astral gender, gender queer, demigender or non-binary are innate attributes.

@trundistroyer @BrunswickSteve @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT Science literally says it's an innate trait.

@PepsiAl252865 @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT That’s the false trans movement narrative, sure, and the sad thing is that while you continue to hold on to that falsehood instead of making the effort to understand what genuinely motivates people to oppose the demands of the trans movement, you will continue to lose support.

@BrunswickSteve @CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT No. Transphobia is literally the same antipathy towards transgender people that racism sends towards ethnic minorities, and that homophobia sends towards gays and bisexuals.

@daniellismore Yes, but like almost every man, woman and child since the dawn of time — and even most dogs — she knows the difference between men and woman.

J.K. Rowling is not cited in any peer reviewed scientific research on sex development, gender identity, neurobiology, endocrinology, or intersex conditions. She has not contributed to the medical or biological understanding of how human bodies develop.

@WolfBunnyHdz1 @nyaraVT Why? Because you support the removal of single-sex protections or because you support sterilising children? Or is it because the thought of people ignoring you makes you angrier than anything else?

@BrunswickSteve @nyaraVT And that is the fucking reason we keep fighting.

@nyaraVT Act as you like. Just stay out of women-only spaces.

"most people will accept trans women if they just acted like cis men and didn't actually want to live as women"

@CristelleHull_ @nyaraVT No, both racism and homophobia involve antipathy towards people based on ethnicity and sexual orientation respectively. Transphobia involves no antipathy - it is merely the label for people who know that when a man says he’s a women, he is really a man. That’s it.

Someday, the history books will look back on the transphobia in this time and recognise that transphobia is no different from racism and slavery. I pray that someday all bigotry will be forced back into the shadows and that we can live in a world where love and acceptance prevails. 🙏❤️

@daniellismore I have reviewed your evidence in detail and I’m afraid you’ve failed to prove any culpability. Case dismissed.

While You Were Watching the Harry Potter Trailer The new Harry Potter promotion is everywhere. The nostalgia is loud. The excitement is real. Millions of people who grew up with those books are feeling something exciting. Hold that feeling for a moment. Then read this. Between 2019 and 2025, 46 transgender children under the age of 18 died by suicide in England. That data was not handed over willingly. The Good Law Project spent years fighting for it through Freedom of Information requests to the NHS-funded National Child Mortality Database. The government commissioned its own review in response. That review accounted for fewer than a third of the deaths the FOI data revealed. When challenged on this, Health Secretary Wes Streeting’s department fought tooth and nail to block every Freedom of Information request, often on spurious grounds. They did not want you to know. Deaths rose roughly fivefold in the immediate aftermath of the Bell v Tavistock ruling, with 22 trans children taking their own lives in a single year. The government called that figure dangerous misinformation. Then the data came out and confirmed it. J.K. Rowling wrote those books you loved. She also built a parallel career. She donated £70,000 to the anti-trans group For Women Scotland in 2024 after it lost its challenge to a Scottish law that legally recognised trans women as women. When the UK Supreme Court later ruled in that group’s favour she posted a photograph of herself with a cigar. The post read “I love it when a plan comes together.” That was not the end of it. She has since launched the JK Rowling Women’s Fund, a private organisation using her personal fortune to bankroll legal campaigns against transgender rights in workplaces, public spaces and what she terms protected female spaces. The Harry Potter franchise is estimated to be worth around $25 billion. She retains creative control over every adaptation. She is an executive producer on the new HBO series. Every ticket sold, every piece of merchandise bought, every streaming subscription taken out to watch the reboot feeds that fortune. The Good Law Project’s Jolyon Maugham noted that money earned from selling her books to children will be used to harm trans children. That is not an accusation. That is the financial reality of where this money goes. Forty-six families are not watching the trailer. You are allowed to hold both things at once. The books you loved as a child and the knowledge of what the woman who wrote them has done with the wealth they generated. Nobody is asking you to burn anything. We are asking you to be honest with yourself about the chain you are part of when you buy into this. The wizarding world taught a generation that it takes courage to stand up to powerful people doing wrong things. It would be a shame to forget that now.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ We do not yet know the full consequences of the puberty blocker ban. The data takes time to surface. The Freedom of Information requests take years to fight for. The government reviews come back incomplete and the real numbers have to be dragged into the light by lawyers and campaigners while ministers call it dangerous to even ask the question. We do not yet know the suicide rate of young transgender people in the years since that ban became permanent. We will find out. In time, as we always do, the data will come. And when it does we will be able to see clearly what this campaign has actually funded. Not women’s rights. Not child safeguarding. Not evidence-based medicine. This is a tragedy unfolding in the United Kingdom in real time. Children are living inside it right now. The Harry Potter trailer is everywhere and 46 families already know what it costs when powerful people decide that some children do not deserve care. History will not be kind to this moment.

@ItBeClaireZee Yes. Supports them as long as they don’t insist on entering women’s single-sex spaces if that’s not their sex.

Nah. She's been very clear on what she thinks of trans people.

@EPM106 And was she right?

she personally called me a man in a dress last year

@thenation @michaelwwaters Is it, though? Is it really? Or is it just a way to stop men cheating? It is, isn’t it? It’s entirely about preserving women’s sport from male incursion. You know it is, really. And did you also realise it’s 2026, the year people no longer have to talk nonsense to virtue signal?

The Olympics' new anti-trans testing regime revives some of the most discredited and discriminatory policies in the history of the games, says @michaelwwaters. bit.ly/41uI5H7

@Heccles94 First they came for the women and children, and I stand by them because it’s the right thing to do regardless of any poem.

First they came for the trans folk, and I stood with them, because I’ve read the rest of the poem 🏳️‍⚧️

@ScotNational Brian’s a great actor, but he’s misguided if he thinks Sturgeon needed anyone else to stitch her up. That is probably where her greatest competence lies.

NEW: The British state tried to 'stitch up' Nicola Sturgeon, acclaimed Scottish actor Brian Cox has said

@GBNEWS I think if you did some research, you’d find the ban also applies to men who don’t claim to be transgender. Plus, it doesn’t actually apply to women who do claim to be transgender. Other than that, top journalism.

Snooker becomes latest sport to ban transgender players from women's game gbnews.com/sport/snooker/…

@nyaraVT I’m shocked you never had any education. I almost couldn’t tell.

“Why does Nyara talk so much about trans kids” Because I was one. I know what it’s like to not have education, representation and a supportive environment. Because you’re lying about them. You’re abusing them. Taking away their housing, healthcare and cheer on their deaths.

@Theleftorwright @TransAndMerican The problem is that no matter how many transphobes you argue with, there’s about 8 billion others who also understand that sex is immutable and not determined by what someone identifies as. It’ll take ages to get round all of them.

@TransAndMerican Absolutely correct. Phew. Just came off arguing with a bunch of these... Transphobic idiots.

The trans panic will come to be seen as one of the most barbaric social institutions of the early 21at century

@TransAndMerican Exchange the word “panic” for “cult” and you’ve absolutely nailed it.

@BioinfoTools @winstonpeters Claiming an initiative designed to preserve the integrity of sex-based protections is “anti-trans” isn’t presenting an opinion?

@winstonpeters Can’t help noting replies miss or avoid the point: his 'argument' doesn’t say what his real objective is. That’s gutless & deceitful, really. If you want a thing, say it for goodness sakes. I just said it, that’s all. I didn’t present an opinion, note. Just said what he didn’t.

New Zealand First Member’s Bill that would ensure the biological definition of a woman and man are defined in law, has been drawn and will be debated in the House. This bill is not about being anti-anyone or anti-anything. This is about ensuring we as a country focus on the facts of biology and protect the term 'woman' in law. New Zealand First is the only party that campaigned on keeping men out of women’s sports, keeping men out of women's and girl's changing rooms, and we have received two petitions this term calling for protecting the term ‘woman’ in legislation. We were told at the time that we were going down a ‘rabbit hole’ and ‘on another planet’. But if you look at recent events, both internationally and in New Zealand, the pendulum is swinging back towards common sense and is proving us right. The Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill will provide clarity and consistency in New Zealand law by defining “woman” as “an adult human biological female” and “man” as “an adult human biological male” in the Legislation Act 2019. This Bill would ensure our country moves away from the woke ideology that has crept in over the last few years, undermining the protection, progression, and safety of women. The Bill will add new sections 13A and 13B to the Legislation Act 2019 to safeguard sex-based protections and the importance of sex-based rights. Our laws should reflect biological reality and provide legal certainty. These definitions in law fight back against the cancerous social engineering we’ve seen being pushed in society by a woke minority. The need for legislation like this shows how far the deluded left has taken us as a society. But we are fighting back. This bill is a win for common sense.