Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Here's a complete list of Commandments given by God in the law that doesn't require a temple or Priest, which makes them applicable for all today.
Are there any missing?
Which ones are too difficult for you to keep?
English
CCG BRYSON
53.1K posts
CCG BRYSON
@BrysonGray
Biblical Christian music artist. Support me below ⬇️ [email protected]
Murfreesboro, TN Katılım Aralık 2014
8.8K Takip Edilen362.8K Takipçiler
@FrankLets78822 @moody64556609 @ConnorDWillis Wrong. He never says no one meets those standards. He literally says the gentiles kept it…he even triples down on it in the chapter.
Please go reread it before making outlandish claims.
English
Romans 2:13 is part of Paul’s argument, not his conclusion. He says ‘the doers of the law will be justified,’ but then goes on to say no one actually meets that standard (Rom 3:10–12) and that by works of the law no one will be justified (Rom 3:20). So he’s not teaching justification by law-keeping, he’s showing why it fails and pointing to justification by faith.
English
If you think acts 10 is about food. It’s objective evidence that you don’t read context when you do Bible study.
Bob Cook ☧@Catholic_Bob
@dmsevoac @blk92izi @BrysonGray I dont know, I think Ill just trust Paul and the entirety of the early church over some random on X Thats just me
English
@FrankLets78822 @moody64556609 @ConnorDWillis That’s completely incorrect and is literally you taking it out of context.
Romans 2, he literally says you’re justified by keeping the law.
English
Circumcision is the issue Paul is addressing, but he explicitly expands it beyond that. In Galatians 5 he says if you accept circumcision, you’re obligated to keep the whole law, and then says those seeking justification by the law are severed from Christ. So he’s not limiting it to one act, he’s identifying a framework.
English
@FrankLets78822 @moody64556609 This doesn’t make any rational sense.
English
@moody64556609 @BrysonGray God is the one who says ‘what God has made clean.’ That’s not Peter’s interpretation, that’s the vision itself. Peter applies it to Gentiles, but the category shift comes from God.
English
Galatians is addressing requiring circumcision to be saved. Paul literally tells you this. The law doesn’t require that. Paul debunks every extra claim you have in Galatians 3:10.
So, either Paul a shizo that contradicts himself (and Jesus) or he’s taking about the specific thing being addressed.
English
That analogy doesn’t really fit though. Galatians 5 isn’t addressing a behavior like theft, it’s addressing a framework, seeking justification through the law. So the question isn’t ‘are people doing this behavior,’ it’s whether that framework is being taught or implied. That’s why I’m asking for a consistent standard.
English
@BrysonGray A unitarian claims the same thing
Stop denying history brother
U can’t find ur church in 2 or 3rd century
English
My denomination is what every apostle in the Bible practiced.
Maximus@Maximus733778
@BrysonGray Bro ur denomination started existing 100 years ago lol
English
People that post like this are the dumbest people alive and have 0 biblical knowledge
Zherka@ZherkaOfficial
Being a good person because God says so does not please God. You have been fooled by this teaching for thousands of years. The Old Testament is fulfilled by Jesus Christ. Every prophecy for thousands of years has pointed to a man coming to save us, Focus on him.
English
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
What’s a theologian to a church father? What’s a church father to the word of God?
open.spotify.com/track/2gGzY68l…
I think this is my favorite on the new album @BrysonGray
English
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
@FrankLets78822 God didn’t redefine anything. Gentiles came into the true faith of God which cleansed them. Pharisees said it was unlawful to associate with gentiles, which is obvious if you simply read the book of acts.
English
@BrysonGray Acts 10 is about Gentiles but the argument depends on God redefining ‘clean/unclean.’ Peter literally appeals to the food law and gets corrected.
English
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
You just admitted I was right then attempted to change the context.
MidnightMarauder ✝️@MDnightMarawder
“Acts 10 isn’t about food” is one of those takes that sounds deep until someone remembers the vision literally involves animals Peter thinks are unclean. Yes, the main point is Gentile inclusion. But the symbolism only works because God is dismantling the clean/unclean boundary Peter is operating with. So no, Acts 10 is not “just about bacon.” But pretending food has nothing to do with it is context cosplay. And Paul still exists: Romans 14, Colossians 2, 1 Timothy 4. The New Covenant does not bind Christians to Mosaic dietary law. That’s not “ignoring context.” That’s reading more than one chapter.
English
@ChrisLoesch @BoxeMag_com I see why people think it was an early stoppage but bro just got dropped, had wiggly legs, and was letting usyk use him as a punching bag.
English
@BoxeMag_com No. Rico would not have survived another round. The ref isn’t watching the clock, he’s saving the fighter.
English
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
CCG BRYSON retweetledi
