Arvind Sontakke IRS Rtd

@badrulhasan192 @INCIndia @abbas_nighat भाजपा ज्ञान शत्रु है. शोध खोज संशोधन विज्ञान शिक्षा की घोर शत्रु है ये #BJPRss. जिसका पीएम टेलीप्रॉम्प्टर है वो भारत के भविष्य को बर्बाद करेंगा.

@INCIndia @abbas_nighat

इन आंसुओं का हिसाब कौन देगा 👇

@mohitlaws @GauravGcomic This is comedy as well as the #Truth. Mr PM is ignorant about economy. Teleprompter PM Modi will destroy Indian Economy. पहले भाईचारा बर्बाद किया अब देश को बर्बाद करेंगा ये टेलीप्रॉम्प्टर मोदी .

This is brutal.😭😭 @GauravGcomic

Watch my video series on how the Modi Govt has destroyed Indian economy. First video tomorrow at 10am on all my social media channels. देखिए मेरी वीडियो श्रृंखला कि मोदी सरकार ने भारतीय अर्थव्यवस्था को कैसे नष्ट किया। मेरे सभी सोशल मीडिया चैनलों पर पहला वीडियो कल सुबह 10 बजे।

@TheIndian1954 @RahulGandhi

@Buddha22vows @RahulGandhi Sontakke, AN ITALIAN HOOKER’S SON IS NOT THE OWNER OF INDIA.

I have written to the Prime Minister recording my dissent from the CBI Director selection process. I cannot abdicate my constitutional duty by participating in a biased exercise. The Leader of Opposition is not a rubber stamp.

Post - (1/2) This is Shweta Sanjiv Bhatt, In an absolute travesty of justice, once again a politically motivated and blatantly vitiated trial was conducted in the lower sessions court Palanpur in a 28 year old case of 1996 … A case which was stayed by the Supreme Court in 2000, which was maliciously reopened by misleading the Gujarat High Court in 2018, a case to which we were never party to, a case of 1996 which was Sumersingh Rajpurohit (complainant) V/s State of Gujarat, which was maliciously and illegally turned to State of Gujarat V/s Sanjiv Bhatt in 2018 with the sole intention of framing and convicting Sanjiv Bhatt yet again for a crime he did not commit to silence his voice of truth. Yet again, in blatant disregard for due process of law and in a gross travesty of justice, Sanjiv Bhatt was convicted for a crime he did not commit … His only crime that he refuses to back down and continues to stand up against this fascist regime. Once again, we were subjected to a blatantly vitiated trial, where we were not allowed to call defence witnesses, where Sanjiv was not allowed to depose under oath and provide evidence in his defence, where once again the prosecution dropped vital witnesses and disregarded important documents and conducted a blatantly vitiated trial with the sole intention to falsely frame Sanjiv Bhatt and impose the highest quantum of imprisonment as expeditiously as possible so that he continues to languish in jail and his voice is silenced forever. A trumped up/fabricated case of drug planting was maliciously made against Sanjiv Bhatt even though, Sanjiv Bhatt never conduct the said raid, never seized the opium from the room, was never involved with the case or was ever party to the FIR. The Prosecutions fanciful fabricated tale of drug planting was concocted around two individuals, both of whom are dead and therefore cannot refute the prosecutions false narrative. Even though the FIR of 1996, named I.B. Vyas and Justice R.R. Jain as primary accused, the Regime at the behest of their political masters, in order to achieve their malicious means, turned the main accused, I.B. Vyas into an approver and wrongfully framed Sanjiv Bhatt for the alleged crimes and acts of I.B. Vyas. Despite Sanjiv Bhatt never having been part of the investigation on Sumersingh (complainant), despite Sanjiv Bhatt not having conducted the raid or having seized the opium, despite there not being any iota of evidence to corroborate the prosecution’s fiction and fanciful fabricated narrative … in a gross departure of justice, the lower sessions court Palanpur, today convicted Sanjiv Bhatt for a crime he did not commit. Such is the threat Sanjiv’s truth continues to pose to this regime that all powers to be, are being used to subvert the system to silence Sanjiv Bhatt. For all those people who will start opining without even knowing any details or facts of the case, please take a minute and read the facts. This would perhaps open your eyes to the miscarriage of justice being faced by a brave and diligent man for doing his duty with unwavering dedication. BRIEF BACKGROUND & FACTS OF THE CASE: 1) In 1996 Sanjiv Bhatt was posted as the District Superintendent of Police (DSP), Banaskantha. 2) On 30th April 1996 the district control room Palanpur received an anonymous tip at 6:10 am indicating that one Sumersingh Rajpurohit was illegally doing business of Opium and that he had brought 5 kgs of Opium to Hotel Lajwanti in Palanpur with the intent to distribute. 3) This information was received by Police Inspector (PI) I.B. Vyas, who carried out a raid on Hotel Lajwanti and recovered 1 kg and 15 grams of Natural Opium from room no. 305, which had been booked under the name of Sumersingh Rajpurohit. Based on the raid conducted and the opium seized by I.B. Vyas, Prohibition Crime Register No. 216/1996 was registered at the Palanpur Police Station. 4) Once the FIR was registered by I.B. Vyas, as per protocol, Sanjiv Bhatt, who was then the District Superintendent of Police (DSP), Banaskantha was forwarded the report alongside numerous reports from the entire district. 5) The entire investigation was carried out by I.B. Vyas who was a Police Inspector at the Local Crime Branch. 6) The opium seized by I.B. Vyas from the hotel room was sent for forensic examination at the Forensic Scientific Laboratory, where after thorough investigation of the sample it was concluded that the seized opium was Natural Opium not Prepared or Commercial Opium. 7) Upon investigation by Mr I.B. Vyas, it was revealed that one Mr. Sumersingh Rajpurohit of Pali had checked in the said room where the Opium was found. However, at the time of search, Sumersingh was not found and, therefore, the police personnel of Palanpur Police Station under the supervision of Mr. I.B. Vyas (Principle Accused), PI, LCB travelled to Plai Rajasthan and pursuant to informing the Local Pali Police, and with their assistance, arrested Mr Sumersingh Rajpurohit from Pali and brought him to Palanpur to question him in the FIR registered earlier by I.B. Vyas, who then put Sumersingh Rajpurohit under arrest on 3.05.1996. 8) The very next day on 4.05.1996, Sumersingh was produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate who granted remand of Sumersingh to the Local Crime Branch till 10.05.1996. On 6.05.1996 a Test Identification Parade was carried out;however, the witnesses could not identify Sumersingh. 9) As soon as this information reached Mr Sanjiv Bhatt, he immediately ordered Sumersingh Rajpurohit to be released from the Local Crime Branch even though the court had granted his remand to Local Crime Branch till the 10th. 10) It was upon Sanjiv Bhatt’s instructions that Sumersingh was released. Upon being apprised about the raid, the arrest of Mr Rajpurohit by I.B. Vyas and the subsequent identification parade in which the hotel staff was unable to identify Mr Rajpurohit, Mr Sanjiv Bhatt immediately ordered the release of Mr Rajpurohit and as the D.S.P ordered in writing that Section 58(2) of the NDPS Act should be immediately added to the report and it should be thoroughly investigated as to who brought and planted the opium to frame Mr Sumersingh Rajpurohit. This shows Sanjiv Bhatt’s bonafide and good faith. 11) It is pertinent to note that at no point in time was Mr Sanjiv Bhatt involved with the conduction of the raid or seizing of the opium. The only person involved was I.B. Vyas, who received the tip. Conducted the raid and seized the opium. 12) The prosecutions fanciful fabricated story 28 years later, in 2018 has tried to frame Sanjiv Bhatt for planting drugs to frame Sumersingh, a man whom Mr Sanjiv Bhatt had never met. Sanjiv Bhatt never conducted the raid, nor did he seize the opium from the room, nor was he part of the investigation against Sumersingh; In fact, it was Mr Sanjiv Bhatt who had sought for investigation in the matter of who had tried to frame Sumersingh Rajpurohit. 13) On 17.10.1996, 6 months after the incident, disgruntled Sumersingh Rajpurohit, being an influential person in Rajasthan filed a complaint against the State of Gujarat, Banaskantha Police, reporting against I.B Vyas and Justice R.R. Jain. It was Sumersingh’s contention that Justice R.R Jain had colluded with I.B. Vyas and had planted drugs in his name to pressure him to vacate the shop he was currently a tenant in which belonged to Justice R.R. Jain’s sister. 14) It is important to note that the FIR was, Sumersingh Rajpurohit vs State of Gujarat, Banaskantha Police all the way till 2018. In 2018 in order to maliciously frame Sanjiv Bhatt and silence him by wrongfully convicting him under trumped up charges, the case was overnight turned from Sumersingh Rajpurohit V/s State of Gujarat to State of Gujarat V/s Sanjiv Bhatt. 15) It is also important to note that the FIR lodged was against Justice R.R. Jain and Mr I.B. Vyas as the primary accused. The name of the entire Banaskantha Police was later added as per procedure/protocol. Mr Sanjiv Bhatt’s name was also added to the FIR only because he was in-charge of the Gujarat Police, Banaskantha at the time as he was the D.S.P (Superintendent of Police/Head) of the Banaskantha District. However, it is pertinent to note, the primary accused in the FIR were Justice R.R. Jain who is now deceased and I.B. Vyas who had conduced the raid and investigation against Sumersingh. 16) An inquiry was set up under the supervision of Mr. D.K. Dhagal, IPS. He conducted the inquiry and submitted a report to the State. The State of Gujarat diligently defended and protected the police personnel’s and filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan as well as preferred an Appeal in the Supreme Court of India to protect the police personnel of Gujarat. 17) The State of Gujarat, Home department and Legal Department passed various speaking/reasoned orders appointing Law Officers to defend the Police Officers in all proceedings arising out of this matter. The State had consistently held the position since 1996 that the officers of Gujarat Police were acting in good faith. 18) Furthermore I.B. Vyas as well as his team who had conducted the raid, seized the opium and had arrested Sumersingh were conferred with awards by the State of Gujarat for their diligent hard work. I.B. Vyas in numerous statements since 1996 has taken full credit for the raid and seizing of the opium as well as carrying out the investigation. No inquiry proceeding was ever initiated by the State of Gujarat against any of the members involved in the investigation/supervision of Palanpur Police Station 216/96. All the policeman and officers were granted timely promotions. 19) Pursuant to a thorough investigation by the CID/SIT, in 2000, an A-Summary Final report was submitted and the Supreme Court granted a stay on the matter and closed it on 13th May 2000. 20) In 2018 when Mrs Zakia Jafri appeal the Supreme Court to reinvestigate Modi’s role in the riots, the State machinery in order to silence and discredit Sanjiv Bhatt, who is the sole surviving witness to Modi’s complicity in orchestrating the Gujarat Riots, framed Sanjiv Bhatt in two nearly 30 year old cases fabricated cases to unlawfully detain him and persecute him for crimes he did not commit. His only crime that he stood up against Modi and spoke truth to power. 21) On 3rd September 2018, the Gujarat High Court was deliberately and maliciously misled by the State in believing that no investigation had ever taken place since 1996. The truth of the matter, that an investigation was carried out and an A-Final Summary report had been filed in 2000 was illegally and deliberately suppressed by the prosecution to maliciously mislead the court into re-opening a closed/stayed matter. 22) The fact that the case arising out of CR No.216/1996 of Palanpur Police Station was closed by filing an A-Summary report in 2000 under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C, was deliberately withheld and suppressed by the prosecution with the intention to mislead the Hon’ble Court into passing an order to investigate an already investigated and duly closed matter by the Supreme Court of India. Overnight, the case which was Sumersingh Rajpurohit V/s State of Gujarat was maliciously and illegally turned into State of Gujarat V/s Sanjiv Bhatt 23) It is pertinent to note that the Prosecution/State of Gujarat deliberately suppressed the facts from the Court about the petitions preferred by the State of Gujarat before the various High Courts and the Supreme Court protecting and defending the police officers right up till 2018. 24) Section 59 of NDPS mandates that previous sanction of the Union Government is required to investigate or prosecute; however, without any sanction to prosecute, pursuant to the aforesaid order, the State of Gujarat formed a SIT and under the pretext of questioning Mr Sanjiv Bhatt in a 28-year-old duly investigated and closed case, barged into his home in the early morning of 5th September 2018, detained him and subsequently illegally arrested him. 25) It is pertinent to note that without a Sanction to Prosecute, the State cannot investigate let alone, conduct a trial or prosecute an officer as it is legally not permissible; thereby rendering the trial as well as conviction illegal. 26) Moreover, 161 of the Bombay Police Act mandates that any actions against a Union Public Service Commission I.P.S Officer, should be brought within a year and not thereafter for any action in colour of duty or excess thereof. The unlawful detention and conduction of a trial in a 28-year-old case is a gross violation of the 161 Bombay Police Act, which was establish precisely to protect officers from changing and vindictive political regimes. 27) It is pertinent to note that the case was suddenly and unlawfully re-opened, and the State of Gujarat became adverse to the police personnel only in 2018. Hence, after consistently protecting the police personnel from 1996 to 2018, suddenly the State turned hostile against the very officers it was protecting since 1996 till 2018. 28) On 5th September 2018, the State barged into Sanjiv Bhatt’s home in the early hours of the morning and took him away under the pretext of questioning him in 28-year-old case and subsequently put him under arrest without any charge or cause. That was the last we saw Sanjiv Bhatt as a free man. 29) Mr Sanjiv Bhatt was maliciously framed and singled out and a fictional, fabricated case was set up for the first time after his arrest in 2018. 30) On 6th September 2018, the State sought for a 14 day remand of Sanjiv Bhatt. The 3rd Additional Civil Judge at JMFC Palanpur rejected the State’s demand for custody stating that no offence was made as the entire act of the State seemed to be politically motivated. It is important to note that the Add. Civil Judge was immediately transferred as punishment and the very next day prosecution maliciously acquired permission to take Sanjiv Bhatt into remand the very next day before even the opening of the court. While the State seized Sanjiv Bhatt in a 28-year-old case, they on the other hand, in his absence expeditiously conducted a blatantly vitiated trial and convicted him for life for a crime he did not commit. 31) Even though the main accused in this case was Mr I.B Vyas, the prosecution, to single out Mr Sanjiv Bhatt and wrongfully frame him, conveniently turned I.B. Vyas, the main accused into an approver despite the primary allegation being levied against Mr I.B. Vyas and the fact that Mr Sanjiv Bhatt was never part of the original complaint. 32) I.B. Vyas deposed against Mr Sanjiv Bhatt, parroting the prosecutions fanciful and fabricated narrative, which stands in stark contrast and contradiction to his own statements and depositions made since 1996 till 2018. As a reward for doing the prosecution’s dirty work, I.B. Vyas has been largely out of jail on multiple temporary bails from time to time. 33) Right up till 2018, all the sworn statements and testimonies of I.B. Vyas before the Investigating Officer (I.O.) of Pali Kotwali 403/96 as well as the questionnaire sent by CID (Crime) Rajasthan to the I.O, Mr I.B. Vyas all clearly stated, that that he (Mr I.B. Vyas) had led and conducted the raid and the subsequent investigation, and that Mr Sumersingh was never produced before Mr Sanjiv Bhatt nor did Mr Sanjiv Bhatt have any involvement in the case being handled by Mr I.B. Vyas. This fact was also mentioned and corroborated in the contemporaneous Case Diary of Palanpur City Police Station Cr No. 216/96. 34) However, in 2019, Mr I.B. Vyas, going against all his previous sworn statements, conveniently changed his narrative and parroted the concocted fictional story of the prosecution/State of Gujarat revolving around two deceased individuals, to exonerate himself and falsely frame Mr Sanjiv Bhatt. 35) Upon parroting the States concocted and fabricated story to frame Sanjiv Bhatt, Mr I.B. Vyas was immediately made an Approver by the Prosecution and was protected from undergoing a trial, despite the fact that Mr I.B. Vyas was the Principle Accused (Accused No.1) along with Justice R.R. Jain. 36) After 28 years a fanciful fictitious story was created by the Prosecution /State, wherein for the first time, in contradiction to all recorded testimonies since 1996, in 2018, the prosecution comes up with a concocted story to falsely frame Sanjiv Bhatt alleging that Mr Bhatt was a friend of Justice R.R. Jain, who is deceased and cannot corroborate the Prosecutions fanciful fiction. According to the prosecution, because of the friendship, Mr Bhatt helped Justice Jain to get the shop vacated from his tenant, Mr Sumersingh Rajpurohit. 37) The entire Prosecution’s case is conveniently based on fanciful fiction that Mr Sanjiv Bhatt procured a sample of opium through constable Malabhai Rabari, who died on 20/02/2018 and therefore cannot refute Prosecutions fictional fabricated story. 38) The prosecution has not been able to furnish any material evidence to substantiate their claims made in their fabricated story. 39) Fiction regarding the so-called criminal conspiracy is based entirely on fanciful conjectures and false statements induced from the other co-accused police officers who have been charge sheeted in Pali Kotwali Police Station CR No. 403/96. All these statements are contradictory to what they have stated before the investigating officer of Pali Kotwali CR No. 403/96 40) The entire prosecution case is based on the fiction that Sanjiv Bhatt procured a sample of opium from Agthada through Police Constable Malabhai Rabari (who died on 20/02/2018). This fiction was sought to be substantiated by the statement of then LCB PSI R.P Patel. The entire fanciful criminal conspiracy and procurement of Opium etc is sought to be established on the roles of Police constable Malabhai Rabari and Police inspector Nirmal Singh Gohil, both of whom are deceased. This has been done with deliberate malafide intent and has been entertained by the Officer of the Court. 41) The allegation of financing and procurement of narcotics were added to the charge sheet maliciously without the court’s permission. 42) Despite there being exhaustive Forensic and Chemical reports stating clearly that the sample seized was that of Natural Opium, the prosecution has blatantly tried to mislead the court into believing that the opium seized was prepared/opium derivate. This has been done with the malafide intent to unlawfully add section 21, which is not legally applicable in the present case. 43) Despite a clear court order disallowing the prosecution to add Sections 21 and 27A of the NDPS act to the charge sheet and despite it being unequivocally opined in the FSL (Forensic) report to Investigating Officer CID (crime) in 1996 that the opium seized was Natural Opium and not of opium derivate/prepared opium. The malicious addition of Section 21 and 27A of the NDPS act by disregarding a court order and misleading the court, were made by the prosecution with the deliberate intention to falsely frame Mr Sanjiv Bhatt for the highest quantum of punishment possible as well as to frustrate any bail application before the Supreme Court by wrongly bringing it under the purview of Section 37 of the NDPS act. 44) It is important to note the Judge who passed an order disallowing the wrongful addition of false charges against Mr Sanjiv Bhatt was unceremoniously and suddenly transferred out and overnight a new Judge was appointed in his stead. 45) The prosecution has not been able to provide evidence to substantiate or make out any of the sections wrongfully and maliciously added in the charge-sheet. 46) It was unlawfully ignored that the FIR dated 30/04/1996 was registered only for the commission of offences under section 17 of NDPS act, yet the prosecution unlawfully and falsely alleged commission of further offences which is legally not permissible. 47) It is important to note that the closure report was filed by the SIT on 20/02/2000 following which, the Supreme Court of India had closed the matter. In a blatant disregard for justice and in utter display of abuse of power, the court illegally tried the mater. 48) Despite the closure report being submitted by the SIT in 2000, it was only on 2nd October 2018, a month after Sanjiv was illegally taken from own home under the pretext of questioning him, that the SIT submitted a charge sheet narrating a fabricated and fanciful story unsubstantiated by any facts. 49) It is important to note that since 1996, the accused No. 1 in this case has been I.B. Vyas, against whom the FIR was filed in the first place and was the main accused. 50) It is pertinent to note that in 2019, the prosecution conveniently made the main accused, I.B. Vyas into an approver, using him to propagate their false narrative to falsely frame Sanjiv Bhatt for a crime which was committed by I.B. Vyas. 51) It is also important to note that none of the offences alleged by the prosecution have been prime facie made out against Sanjiv Bhatt nor has the prosecution been able to provide any material evidence to support any of the claims of their fabricated narrative. Despite there being absence of any substantial material evidence, the lower session court in absolute abuse of power and a gross departure from due process has convicted Sanjiv Bhatt, without any proof or evidence. 52) Despite the charge sheet being completely silent on the reasons for the alleged implication, a trial was conducted, which in itself is unlawful. 53) None of the assertions made in the A final report can constitute an offence u/s 19, 24, 27A of NDPS act as the quantity of Natural Opium recovered from hotel Lajwanti from the room booked by Sumersingh Rajpurohit was 1 kg and 15 grams, which is not commercial quantity and therefore, sections 19, 24, and 27A cannot be applied. 54) Moreover, the product seized was Natural Opium, which was confirmed and corroborated by the CFSL, Forensic examination and report dated 15.07.1996 and 23.09.1996. Therefore, Section 17 of the NDPS act is not applicable as it applies only to Prepared Opium and not Natural Opium, which is the product involved in the present case. 55) Moreover, Section 21 of NDPS is not applicable as it relates to manufacturing of drugs and there is no allegation nor is there any evidence for manufacturing of drugs. 56) Furthermore, Section 58 is not applicable as Sanjiv Bhatt never entered, searched, seized or arrested any person relating to this crime. The raid, seizing of the opium, arrest of the Sumersingh Rajpurohit as well as the subsequent investigation was carried out by I.B. Vyas, who was the main accused in this case, right up till 2019, when he was suddenly made approver and Sanjiv Bhatt, who was never party to the case was falsely framed using I.B. Vyas to parrot the prosecutions fabricated narrative. 57) Moreover, Section 116 is not applicable as there is no evidence to show that Sanjiv Bhatt gave I.B. Vyas any instructions. It is important to note that Sanjiv Bhatt is in-fact being framed and falsely prosecuted for the actions of I.B. Vyas who was conveniently turned approver by the State with malafide intent and did not face trail. 58) Furthermore, Section 167 of IPC is not applicable as Sanjiv Bhatt neither drafted the charge sheet neither the case diary, nor did he submit it as evidence in court which is prerequisite for constituting an offence under Section 167 of IPC. 59) Moreover, Section 204 of the IPC is not applicable as there was no allegation of destruction of any document made against Sanjiv Bhatt. In-fact the allegation of destruction of documents was made against I.B. Vyas, the main accused in the case, who was turned approver by the government to do their dirty work in framing Sanjiv for a crime he did not commit. 60) Moreover, offence u/s 465 and 471 of IPC cannot be made out as there is no evidence of preparation of any document by Sanjiv Bhatt which is necessary for constituting a offence under this section. 61) Therefore, as no material evidence to support section 465 and 471 IPC were produced by the prosecution, Section 120 B of IPC cannot be made out and the court cannot prosecute for offence of conspiracy. 62) The prosecution had intended to examine around 69 witnesses; however, only 19 witnesses were examined. Rest all the witnesses were dropped. This modus of objecting to the questions and recording answers as per the convenience of the Prosecution continued during the examination of 19 witnesses. 63) I.B. Vyas and other prosecution witnesses were openly and continuously tutored in open court by the Judge as well as the prosecution mid examination. drive.google.com/file/d/1ifZM7Z…

This is Shweta Sanjiv Bhatt, Today marks 7 years … 2555 days since Sanjiv Bhatt, an honest, upright officer, has been languishing in jail — wrongfully incarcerated for having the courage to speak truth to power! As I sit to pen down this post, I pause to wonder when we, as a nation, lost sight of what truly matters ....When did appeasing the fragile ego of a megalomaniac fascist take precedence over safeguarding the very soul of our country? Today, brilliant minds, honest souls, and courageous hearts languish in prison ...They are mocked, humiliated, and silenced by a judiciary that was meant to protect them, meant to deliver justice, not serve as a handmaiden to power. And so, we must ask ourselves: where did we, as a people, go wrong? And more hauntingly — is it too late to turn back? It takes unimaginable courage, resilience, and faith to stand alone against an entire system designed to crush you. Day after day, year after year, these heroes endure indignity, isolation, and suffering — yet refuse to bow down! The nation owes them a debt beyond measure …. And yet, instead of standing with them, we leave them to fight alone. Today marks seven years of Sanjiv’s unlawful incarceration …. Seven years stolen from a man whose only “crime” was to speak truth to power. Seven years during which the machinery of injustice has worked tirelessly to break his spirit. Seven years in which rapists, murderers, and lynchers walk free, while a man of conscience languishes in jail — his courage the only crime that keeps him there. As days bleed into weeks, weeks into months, and months into years, the mockery of justice continues. I often wonder, Who is to be held responsible? The totalitarian political duo that pulls the strings? The judiciary that bends its spine to serve power? Or the mute spectators who choose comfort in silence while injustice reigns? We, as a family have and will continue to fight for justice…. the question is, when will you find your courage to join the fight? When will you rise and say: Enough, is Enough!! This regime survives on fear. It thrives on cowardice, greed, and silence. But must we remain silent? Must we allow them to believe that we, the people of India, are cowards, spectators, shadows without voices? The time has come to prove otherwise. The time has come to raise our voice. Stand for the heroes who sacrifice everything — their freedom, their families, their futures — yet walk with heads held high and smiles on their faces! This regime has tirelessly tried to make every attempt for the world to forget these heroes, but we must not ... We cannot! For seven long years, Sanjiv Bhatt has stood alone, fighting quietly, courageously, against the darkest forces of power. He has endured what few of us could, with dignity and unshaken conviction. If there was ever a moment to defend those who defend truth, that moment is now… If there was ever a time to reclaim the nation’s conscience, that time is now… If there was ever a chance to prove that India still has brave hearts who will not bow to tyranny — it is now! It is time for us to show Sanjiv Bhatt that he is not forgotten …That he is not alone in his fight! The time to fight for justice is now!! #justiceforsanjivbhatt #FreeSanjivBhatt #EnoughIsEnough

देश के युवाओं के सामने एक गंभीर बात रखना चाहता हूँ। एक काम कीजिए - खुद Google कीजिए: “NEET 2024 की भयंकर चोरी के दौरान NTA का DG कौन था, और मोदी सरकार ने उसे आज कहां बैठाया है?” देखा? समझ आया? BJP इसी तरह आप जैसे लाखों मेहनती विद्यार्थियों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ करने वालों को इनाम देती है - उनकी रक्षा करती है, ऊपर से उन्हें तरक्की देती है। साफ़ है - मोदी जी और भाजपा आपके भविष्य की चोरी में ख़ुद साझेदार हैं। जिस बाज़ार में आपकी मेहनत, आपके सपने नीलाम हो रहे हैं, उसका एक ही उसूल है - जितनी बड़ी चोरी, उतना बड़ा इनाम।

शुभेंदु अधिकारी कितने बड़े वाले भ्रष्ट हैं, ये बात नरेंद्र मोदी बता रहे हैं. ये वीडियो 2016 का है. अब उन्हीं शुभेंदु अधिकारी को मोदी ने पश्चिम बंगाल का मुख्यमंत्री बना दिया है. मोदी का फंडा साफ है- खूब खाओ, मुझे भी खिलाओ.. जमकर भ्रष्टाचार फैलाओ.

मोदी जी ने कल जनता से त्याग मांगे - सोना मत ख़रीदो, विदेश मत जाओ, पेट्रोल कम जलाओ, खाद और खाने का तेल कम करो, मेट्रो में चलो, घर से काम करो। ये उपदेश नहीं - ये नाकामी के सबूत हैं। 12 साल में देश को इस मुक़ाम पर ला दिया है कि जनता को बताना पड़ रहा है - क्या ख़रीदे, क्या न ख़रीदे, कहां जाए, कहां न जाए। हर बार ज़िम्मेदारी जनता पर डाल देते हैं ताकि ख़ुद जवाबदेही से बच निकलें। देश चलाना अब Compromised PM के बस की बात नहीं।

@MahuaMoitra @IndiGo6E We must know culture of BJP. We must know mind controlling and manipulative, inhuman culture of BJP. Amit Shah orchestrated killings of Soharabbuddin Shaikh on 26-11-2005 and Tulsiram Prajapati on 28-12-2006. All killers exonerated by Bombay court. This is the culture of BJP/RSS.

This is BJP culture. Why is anyone surprised? I ignored it & went to my mtng from airport. Then people forwarded me video which the Sanghis were “viralling”. That’s when I called it out. @IndiGo6E tells me they need a formal complaint. Which I am sending.

@MahuaMoitra @IndiGo6E @RamMNK @DGCAIndia We support your initiative to complaint against those miscreants. Let us take this battle of self respect to its logical and legal end.

So here is the official complaint @IndiGo6E and @RamMNK @DGCAIndia - please inform me of action taken. Regards. (1/2)

वोट चोरी से कभी सीटें चुराई जाती हैं, कभी पूरी सरकार। लोकसभा के 240 BJP सांसदों में से, मोटे तौर पर हर छठा सांसद वोट चोरी से जीता है। पहचानना मुश्किल नहीं - क्या उन्हें BJP की भाषा में “घुसपैठिए” कहें? और हरियाणा? वहाँ तो पूरी सरकार ही “घुसपैठिया” है। जो संस्थाएँ अपनी जेब में रखते हैं, जो मतदाता सूचियों और चुनावी प्रक्रिया को तोड़-मरोड़ देते हैं - वो ख़ुद “remote controlled” हैं। उन्हें असली डर सच्चाई का है। क्योंकि निष्पक्ष चुनाव हो जाएँ, तो आज ये 140 के पास भी नहीं जीत सकते।

#churchservice #youthsports #sermon #champions #teamsports #sports #trending #viral #explore #foryou #education #motivation #community #indiawantsanswer #CitizenSurveillance

Leader of opposition #RahulGandhi on Wednesday launched a broadside against the #BharatiyaJanataParty, claiming that every sixth parliamentarian out of the BJP’s 240 MPs has won through vote theft. In a social media post on X, Rahul accused the BJP of keeping institutions in its pocket. Read here🔗toi.in/LUZiXZ76