Hockey Sense

2.1K posts

Hockey Sense banner
Hockey Sense

Hockey Sense

@BuildHockeySnse

Ice and video work led by Prep, MIAA, NCAA coaches. We help you: Build hockey sense. Maximize your skill set. Impact the game more. Reach your potential!

MA / NH / CT / Online Katılım Nisan 2019
1.9K Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
@ESPNRefNHL Fair point - I know everything is fast in the game but don’t you think icing is closer to offsides than penalties? If we review goals for offsides why is icing different?
English
0
0
0
4
Dave Jackson
Dave Jackson@ESPNRefNHL·
@BuildHockeySnse That would be an expansion of judgement calls being reviewed . I don't believe there's any desire for that. If you were able to review that play then what about a 50/50 hook, hold or interference leading to a goal? At that point it becomes reffing by video.
English
1
0
1
101
Dave Jackson
Dave Jackson@ESPNRefNHL·
Icing is not a race to the dots. Icing is a race to the puck, determined at the dots. 1st player to arrive at dot does not automatically win. Liney has to decide who will win the race to the puck, when first player gets to dot. The dot only initiates the decision-making process.
English
29
10
203
45.4K
Hockey Sense retweetledi
TJ Oshie
TJ Oshie@TJOshie77·
Love Newhook going to the hard areas and getting rewarded. But… I cannot stand these kids scoring goals and then blatantly skating by their teammates to celebrate alone. If you go through 5 guys and score then go ahead and do your thing. Any other scenario give your teammates some love. Especially in playoffs! #team
NHL@NHL

ALEX NEWHOOK OPENS THE SCORING JUST 1:36 INTO GAME 2! 📺: @NHL_On_TNT, @Sportsnet, & @TVASports

English
246
33
1.1K
681.9K
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
This is a very thorough and well-laid out take on the 5-in-5 for hockey. Not optimistic anyone in the NCAA will listen or care because they want standardization and only care about football / basketball but this makes a great case for an exception!
Jonesy@HedgeyeDJ

NCAA Hockey “5 in 5” Eligibility Position Paper Please find below a link to an extensive white paper addressing concerns around the proposed NCAA eligibility changes and their detrimental impact on ice hockey. Some key points from our paper: •The proposal would dramatically alter a decades-long development pipeline that has supported academic progress, competitive parity, and professional player development in NCAA hockey. •It would disproportionately disadvantage the 2006–2010 birth cohorts, who have invested substantial time and financial resources based on the existing, well-established pathway. •Many incoming freshmen could face material uncertainty in roster status, development trajectories, and long-term opportunities despite an implicit understanding between athletes, institutions, and the NCAA. •Sport-specific carve-outs are consistent with NCAA practice; men’s ice hockey already benefits from tailored rules for drafted players and extended enrollment deferrals. •The white paper advances policy alternatives that preserve the core intent of age-based eligibility reform while avoiding harm to players and families and preserving a development pipeline that demonstrably functions well. Full paper here: app.hedgeye.com/insights/18191… CC @KeithMcCullough @hedgeye

English
1
1
2
4.3K
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
Big European presence in 1st round of @ushl Phase 2 Draft. 8 picks followed by NAHL 3 NTDP, BCHL, NE Prep, MN HS, U18 2 each
English
0
0
1
344
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
@JhanHky Get near the net is also incomplete but better than go to the net….
English
0
0
0
59
Jack Han
Jack Han@JhanHky·
Soon on the Hockey Tactics Newsletter: Every player's heard "go to the net if you want to score." It's good but incomplete advice. I'll fill in some of the blanks.
English
2
0
16
11K
Jesse Marshall
Jesse Marshall@jmarshfof·
Excited about the playoffs. Also thinking of my friend, Stan Savran today. First trip back to the playoffs without him since he passed. He would have absolutely loved this matchup. RIP, buddy.
English
9
9
453
11K
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
@mc_mcvicar The two can be mixed together too - one program we worked in had a station in NZ and SAG in end zone. If SAG focused on underhandling players come out after shift, work on catch-shoot in isolation the go back in line for the game. Good way to marry the two together.
English
0
0
1
22
Jamieson McVicar
Jamieson McVicar@mc_mcvicar·
Is there still time to break down intricate fundamental skills with a coach individually? Yes absolutely. However, that should not be what your summer revolves around. Push comfort zones in a competitive environment, play games, win battles, have fun, be creative, etc.
English
1
0
0
164
Jamieson McVicar
Jamieson McVicar@mc_mcvicar·
Started thinking a bit recently about if I were to suggest a players ideal off-season plan to their family, what would it look like? Each players situation might be a little different, maybe it is weighted differently in some areas, just some food for thought. 🧵👀
Jamieson McVicar tweet media
English
4
0
7
1.3K
Hockey Sense retweetledi
Jamieson McVicar
Jamieson McVicar@mc_mcvicar·
I would encourage players and families to find an environment that supports the unpredictability and tempo in which they feel in games. Be around coaches who understand how to create that environment, understand how to add constraints, and understand how to get results.
English
1
2
1
378
Hockey Sense
Hockey Sense@BuildHockeySnse·
@Coach_Healy @mc_mcvicar Agreed! Definitely age / maturity dependent - also where a player is in their development. Esp with what their skill set looks like. A kid who just hit growth spurt may need more focus on skating posture, a kid about to move into checking balance, etc.
English
0
0
1
28
Coach_Healy
Coach_Healy@Coach_Healy·
@mc_mcvicar This is a good starting point and certainly worth a longer discussion. Like you say in the post. More of a guideline. Not a single perfect recipe for ALL player of all ages etc.
English
2
0
1
151