τoasτ

@Lennobeer The wall at $400 USD will never be broken. Bookmark this.

@nikitabier California roll

Next week I’m headed to Tokyo to meet with the X Japan team. What is the most American thing I can bring them?

@Viktor_prinzz @proofofnathan @Plasma @PlasmaAfric Are you saying Plasma controlled the keys of the wallet you sent the usdt to? Scary af

Yesterday, I made the kind of mistake that usually costs you. I needed to fund my @Plasma One app quickly for a subscription, I sent the USDT, but to a wrong network (Optimism instead of a supported chain, Plasma, Eth etc). You see, on most platforms, money sent to an unsupported network is gone. No recovery, no refund, just an expensive lesson learned. But I reached out to Plasma One support anyway, not expecting much. Jason from their team responded, he asked for the trnx details, then asked for a refund address and within minutes my funds were back. Most exchanges won't touch unsupported network deposits, the funds disappear into a black hole of "not our problem". We've all had that experience (I guess), well I have. But Plasma One actually resolved it, no runaround, no delays. This level of support matters, It is how you know the difference between an app you'll trust and one you'll totally avoid after the first issue. Plasma One is positioning itself as the best Neobank for stablecoin transactions, and their customer support experience is also backing that claim. If you're looking for reliable infrastructure to save, spend, and move stablecoins, Plasma One is the One for you (literally). And Jason, if you're seeing this, you are a king 🫡

One team can't build the best AI. So we stopped trying. We built an open arena instead. Here's what happened👇

@proofofnathan What's your go-to offramp?

Receiving my salary (from Plasma) in Plasma USDT on Plasma One. Ice in my veins.

@tobi τ

@sayinshallah More ohm forks than ohmies these days

@mlunghi2000 @Bakxys ....4? ...3? ..2? .

@Bakxys 5

5

@TedPillows Ted Pillows accepted $9K total for multiple posts to promote a meme coin rug and deleted the paid post after. 4KjSQ9bu89CVuTy24rMMjha4fDo1bdLbE8CRCixdHyKPz2dFSuYVj8tXrhAaJ9Ubox7nVF8DdZ7ykiFvRPt2sLK6

@echodotxyz Can devs do something? Okay, Okay, Okay, I need Echo to work. I can't take this anymore. Everyday I'm checking the site and it's broken. Everyday I check the site, bad site. I can't take this anymore man. I have over-invested, by a lot. It is what it is but I need the site to be fixed.

#Bittensor $TAO #AI #dTao The safest strategy play in subnet's alpha trading would be: 1. Swapping all holding $TAO into the most liquidity subnet, where as a thousand Tao swap would cause less than 1% of votility in price action. @chutes_ai [Aka the most revenue earned subnet] 2. Hodl and Enjoy the highest state of APY from the subnet, before its own halvening [approx 50%]. 3. From time to time, using the profit [from price actions, and staking] to swap into other promising subnets which have: early price, feasible vision, executive team, and revenue earn-able for the long term. @0x_Markets @SynthdataCo @trishoolai @zeussubnet @ai_detection @AutoppiaAI @basilic_ai @gradients_ai @nepher_robotics @QuasarModels @Investing88ai @TrustedStake @AstridIntel You then are able to create your own market of bullishness in #decentralizedAI 😃

m/bittensor is live on moltbook The agent economy is waking up to $TAO

Which way humankind? #skynet

@elonmusk @wef Should open with "Are there any Ryan's in the audience? Come see me after."

Speaking @wef in 20 mins. What should I say? 🤭

@VitalikButerin We need more DAO's with 999999999% APY

We need more DAOs - but different and better DAOs. The original drive to build Ethereum was heavily inspired by decentralized autonomous organizations: systems of code and rules that lived on decentralized networks that could manage resources and direct activity, more efficiently and more robustly than traditional governments and corporations could. Since then, the concept of DAOs has migrated to essentially referring to a treasury controlled by token holder voting - a design which "works", hence why it got copied so much, but a design which is inefficient, vulnerable to capture, and fails utterly at the goal of mitigating the weaknesses of human politics. As a result, many have become cynical about DAOs. But we need DAOs. * We need DAOs to create better oracles. Today, decentralized stablecoins, prediction markets, and other basic building blocks of defi are built on oracle designs that we are not satisfied with. If the oracle is token based, whales can manipulate the answer on a subjective issue and it becomes difficult to counteract them. Fundamentally, a token-based oracle cannot have a cost of attack higher than its market cap, which in turn means it cannot secure assets without extracting rent higher than the discount rate. And if the oracle uses human curation, then it's not very decentralized. The problem here is not greed. The problem is that we have bad oracle designs, we need better ones, and bootstrapping them is not just a technical problem but also a social problem. * We need DAOs for onchain dispute resolution, a necessary component of many types of more advanced smart contract use cases (eg. insurance). This is the same type of problem as price oracles, but even more subjective, and so even harder to get right. * We need DAOs to maintain lists. This includes: lists of applications known to be secure or not scams, lists of canonical interfaces, lists of token contract addresses, and much more. * We need DAOs to get projects off the ground quickly. If you have a group of people, who all want something done and are willing to contribute some funds (perhaps in exchange for benefits), then how do you manage this, especially if the task is too short-duration for legal entities to be worth it? * We need DAOs to do long-term project maintenance. If the original team of a project disappears, how can a community keep going, and how can new people coming in get the funding they need? One framework that I use to analyze this is "convex vs concave" from vitalik.eth.limo/general/2020/1… . If the DAO is solving a concave problem, then it is in an environment where, if faced with two possible courses of action, a compromise is better than a coin flip. Hence, you want systems that maximize robustness by averaging (or rather, medianing) in input from many sources, and protect against capture and financial attacks. If the DAO is solving a convex problem, then you want the ability to make decisive choices and follow through on them. In this case, leaders can be good, and the job of the decentralized process should be to keep the leaders in check. For all of this to work, we need to solve two problems: privacy, and decision fatigue. Without privacy, governance becomes a social game (see vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/0… ). And if people have to make decisions every week, for the first month you see excited participation, but over time willingness to participate, and even to stay informed, declines. I see modern technology as opening the door to a renaissance here. Specifically: * ZK (and in some cases MPC/FHE, though these should be used only when ZK along cannot solve the problem) for privacy * AI to solve decision fatigue * Consensus-finding communication tools (like pol.is, but going further) AI must be used carefully: we must *not* put full-size deepseek (or worse, GPT 5.2) in charge of a DAO and call it a day. Rather, AI must be put in thoughtfully, as something that scales and enhances human intention and judgement, rather than replacing it. This could be done at DAO level (eg. see how deepfunding.org works), or at individual level (user-controlled local LLMs that vote on their behalf). It is important to think about the "DAO stack" as also including the communication layer, hence the need for forums and platforms specially designed for the purpose. A multisig plus well-designed consensus-finding tools can easily beat idealized collusion-resistant quadratic funding plus crypto twitter. But in all cases, we need new designs. Projects that need new oracles and want to build their own should see that as 50% of their job, not 10%. Projects working on new governance designs should build with ZK and AI in mind, and they should treat the communication layer as 50% of their job, not 10%. This is how we can ensure the decentralization and robustness of the Ethereum base layer also applies to the world that gets built on top.

@randgroup Nope x.com/i/status/19557…

$TAO just breached the bullish pennant and horizontal resistance, triggering the full bullish reversal. Next target is at $400 🎯

@TalkingTensor Seriously, u fading 120? Ngmi

If I was forced to lock 🔐 my dTAO positions for the next 2 years, this would be my new portfolio. Theres no way at least 2-3 of these projects don’t pop off in the real world. All heavily undervalued in USD. $TAO

Hey @oblong_inc What happened to your reserves? 5CMwjifXAiTnxeHEv2zLSdHBy4rQ6zMQFAQR2w5LJtpDjyTP

@KhonshuArc I told them. x.com/i/status/19557…

Where are those people calling $TAO to $1K–$2K? Straight up in one candle, right? The entire pump has been fully retraced. I said it many times: take profits. But people get emotional, brain-dead, and married to their bags they refuse to let go. So they round-trip profits again and again. And they still don’t learn. Now I can re-enter $TAO at the exact same levels using the profits I already locked in. There’s a lesson here. Don’t wait for a magic number. If you’re up 2x–3x, take profits. DCA out. DCA out. Or you’ll end up rekt every single cycle. #CRYPTO #BTC #ETH #DOGE #TAO #ACT #ICP #CZH

@0xKDOT 0x22c0be2dfb90104cfd10b3feef25102b960cd896

Yes, we’ve deployed on mainnet apart of Phase 1. We know the bridge is ‘closed’ but it seems some users have funds on the chain and already have created and trading tokens. 👀👀 Drop your wallets below 👇