XANA

@Dougcotefx @RAZ0RFIST The difference is that left wingers and a lot of right wingers want to dance around the Jewish element. They'll criticize Israel or Netanyahu's government, but only a small subset will see the problem as Jewish by nature.

@RAZ0RFIST @CL_Xana I'm pretty certain trump's isreali chokehold can be quite vividly seen by just about everyone. Regardless of which political idol folks choose to worship..

I don't know what you guys aren't getting. Trump is a dictator. But also a king. But also a Nazi. A Nazi controlled by Jews, naturally. Oh, and also a Russian double-agent who protects his secret agent identity by peeing on Moscow hookers. See? It's simple.

@KenTKJapan @TobyTurner No American today would be upset about the word Yankee. One of my favorite children's songs growing up was Yankee Doodle, which is a silly song poking fun at Yankees. Maybe 200 years ago it was a charged word, but certainly not today.

@TobyTurner 🇺🇸 Yankee by Chat GDT アメリカでは意味が全然違って… 南部の人が北部の人を指す言葉（ちょっと皮肉っぽい） アメリカ人全体（外国人から見て） 海外では「アメリカ人＝ヤンキー」みたいに言うこともある 結論から言うと、あまり良い言い方ではないので使わない方が無難です。

I LOVE THE JAPS!!!

@doppelgangerung @RAZ0RFIST The guy in the keffiyeh is accepting of left wing globalist Jews who are less likely to be zionists. That's why they limit their complaints to Israel or Netanyahu. The keffiyeh guy has no problem with the Soros style Jews who fund events like No Kings protests.

@CL_Xana @RAZ0RFIST You think the guy next to you in the keffiyeh, shooting "globalize the intifada" is making a distinction between Israel and the Jews?

@RAZ0RFIST Only left wing Trump critics distinguish between Israel and the Jews, meaning you've mixed up your goombas. Only a subset of right wing Trump critics say he's Jew controlled.

@CL_Xana Ask someone at the No Kings rally if they believe Trump is a Nazi. And if they believe he is controlled by Israel. Well, would you look at that, Mario! A real, live Goomba. Get bent with your Reddit tier argumentative fallacy camouflage.

@ThunderStrzok1 @bar_caglar @VigilantFox No land was occupied, so this example only fulfills half of the challenge. Israeli borders have always remained intact, unlike Gazan and Lebanese territory.

@CL_Xana @bar_caglar @VigilantFox

A reporter asks Tucker Carlson if Israel has a “right to exist.” Tucker flips the question right back and asks her to define what “right to exist” means. And then this happened.

@ThunderStrzok1 @bar_caglar @VigilantFox To prove my point, I pose that you cannot identify which part of Israeli territory has been invaded and occupied by its enemies in the same way that Israel has invaded and occupied Lebanon and Gaza. Show me on a map which piece of land has been taken from Israel.

@ThunderStrzok1 @bar_caglar @VigilantFox He brings up Gaza and Lebanon to synthesize hus agreement with his belief in universal principles. If countries have a right to their border, Israel is a less interesting subject to study than Lebanon or Gaza when it comes to the right of countries to exist.

@AcademicAgent_X I suppose now would be a bad time to present you with my research.

I am FURIOUS to have been put in a venn diagram with Captive Dreamer. I must object. I am going downtown, I'm going to Mitch & Murray. I am taking this all the way to the United Nations!

@DGPsalm3 @AmericanReform_ @christopherrufo You misinterpreted my point. How is it coherent to look at so many of the broad social pushes made by the left, recognize that they were largely founded and propagated by Jews, as Prager does, and conclude anything other than that Jews created the left?

You completely missed Prager’s point that Jews are by their values “messengers.” Jews were disproportionately part of every “ism” — good and evil — because of that value system. Jews gave us the Old and New Testaments, too. Marx was raised Lutheran and was atheist his entire life. Stalin was not a Jew. Lenin was not a Jew. You want to trace back a drop of blood from his ancestors, so why shouldn’t we say Lutherans created Marxism?

I don’t believe the Jews caused all of America’s problems

@ThunderStrzok1 @VigilantFox You can see this in the way that she finds any piece of information she can use to conclude that Tucker is a zionist, even if a little. This was meant to pull him to the full zionist position of aggressive war and collective punishment, which Tucker refuses.

@ThunderStrzok1 @VigilantFox His antisemitism is something you ascribe to him, not something that he believes. He avoids the simple answer because he's familiar with how loaded the question is. If he gave the answer you wanted she would have used that to demand Tucker to support Israeli wars of aggression.

@ThunderStrzok1 @VigilantFox The problem with the question is the practical vagueness. Whether or not Israel has a right to exist isn't meaningful compared to what Israel has a right to do to defend its existence. Perhaps Israel has a right to bomb every country in the world to affirm its right to exist.

@ThunderStrzok1 @VigilantFox Tucker agrees that countries have a right to their borders by the end of the clip, when the interviewer finally decides to define what right is meant by the question. The problem is that people who ask about Israel rarely mean anything so concrete.

@DGPsalm3 @AmericanReform_ @christopherrufo Prager says Jews created Marxism, socialism, humanitarianism, environmentalism, feminism, and egalitarianism in the post you're responding to. Frankly, I don't care if he wants to draw the line at 'Jews created the left'.

Dennis Prager and Ben Shapiro say that Jews didn’t create the left. So now you have a problem. These are the types of problems you run into when you’re retarded. You think one woman nearly no one has ever heard of represents all Jews. 63% of Jews voted for Kamala Harris, but many of those are atheists. 63% is not that big of a number when compared to other groups. In contrast 75% of Orthodox Jews voted for Trump. Trump did better among Orthodox Jews than he did among Catholics (Trump only got 61% of Catholics).

@ThunderStrzok1 @VigilantFox What rights are we affirming Israel to have? The right not to be killed? Sure. The right to wage aggressive war on all of your neighbors and strongarm America and the world into your conflicts? That's harder to sell.

@VigilantFox Tucker has no problem saying Lebanon has a right to exist and Gaza has a right to exist, but when it comes to Israel, Tucker has no idea what a right to exist is.

@ramzpaul How is it that you consistently adopt Fuentes' positions about 6 months after he does while maintaining absolute disdain for the guy?

I refuse to vote for anyone that is antiwhite or accepts AIPAC money. As such, I probably won't bother to vote.

@ThunderStrzok1 That's because political need determines how effective the use of military might is. US could rain bombs on Antarctica, achieve every goal, destroy every desired mountain, and all that would be accomplished is that the missile stockpile is depleted because it wasn't necessary.

@CL_Xana Your comment reinforces my belief that many people are unable to separate the political need for the war and the military success of the war.

Am I a unicorn? I acknowledge the war with Iran is going very well for the U.S. and allies, but I still have doubts the war was necessary in the first place. Are those thoughts contradictory, because it seems I’m the only one that has no problem holding both of them.