CSL

@michaeljknowles Got any new data? This is pathetic. I’m not telling the biological daughter of my friends she shouldn’t exist and I’m not supporting people who feel that way.

Two in five children raised by same-sex couples describe challenging in trusting other people (Goldberg, 2007).

Children of LGBT parents fare worse on 77/80 social outcome measures (Regnerus, 2012). They're 35% less likely to make normal progress through school (Allen, 2012). They suffer emotional problems at twice the rate of children raised by a mother and father (Sullins, 2015). Etc.

@BBMagaMom Seems like we found the bitch, though and pro tip, it’s not her.

Rosa DeLauro…the purple-haired, finger-wagging 83-year-old Congresswoman who’s been in DC since 1991, and still screaming into microphones with that permanent pissed-off scowl like it’s her full-time job. Married to big-time Dem pollster Stan Greenberg, both of them raking in elite money while she lectures everyone about “working families.” Funny I always thought she was a Les…Nevermind…. We know who wears the pants in that marriage. She’s the epitome of the liberal white woman: blue hair since before TikTok, permanent scowl, and zero accountability. Remember when Hurricane Irene hit her Connecticut district? She was chilling in a luxury Italian hotel. The Hartford Courant literally gave her an F, her response? “No apology for taking a vacation.” 🤦🏻‍♀️ 35+ years of this and what do her voters get? More spending, more rage, more memes. America’s favorite out-of-touch Democrat grandma. Change my mind. 😂🔥

@BBMagaMom This is how “conservative Christians” act? You’re disgusting.

Proof for everyone melting down in my comments: Yes, Rosa DeLauro is married. Here’s her and her husband, longtime “political strategist” Stan Greenberg. Let that sink in. Someone actually looked at that and said “I do.” The man deserves a medal… or a therapy bill. 😵‍💫😬

@megbasham @BrandonStraka @MattWalshBlog Do you want socialism?

Brandon I like you and appreciate the efforts you’ve brought to the party. But gay marriage is down 8 points with young people. It’s down 15 with Republicans since just 2021. The reason is because we are starting to see the rotten fruit of Obergefell— babies without a mother or father. And people are rightly repelled by that. Children need and co deserve a mother and a father.

Here's another "former liberal" who showed up to the conservative movement 10 seconds ago and now demands that we accept abominations like gay surrogacy, and then calls us "retards" if we dare to advocate for the conservation of marriage and the family, as we always have. I'm really getting sick of the "former liberals" barging into the movement and trying to set the ground rules. If you have this kind of contempt for the basic tenants of conservatism then guess what? You aren't a former liberal. You're a current liberal.

@MattWalshBlog Rage baiting whore

Absolutely evil and disgusting

@devahaz She’s disgusting. Full stop.

You called Americans who spoke Spanish poorly “whitey mcwhiterson”

@Riley_Gaines_ Is there a stupider person with a platform?

God hates sin, not the sinner

@AThinksAloud Why do you guys act like he was a saint? He texted pretty antisemitic stuff and he had some very questionable friends like John Mappin?

I sometimes wonder if Charlie Kirk was a bit naive about the corruption in politics and how utterly debased so many people in those political circles are. Perhaps his romantic feelings about the United States, our founding, our Christian roots were coloring his perspective on reality. Or maybe he absolutely knew, but just felt that God would protect him, and he was on a mission and would charge forward fearlessly in faith and obedience to his calling. It reminds me of evangelical missionaries who go on the mission field to dangerous places, befriending tribe members and believing that they are safe and will be successful at converting the tribe, only to wake up one day riddled with arrows. I'm not suggesting that Charlie was killed by politicians, BTW. I am saying that many people he trusted were pushing forward an agenda that is the antithesis of everything he believed in, and have trotted out his corpse like it's Weekend at Bernie's to push forward a post-liberal, authoritarian and antisemitic agenda backed by Alexander Dugin. All while trying to destroy the organization he built, and the peace and safety of the wife he left behind. This is unfathomable betrayal that I highly doubt he saw coming. I'm also not saying Charlie was not fulfilling his calling, or that he should have stayed away anymore than I would say that about a missionary. But I do think that sincere Christians who entangle themselves with politicians or other powerful people are putting themselves in a dangerous position, not unlike a missionary who travels to a remote jungle. Because let's face it, many people involved in politics are not civilized. They are, in fact, barbarians with medieval beliefs, no morals and wicked intentions. I would put Tucker in that bucket along with anyone who remains supportive of him at this point, especially politicians.

@kenyon_burnham_ @PhilWMagness @jmhorp Infers is the opposite of implies. Please learn this.

@PhilWMagness @jmhorp Sorry, but what’s the “gotcha” here? That it’s an AI image? I don’t see anywhere in the original tweet that claims or infers that this is a historical image, but rather a lifestyle that all Americans should have the financial freedom to pursue.

🧵Yesterday, a Vance-aligned group called the Bull Moose Project posted this viral picture of an old farmhouse on sprawling acreage, purporting to illustrate how once-common rural housing became unaffordable in the United States. I did some digging into the photo...

@Midwesthomo77 Cater to me, but not that way.

I support your sentiment, but can we please stop using LGBTQ+ when we are specifically talking about same-sex couples and families headed by those couples. Not all gay people identify with the LGBTQ+ community and want nothing to do with it. It's not an inclusive term, in fact it's quite EXCLUSIVE because it leaves out a whole swath of gay people, the very people who started the movement in the first place. And don't come at me with how transgender people were such a part of the early gay rights movement. They weren't.

@KurtSchlichter Ah, the classic standoff: Loyola v. Georgetown.

Ted is a terrible lawyer

@MeghanMcCain @BrentScher Are you going to address Tucker and Buckley trashing your father? It’s needed.

If you live in Virginia, remember to vote NO on the communist takeover of elections today.

@SethDillon At what point is it fair to ask why Charlie was friends with this freak Mappin? Are we just not doing that? Or is their purported friendship a misrepresentation of reality?

These people are insane.

@frandalorian He’s too stupid. Don’t waste your time.

The constitutional protection would be the 14th Amendment, especially the Equal Protection Clause, which prevents states from treating people differently without a strong justification. So if a state allowed surrogacy for straight couples but banned it for gay couples, it would be unequal treatment based on sexual orientation.

@influencertrash @BottleBell @AlexBerenson @jordanbpeterson Do you know when the warnings were added? Post it here. As someone who was prescribed these in my 20s in a very vulnerable situation, you’d like to think you could trust your doc to give you the necessary information. 40s me is way less naive, but the regulations are updated too.

@BottleBell @AlexBerenson @jordanbpeterson He went to Harvard for psychology. Credentialed in addiction. What? “Unable to taper as prescribed”means you’re addicted. Maybe only physically. is being an addict a character defect? Obviously you think so. Meds come with the side effects. Klonopin has a black box warning.

Like I said, I don't know what is happening to @jordanbpeterson now. But I do know his daughter is 1: waving off his earlier benzo dependency as unlike a street drug addiction 2: lumping SSRIs in with benzos as "psych meds" The second point in particular is dangerous and misleading. The first is more self-serving, but it links to the second by encouraging viewers to focus on the prescription status of benzos rather than why they are used - a core problem with drug policy. The fact Matthew Perry got his ketamine from doctors didn't stop it from killing him. I didn't ask Peterson's daughter to say anything. As far as I know, no one did. But her video has been viewed millions of times, and if she is going to make strange medical claims that may discourage people from using SSRIs - which are NOTHING like benzos - I am not going to shy away from challenging medical misinformation.

@JudyinCanada1 @GayPenguins1 We’re not operating American law and policy on what you think is a “sin.”

If homosexuals were meant to have children, they would be capable of having them. Yes, homosexuality is a sin. If you don't like that, then your argument is with God, not the people who believe. The good news is that it is something you can overcome. Lots of people, with God's help, left the homosexual life behind them.

Matt Walsh (and a good number of other "influencers") do not just have a problem with gay's adopting or getting married. They literally hate that gays exist. It is "sin" in their world view. Which I am ok with them holding. I'm not ok with them trying to push it as public policy.

@GayPenguins1 Amen

@cmwrawcliffe @N81568Lynn @Liz_Wheeler Were you always a fascist?

@CSL4q @N81568Lynn @Liz_Wheeler Then she is risking severe long and short term health consequences that are three times higher than if she is carrying a child she is related to. And legal action if the property of the commissioning parents doesn't make it to term.

No, gay men should not to allowed to buy babies via a surrogate. No, single straight men should not be allowed to buy babies via a surrogate. No, single women shouldn’t be allowed to buy babies via a surrogate. No, married heterosexual couples shouldn’t be able to buy babies via a surrogate. Is that clear enough for you? Surrogacy commodifies a baby, reducing the child into a product to be purchased, grossly violating that child’s human dignity. Surrogacy then robs the baby of mother and/or father, all to gratify adults who think their desire for a child trumps the wellbeing of the child who deserves an intact natural family. Surrogacy in all circumstances is a gross violation of natural law. It should be illegal. This should not be a controversial opinion.

@MattWalshBlog Tenants? You’re such a dumb fuck. Take a break and go to college.

@buckleycarlson It’s still a binary choice, dumb fuck. And you’re on the wrong side.

"Just to be clear," intoned every fragile, self-reverential, insecure pompous ass in memory. No. It was a binary choice... & Cackling Kamel-Toe would have left our border open. But we still would have fought Israel's war on Iran. Exactly as we would have, earlier, if your father hadn't thrown '08. @MeghanMcCain