Chris Schroeder

6.8K posts

Chris Schroeder banner
Chris Schroeder

Chris Schroeder

@CSchroeder125

Proximity is the essence of purpose - the particle; perfection of change (function). Distance is the essence of dreams - the wave; perfection of unity (form).

Katılım Haziran 2014
152 Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
Arthur Schopenhauer
Arthur Schopenhauer@SchopenhauerNow·
“Life is a constant process of dying.”
English
1
0
4
283
Math Files
Math Files@Math_files·
23456789 is the greatest prime number formed by digits in strictly increasing consecutive order.
English
3
2
7
329
Kekius
Kekius@kek_savior·
Schizophrenia is a mental illness, the ultimate form of delusion. Patients often believe in things that are completely untrue but with extreme intensity.
Kekius tweet media
English
61
3
98
2.9K
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
Who's to say that consciousness doesn't possess its own innate quality that draws matter towards it, like donning armor (containment). I refer to this as the 'Gravity of God'. Continuing the armor analogy, it's like THACO (D&D) in that it concerns itself with anti-probability.
Atlas Press@realAtlasPress

"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." —Max Planck

English
0
0
0
10
Natural Philosophy
Natural Philosophy@Naturalphilosy·
“I recognize no obligations toward men except one: to respect their freedom and to take no part in a slave society.” — Ayn Rand
Natural Philosophy tweet media
English
6
12
123
5.7K
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
@DanielvsBabylon Welcome to the "Wobble", we got fun and games. We got everything you want, honey, we all know the names. We are the people that can find whatever you may need. If you got the money, honey, we got your disease.
GIF
GIF
English
0
0
0
25
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
I agree on invisible tethers (I refer to them as "Null-threads" in my work), but find myself drawn these days to more metaphorical mathematics. It helps my comprehension better than weighty formulas and principles. I could try to quote QCD theory, which has the answer, but is vulgar in its extrapolation. I'll consider working on my articulation, particularly because this is a worthwhile pursuit. Be open though, You/we/all (in the specific) might need to adjust away from traditional thinking approaches and go back to the "intuitive stage" of understanding. Simply stated, math will always "math" itself away when chased, therefore we need to "jump" the logic and get ahead of it to capture the wisdom (i.e. letting the understanding run us over, un-observed, like the train in the trolley problem).
GIF
English
0
0
0
2
MotionMountain - Physics for Others
@CSchroeder125 @Rainmaker1973 Below is Dirac's explanation for the spin-statistics theorem for fermions, in simple terms: objects with tethers have spin 1/2 and are also fermions. Just imagine that the tethers are invisible. I collect alternative explanations. If you know a paper about yours, I'll cite it.
MotionMountain - Physics for Others tweet media
English
1
0
0
6
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Golden ratio unfolds [🎞️ infinite intellect]
English
19
368
2K
207.3K
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
This is the titular variance between the essence of what makes a "Champion" and what makes a "Hero". A champion is a pioneer of novelty, the first (new) steps for mankind to observe and applaud. A hero is one who embodies all the steps NOT being applauded, a pioneer of underappreciation. I'm quite a fan of heroes, but under no circumstance would I ever tell that to my Hero.
English
0
0
1
52
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
@isjuustadream I want the rate at which I find myself in a state of "wanting" to be reduced... 😬
English
0
0
0
18
Everything
Everything@isjuustadream·
Did you want more than this? What more can you possibly ask for??
English
5
1
14
712
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
@DanielvsBabylon ... and we all applaud the darkness, with varying degrees of unveiled understanding and enthusiasm.
GIF
English
0
0
0
20
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
@MotionMountainP @Rainmaker1973 Sorry, you've got to seek from this point on. The workloads of this conversation must be balanced, but if you're asking these types of questions I think you'll find the answers (soon).
English
1
0
0
5
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
When I die I hope I do so while wearing only one boot, while the other foot is left bare.
English
0
0
0
1
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
x.com/i/status/20393… Does this help? This is the same logic as the original post but perhaps more intuitive because it uses a 3D model. Each 90 degree "step" commits to the dimensional layering. In this cuboidal design, 8 steps (720) degrees produces a full "dimensional jump" from the original source (i.e. turns the cube into a tesseract). Explanation: Imagine a Rubik's Cube Original Design = 1 cube 1 x 1 = 1 (treat this as homebase; 'h'). Every time the cube rotates 90 degrees (r) it falls on a new side, and whenever it falls on a new side the # of cubes (h) doubles (1 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 8...). How many rotations (r) would it take to create a Rubik's Cube (3x3x3)? 0th Dimension (1 point/cube; dot) 1D (2 points/cubes; line) 2D (4 points/cubes; square) 3D (8 points/cubes; cube) ------------------------------------------ 4D (16 points/cubes; tesseract) <-- 8 points within; 8 outside. 5D (32 points/cubes; ... hyperspace+) <-- 16 points within; 16 points outside. ... etc. 8 (rotations) is the solution. 8*90 (degrees) = 720. Hence, my original statement that two full turns (2*360 degrees) produces the explanation for spin-1/2 particles, as presented by Fermi-Dirac. If you know what a "gimbal lock" is, it's similar to that (but I won't bore the details). NOTE: I chose "h" specifically because of it's relevance to Planck's Constant (h) and Limit. Instead of growth, imagine (h) being so small that there is no more "stuff" to reveal (i.e. return to original design). Does the pattern end? Not really, we just trade "unveiling" to "unravelling" when quantum foam gets messy. Sloterdijk provides an excellent explanation on it in his "Spheres" trilogy.
Mathematica@mathemetica

6 × (1² + 2² + … + n²) = n(n+1)(2n+1) No algebra. Just glowing acrylic blocks stacking into pure geometric perfection.

English
1
0
0
15
Chris Schroeder
Chris Schroeder@CSchroeder125·
@LensScientific Acceptance is 'choosing' to "roll the dice". Realization is 'acceptance' of "outcomes". Knowledge is 'realizing' that you rolled a "6". Understanding is 'knowing' that there are "six sides". Wisdom is 'understanding' when to "roll the dice".
GIF
English
0
0
1
26
The Scientific Lens
The Scientific Lens@LensScientific·
Any fool can know. The point is to understand. — Albert Einstein
The Scientific Lens tweet media
English
28
110
451
10.5K
The Fourth Way
The Fourth Way@The4thWayYT·
be gentle, its my first time on earth
English
6
9
58
2.4K