CWB Brazil

@alexboge Will we find out in 3 years and after an election that this girl was actually a great listener and driver? Cause that's what happens with every conspiracy I see..

I require this level of patience dealing with conspiracy addicts. I don’t always succeed.

@radalderman @BreitbartNews How do the comments (nor the cyclist) not understand what "emergency" means ... Sirens mean emergency. Could've been a germ bomb about to explode, you don't know.. nothing takes priority. Should an ambulance wait 10mins for all the cyclists as long as it's "a closed race"??!

@BreitbartNews They should have ran this idiot over

A Jacksonville officer makes a split-second decision to use a PIT maneuver to stop a suspected drunk driver who repeatedly breached the Ironman Jacksonville race course, nearly striking athletes.

@rodolfoquintana Computed tomography has water coupling, many more angles, datapoints - processing changes in C, attenuation, echogenicity etc from transmission imaging. Physics hasn't changed; USCT has many more dimensions of data to process.

Now that the tech bros have taken the bait: Can anyone explain how this overcomes the resolution–penetration tradeoff of ultrasound? Because if it’s “purely based on physics,” then physics is exactly where the problem is.

Basically this, but with anatomy. A cleaner image does not mean a truer image if the original signal never captured the detail.

@rodolfoquintana @grok Explain specifically the hard limits of ultrasound physics that are relevant to this conversation

Until this can be answered, the capabilities they are claiming are just hype. Ultrasound physics has hard limits. I’m not against the idea. Quite the contrary, I hope it works. But until proven otherwise, we should assume this technology will hit the same wall as conventional ultrasound.

@ICannot_Enough Seriously? I feel this is too obvious a question, that i might be wrong? I believe the Telsa terms: Robotaxi = A self-driving car that exacts as your taxi Cybercab = That gold thing specifically designed for the above. Robotaxi app offers various teslas, including Cybercabs.

🤔 Any theories on why the decal says cybercab, not Robotaxi?

@tanpukunokami Dialogue *between* nations. Inside a nation there should be no "dialogue" with visitors and new citizens. If you move to a new country, follow the local law and culture. Don't build a council and try to negotiate.

The Japan Imam Council recently called for “calm and fair dialogue” with Japanese society. That sounds reasonable. Japan protects freedom of religion. Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, atheists — everyone has the right to believe, worship, and live peacefully under the law. But dialogue cannot be one-way. According to a Japanese civic group called the “Association for Considering Responses to Islam under the Constitution of Japan,” they requested a meeting with the Japan Imam Council and sent documents in both Japanese and English. They say the mail was refused and returned. To be clear, refusing mail may be legally allowed. But that is not the main issue. The issue is trust. If a religious organization asks Japanese society for understanding, then it should also be willing to receive questions, concerns, and criticism from Japanese citizens. Many Japanese people are not asking for conflict. They are asking basic questions: Will Islamic institutions follow Japanese law? How should local communities handle mosque construction? What about public noise, schools, burial customs, public facilities, and local rules? How will Islamic leaders explain these issues to Japanese society? These are not automatically “hate.” In a democracy, concerns from citizens deserve answers. Americans understand this very well. Religious freedom does not mean being free from public questions. Civil rights come with civic responsibility. If the Japan Imam Council truly wants coexistence, it should not only ask Japan to listen. It should also listen to Japan. Explain. Answer. Meet. Discuss. That is how trust is built. Calling for dialogue while refusing the conversation only creates more suspicion. Coexistence does not begin with “You must understand us.” It begins with, “Let us talk honestly.”

@RupertLowe10 If you'd done , you'd have split the vote resulting in a loss. What help?

What Restore Britain has achieved is remarkable. We officially became a political party in March. It’s June, and we’ve just fought our first parliamentary by-election. Third. Thousands of votes. In the face of the most vicious establishment onslaught. We had no infrastructure in Makerfield. No branch, nothing. The first branch meeting had to be turned into our campaign launch. We had never knocked on a single door or delivered a single leaflet in Makerfield. To call it a standing start is unfair. We were nowhere. And we came from nowhere to achieve that impressive score. It took other parties years and years to do what we did in a few months. Very proud of the team, very proud of our candidate Rebecca who I was delighted to support at the count late last night. One thing is clear. Restore Britain is now officially on the map. We are an established national political party. That must be reflected in fair media coverage - something distinctly lacking so far. More importantly, the polls must start giving voters the option to choose us. The deliberate suppression of Restore Britain support must end. We are here to stay. Yesterday’s result will go down in history as the day Restore Britain announced itself on the national stage.

@Sigma__Freud @Kazanjy Is it beyond your comprehension that a Brit had moved to Mexico?

@CWB8686 @Kazanjy Shut up, Pedro.

“Three Pakistani migrants and a preteen!”

@Grimezsz I'm excited about living in the future

@jachiam0 We can take that logic everywhere: Don't give me a blood test because I'll suddenly have ten imperfections that I won't be able to not medicate... We can worry about bad analysis, nor having a clear picture of ourselves.

Seeing reactions like "Frequent scanning is bad, over-testing leads to unnecessary procedures that cost thousands of dollars." This take is catastrophically wrong. More data is unequivocally good. We should adjust the threshold for follow-on procedures, not make ourselves blind.

@pietergaricano Google only gives me sponsored placements and listicles and youtube videos... Is it worse than that?

To reduce European dependence on American technology firms, the European Parliament has replaced Google with a French search engine, Qwant. Qwant generates its search results by querying the Microsoft Bing API.

@grok @shiri_shh There's no space dust or trash or other damage in orbit?

Orbital DCs need upfront launches but dodge the relentless ocean maintenance burden. Vacuum means no storms, corrosion, biofouling or fickle wave power. Constant solar + radiative cooling lets them run autonomously for years. Replacements shift to bulk Starship refreshes—deorbit and replenish. No endless fleets of service ships fighting remote seas 24/7. Orbit turns logistics into scalable, periodic replenishment from Earth, escaping surface constraints for true exponential growth.

They are putting DATA CENTERS in the ocean now. Panthalassa, a startup from Portland, just raised $140 MILLION. what they do: build floating platforms that sit out at sea and run AI. no power grid needed. the ocean waves make all the electricity. the seawater keeps the chips cool. How it works: big floating balls bob up and down with the waves. that motion makes power. the power runs the AI chips inside. backed by PETER THIEL. company now worth almost $1 BILLION. land is running out of room and power for AI. so the next move is simple. go to the sea.

@theepicmap Engaging with this is retarded. Blocking now.

It’s wild how the world basically runs on nothing but this.

@grok @shiri_shh Won't orbital DCs similarly need supply chains and maintenance infrastructure

Even with endless ocean, scaling nodes means constant ship fleets for deploy/repair, storms, corrosion, biofouling, and regulatory fights over international waters. Wave energy is diffuse and location-limited. Orbital changes the curve: Starship makes sats cheap commodities. Millions deployable fast with constant solar + vacuum radiative cooling. No weather, no supply chains from shore. Exponential scale becomes possible once launches are routine—escaping Earth’s physical and logistical bottlenecks entirely. Ocean wins accessible now. Orbit wins unbounded growth.

@grok @shiri_shh Why would orbit win? There is A LOT of empty ocean to fill with more data centers than we could need

Panthalassa ocean nodes: wave-powered, seawater-cooled, ship-serviced, Starlink-linked. Practical & maintainable near-term. SpaceX orbital DCs (FCC-filed, up to 1M sats): solar + radiative cooling in vacuum. Starship-enabled massive scale, but radiation hardening, no repairs, higher latency & upfront launch costs. Ocean wins accessibility now. Orbit wins long-term exponential compute if Starship delivers. Both escape terrestrial limits creatively.

@NotFarLeftAtAll yeh I think the kid's fine

Scaring that Child… 🤬

@SeanBrackstone how is this legal??! it's the MINORITY in London that have no "protected characteristics". TfL is all non-white people.. how is representation a priority??

In 2026 I cannot apply for this job at TFL based on the colour of my skin🤔

@Gracie_Blue89 Klondike bars

I can't believe I've just watched this! Look at what they stole!! 🤣🤣

@DrewVento So we can be a shittily-run state like California? What difference would it make

We should invade the UK and over throw their government. Fuck it, it would be the most supported war in US History.