Rob Caiger ✝️🇬🇧🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✊🏻

Privileged to know Dan Popplewell when he wrote this as part of @themagictheatre 'London Town' album. Featuring the gorgeous vocals of Sophia Churney, this is a classic. 10 years on, I'm living every word of 'Summer Sun' and finally happy... youtu.be/HD5xGQOVTI4 via @YouTube

After 18 months of “standing up to Putin” the Labour govt quietly issued a licence allowing imports of Russian oil refined in third countries. Yesterday Labour MPs voted AGAINST UK oil and gas licences. We are now importing from Russia instead of drilling in the North Sea. Insane.

Give Rob a follow 🩵

Every day I am floored I am bowled over I am amazed at how much America is doing for us. I am amazed at how they care God bless them ❤️❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🚨 WOW! JD Vance just broke it down PERFECTLY for patriots in the West rising up against 3rd world migration, BUCKING Keir Starmer calling it "far-right" "To everybody in the UK who rejects [3rd world migration], I'd encourage them to just KEEP ON GOING! It's OK to want to defend your culture!" 🔥 "All over the West is this idea that the way to generate prosperity is to bring in MILLIONS and millions of unvetted people and DROP them into your neighborhoods — and we simply reject that idea!" "It's OK to want to live in a safe neighborhood. It's okay to want your job to go to yourself and your neighbors and not to a stranger who you don't even know." "It is reasonable for the people in Western societies to want to control who comes into their country and who doesn't." "A lot of people, frankly, a lot of people in the media have tried to persuade all of those people that it's somehow racist to want to protect your borders..." "...even though very often the very people who are most affected by low wage immigration are lower income black and Hispanic Americans right here in the United States of America, and I guarantee that's true in the UK." "So we believe in making America great again. You can't do that unless you protect your borders. I'd encourage our friends in the UK to follow the same path." 🇺🇸🇬🇧 AWESOME!

Fair expectations

Seared scallops are super quick to cook and really delicious. Paired up with the greens and orso pasta this recipe delivers a really satisfying meal.buff.ly/D4CmNiS

Yesterday, @piersmorgan tried the old “gotcha” on me with an odd clip from the “Unite the Kingdom” March. I think it exposed a basic flaw in institutional thinking in the UK: a fear to call out Islamism.

London Assembly member Susan Hall is facing accusations of “xenophobia” and “Islamophobia” simply for embracing the national flag and showing pride in being British. She is breaking all the rules of political correctness by refusing to feel ashamed or guilty for things she never did, never said, and never controlled. This is the new normal in Britain: loving your own country and flying its flag is now considered a hate crime by the woke left and their Islamist allies. Meanwhile, those who openly call for the destruction of Britain and the Jewish people are protected and celebrated. Susan Hall represents the silent majority of Britons who are tired of being made to feel guilty for their own existence and heritage. She refuses to apologize for wanting Britain to remain British. Her unapologetic stance is exactly what Britain needs right now. Share if you support Susan Hall’s courage and believe Britain must stay British!

MUSLIM RAPE GANG JAILED FOR 277 YEARS Three girls, one just 12, were "appallingly" raped over EIGHT YEARS, from 1995-2003 The serial rapists: Ansar Mahmood Qayum, 49; Tariq Azam, 57; Zulfiqar Ali, 47; Aurrangzeb Azam, Sajid Majid, 53; Manaf Hussain, 51; Shakeel Haq, 58; Rafiq Patel, 73; Zaheed Ali Novsarka, 58; Mohammed Sheikh, 53; Mohammed Yasin, 52; Liaquat Hussain Hanif, 49; Ebrahim Mananiat, 56; Ibrahim Khalifa, 87; Shafiq Siddique, 56; Mohammed Munir Shaffi, 48; Mohammed Ishtiaq Hussain, 51; Abbas Kaji, 57 & Tasawar Hussain, 46; Donna Lynn, 45, their rape enabler The children were repeatedly raped, sexually assaulted, drugged & treated as commodities for the gratification of heartless Muslim predators Fears of being called racist or Islamophobic gave these evil predators cover MAY THEY ROT IN JAIL & BURN IN HELL! thesun.co.uk/news/39158030/…

🙏 It would also be an idea for Westminster to engage and show a little more interest in what is happening and has happened at the Inquiry. We’ve been deafened by their silence…

Neoliberalism is the scourge responsible for most medical, social and geopolitical scandals in the 21st century. "Humans as commodities" and ideology it rests on is rooted in delusional economic thinking and psychopathic superiority complexes rooted in nihilism and dehumanisation

Folks slipped down to Dorset to meet up with my good friend Ex Dorset PC Lorne Castle; Lost his job tackling a Knife carrying thug & Now faces up to 5yrs prison for GBH when tackling an alleged shoplifter; Nah NOT on MY watch! Lorne wants to 👏 Everyone for their cont support👇🙏

Price Controls. 1970s Answers. A Government That Has Run Out of Road. Rachel Reeves has a proposal. Supermarkets should cap the price of bread, milk and eggs. In return, the government will suspend some of its own regulations. Not permanently. Not because they were wrong. Temporarily, as a transaction, in exchange for retailers absorbing costs the government has imposed on them and cannot now bring itself to remove. This is what the end of the road looks like. The British Retail Consortium has named the problem plainly. The challenge facing retailers, it said, is a combination of higher energy and commodity costs from the Middle East conflict and the soaring cost of the government's own domestic policies. Both. Not one or the other. The Iran conflict lit the match. This government built the bonfire, as I preficted when Exercise Turnstone first came to light. The war made the damage visible. It did not cause it. The costs pushing food prices up are documented and domestic. The April 2025 National Insurance hike. The minimum wage, up 40 per cent since 2020. The net zero packaging levy, which charges retailers per tonne of materials. Business rates. Every one of those is a policy choice made in Downing Street and the Treasury. The Food and Drink Federation has said so explicitly. The retail sector has said so repeatedly. And the government's own offer confirms it: in exchange for price caps, Reeves will relax the net zero packaging regulations and delay the obesity crackdown. She is suspending her own policies because she knows they are part of the problem. She will not say so. The structure of the deal says it for her. A retail analyst, asked to assess the proposal, cited the Soviet Union unprompted. The former chief executive of John Lewis called the SNP version of this policy the economics of a madhouse. Reeves has adopted a version of a policy that her own retail sector compares to Soviet price controls and describes as a return to the failed policies of the 1970s. These are not Conservative attack lines. They are the industry's verdict, in its own words, delivered this week. The proposal also threatens to compound the damage it claims to address. Price caps incentivise supermarkets to source cheaper food from abroad. British farmers, already driven to the brink by NI hikes and inheritance tax changes that hit family farms directly, will face a further squeeze as retailers seek cheaper foreign alternatives to stay within the cap. The government will have used a food security crisis to accelerate the destruction of domestic food production. The instrument designed to help will make the underlying problem worse. This is where the Callaghan parallel lands with full force. In 1976, a Labour government that had spent beyond what the bond market would tolerate reached for emergency instruments: price controls, incomes policies, interventions that addressed symptoms while the disease advanced. The IMF arrived. The humiliation followed. What is happening now is slower and more diffuse, but the logic is identical. A government that has foreclosed its own fiscal options, constrained by bond market discipline on one side and a restless parliamentary party on the other, reaching for 1970s instruments because every modern lever has already been compromised by a previous decision. The bond market is watching. Gilt yields are already close to their highest level in 28 years. Morgan Stanley has told its clients the economy will flatline. Asset managers are advising clients to avoid long-dated gilts. A voluntary cap on the price of milk will not change any of those judgments. It will confirm them. Callaghan's ghost is not a metaphor. It is a destination. "Reeves has adopted a version of a policy that her own retail sector compares to Soviet price controls and describes as a return to the failed policies of the 1970s."

@London_W4 @MrsPatSimmons Well said Alastair. From a place of enlightenment, enrichment & learning. All the things the baying mob are not.

Had extremely intimidating threats from Muslims today. It’s what they do. It’s what they know. They have learned that threats and violence make people keep quiet and not criticise them. Well, I shall carry on saying what I think about Muslims and anyone else. The police and the government support the Muslim violence and threats so they’re of no use. Just wanted to say to the people who threaten that you’re sad losers. Anyway, it’s been a most pleasant day and a lovely evening. Sat in my armchair on my boat with a glass of wine and thinking about the many thousands of wonderful people on here. Here’s a photo of me in the V and A. It’s a recent one so the Muslims should be able to recognise me out and about. Cheers to the beautiful people 🥂

The guys are what now? They are selling their tiny daughters to perverts who want to stick their dicks in their tiny bodies. Their bodies that will break, their souls that will die… Don’t tell me it’s complex. It’s barbaric because their whole male dominated culture is backward depraved animalistic misogyny.

The Party That Profited From The Crisis It Refuses To Solve. There is a multi billion pound industry built on the continuation of mass illegal immigration into Britain. It requires the boats to keep coming. It requires the asylum claims to keep flowing. It requires the hotels to stay full. It requires the legal challenges to keep blocking removals. Remove the crisis and the industry collapses. Which is why the industry has every incentive to ensure the crisis never ends and every incentive to fund the political parties that guarantee it will not. The Liberal Democrats are that party. Ed Davey campaigns for open borders, opposes every serious enforcement measure and demands Britain rejoin the EU customs union that would deepen its exposure to the same migration crisis now tearing the continent apart. His party has opposed the Rwanda scheme, opposed detention, opposed accelerated removals and opposed every legislative attempt to create a credible deterrent. The policy position is consistent. So is the funding. Safwan Adam was the Liberal Democrats' biggest election donor. He gave the party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year, confirmed by Electoral Commission records. Adam was a director of Stay Belvedere Hotels Limited, a company appointed in April 2021 with no prior track record in immigration accommodation. Within months it was running 51 hotels housing asylum seekers across England and Wales, providing approximately a quarter of all Home Office asylum places under a contract worth billions of pounds of taxpayer money. In the year to September 2022 SBHL reported nearly £705 million in income, almost entirely from government contracts. The company paid out £45 million in dividends. Adam and his co-director each received at least £7.8 million. Between 2020 and 2022 the company reported pre-tax profits of £75.7 million on a turnover of £888 million. The contract was subsequently stripped after the Home Office found significant elements of the company's behaviour fell short of what we would expect from a government supplier. Staff were reportedly paid as little as £5.60 an hour, below the legal minimum wage. The mechanism is not complicated. More crossings mean more asylum claims. More asylum claims mean more accommodation contracts. More accommodation contracts mean more dividends. More dividends mean more political donations. More political donations fund the party that opposes every measure that would reduce the crossings. The Liberal Democrats do not want to solve the small boats crisis. Their donor base depends on it continuing. This is not an isolated arrangement. It is the visible tip of an industrial complex that includes NGOs paid to process claims, human rights lawyers paid to challenge removals, accommodation providers paid to house arrivals and people trafficking networks paid to deliver them. Each component of that system profits from the continuation of the crisis. Each has a financial interest in open borders. Each opposes enforcement. And each, in one form or another, funds or lobbies the political parties that deliver the policy environment they require. The British public is told the small boats crisis is a humanitarian emergency requiring compassionate solutions. What it actually is, is a supply chain. People are the product. Taxpayer money is the revenue. Political donations are the return on investment. And the Liberal Democrats, the party of compassion and human rights, were a shareholder. Ed Davey wants to talk about foreign money in politics. He is right to raise it. The money that flowed from the asylum accommodation industry into his party's election fund is a reasonable place to start. "Safwan Adam was the Liberal Democrats' biggest election donor. He gave the party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year"

Trying to understand why the BBC is presenting this as “new”. Afghan men have been selling their children since the dawn of time. Whilst I sympathise with all affected, as I have personally worked in Afghanistan on projects for women and children, it reinforces my views on strong borders and the need for controlled immigration policy.

I have slept on yesterday’s National grooming gangs Select Committee meeting, and I am still left with more questions than answers. I have since spoken to survivors and campaigners. Most of us remain highly concerned, and I am certainly not convinced. Baroness Anne Longfield introduced herself and explained the next steps and the framework for the inquiry. The inquiry formally opened on 13 April, but the criteria for selecting the local areas to be investigated will not be published until 13 July. Despite being pressed repeatedly on this point, no further clarity was given. Oldham is already included because that investigation was inherited. Robbie Moore MP repeatedly asked whether Bradford would be included. Other MPs followed with the same line of questioning, which tells me they were equally dissatisfied with the answers being given. The responses were full of legal jargon, references to due diligence, and timescales, but no clear answer was given. The overall tone felt far too relaxed for a discussion about one of the worst safeguarding scandals in modern British history. Baroness Longfield confirmed that she wrote to councils instructing them not to destroy evidence, something that came to light through a Freedom of Information request by Robbie Moore. The fact that councils had to be told not to destroy evidence is alarming. She described this as a “red flag” and said she would be “disappointed” if evidence had been destroyed or withheld. If evidence has been destroyed, concealed, or deliberately withheld, that is not “disappointing”. It is illegal. We were also told that the inquiry will not start from scratch but will build on existing material. If records have already been lost or destroyed, it raises serious questions about whether the full truth will ever come out. For this inquiry to have any credibility, neither Labour nor the Conservatives should have any involvement whatsoever. This must be a fully independent, judge-led inquiry. Victims, survivors, and campaigners have said this from the outset. There is no trust in either of the two main parties. When Baroness Longfield said she did not have to reveal whether she would return to Labour after the inquiry, it only reinforced those concerns. The trust is gone. This scandal, and the cover-up surrounding the Labour Party is the reason why many have left that party.

@TRobinsonNewEra Unconscionable. I am happy to fund a wrongful death lawsuit against these disgusting excuses for law enforcement. They damn well better have been fired.