David R. Robinson
46.8K posts

David R. Robinson
@CalgaryRugbyDad
CDN resource entrepreneur/financier, husband, father, and rugby referee. Fiscal conservative and social progressive. I want a strong AB and an undivided Canada.
Calgary, Alberta Katılım Mart 2019
1.7K Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler

Want to win a pair of tickets to our Mar. 23 game vs. Vegas, courtesy of @original16beer?
Tell us which Flame you think will score the first goal tonight and use the hashtag #Flames1stGoal to enter!
A winner will be selected at random from the correct responses.

English

Want to win tickets to our home opener vs. the Avs courtesy of our friends at @original16beer?
Tell us who you think will open the scoring for us tonight and use the hashtag #Flames1stGoal!
A winner will be drawn at random from the correct responses.

English
David R. Robinson retweetledi

"Alberta has every right to decline a request to assist with the implementation of the buyback program. The feds devised this idea and they are the ones who are obligated to figure out the logistics. It’s not Alberta’s problem to solve."
calgaryherald.com/opinion/column…
English

@redsnoopy69 The Koch Brothers are enemies to Canadian oil & gas. The CPC is NOT for the Koch Brothers.
English
David R. Robinson retweetledi

“We get in our own way,” he said, then listed a few problems: “A political quagmire that requires a crisis to make decisions”; “layers of regulation”; “permit & consultation that take ages to complete”; “Canada is one of the most highly taxed economies.."
#Echobox=1664817003" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">financialpost.com/diane-francis/…
English
David R. Robinson retweetledi

should be paying off any day now.
Squawk Box@SquawkCNBC
"At the end of last year, overall fossil fuels represented 81% of energy consumption. 10 years ago, they were at 82%," says Jeff Currie. "$3.8 trillion of investment in renewables moved fossil fuels from 82% to 81% of the overall energy consumption."
English

The Liberals' policies have undermined Canada's #energy security and prosperity. A new #Conservative government will correct the course.
Pierre Poilievre@PierrePoilievre
Trudeau’s anti-development policies are destroying our working class & driving energy production to dirty dictatorships. Every time he blocks a mine, kills a pipeline or raises taxes on a factory, dictators around the world do a victory dance as he hands them power & money.
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen So, if NG was never going to happen, why did Trudeau need C48? And why just in northern BC, and not elsewhere in Canada?
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Trudeau had literally nothing to do with NGP’s failure. He euthanized it after the courts dealt it the fatal blow.
Poilievre repealing C-48 will, as I showed you, have no bearing on anything.
English
David R. Robinson retweetledi

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen I am talking hypotheticals if we hadn’t had Trudeau and so did not have C48. It could have been very different. Partnering with FNs would have been key.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen I’m pointing out facts you’d rather not acknowledge. If you need to run away from that, fill your boots.
GIF
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Max, why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth which I never said? This is a waste of time. Ciao.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen That's 2025. So you're asking someone to risk billions of dollars of capital in the most challenging legal environment around on a project that will have to contend with declining demand for oil?
Good luck with that.
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Nobody is saying it will be easy. But with C48, it became impossible. Good thing Poilievre would repeal C48 if the Conservatives win.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Nobody is risking capital on a new oil pipeline through unceded Indigenous territory in BC unless you have unanimous support for it -- and best of luck with that.
Enbridge had its shot, and it blew it. Not because of Ottawa or regulations, but because of the law.
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen I am not saying anything about ignoring the legal terrain. We need to be working with Indigenous and other key groups to be able to get our much-needed oil and LNG to key foreign markets such as in Asia.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Sure. But ignoring the legal terrain there (a mistake Enbridge made, by the way) is a fatal error. You can't do it. And it cost Enbridge billions.
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen EE just to make the point that politics very much factors in Canada. As to NG, I am talking about the economic rationale, and the impact on global markets; it would have actually been better than TMX.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Northern Gateway: insufficent and inadequate consultation, as clearly described by the courts. Given the legal terrain there, that was always a fraught project -- even without Enbridge's bumbling incompetence.
Why are we doing EE if you acknowledge it wasn't possible?
English

@maxfawcett @1223Chuck @BobBenzen Now do Northern Gateway, and Energy East. I say this knowing NG was possible, and EE wasn’t (because of Quebec).
English

@1223Chuck @BobBenzen TMX, the first oil pipeline to Pacific tidewater in 60-plus years, is being built and funded by Ottawa.
LNG Canada, the biggest energy project in Canadian history, benefited from huge federal subsidies.
In other words: huh?
English

Who is opening the scoring for us tonight?
Use the hashtag #Flames1stGoal with your guess for a chance to win tickets to our Oct. 7 pre-season game vs. the Jets!
A winner will be selected at random from the correct responses.

English

@bal4_rednirus @sylviajh14 @jkenney @narendramodi It makes no sense to have the LNG facilities in Alberta. They should all be on the coast, in BC, with the nat gas coming from BC, AB, and SK.
English

When I first met @narendramodi 15 years ago, he asked how quickly we could get Canadian LNG to Asia.
Korean leaders asked me the same question on my recent trade mission.
Shamefully, Canada let green politics & red tape kill multiple LNG projects.
nationalpost.com/opinion/rahim-…
English

@bal4_rednirus @mssbriss @jkenney @narendramodi It wasn’t that. It was greed. Christy Clark made the terms too tough, and so the capital went elsewhere. The unreliable regulatory environment didn’t help, along with indigenous issues.
English

@CalgaryRugbyDad @mssbriss @jkenney @narendramodi The BC Liberals and federal Conservatives don't have the ability to get the deal done. The BCNDP and federal Liberals sat down with the indigenous people of the province and got the deal done.
English

@bal4_rednirus @mssbriss @jkenney @narendramodi Yup, but at least Harper didn’t go out of his way to kill pipelines (which is what Trudeau has done). And where LNG is concerned, Christy Clark is the reason we don’t have much more going forward in BC.
English

@jkenney @CalgaryRugbyDad @narendramodi BC is building three LNG plants and two oil and gas pipelines to the Pacific.
English

