๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ

16.9K posts

๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ banner
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ

๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ

@CanesDavid

Father of 5๏ธโƒฃ | Urologist @laheyuro | Associate Prof | MIS robotic onc | ๐ŸŽธ| Personal finance rants | Workplace efficiency enthusiast | Founder @wellprept ๐Ÿ‘ˆ

Katฤฑlฤฑm Ekim 2012
5.8K Takip Edilen21.9K Takipรงiler
SabitlenmiลŸ Tweet
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ
Drowning in bureaucracy & EHR hell? Step into the OR. Subtle and still surprising varations in renal hilar anatomy. The ureter peristalsing like clockwork. The course of the obturator nerve... Unchanged since the dawn of surgery. Untouched by spreadsheets. Untouched by admin. It's breathtaking. Lucky us.
English
8
11
123
22K
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ
I can tell you my take based on my experience as a multi-port surgeon, which apparently differs from all the other comments here. I also helped to work on some of the earliest laparoscopic single-port surgeries in the early 2000s. Better outcomes in prostate removal come from experience and preservation of as much surrounding anatomy as possible. From my point of view, that comes from making good DECISIONS with your surgical plane choices, and anatomical preservation. I can't for the life of me logically understand why it would be in any way based on single port versus multi-port. A single port surgeon can make poor decisions, as can a multi-port surgeon, and vice versa.
English
2
0
5
191
Daniel E Spratt
Daniel E Spratt@DrSpratticusยท
Urology community Help teach us non-surgeons the benefit of single port and continence outcomes. Is this something that improves outcomes? @dr_coops @Uroweb @BogdanaSchmidt @ChapinMD @wandering_gu @qdtrinh @jeshoag @SFreedlandMD @EUplatinum @UrologyUS
Justin David@Justindavidmed

Excellent talk by @drjkaouk on Single Port prostatectomy. Data shows early return to continence compared to multiport, consistent with what weโ€™ve seen with our transvesical single port prostatectomies @RamPathakMD

English
8
0
10
5.2K
Ram Pathak, M.D.
Ram Pathak, M.D.@RamPathakMDยท
@CanesDavid @Justindavidmed @drjkaouk Number of skin incisions isnโ€™t the factor. The ability to dock the robot transvesically, avoiding adhesions (j-pouch video shown). Also, less traction force on surrounding structures is easier done on this platform. Quicker return to activities (no lifting restrictions, etc.)
English
1
0
1
124
Justin David
Justin David@Justindavidmedยท
Excellent talk by @drjkaouk on Single Port prostatectomy. Data shows early return to continence compared to multiport, consistent with what weโ€™ve seen with our transvesical single port prostatectomies @RamPathakMD
Justin David tweet mediaJustin David tweet media
English
1
3
8
6.7K
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ retweetledi
Patrick Kenney
Patrick Kenney@PatrickKenneyMDยท
If patients canโ€™t complete the intervention it would stand to reason that the intervention does not workโ€ฆ
Ryan@reallyoptimized

@EricTopol Total fail, Eric. The increase in volume was negligible between control and intercen, and the intervention group was 40% below the recommended guideline. This trial only showed that compliance is difficult.

English
1
2
3
1.8K
Ram Pathak, M.D.
Ram Pathak, M.D.@RamPathakMDยท
@CanesDavid @Justindavidmed @drjkaouk 1. Ultra preservation of anterior structures 2. It is Retzius sparing 3. Not hypermobilizing urethra 4. taking the prostate out of its โ€œcocoonโ€ and not harming surrounding structures.
English
1
0
1
174
Healthcare AI Guy
Healthcare AI Guy@HealthcareAIGuyยท
A surgeon just removed a manโ€™s prostateโ€ฆ from 1,500 miles away. In London, Dr. Prokar Dasgupta controlled a 4-armed robot operating in Spain with just 0.06s lag. Do you think remote surgery, whether by a surgeon or AI, will be the future?
Healthcare AI Guy tweet media
English
7
8
44
4.7K
Alejandro Macias
Alejandro Macias@doctormaciasยท
Si has tenido un cรกlculo renal, se te ha advertido que lo mรกs importante para prevenir otro ataque es aumentar la hidrataciรณn. Un ensayo aleatorio de hidrataciรณn en mรกs de 1600 participantes no mostrรณ ningรบn beneficio, a pesar de la evidencia de aumento del volumen urinario.
Alejandro Macias tweet media
Eric Topol@EricTopol

If you've had a kidney stone, you've been advised that the most important thing to prevent another bout is to increase hydration. Now a randomized trial of hydration in over 1600 participants showed no benefit, despite evidence of increase during volume. thelancet.com/journals/lanceโ€ฆ

Espaรฑol
6
33
201
17.2K
Dereck Paul, MD
Dereck Paul, MD@dereckwpaulยท
Some experts do not think OpenClaw is relevant to AI in healthcare. They are wrong. OpenClaw represents us phase shifting in the way we relate to AI systems again. We are moving past promting a chatbot to ask a question so that we can do the work. We are moving past prompting an AI agent to go off and do a defined task itself. We are arriving at providing an AI agent with an objective and it continuously prompting itself to go off gather information and take actions that advance its objective. In medicine, this will look like an agent scouring a panel of active pateints for care gaps, lab trends, or treatment optimizations. Continuous clinical inference โ€” always on is future of all AI knowledge work, medicine included.
English
9
1
26
2.3K
Andrew Gabrielson
Andrew Gabrielson@urogabeยท
Important new study in @TheLancet - a behavioral intervention to promote high fluid intake among kidney stone formers did not significantly impact recurrent stone events on 2y f/u Flips secondary stone prevention dogma on its head - kudos to the PUSH trial authors
Andrew Gabrielson tweet media
English
5
5
26
4.2K
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ retweetledi
Ryan
Ryan@reallyoptimizedยท
@EricTopol Total fail, Eric. The increase in volume was negligible between control and intercen, and the intervention group was 40% below the recommended guideline. This trial only showed that compliance is difficult.
English
3
1
63
8.3K
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ
If thereโ€™s one lesson that Claude Cowork reinforces itโ€™s this: context is everything. With a 1M token context window, I can feed it like a ravenous animal, and the quality of the output absolutely soars. I imagine all founder/CEOโ€™s are in absolute heaven at the productivity this unlocks. What a time to be alive. Iโ€™m continuing to do my best to dismantle the messy parts of being a doctor. This way only the joy remains.
English
1
0
24
1.6K
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ
I also tend to NS in high risk if dominant lesions not near NVB on MRI I highly value your opinions Brian nearly without fail. This one shocked me tbh. This has โ€œnear-retirement open surgeon still justifying Open Prostatectomyโ€ vibes. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ I kid, butโ€ฆ hey. Thatโ€™s what it reminds me of. I wonder how often your DRE is discordant with what you already planned/saw based on MRI?
English
3
0
2
81
Brian F. Chapin
Brian F. Chapin@ChapinMDยท
@DrSpratticus @dr_coops @urotoday @UroOnc @Uroweb @wandering_gu @BogdanaSchmidt @CanesDavid @DrMLChua @HimanshuNagarMD @AmarUKishan @piet_ost @alison_tree @declangmurphy @uroegg Limited data zone, I find it helps me w/nerve sparing decision/plan. Equivocal MRIs + Rads comments on EPE/abutment doesnโ€™t provide the risk assessment of a full Nspare like palpating the surface + tumor. I tend to Nspare even in higher risk tumors when a high priority for Pts
English
1
0
5
179
๐™ณ๐šŠ๐šŸ๐š’๐š ๐™ฒ๐šŠ๐š—๐šŽ๐šœ retweetledi
Lee Zhao
Lee Zhao@lee_c_zhaoยท
Something Iโ€™ve never shared publicly before. Early in residency, I placed a โ€œsimple" suprapubic tube. It went fine. Then my patient died. I nearly walked away from surgery forever. Turns out residency never ends. The doubt, the what-ifs, the crushing weight of decisionsโ€ฆ they follow you your whole career. Hereโ€™s how Iโ€™ve learned to carry it anyway: leezhaomd.org/post/the-endleโ€ฆ @AmerUrological #MedTwitter #Surgery
English
7
22
137
10.5K