Tulip Speculator🌷🇺🇸

@Swingtrader A solid 40% of our population hates Trump to the point that they actively root for the US to fail. They have no idea how catastrophic it would be for their own lives but they live in delusion anyway. I have serious doubts that he will succeed but I certainly hope he does.

Israel and Saudia arabia will dominate the middle east, and full focus will shift to china after Iran is settled Europe will sign long term contracts for US energy, and china either agrees to buy oil in USD or has total dependence on russia who is now a paper tiger

Yes, they aren't Japan, and you're 100% correct, we're choking off chinas oil, same strategy I agree But what are they doing? They have critical minerals, they have currency manipulation, we're actively taking away the gold risk angle once we take the oil it's checkmate We force their hand This is trump showing he is not afraid if it goes that route, it's scary, but that's the path he's taken us down We are all in and not many realize it, it either works and dollar dominance is secured and world order is maintained, or it's war Game it out

There's nothing alarming. He's just doing his job, which is to be a mouthpiece for the USGA and PGA Tour. Golf writers are not journalists in any sense of the word. The real oddity is why these lackeys spend so much time denigrating their product, which is the skill of the players.

The course was not set up at 7,700 yards today. It was set up at 7,489. The field averaged 71.64 yesterday. Today, with 17 players still on the course, the average is 71.07. On a par 72. What exactly is “alarming” about that? Also, wind being part of a course’s defense is not a flaw, nor is it new. The Old Course has relied on wind as a defense for centuries. Some might argue it's the main defense. The better question is not “did someone shoot low?” It is “did the course separate players?” According to Data Golf, yesterday the standard deviation in scores was 3.07, which is more variance than a typical PGA Tour course and more than what you typically see at Doral. Today it's 2.66, which is about what you would expect at the typical tour course.

@adplacksports @mweav27 Sad that you refuse to acknowledge player fitness, skill, and the complete revolution in optimization from Trackman and GCQuad. No one is questioning that player performance has improved. The ball rollback will be a total failure.

im super aware of where things settled michael. -0.97 speaks to the same point on a golf course of this caliber. The PGA Tour was last here a decade ago. We have SG data from 2015 and 2016. The winning score was -4 in 2014. It played to an average of +1.1 over par the last time we played PGA Tour golf here, with even similar weather conditions, and a shorter golf course than we saw today. So what changed in 10 years when the golf course only got harder to change the scoring so dramatically? Golf courses cannot keep up with technology, and the game is increasingly out of scale. That's the point of the tweet. This one of dozens of examples.

@adplacksports Using scoring when only a few played the last 4 holes (and played them well; skewing DG's scoring early in the day) would also be disingenuous. Somebody always plays good, it just so happens they did it early today. Here's where things settled for the day.

Compliance, Trading, HF Sales

@tweetermUSA @DickLeaky2 @RobertMSterling @OcrazioCornPop @grok They filed for bankruptcy in 2024, while Biden was still in office. Then again in 2025, when fuel costs were much lower. You're reading one press release with zero understanding of the context. Stop embarrassing yourself.

@DickLeaky2 @Canyonaro @RobertMSterling @OcrazioCornPop @grok Always. Believe. Trump. Bitch sit this one out.

“Your company was dead broke?” “Yes, Dave.” “But a competitor offered to acquire you and rescue the business?” “That’s right, Dave.” “So what happened?” “Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg blocked the deal and we just went out of business, Dave.”

@tweetermUSA @RobertMSterling @OcrazioCornPop @grok That somehow only killed Spirit? They were circling the drain for years. The JetBlue deal was a rescue & blocking it cost a lot of jobs.

@RobertMSterling @OcrazioCornPop @grok lol they literally said it was because of fuel costs

@josh_ai @Futurenvesting

@Canyonaro @Futurenvesting No. It’s their inefficient models that strain compute while failing to scale appropriately.

Anthropic is now showing off $44 BILLION in annual recurring revenue. This is up $14 billion (+46.6%) since last month! BULLISH for AI Infrastructure $NVDA $AMD

This is the answer that makes the most sense. Think they're going to have to cede a LOT of equity to Jon & Bryson to keep them on board, especially if they're still owed guaranteed money. But that might make sense for a new owner. For context, Bryson's YouTube channel regularly outdraws the PGA Tour.

@alan_bastable One potential investor they failed to mention here is a large media/ streaming company. With the price of content going through the roof. The opportunity to own a sports league that can give you a massive amount of content could make this look like a pretty cheap purchase.

spoke to a couple of corporate M&A/restructuring smarties to better understand LIV’s potential next steps as it seeks investors golf.com/news/liv-golf-…

@inda_zona @Sassafrass_84 Bullshit Rockefeller Foundation study that's a total joke, yet you believe it because you want it to be true 🙄

@Sassafrass_84 Bc they have to support the underperforming MAGA states. CA, NY and other blue states give more in federal taxes…. red states are the recipients.

Can a liberal come answer this question, please?! I mean, you got what you wanted, and yet you are still unhappy.

The audacity of this bitch ...

@tashispublicist @slevin_heaven @kieran_candin90 @jimmysoldout There are socialist hellscapes you can try out if you think that's better. There's one a mere 90 miles south of Florida. Book a flight.

@slevin_heaven @kieran_candin90 @jimmysoldout i don’t believe in building equity in a capitalistic hellscape that’s going to crash sooner than later

no shade but why would i literally ever buy a home… you still have to pay a mortgage monthly that would be the same cost as just paying rent atp. and at least with renting, the expenses for anything that goes wrong falls into the landlord instead of on you

@PollsTesla Hell no. It's a race between him and his nemesis Sam Altman for least trustworthy.

Would you trust this man? #Anthropic

Your comment on the 100% political correlation is spot on. I'm of a split mind on this, owning an industrial business. The supply chain is in full panic mode but it's hard to tell how much is real vs how much is just trying to push pricing based on questionable direct effects. OTOH, a lot of the supply chain stress is due to volumes picking up. The private economy went into recession in summer 2024 & has been coming out of it over the past few months. But the Hormuz situation could very well derail it. Very uncertain situation.

Musings of the Day, 5/1/26: I think this is very interesting. Just a scant two months ago, we were in a Goldilocks Disinflationary Growth environment, which was my Base Case for the Trump 2.0 Playbook. Alas, the Oil Shock from the Iran War has very quickly tipped us into the Stagflation Quadrant, since high Oil prices stoke Inflationary pressures and simultaneously blunt Aggregate Demand and Consumer Confidence. The Trillion Dollar Question is whether a quick resolution can just as quickly revert us back to the Goldilocks Quadrant. The opinions I get on this are almost 100% correlated to political views on Trump, but I am trying to be objective. I am cautiously optimistic that it could happen, but I hedged by buying puts. I will note that the stock market sneered at my puts and seems to think Goldilocks is achievable as well. I encourage you to check out this function for yourself from time to time on UrbanKaoberg.com!

@josh_ai @Futurenvesting And the number of new sign-ups was even higher. I'm a frustrated early user as well & it sucks right now compared to a few months ago. But it sucks because it's so overloaded with new people.

@Futurenvesting So it’s inaccurate. Because the amount of cancellations that happened in April was massive.

@MasterHedge @MartinShkreli You're much smarter than most who read this. It was a short-only fund for most of its life and still has a short bias. This investors know what they're using it for. But man it's a rough way to go through life. I understand why Jim Chanos quit.

@MartinShkreli Anyone can have the odd bad year but that ITD number is quite special. I assume he has marketed the fund as a net short fund? Because otherwise……..

Stanphyl -9% in April. S&P +10%. YTD -5% vs. S&P +6% ITD -14.% vs. S&P +606% bUt TeSlA iS sTiLl oVeRvAluEd

@PollsTesla This is what SpaceX investors signed up for. No crying in the casino. (yes they got fleeced)

🚨🚨Musk Ripping Off SpaceX🚨🚨 #SpaceX #ElonMusk

@TexasOncologist He doesn't miss

💀💀💀 Love this account

@SergioCollects @EricLDaugh And he's the one who got shot. Thankfully he was wearing a vest. Give that guy a medal.

@EricLDaugh This guy’s the real hero

🚨 JUST NOW: US Attorney Jeanine Pirro RELEASES footage DEBUNKING claims that the Secret Service officer got shot by "friendly fire" in the Trump assassination attempt PIRRO: "There is no evidence the shooting was the result of friendly fire." "The video also shows [Cole] Allen casing the area in the Hilton Hotel the day before the attack." Cut and dry case! LOCK HIM UP FOR LIFE

@NonyaBizznsss @maestromostro @EricLDaugh The Secret Service director says the agent who was shot (he was wearing a vest) was the only one who actually returned fire.

@maestromostro @EricLDaugh Could be wrong could be a short dude with a ponytail.

@KevinMcGilly @boriquagato You're willfully ignoring that Earl Warren, nominated by a Eisenhower, dragged the US farther to the left than any politician ever could. Your counts are utterly meaningless to anyone who has even a cursory understanding of US jurisprudence. This isn't Canada.

@boriquagato Lol. From 1994-2005 the court consisted of seven Republican appointees (Rehnquist,Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas) and two Democratic appointees (Ginsburg and Breyer). From 2009-2016 it was 5 GOP 4 Dem. You make up facts to meet your evolving need to win.

this is one of these statements that inadvertently says far more than it intends: "we can no longer be OK with" implies that you used to be OK with it back when it benefited you and lifetime appointments were what kept the court stacked in your favor. you are now against them because you see that system as no longer benefitting you. that is the essence of tactical morality: it's based on no ethics or universal principle only upon the question "does this benefit me and give me what i want?" you make up new morals to meet your evolving need to win. i support the rules if they mean i get to score a goal. but if you score a goal, i want the rules changed. at a fundamental level, this is the repudiation of the idea of a social contract: i demand to be protected but refuse to be bound. you need to play by the rules of the game when i am winning but i will overturn the game board if i start to lose. that's neither morality or justice, it's just machiavellian application of power.