CaptainCorndog

3K posts

CaptainCorndog banner
CaptainCorndog

CaptainCorndog

@CaptainCorndog3

Cheaper than a hot dog with no mustard.

Katılım Mayıs 2022
102 Takip Edilen64 Takipçiler
CaptainCorndog retweetledi
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
It's going to be an interesting day for sure when the typical American suddenly realizes that when Al Jubail is burned down, the supply chain of lubricants will collapse. And when the lubricants collapse, then trucks don't run and forklifts don't fork. And when forklifts don't fork and trucks don't truck, there's not going to be much food that appears on grocery store shelves. And at that moment all those who have been mindlessly cheering for war on Iran will seize up and begin to ask themselves, "What have I done?" You've fucked yourself is what you've done. You've ALREADY fucked yourself, because these events are being set into motion right now, but you just don't know how badly you've fucked yourself because the fucking is delayed by global logistics and shipping timelines. It won't be long, however, before the self-fucking arrives, and people who know absolutely nothing about lubricants, grease, transportation, engine oil, supply chain logistics and the Al Jubail industrial city will suddenly discover just how fucked they really are.
English
1
2.1K
7.5K
307.4K
CaptainCorndog retweetledi
Brian Berletic
Brian Berletic@BrianJBerletic·
as for people betting "Trump" won't use nuclear weapons - they still don't get "Trump" isn't in charge of anything. This is an all-or-nothing bid by the US to maintain primacy over the planet before losing it permanently. The unelected US corporate-financier establishment - pushing for wars since the inception of America as a nation - have ALREADY USED NUCLEAR WEAPONS - TWICE!!! They considered using them on Korea, Vietnam, and even as recently as Afghanistan. DO NOT let the US pin this solely on a single politician, or an administration or a US proxy. Make sure EVERYONE involved is blamed and held accountable. This is called compartmentalization - dividing up your political fronts when dirty work is required so you can flush the consequences down with one or more of these fronts while keeping the political whole more or less intact. The US literally does this every 4-8 years with presidents and scores of wars of aggression and other horrible foreign and domestic policies - and they will do it with this time as well. It wasn't "Clinton," "Bush," or "Obama's" wars (although they are accomplices and equally guilty) - they are Wall Street and Washington wars - every single one of them - no matter who is picked to sell them and take the fall for them. If you never expose and hold Wall Street and Washington as a whole accountable, they will continue their compartmentalization game forever without end.
English
0
479
1.2K
22.7K
CaptainCorndog retweetledi
Brian Berletic
Brian Berletic@BrianJBerletic·
As the US president openly talks about premeditated genocide against Iran's "whole civilization," the US is more openly linking its war on Iran to China. The US will not simply "give up" in Iran because its war on Iran is a war on wider multipolarism and ultimately against the rise of China itself. The US is out of time - each year China becomes stronger and multipolarism becomes stronger. The US is now engaged in a dangerous global murder spree to destabilize and destroy as much of multipolarism as possible. The US would rather destroy the global economy and attempt to emerge strongest on the other end than simply coexist with the rest of the world. The US will do virtually anything - probably up to and including using nuclear weapons against Iran - if not directly - by using its Israeli proxies to do it on their behalf - to permanently destroy the region and further isolate both Russia and China. And again - this isn't "Trump" doing this - the US has planned and prepared for this very war for decades - conducting plans it has put to paper verbatim. To understand and overcome this threat - people must read the policy papers the US is literally reading from as it wages war and proxy war against Russia, Iran, and China at this very moment.
Brian Berletic tweet media
English
3
473
1.1K
33.2K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics The way it should be, but it will not be happening anytime soon. Again, your read of the facts on the ground in the USA is catastrophically out of touch. Russiaphobia is the altar upon which the entirety of the machinery of the US imperial state worships. TAKE IT TO THE BANK.
English
0
0
0
108
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
Honestly, European countries is making a huge mistake double-crossing USA. USA would have no qualms abandoning Ukraine and build a partnership with Russia. The 2 nuclear powers have a lot of mutual benefits if they work together - and in fact, together, would be able to manipulate prices of grain, fertilizer, energy in ways that had never ever been possible (since the 2 balanced out each other in the past) Once USA decide NATO too much trouble for the cost of maintaining it - USA will like form a new alliance that would bring new countries across Asia - like the gulf states, India, Japan, Australia, together with Russia - and guess what, when this happens, thats also basically as good as USA joining BRICS. Europe would be surrounded, everything they import will be under the control of an alliance led by the 2 powers they pissed off. I got a feeling Trump is SO TEMPTED to just make such a drastic geopolitical reform watching the Europeans backstabbing his country.
English
125
22
160
14.2K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics DPA thinks Iran is fighting the USA of 1991... More like USSR of 1991. Your misread of the facts on the ground here in the US, despite the course of empire, is so monstrously out of touch the word epic doesn't begin to describe it.
English
0
0
0
66
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@mtracey @AslanEgia No offense Michael, as your work is important and valuable, but when it comes to such topics, you have nothing on Berletic. Pro-reality does not mean pro-Russian. I'll take his geopolitical science over yours every day of the week.
English
0
0
1
16
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey@mtracey·
@AslanEgia Not really. That guy is so passionately and authentically pro-Russia, he basically had a scream-crying hissy-fit the one time I did speak to him. "Trump isn't in charge of anything, he makes ZERO decisions," is just quasi-astrological claptrap. Hardly worth serious engagement
English
13
2
79
3.6K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics The idea the USA can wage, maintain, and win a high intensity conflict in Iran is ridiculous to the point of absurdity. Iran has 7 million volunteers. I don't care what the kill ratio is. The US can't begin to recruit the numbers needed and a draft will end with heads on pikes.
English
1
0
1
63
CaptainCorndog retweetledi
Scott Ritter
Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter·
@MarioNawfal This statement disqualifies you as an analyst on the issue. And is one of the reasons I won’t be returning to your podcast. You have an agenda. And it’s not the truth.
English
999
3.6K
26.1K
438K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics Why in the world would Russia provide AD to protect western and Israeli stooges in Syria from Iran? That is the absolute last thing Russia is delivering to Julani. Dear lord man.
English
0
0
2
36
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
Russian Air Force transport plane had been visiting Syria (in Damacus right now); twice within a week. Probably transporting air defense for the Syria, to defend themselves against Iran's threat to attack Syria. I'm speculating here.
Defense Politics Asia tweet mediaDefense Politics Asia tweet media
English
3
0
3
831
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics US aircraft have not penetrated Iranian airspace to anyhwhere near the extent they did in Iraq in those first few days. In 1991 they were using a lot of smart bombs (as in gravity). The current air war has largely been waged with standoff munitions and drones.
English
0
0
1
333
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
I just want to note how insane it is that the US lost 1 plane in combat to the enemy after a month of operations, in this Iran War (not including the loss of the tanker, the 3 x F15 shot down by Kuwait) In the 1st Gulf War, 7 planes on the allied side was shot down in the first day of Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991) - 1 x F18C - 2 A-6E - 1 x F14A - 2 x Tornado GR1 - 1 x F-15E
Defense Politics Asia tweet media
English
76
58
424
47.4K
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
I just realised, a lot of people were hoping that Trump would say something about deescalation or ending the operation (on twitter) Ermz... lol~ I already said, this is the endgame: its either USA totally regime change Iran; or Iran emerge as the regional hegemony. There wont be an in-between. As such, expect USA to go on and go on hard; while Iran will resist with everything they have.
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics

Trump's "highly anticipated" speech. Guess: is he gonna talk about Iran War or he gonna talk about anything BUT the Iran War? youtube.com/watch?v=OzhLRP…

English
9
1
16
1.8K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics That was not the point of the post or the offer. US bases in the region have proven to be liabilities. They will remain so in Israel as well. Thus, there is nowhere in the region in which US assets will be safe, now, or in the future. Welcome to Pandora's box. Enjoy the show.
English
1
0
0
11
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
@CaptainCorndog3 They will kill them a 3rd time. Dont worry. You seriously think USA cares about the "US assets". Its a war dude. Things get destroyed in a war.
English
1
0
0
12
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
So funny~ I used to like Jeffrey Sachs and share his views, but recently maybe last 1-2 years, mine diverged from his. I still align more to Bilahari's POV. If one really think Iran even winning at all, I can see why WW3 look plausible. But no. In the last 2 sessions in China, there is already a clear sign of China become more pragmatic and thus likely to reduce its overextension in geopolitics, not to mention Japan is militarising and declared guarantee for Taiwan. What is already a nearly impossible or costly win will now be unwinnable already (and that's not even counting US in) No country ever was declared winning when almost all the leadership is killed off, lost total air control, enemy can bomb anything at will, cities are heavily infiltrated by foreign agents, and a strong revolutionary movement inside the country... no countries in history is classified that.... but somehow, only Iran is said to be winning... that's delusional. Ground invasion is coming, but in another month or 2. Should be at least 25k troops before they would even move in. Peaking likely at 125k troops. Only around 8k is deployed additionally in the region so far. So slowly wait. 3000 more targets to bomb. The air campaign should last at least 1 more month. Everything else is just noise. The negotiations are also just noise.
Defense Politics Asia tweet media
English
20
1
17
2.2K
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
People find it hard to understand why I'm pro-Trump; and they think I would be embarrassed to be supportive of Trump. I had supported Trump through the hell era of 2015-2020 when the MSM was raging against him while Big Tech censorship is the norm. Not to mention after 2020 until Elon bought Twitter. I supported him enough to "break up" with my DPA partner that led me to running DPA alone post 2020. He done so much good, people dont realised. But people one day will learn through the history books in the future - to realised how unreal this person is.
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics

100% he is one of the best, if not, the best US president USA ever had for as long as I had lived. I followed USA for a long time, no one do as much as he does to fulfill campaign promises and actually do good and fight corruption. If you wish for a world with a "good USA" - Trump USA is the best bet. The alternative is the USA that conquered Afghanistan, Iraq and stirred shit in Syria - ALL without a real plan to withdraw (just plans for corruption and scam money)

English
17
6
39
2.6K
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics @RobertGCart MAGA is NOT intact. What happened to your objectivity? On the off chance you haven't been purchased, believe me when I say you have lost any sense of perspective about the USA. MAGA's core constituency walked. Trump is just along for the ride. It's OVER and it's PERMANENT.
English
0
0
0
12
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
Actually i disagree. He is very consistent. He didnt pursue Hillary Clinton after 2016 victory. Why? He explained. Its due to national prestige. JFK, Epstein etc.... is probably the same thing. These are all things that will bring national shame. Thus he tried to find better ways to resolve them - but yes, MAGA wants more aggressive actions against these evil do-ers. For me, I can understand where he come from, even if I also think he should be more aggressive on these political enemies. As far as I can tell, MAGA is mostly intact (but yes, some left the MAGA position; but there are new supporters joining too after getting disenfrancised by the Democrats). Its some of the influencers that broke away trying to find new audience to earn money that made it looks like it.
English
4
0
2
153
CaptainCorndog
CaptainCorndog@CaptainCorndog3·
@DefensePolitics Largest anti-regime protests in US history this weekend. The opposite continues unabated in Iran. You seriously do not understand the internal situation in the USA. They will not be coming to save Singapore or anyone else in the world. The USA will devour you 1000 times first.
English
0
0
1
28