Adekunle

@Omo_Olabisi1 What’s this 😂

Jokes on you…

I know some still target 1.164 liquidity on EURUSD expecting to sell there. But euro futures already swept that liquidity, so price may not need to reach it on CFD chart . Always check futures for clearer context.

@Pips_goddesss I’m dumping silver

I'm dumping $XAUUSD. How about you? 😌

@settoblack Big Setto 🙌🏾

This account is managed by a real person. And he looks like this, sometimes...

@Dwallstreet_ Some people were born stupid and you are one of them

Insight like this is a rare gem 💎

youtu.be/AgSrltPXgSM?si… Alright folks. This week's market prep. has been uploaded. Watch, study, and share with the rest of the community... Importantly, hit the like and subscribe button on my YouTube channel in appreciation of these productions. talk again during the week:).

Obscura is now live! Too many traders and protocols are asked to prove credibility by exposing trades, private data, strategies, or accounts. Over time, that erodes privacy and limits who can participate. Obscura introduces a privacy first reputation protocol for DeFi, powered by @thriveprotocol and @horizenglobal, that verifies trading performance without exposing sensitive information. The first two hundred and fifty users (250) users get free access for this month. Once 250 users onboard, the paywall activates and subscriptions begin next month. Get early access on obscura.finance

@Math_files If you’ve ever wondered what Bayes’ Theorem means in real life, it’s simply this: “Given what I already believe, and given this new evidence, how much should I update my belief?”

Bayes’ theorem is probably the single most important thing any rational person can learn. So many of our debates and disagreements that we shout about are because we don’t understand Bayes’ theorem or how human rationality often works. Bayes’ theorem is named after the 18th-century Thomas Bayes, and essentially it’s a formula that asks: when you are presented with all of the evidence for something, how much should you believe it? Bayes’ theorem teaches us that our beliefs are not fixed; they are probabilities. Our beliefs change as we weigh new evidence against our assumptions, or our priors. In other words, we all carry certain ideas about how the world works, and new evidence can challenge them. For example, somebody might believe that smoking is safe, that stress causes mouth ulcers, or that human activity is unrelated to climate change. These are their priors, their starting points. They can be formed by our culture, our biases, or even incomplete information. Now imagine a new study comes along that challenges one of your priors. A single study might not carry enough weight to overturn your existing beliefs. But as studies accumulate, eventually the scales may tip. At some point, your prior will become less and less plausible. Bayes’ theorem argues that being rational is not about black and white. It’s not even about true or false. It’s about what is most reasonable based on the best available evidence. But for this to work, we need to be presented with as much high-quality data as possible. Without evidence—without belief-forming data—we are left only with our priors and biases. And those aren’t all that rational.

Being in drawdown with no cash and no setup is the most dangerous place for a trader. That’s when you start feeling “pressure” to trade. But let’s be honest… It’s not pressure from the market. It’s pressure from your situation. No setup means no business. The market doesn’t care about your bills. It doesn’t reward urgency. It rewards discipline. The fastest way out of drawdown is not forcing trades. It’s protecting what’s left and waiting for your edge. If there’s no clear confirmation, no alignment, no reason, stay out of the market. One forced trade can extend your recovery by months. Sometimes the most profitable move is doing nothing. Lock in. Protect capital. Wait for your setup.

A home that suits the cars..

Whoever said “money can’t buy happiness” really knew what they were talking about 😔

@settoblack Big Setto 💪🏾

my most unlikely trading day. Pay the Trader. $EU $XAG

Stage 2: The discipline Of Waiting. From (1877-1940) Livermore

youtu.be/yTYkbzm4OWk?si… Alright folks. This week's commentary has been uploaded to my YouTube. Kindly share with the rest of the community, and subscribe to my channel. Talk again soon.

If you get married to one side of the market and ignore what price is actually trying to achieve, you’re setting yourself up for unnecessary drawdown. Price doesn’t care about your bias. It follows objective interest: liquidity, inefficiency, and structure. The moment you stop listening to price and start defending an opinion, you move from execution to ego. That’s where accounts get burned. High-level traders stay directionally flexible. They let price show intent first, then deploy risk. Bias is optional. Logic is mandatory. GM💜

It’s been a while here #forex #gbpusd

Gather around, folks. I need to school these jokers that still don't know what they are doing. But parade around with confusionist theories about these markets—masquerading novelty. $DXY $UsdJpy, What Do You See? What is their Higher Timeframe Bias? What similarities do you currently see in both price action? What are their major difference(s)? How do you interpret these variables, such that it makes sense? Can you frame an opportunity under these conditions? ● Usdjpy- Bullish, $DXY- consolidation (with a hint of underlying bullishness. Why? See correlated pair like UJ; which has consistently shown leadership since the second half of 2025) ● They both have clearly defined key levels of support on their weekly chart. ● $DXY is stuck between Key levels on its weekly chart. while $UsdJpy has a clearly defined buyside objective, keying off of the weekly support. ● Ideally, a break through either levels on $DXY is how you validate the weekly bias. But, since the weekly bias leans towards 'bullish' you would want to see a classic 'break & retest' above the key resistance level before you speculate on its longer term premise. Since Usdjpy is clearly defined on its weekly chart, all you need is validation to confirm this bias and then engage. -Doesn't $DXY play any role? Great question. It does. (But to answer, you need to implore creative thinking.) here we go...💡 Since we established that dollar index is in a range, we will be looking for areas of support within that range to support higher dollar prices, pending a potential break through key resistance. (see the Daily Breaker on $DXY) ● Yes, clearly. We select a currency (Jpy) with extreme weakness versus the dollar (Usd). We pair both currencies (UsdJpy) and trade, when $DXY aligns on the near term and $UsdJpy validates its Higher Timeframe Bias. The result, is an exaggeration of price action you see relative to Dollar Index—Relative Strength Analysis 101.

@Kelvintalent_ Congratulations big KT🥰

That little Boy's Dream is about to come true❤️ From staying in a one bedroom face me i face you apartment With my Mum and Younger brother in Ayobo Lagos Years ago To Becoming an Orphan at the Age of 12, then Moved around as an house boy. Finally raised by My Aunt who is a police woman with a salary under 100k Naira a month... Managed to finish High school Supported my Elder brother in selling vehicle spare parts while I shuttle University education . Then i Found Crypto in 2020, merged Forex and stocks Trading to it in 2023... Today i am currently on my 5th and 6th building At the same time and This time around it's not just a house, It's a VILLA. I will show you what A MILLION DOLLARS VILLA looks like Trading changed my Life🔥