BBC 4u

@beyoncegarden Last dude looks so sad he's going to cry when he gets home

the fact that they barely know their kids is actually sad😭

@smoke_nd_pearlz 16!!!??!!??? He looks between 38-44!! Holy fucking shit!

Haircuts really are like makeup for men omg. These don’t even look like the same people.

@Lacey_xenon He's not a top (not) hitting the nail like that lol

When you nail all questions but cant nail the nail 😭

@MrAntiBully69 @LOVETHEVICE @KounaraChan So like I've already said, you thought that my ONLY argument was legality, you've already proven you can't read, proving you have low–remedial comprehension skills. There's nothing further for me to say because the text is fully on the record.✌🏾

the thing that “never happens”always seems to happen

@BerdPerfect @GigglingGanon I understand you don't have a very high iq. That's very clear. But what these individuals do is INVALUABLE for the American public. They audit the CONSTITUTIONAL rights that we are GUARANTEED and ENTITLED to, and ensures that they're operating as they're supposed to.

@GigglingGanon These auditors are obnoxious. It’s like let me go find the most annoying shit I can legally do. So you have a right to record, bully for you, go get a job you bum.

Court clerk of Hancock County Mississippi feels as though her feelings and her time are far more important than the rights of the citizens of the county. An arrogant display of government overreach at the Hancock County Justice Court in Mississippi shows exactly why First Amendment audits are so vital. When an independent journalist, entered the public lobby to document court operations, he was met with immediate, unprovoked hostility from Court Clerk Catherine Garcia. ​Claiming the lobby was a "non-recording facility," Garcia cited a state rule regarding criminal proceedings that has absolutely no bearing on a public lobby. Her primary grievance? The camera was making her clerks "uncomfortable." She even pointed to the court's own surveillance cameras—ironically used because members of the public keep stealing their counter bell—demanding that the journalist stop recording while her own cameras rolled. When journalist refused to yield his constitutional rights to appease her personal feelings, she called for security. ​The situation defused only when Investigator Egan arrived, assessed the scene, and correctly informed Garcia and her staff that filming in the public lobby is perfectly legal as long as private records aren't being exposed. Rather than admitting her mistake, Garcia and a staggering seven court clerks completely abandoned their posts and retreated from the windows, grinding county business to a halt simply because a citizen held a camera. ​This entire interaction highlights a disturbing trend: Catherine Garcia seems to have remarkably little understanding of the law and the actual rights of the citizens she is paid to serve. Because the Justice Court Clerk is an appointed position rather than an elected one, she answers directly to the Hancock County Board of Supervisors. The accountability lands squarely on them. ​The entire Board of Supervisors is up for reelection in November 2027. One can only hope that when the 2027 election cycle arrives, the voters of Hancock County demand sweeping changes on the board. A fresh, newly elected board needs to step up and replace Garcia with someone who is genuinely willing to uphold the constitutional rights of the county's citizens, rather than prioritizing their own fragile egos and personal feelings over the law.

@ZemiVoid @GigglingGanon Change the laws, you mean change the Constitution for individuals with cameras? 🤣 wow the stupidity on this side is through the roof!

@GigglingGanon There is a difference between exercising your rights and being a duchebag. This is a good way to make lawmakers change the laws.

@BJWoods013 @GigglingGanon What strangers you watch the entire video play out you even have the ability to read the caption and somehow you came across with a completely different conclusion. 🤣 holy shit.

@GigglingGanon These fucking losers going in places filming them just for a reaction are the worst types of humans. Insufferable low lifes.

@PaulDick96 @KounaraChan Well considering I'm NOT arguing MORALITY but LEGALITY it appears you are far outside your intellectual element.

@Caramellvr @KounaraChan BBC 4u is a trustworthy moral benchmark for us guys, pack it up and admit he’s right

@YoungGun8140 This dude is doing his taxes and next thing you know chat GPT is telling him he's Neo...? ... 😆🤣 😂 😹 I can't stop laughing this is so fucking funny!

The AI crisis no one is talking about.

@its_The_Dr This man doesn't understand. Robert's Rules of Order, a Point of Order is designed to interrupt proceedings by OFFICIAL MEMBERS (NOT the General Public), if a procedural rule is being broken there are strict limitations on who can use it and how it must be delivered.

A veteran had hands put on him at Midland City Hall, He called a Point of order when someone on the Board was saying something that wasn’t true! The Mayor sent the Cops on him a came back and filed a Complaint on her. This is an intimidation tactic to stop you from doing your job as a Citizen! He had every right to clarify with a point of order but obviously the mayor knew she was lying. This is what happens when elected officials become Tyrants.

@EmilySm43 Got skills

He's??

@LibOrNormal Yes... because you don't know if they're unarmed and they have the ability to arm themselves while in your home.

🤔

@Kinza1278 Yes. This is a stupid question.

@MrAntiBully69 @LOVETHEVICE @KounaraChan You can "think" whatever the fuck you want. The LAWS and your thoughts are NOT on the same page regarding these LEGAL matters.

@ThegoddessNamii @KounaraChan You're not thinking CRITICALLY nor LEGALLY! take the inverse of what you're arguing: Do you personally find it permissible for Cameras to be in bathrooms recording Private actions and ASSUMING your 👆🏾) intent and ✌🏾) what your private actions are?

@Caramellvr @KounaraChan It’s clear what he was doing tho..lol I feel like you’re defending this so hard bc you do shit like this too. For Christ sake look at your screen name ☠️ this generation is hypersexual and porn addicted. She shouldn’t record,but he shouldn’t be touching himself sexually n public

@MrAntiBully69 @LOVETHEVICE @KounaraChan There's no such thing as a Court of MORALITY, that's 100% what a court of LAW is for. In other words, this matter couldn't be settled under different people's "morals" it can only be settled under the codes of law which is the reason I analyze it through a legal lens.

@RyderzStorm @KounaraChan The low IQ of x users is jarring. U're presume "perverse" acts w/out ample facts. The MTF defended their actions & privacy. This matter wouldn't be settled in a "moral" court but a LEGAL Court. And in this case the person recording in a BATHROOM is in the worst LEGAL POSITION.

@Caramellvr @KounaraChan People like bbc 4u excuse this behavior which results in escalation of behaviors until someone gets hurt. Your weak minded defense of this perversion results in real victims.