Cafe y cigarro

Año nuevo, equipo nuevo... ¡VUELVE LILLIA'S FEET! 🦌 ¡VUELVEN LOS STREAMS ! (twitch.tv/adcaries) ¡NO VOLVERÁ EL PELO! 👨‍🦲 Martes 13 a las 21:00 - Cuartos de final 🔝Greskas 🌳@BrimstoneDavid 🥷 @davexFN 🏹ADCalves 🩼 @El_Gelito 🤡 @sonsonsan_

@ypellic3 yo soy el siguiente

ME HA BLOQUEADO POR FIN

Before Fidel, Cuba was not some balanced, diversified "free market" farm paradise. It was a U.S. sugar monoculture with land concentrated in latifundia, serving one buyer, in one currency, for one purpose. Sugar for the empire. Tourism for the empire. Mafias, casinos, and brothels for the empire. That was your "economic fundamentals." When you turn a country into a plantation, it will import a lot of its food. Because the best land is reserved for export crops that serve foreign profit, not local nutrition. The revolution inherited that structure. Cuba did not start from "normal economy" and then ruin it with Marxism. It started from a gangster client state, where Washington and a tiny local elite owned the soil. What did Fidel do? He broke the plantations. He redistributed land. He sent literacy brigades into the countryside. He turned a semi-feudal island into a society where peasants could become doctors, engineers, and teachers. Then the United States answered that audacity with: Bay of Pigs. Economic embargo. Terror campaigns. Permanent attempts to isolate and starve the island. You act as if the USSR "feeding" Cuba was proof of Fidel’s incompetence. In reality, it was the only major power willing to trade with a country Washington was trying to strangle. Cuba sent sugar, citrus, nickel, and workers. The USSR sent oil, machinery, grain, and yes, food. That is called trade and specialization. Japan, the Gulf monarchies, Singapore, South Korea, many European states import large portions of their food. Nobody calls that a failure of "economic fundamentals." They call it comparative advantage. It only becomes "proof of incompetence" when a socialist country does it under siege. You say, "In the end, this folklore hero achieved nada." Nothing? He took a U.S. playground of casinos and child prostitution and turned it into a country with: Universal literacy. Life expectancy comparable to rich countries. Infant mortality rates lower than many U.S. cities. One of the highest doctor-per-capita ratios in the world. Medical brigades that went to Africa, Latin America, even to Western countries during crises. Under embargo. Under permanent sabotage. Ninety miles from a state that spends more on its military than most of the planet combined. If that is "nada," what do you call a superpower that spends trillions on war and still has people rationing insulin, drowning in student debt, and sleeping under bridges? You reduce six decades of resistance to a meme about "importing two-thirds of its food." I look at the same history and see this: A small island that refused to be a plantation. A people who were told, "Surrender and we will feed you properly." A leadership that answered, "We would rather be poor with a spine than rich on our knees." You want to score a cheap point about Fidel’s "folklore." But the real folklore is the story you are selling: That a country under embargo, sabotage, terror, and economic siege should be judged by the same metrics as the empire that besieged it, and if it is not equally rich, the problem must be "communist incompetence." Cuba’s real "crime" was not bad economics. Its crime was proving that a small, Black and brown island could kick the United States out and still refuse to crawl back for forgiveness. That is why people like you need to keep repeating that it "achieved nothing." Because if you ever admitted what it actually achieved under those conditions, you would have to ask a much more uncomfortable question: What would Cuba have become without the boot on its neck?

bo bo bo

#FE3H Black Eagles x P5R All out attack💥 I made them into animations!!❤️🦅

El 10% de las familias más ricas concentra el 42% del valor de toda la vivienda de España elpais.com/economia/2026-…

@0pp3n @BrimstoneDavid @davexFN @El_Gelito @sonsonsan_ yo a las 9pm

@Carles_vg @BrimstoneDavid @davexFN @El_Gelito @sonsonsan_ eres un ESTAFADOR y un SIN VERGUENZA

Año nuevo, equipo nuevo... ¡VUELVE LILLIA'S FEET! 🦌 ¡VUELVEN LOS STREAMS ! (twitch.tv/adcaries) ¡NO VOLVERÁ EL PELO! 👨‍🦲 Martes 13 a las 21:00 - Cuartos de final 🔝Greskas 🌳@BrimstoneDavid 🥷 @davexFN 🏹ADCalves 🩼 @El_Gelito 🤡 @sonsonsan_

@0pp3n @BrimstoneDavid @davexFN @El_Gelito @sonsonsan_ a tu madre le dije de todo menos gorda

@Carles_vg @BrimstoneDavid @davexFN @El_Gelito @sonsonsan_ Uno de esos pateó a mi perro y llamó a mi madre gorda.

@ypellic3 esta es la vibra que traigo al repositorio de la empresa y a quien no le mole que no me contrate

- as any, nos la pela el tipado - ? no instanciado/undefined? me la puede pelar más - [0]? dame lo primero q tengas y si existe, mejor

Nuno Loureiro was assassinated yesterday He was a professor + the director of MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center > 47 years old > Studied nuclear fusion (= energy source of the Sun + stars) for 10 years at MIT > His award-winning work focused on creating a virtually limitless, clean energy source on Earth - one that doesn’t produce carbon or radioactive waste (usual biproduct of fission reactors) > His research was essentially a threat to companies in the energy sector (fossil fuels, wind, solar, etc) > Nuno was vital to the development of fusion nuclear power plants, without him the path ahead is less clear + his death will set back the entire field Nuno is not the first MIT fusion scientist to be brutally murdered, in 2004 Eugene Mallove was also shot in his home I hope this opens eyes – there is an agenda at play

@0pp3n esto no te lo pienso perdonar

Qué hace Milei ahí?

@Carles_vg ?

@0pp3n borra ya

@ypellic3 @Paggnut y que tiene de malo estar calvo?

@Paggnut poco le pasa

walter white eres el ser más despreciable de la historia de la ficción y nada que hagas puede redimirte

@ypellic3 la serie se llama breaking bad no breaking good

Ya queda poco para que salga nuestro manga!! ❤️ もうすぐ僕たちのマンガが発売されるよ！ #マンガ #新刊 #もうすぐ発売

@Sheep_Esports @i_Eros_ @anonimotum @LEC_Wooloo

[SOURCES] AD Carry Flakked 🇪🇸 will not be playing for Team Heretics 🇪🇸 in the #LEC next year He represented the organization for 3 years Report by @i_Eros_ @anonimotum @LEC_Wooloo 🔽 sheepesports.com/en/articles/so…

@Legolas1v9 Hearthstone en big 20 25...

Gente que tal el juego de cartas del league of legends? Vale la pena viciarse un poquillo? (eso si nada superará al hearthstone)

Social democracy cannot serve as a true alternative to capitalism. It appears attractive on the surface but is built upon deep contradictions that eventually collapse under their own weight. At its core, social democracy seeks a balance between capitalist profit motives and socialist calls for fair wages, quality public services, and ecological protection. Yet these progressive demands inherently threaten capital itself because they raise production costs, empower workers, and weaken the endless drive for accumulation that capitalism depends on. There are two ways to address this contradiction. One is to reject the logic of accumulation altogether and move toward a post-capitalist system organized democratically around human needs and ecological balance. Social democracy, however, remains loyal to capitalism. It manages the contradiction not by overcoming it but by exporting its costs. Through imperialism, social democratic states extract cheap labour and natural resources from the global South, allowing them to sustain prosperity, high wages, and welfare systems at home while keeping capital accumulation intact. Even those states often praised as moral examples, such as the Scandinavian countries, rely on vast transfers of value from the global South through unequal exchange. Their social stability is built on the hidden exploitation of others. This imperial outlet is not available to nations on the periphery. When workers and environmental movements in the South demand justice, their ruling classes cannot offset those demands through external exploitation. With no outside to draw from, they turn to coercion. Repression becomes the only means to preserve accumulation, often with the direct or indirect support of the core powers. The violence that marks many capitalist states in the South is therefore not cultural or accidental but structural. Capitalism itself requires violence to survive. The imperial core can appear peaceful only because the brutality is displaced elsewhere. Social democracy, then, is not a step beyond capitalism but a softer version of it. The illusion works only for those who benefit from it. The miners in Congo and the garment workers in Bangladesh who feed Western industries see through it clearly. A real alternative must go further. It must build an economy centered on human well-being and ecological balance rather than profit. Such a system is entirely possible, but it demands abandoning the drive for accumulation once and for all.