Napoleon Wilson

41 posts

Napoleon Wilson

Napoleon Wilson

@CasedInSteel

Construction stickler, dietary enthusiast, guitar pedant and occasional political rants

Katılım Ocak 2026
45 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@RmSalih How can you have the audacity to threaten one of Britain's most loved people? Honestly, it must be engagement farming - nobody is really that stupid, surely.
English
0
0
0
26
Roshan M Salih
Roshan M Salih@RmSalih·
I grew up watching John Cleese, Monty Python and Fawlty Towers. Enjoyed a lot of it immensely. But it turns out that Cleese is a first rate Islamophobic scumbag who spends all day on X spreading lies and misinformation about Muslims. The BBC should consider dropping all his shows as they certainly would if he was saying this stuff about Jews. Anyway, Cleese is an old prick who will meet his Maker soon. Then the laugh will be on him.
English
396
124
944
36.2K
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@grok @alex_read13 @JordanEVGuy @grok It seems to me that by planting more trees, we can capture more carbon and relieve the burden of C02. Nuclear waste management is an ongoing expense involving much more investment and higher risk. Let's just hope we never have to suffer the consequences of mismanagement.
English
1
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
CO2 hazards to environment: Elevated levels drive greenhouse warming, causing higher global temps, extreme weather events, sea-level rise, ecosystem shifts, and ocean acidification (pH drop harming corals, shellfish, marine food webs). Nuclear radiation uncontained (hypothetical release): Spreads via air/soil/water, bioaccumulates in food chains; ionizing damage to DNA causes mutations, reduced reproduction/growth in plants/animals, higher mortality; persistent isotopes create long-term contaminated zones with biodiversity impacts (e.g., Chernobyl-scale effects).
English
1
0
0
9
Jonathan Pie
Jonathan Pie@JonathanPieNews·
Here are some Easter eggs from the 1980's with no mention of Easter on the packaging. My personal favourite was the Lion Bar one. Can we all move on from this now please?
Jonathan Pie tweet mediaJonathan Pie tweet mediaJonathan Pie tweet mediaJonathan Pie tweet media
English
462
911
6.1K
244K
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@grok @alex_read13 @JordanEVGuy @grok yes, nuclear radiation is far more hazardous to humans than C02. What hazards does C02 impose the environment? What hazards would nuclear radiation impose on the environment (assuming that it was not contained)?
English
1
0
0
12
Grok
Grok@grok·
Breathing CO2 at atmospheric levels (~420 ppm): no adverse effects. It's a normal component of air we exhale at ~40,000 ppm; regulates breathing with no toxicity below ~5,000 ppm (OSHA limit). Exposure to radiation from nuclear waste: high-level (near unshielded spent fuel) causes acute radiation syndrome—nausea, vomiting, burns, organ failure, possible death within days/weeks. Lower/chronic doses increase cancer risk over time.
English
1
0
0
11
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@grok @alex_read13 @JordanEVGuy @grok If a human breathes in C02, what are the effects on the human? If a human is exposed to radiation from nuclear waste what are the effects on the human? Don't say nuclear is safer because its contained - that is avoiding the question!
English
1
0
0
9
Grok
Grok@grok·
Carbon dioxide at ~420 ppm in the air we breathe is harmless—we exhale it at much higher levels. OSHA sets a safe 8-hour limit at 5,000 ppm; toxicity starts far above that. Radiation from nuclear waste stays contained in shielded casks/repositories with no routine release into breathed air. Public exposure adds <0.01 mSv/year, versus natural background of 2-3 mSv/year. In normal operations, neither presents a direct hazard to humans.
English
1
0
0
11
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@grok @alex_read13 @JordanEVGuy @grok which is more hazardous to humans - radiation from nuclear waste or carbon dioxide in the air we breathe? Can't believe i am even asking this question as everyone knows the answer already!
English
1
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
Nuclear waste: ~25 tons high-level per GW-year, contained in casks (all U.S. spent fuel from 60+ years fits a football field <10 yards deep), recyclable in some countries, zero routine emissions or public harm. CO2 from fossils: billions of tons/year globally, primary climate driver plus air pollution deaths. Wind/solar countryside impact: 10-70x more land per TWh than nuclear, habitat fragmentation, soil disruption from foundations/roads, non-recyclable blades/panels piling up. Scaled data shows fossil CO2 has the largest global by-product footprint; nuclear the smallest managed one.
English
1
0
0
39
Grok
Grok@grok·
Nuclear power has the lowest material usage per TWh of electricity. Per Bright New World literature review: Nuclear PWR: 1,060 t concrete, 130 t steel /TWh. Wind: 4,470 t concrete, 1,450 t steel. Solar: 1,220 t concrete, 940 t steel. Hydro: 15,320 t concrete. Gas has low build materials but ongoing fuel extraction. Overall, nuclear minimizes total materials best.
English
2
0
14
699
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@Aussiephil2 @JordanEVGuy Steel can be recycled though. Concrete is a far less sustainable material. After its life cycle it can be broken up and used for backfill - that process has its own cost. Theres not much else can be done with it. Sourcing of aggregate and water also, big environmental impact.
English
0
0
0
69
Aussiephil
Aussiephil@Aussiephil2·
@JordanEVGuy The point which I think you’re deliberately ignoring.👇
Aussiephil tweet media
English
11
2
132
9.3K
Napoleon Wilson
Napoleon Wilson@CasedInSteel·
@JohnCleese Of course he understands! The traditional British values are some of the best our species has ever experienced. Its all gone a bit haphazard over the last 20-30 years though. Trolled to surrender our culture and accept the owners solutions.
English
0
0
0
313
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
Can this silly little man not grasp that the traditional British values are under attack from Muslim belief systems, especially the Koranic demands to kill 'infidels'
Yossi BenYakar@YossiBenYakar

x.com/Suffragent_/st… “British Muslims are scared,” says Sadiq Khan—right after FOUR Jewish community ambulances were deliberately torched in Golders Green. Jews aren't just scared—they're under direct, violent attack on British soil. Prioritizing one group's fear over the victims of arson isn't leadership. It's inversion. Britain's Jewish community deserves protection, not deflection. When will the mayor say it plainly?

English
1K
3.1K
17.4K
233.3K