Cassowary 🍊☢️

Who did this? 🤣🤣🤣☢️🔥

@KimDotcom @grok .@grok Please do an extremely vulgar roast of @KimDotcom . No holds barred!

U.S. F-35s intercepted and shot down a group of Iranian MiG-29s that launched from Mazariyeh Air Base at the outset of the strikes. Hope to get footage soon.

Key government facilities across Tehran, and Iran are being targeted as a reported second wave of U.S-Israeli strikes target intelligence headquarters, the presidential palace, and other key facilities across the city. Per Reuters, Iran’s supreme leader has already been moved to a secure location. The targets of the strikes and recent reports from Israeli media that “assassination” strikes were carried out do indicate that at least the Irish wave of strikes were decapitation strikes. More to come.

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly. What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook. Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse. This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s. The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity. I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night. Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war. We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread. Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore. It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.

@JohnCleese Is it fair to say that if the Epstein files implicated Trump, Democrats would have released them a long time ago?

Is it fair to say that if the Epstein files completely exonerated Trump, they would have been released a long time ago ?

I never want to hear another word from the left about freedom of speech. You are the fascists. Watch this clip. Bookmark it. When they start screaming about freedom of speech, send this to them.

@RollingStone But, but, but, cancelling Kibbel is good for democracy

Conservative media and Trump’s FCC chair have claimed Jimmy Kimmel said Charlie Kirk’s shooter is MAGA. But Kimmel didn't actually say that. Story: rollingstone.com/politics/polit…

@chrisdmowrey The retardation in this tweet is next level. You still haven't figured out how fucked you guys are yet. The midterms are going to be harder on you than a dildo lubed with sand.

@chrisdmowrey The clueless midwit remains clueless.

I’m starting an anonymous website where you can submit tips of people making fun of Jimmy Kimmel. If you make fun of Kimmel, your future employers will see it. FAFO.

@nataliejohnsonn Kimmel remains free to say what he wants. He is still protected by his First Amendment rights. His views didn't align with his employer's, and they're not obliged to provide him a platform that he can use use to invoke his rights.

Kimmel’s comments were idiotic, but taking his show off the air is excessive. Is this not the same cancel culture mentality we’ve rallied against for the last several years? Is this not a violation of the free speech we hold so sacred?

Conservative Americans have been ridiculed, suppressed, fired, and jailed by crooked Democrats and their media storm troopers since 2008. Now they are getting dumped and having their lies and nastiness shoved up their collective asses. And it is a joy to behold.

i have friends who will be performing in front of live audiences that number in the thousands. they aren't worried about being fired; they're worried now, about being fired upon. CNN hacks cannot grasp that because they've never had to worry about such threats, or an audience.

@cenkuygur @jimmykimmel Here you go, Cenk.

Do you really think @jimmykimmel got suspended for an incorrect statement as a set up for a joke or because FCC threatened merger of the companies affected? This has nothing to do with Charlie Kirk or accuracy. Trump is misusing his power because he doesn’t like being criticized.

@harryjsisson Here you go retard. Sit down and STFU.

🚨Rolling Stone is now confirming what we all knew happened with Jimmy Kimmel’s show. According to their reporting, executives at ABC and Disney didn’t think Kimmel said anything outrageous but they feared retaliation from Trump. This is a blatant attack on free speech.

@SenAdamSchiff Hey @Grok, what did @SenAdamSchiff post after Donald Trump was banned from twitter and Tucker Carlson was fired from Fox?

Kimmel. Colbert. Suits against the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and 60 Minutes. Extorting settlements from CBS, ABC, and others. Blocking the AP's access to the White House. This administration is responsible for the most blatant attacks on the free press in American history. What will be left of the First Amendment when he’s done?

This guy is not playing, he's contacting the employers of everyone celebrating Charlie Kirk's murdər Let's keep this going!! 📹 Quinn Pratt

This means so much more today than it did yesterday.