Chris Edwards

4.2K posts

Chris Edwards banner
Chris Edwards

Chris Edwards

@CatoEdwards

Editor of https://t.co/1QrJnKwWa9 (@DownsizeTheFeds) at the Cato Institute.

Washington, DC Katılım Şubat 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen3.2K Takipçiler
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@cafreiman Also, FedEx and UPS are privatized, and they serve the public.
English
4
0
8
493
Trade Blazer
Trade Blazer@TheTradeBlazer·
@FoxBusiness we do not need deliveries every day. Maybe 3x a week. So your magazine arrives on Wednesday instead of Tuesday. Big deal.
English
1
0
0
47
FOX Business
FOX Business@FoxBusiness·
STAMP OF DISAPPROVAL: The U.S. Postal Service is warning Congress it could run out of cash in less than a year without a massive financial overhaul. Postmaster General David Steiner is pushing for higher stamp prices and an end to six-day-a-week deliveries to keep the agency from total collapse. "The failure to do this could lead to the end of the Postal Service as we know it now."
FOX Business tweet media
English
30
3
19
4.2K
Blackjack21
Blackjack21@BigEAthens·
@FoxBusiness I don't get why people get so up-in-arms about 3-4 day a week delivery. Delivery six days a week is a financial loser and very inefficient. That's not the only efficiency problem the USPS has I'm sure, but it's one that is easy to identify and fix.
English
2
0
3
67
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@DavidADitch They are hardly even providing a "financial service." They do the paperwork to pay out the subsidies. It's a very costly "overhead" for a subsidy program.
English
1
0
1
25
David Ditch
David Ditch@DavidADitch·
The heavy subsidization of crop insurance companies is one of the biggest scams going today. They aren't working the land or producing food, they simply provide a financial service. Do they need *billions of dollars* in handouts?
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards

Federal Crop Insurance: Taxpayers will fund it $14.7b in 2026, with $9.6b going to wealthy farmers and $5.1b going to big insurance companies. 10% of the wealthiest farmers get 56% of the subsidies. It's an absurd program. cato.org/blog/federal-c…

English
2
0
7
280
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
Federal Crop Insurance: Taxpayers will fund it $14.7b in 2026, with $9.6b going to wealthy farmers and $5.1b going to big insurance companies. 10% of the wealthiest farmers get 56% of the subsidies. It's an absurd program. cato.org/blog/federal-c…
Chris Edwards tweet media
English
5
11
26
2.7K
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
Farm subsidy spending is soaring under Trump and the Republicans. Lawmakers who claim to be fiscally conservative are shoveling tens of billions of subsidy dollars to millionaire farm businesses and landowners. cato.org/blog/farm-subs…
Chris Edwards tweet media
English
0
0
1
81
𝙱𝚛𝚢𝚊𝚗 𝚁𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚢 🗽🇺🇸
The idea that foreign capital inflows to the USA represent debt that "we owe" is 2/3 incorrect. And we would be in much worse shape w/out foreign purchases of government debt. The best response is less government borrowing. Not tariffs. Not taxes on foreign investment.
𝙱𝚛𝚢𝚊𝚗 𝚁𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚢 🗽🇺🇸 tweet media
English
3
14
61
5.3K
Liz Oyer
Liz Oyer@lawyeroyer·
In just one year, Trump has used the pardon power to forgive over $1.5 billion in debts owed to crime victims and taxpayers. I have more details—and a comparison to Biden’s pardons—in this post. For the full accounting and receipts, visit my Substack: lawyeroyer.com. youtube.com/shorts/OoPCKOS…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
15
12
360
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
I examine a dozen cases of Trump pardoning corrupt politicians and government officials--from Blagojevich to Santos. Springing such crooks from jail signals that public corruption is no big deal, and we will get more of it. cato.org/blog/pardoning…
Chris Edwards tweet media
English
3
9
26
2.4K
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@tomhfh How are all the food items and goods going to get to the cafes and shops? Let alone the police, utility crews, construction workers, movers, ambulances, trash collectors, and others with vehicles?
English
0
0
0
50
Tom Harwood
Tom Harwood@tomhfh·
Britain should make a new deal with drivers. The centre of cities should be people-centric. Cars only as guests. And in return we need a hell of a lot more motorways *between* our cities. Glorious smooth maintained motorways. Deal?
Jonathan Berk@berkie1

Under Mayor Anne Hidalgo, Paris has created nearly 300 “rues aux écoles in an effort to; improve air quality, reduce crashes, and give kids more safe spaces in their neighborhoods to walk, bike, play and just be kids. 🇫🇷

English
126
21
462
65.4K
createstreets
createstreets@createstreets·
What a melancholy comparison. It’s time, lavishly & liberally, to replant street trees, widen pavements, rip out ugly lights & reclaim streets from their highways officer overlords Dickens Street, Toxteth, 1911 vs 2023 via @keithjones84 who is worth a follow
createstreets tweet media
English
61
216
1.3K
48.6K
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@osbornforne Farm bankruptcies are lower than other industries like restaurants, which also feed us. Also, why dont farmers save during the good years? They're not helpless.
English
0
0
0
52
Dan Osborn
Dan Osborn@osbornforne·
U.S. Farm Bankruptcies increased 46% in 2025. This is UNACCEPTABLE. Less than 2% of Americans feed the rest of us. We need to make sure our farmers are WHOLE and pass the reforms they've been calling out for. Right to repair. Reforming checkoff programs. Breaking up seed and fertilizer monopolies. Our farmers have to buy from monopolies then sell into monopolies. They get squeezed on both ends while corporations post record profits. We're losing family farms every single day. We don't have time to wait. agriculture.com/partners-u-s-f…
English
218
1.3K
2.2K
49.7K
Joshua Rauh
Joshua Rauh@joshrauh·
This is a blatant straw-man mischaracterization of Economics. From Nobelist Mirrlees (1971) who derived an optimal top marginal tax rate of zero to Saez (2002) who suggests much higher rates, public finance economists use Social Welfare Functions (SWFs): a formalization that goes back to Bergson in the 1930s but that has deep roots in Bentham’s 19th century utilitarian political economy. My personal view is that social welfare functions combined with diminishing marginal utility of consumption practically bake in tons of optimal redistribution without considering distortions. We can debate that. But please: the idea that public finance doesn’t handle the possibility that caviar for the rich might have less social benefit than bread for the poor is just arguing with a cartoon version of economics.
UChicago | Stone Center on Inequality & Mobility@UCStoneCenter

We rarely think of economics as scandalous, but maybe we should. Sam Bowles, in conversation with @sndurlauf & @ethanbdm, argues that a core assumption in the field impedes moral reasoning about wealth redistribution. Watch the full panel → bit.ly/3Yj4F3B

English
28
62
456
70.3K
Romina Boccia
Romina Boccia@RominaBoccia·
I was today years old when I discovered the @CatoInstitute building making an appearance in the movie The American President (1995) — now streaming on Netflix.
Romina Boccia tweet media
English
1
2
5
281
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@SteveForbesCEO the homeless spending is like the high speed rail spending: billions gone, no results
English
0
0
0
29
Steve Forbes
Steve Forbes@SteveForbesCEO·
Billions spent, homelessness worse, and now blatant fraud tied to politically connected firms. California’s problem is not compassion; it is zero accountability. Taxpayers get ripped off while leaders refuse to clean house. realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/…
English
5
3
26
718
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards@CatoEdwards·
@marcjoffe Most important thing is that the vast majority of "wealth" is business investment, which supports jobs and incomes. Higher taxes=less wealth=lower incomes. Some wealth is yachts and gold bars, but most is business facilities, machinery, and other productive assets.
English
1
0
7
84
Marc Joffe
Marc Joffe@marcjoffe·
The wealth tax is not only driving away billionaires, but deterring billionaires and aspiring billionaires from moving to California. Unless the tax is defeated and future such taxes are constitutionally banned, California's growth trajectory will be permanently lowered.
Marc Joffe tweet media
English
27
14
119
3.6K