Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger
15.8K posts


And there we have it #LiamBlutmanOTWorld
Prize for correct answer (one human, use the hashtag)
My Pick: Necas
English
Chad Kruger retweetledi

One of the footage in today's UFO release: a luminous sphere gliding between wind turbines.
They had it classified. They kept it classified. They still can't explain it.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
WTF is this?! 👀 U.S. military caught a star-shaped object flying crazy fast, doing wild criss-cross patterns in the sky. Wait... were they writing something in the sky?
English
Chad Kruger retweetledi

WTF is this?! 👀
U.S. military caught a star-shaped object flying crazy fast, doing wild criss-cross patterns in the sky.
Wait... were they writing something in the sky?
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸👽🛸 Department of War begins releasing UFO files!
English
Chad Kruger retweetledi

NEW: Rep. Tim Burchett says the first drop of UFO files is a "drop in the bucket" compared to the "Holy Crap" moment that is coming.
"The 1st drop will be big but in comparison to what is coming they will be a drop in the bucket. I would say “Holy Crap” is coming," he said.
162 files were released on Friday, some of them dating back 80 years.
The following footage was from an infrared sensor aboard a United States military platform in 2013, according to the Department of War.
English
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi

@BarstoolBigCat hit the awoo
BalloftheWild (The Artist fka /r/Timberwolves)@BalloftheWild
awoo 53
English

@Chab___ Dear Chad,
I want to apologize for my lack of faith in the Minnesota Wild after they went down 2-1 in the series. I promise to improve my fandown in round 2 vs Colorado.
Sincerely,
Taylor C.
English

Classic Minnesota sports to go up 1-0 in the series just to slowly kill all of our hopes and dreams
ESPN@espn
STARS WIN A DOUBLE OVERTIME THRILLER TO TAKE THE SERIES LEAD ⭐
English
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

English
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi
Chad Kruger retweetledi










