Chad Fisco

@TirthNath @KonstantinKisin @IfindRetards

@KonstantinKisin Utterly fucking! You started it you pretend to end it after sucking all the wealth destroying culture, dignity, spirituality and everything. The time wheel is now turning to force you to realise all this.

What if the west isn't the villain they told you it was? We’ve spent years accepting accusations about racism, intolerance, and slavery without challenging the bigger historical reality: The societies most condemned today are also the ones that led the world in ending slavery, expanding rights, and building the most tolerant nations on earth. That’s the conversation nobody wants to have.

@christhorneart @dstaples The courts dealt with it, move on ffs. You don’t know any first hand information so you’re not qualified to make any judgement. Low IQ witch hunt. Or are you projecting and have some dirty laundry you are guilty about?

@dstaples He is a sexual predator, there is nothing you can say to change that.

I'll repeat this again because the misinformation about Carter Hart around this trial is both appalling and slanderous. Lots to hate about the Vegas franchise. But giving a second chance to Carter Hart isn't one of them. The judge in the case didn't just find no guilt, she exonerated the accused, finding as a matter of fact there was no sexual assault, that the sex was consensual. If you're curious to know the facts of the Hart and his Hockey Canada teammates case, here is summary of the 11 key findings of fact in judge Maria Carroccia's ruling: 1. That Carroccia found the complainant, E.M., to be both unreliable and not credible in her testimony about the events of the night in question, June. 18, 2018 in London, Ontario. More than that, Carroccia found that E.M. had given her consent to the sex acts with the men that night. The Hockey Canada Five were always presumed innocent until found guilty under our system, but Carroccia’s finding does more than find them not guilty. It essentially exonerates them, though we will all likely agree that they acted in poor and immature fashion that night and needed to do more to treat E.M. with care. 2. The judge also found that the notion “believe all women” is a political slogan, but goes against fundamental Canadian values that work to ensure that no innocent person is found guilty without a fair trial. 3. That key video evidence from Jack’s Bar where E.M. met Michael McLeod and other Hockey Canada players that night forcefully and completely contradicts what E.M. said about the players initiating overt sexual contact on the dance flooor, and that E.M., in fact, put her hand on McLeod’s crotch area on the dance floor. 4. That key video evidence from the bar that night forcefully and completely contradicts what E.M. claimed about getting plied with drinks from the players. In fact, E.M. bought almost all of her own drinks. 5. That key video evidence contradicts what E.M. claimed about the players trying to separate her from her friends. 6. That key video evidence and E.M’s own testimony contradicts her claim that she was completely out of it that night due to alcohol consumption. 7. That E.M. had reasons to fabricate a false narrative based on numerous factors, including making things right with her own boyfriend. 8. There was repeated and consistent testimony, including from Crown witnesses Tyler Steenbergen and Brett Howden, that E.M. pushed for the players to engage with sex acts with her, and in the end Carroccia accepted this evidence as fact. 9. That there was numerous evidence of E.M.’s testimony been unreliable. 10. That E.M. had several opportunities to get dressed and to leave if she was fearful, but she left the bathroom where her clothes were and walked naked into the room full of players to continue on with their evening. This dynamic started after she had admittedly had consensual sex with McLeod. 11. That the players group chat the following day was not an effort to fabricate a story, but a group decision to simply tell the truth about what had happened with E.M

@IAM_Da_Vid @elonmusk @cb_doge So then the old person is dead

@ChadFisco @elonmusk @cb_doge Because they sovereignly wish not to be called by it anymore.

"I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus." — Elon Musk

@IAM_Da_Vid @elonmusk @cb_doge Then why is their birth name called dead naming?

@elonmusk @cb_doge Just because our children had a different experience than we did and see things from a different angle in the pleroma of the multitude of perspectives, does not mean we should act like they are dead. What could be uniting. Please step away from the martyr religion indie complex.

@cullenoncurling Could you clarify what you mean by reputation perspective?

Very good read from Ben. I think this move is pretty interesting, no one would argue Brad doesn't know curling but I'm intrigued by the risk Brad is taking from a reputation perspective and the one the US is taking in hiring someone without experience in a similar role

@esjesjesj @Z_XSophie You’re a fucking idiot to think this is different

@Z_XSophie No Elon actually did this

Remember how they lost their shit when Elon did this? Now it’s suddenly “my heart goes out to you” and everyone’s totally fine 😂 The rules change depending on who’s waving. Classic selective outrage.

@TednSmallPieces @BluelineBardown You accidentally logged into 𝕏

Holy fuck 🤣 it’s *BlueCry by the way

@TeriTeaser80417 @XFreeze @IfindRetards

@XFreeze Elon & Co stole the personal data of Americans. Was he concerned about the risk/ reward of those criminal actions? What does Elon think the punishment should be for that? Playing the pathetic victim...

Elon Musk: "If you punish people too much for failure, then they will respond accordingly, and the innovation you will get will be very incrementalist Nobody's gonna try anything bold for fear of getting fired or being punished in some way. So risk-reward must be balanced and favor taking bold moves, otherwise it will not happen"

@AlsoKnownAs_AA @iPhoneinCanada Ok Bell bot

The device purchase IS OPTIONAL when buying wireless service, on contract or not. Device lock rules address BYOD. By making actual buyers of devices pay extra $40 for a new smartphone makes wireless service more competitive. This will be positive effect on outright prices too. #CRTC

CRTC Warns Bell Over New $40 ‘Device Fee’ That Likely Breaks Federal Rules iphoneincanada.ca/2026/05/07/crt…

@DarrenMelynk @Canucks Loose like your asshole?

@Canucks More like " may the Loose be with you"

May the 4th be with you, #Canucks fans. 🌌

@Uli_tap @brivael And you went out of your way to craft a response which could be replaced with “no” and would have the exact same substance. Well done 👍

@brivael Te aventaste un aburrido y enorme pseudo ensayo para culminar en banalidades propagandistas. Sin embargo, tu problema central es que tienes la ingenua convicción de que gobernar una sociedad es jugar a las cartas de Pokémon.

Elon Musk avait dit un truc qui m'avait marqué sur l'allocation de ressources. En substance : passé un certain niveau de richesse, l'argent n'est plus de la consommation, c'est de l'allocation de capital. Cette phrase change tout. L'économie, dans le fond, c'est juste un problème d'allocation. Tu as des ressources finies et des usages infinis. Qui décide où va quoi ? Imagine une cour de récré. 100 enfants, des paquets de cartes Pokémon distribués au hasard. Tu laisses faire. Très vite, un ordre émerge. Les bons joueurs accumulent les cartes rares, les collectionneurs trient, les négociateurs trouvent des deals. Personne n'a planifié. Et pourtant chaque carte finit dans les mains de celui qui en tire le plus de valeur. Le système maximise le bonheur total de la cour. C'est ça, la main invisible. Maintenant fais entrer la maîtresse. Elle trouve ça injuste. Léo a 50 cartes, Tom en a 3. Elle confisque, redistribue, impose l'égalité. Trois effets immédiats. Les bons joueurs arrêtent de jouer, à quoi bon. Les mauvais n'ont plus de raison de progresser, ils auront leur part. Les échanges s'effondrent. La cour est égale, et morte. Elle a maximisé l'égalité, elle a détruit le bonheur. Le problème de la maîtresse, c'est qu'elle ne peut pas avoir l'information que la cour avait collectivement. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises, formulé en 1920. L'URSS a essayé de le résoudre pendant 70 ans avec le Gosplan. Résultat : pénuries, queues, effondrement. Pas parce que les Soviétiques étaient bêtes, parce que le problème est mathématiquement insoluble en mode centralisé. Quand Musk a 200 milliards, il ne les consomme pas, il les alloue. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Chaque dollar est un pari sur le futur. Et lui a un track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. Il a démontré qu'il sait identifier des problèmes immenses et y allouer des ressources avec un rendement spectaculaire. L'État aussi a un track record. Hôpitaux qui s'effondrent, éducation qui décline, dette qui explose, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des budgets en hausse constante. Le marché identifie les bons allocateurs, la politique identifie les bons communicants. Le profit n'est pas une finalité, c'est un signal. Il dit : tu as alloué des ressources rares vers un usage que les gens valorisent suffisamment pour payer. Plus le profit est gros, plus la création de valeur est grande. Quand Starlink est rentable, ça veut dire que des millions de gens dans des zones rurales ont enfin internet. Quand un ministère est en déficit, ça veut dire qu'il consomme plus qu'il ne produit. L'un crée, l'autre détruit, et on appelle ça redistribution. Dans nos sociétés il y a deux catégories d'acteurs. Les entrepreneurs et les bureaucrates. L'entrepreneur prend un risque personnel pour identifier un problème, mobiliser des ressources, créer une solution. S'il se trompe il perd. S'il a raison, ses clients gagnent, ses employés gagnent, ses fournisseurs gagnent, l'État collecte des impôts. Il est la cellule de base du progrès humain. Le bureaucrate ne prend aucun risque personnel. Son salaire est garanti. Au mieux il maintient une rente existante. Au pire il la détruit par excès de réglementation, mauvaise allocation forcée, incitations perverses qui découragent ceux qui produisent. Mais dans aucun cas il ne crée. Regarde les 50 dernières années. iPhone, internet civil, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. Toutes des inventions privées, portées par des entrepreneurs, financées par du capital risque. Pas un seul ministère n'a inventé quoi que ce soit qui ait changé ta vie au quotidien. La France est devenue le laboratoire mondial de la dérive bureaucratique. 57% du PIB en dépenses publiques, record absolu. Une administration tentaculaire, une fiscalité qui pénalise la création de richesse. Résultat : décrochage face aux États-Unis, à l'Allemagne, à la Suisse. Fuite des cerveaux. Désindustrialisation. Dette qui explose. Et le pire c'est que la mauvaise allocation s'auto-renforce. Plus l'État prélève, moins les entrepreneurs créent. Moins ils créent, moins il y a de base fiscale. Plus l'État s'endette et taxe. Boucle de rétroaction négative parfaite. La maîtresse pense qu'elle aide, et chaque année la cour produit moins. Dans nos sociétés, ce sont les entrepreneurs, toujours, qui font avancer la civilisation. Les bureaucrates au mieux maintiennent une rente, au pire la détruisent. Aucune société n'a jamais progressé en taxant ses créateurs pour subventionner ses gestionnaires. La question n'est jamais qui a combien. C'est qui alloue le mieux la prochaine unité de ressource pour maximiser le futur de l'humanité. La réponse depuis 200 ans n'a jamais changé. Ce ne sont pas les fonctionnaires.

@DavidChoiMusic @brivael That’s a nice list of things but what point are you trying to make? Bullies get detention (jail), social services take care of the handicapped kid, and how does the size of any one kid need to be a concern? The analogy is excellent.

@brivael Your playground analogy doesn’t take into consideration if a child is handicapped, or if they kids are taught to be bullies, or if one of the kids is actually the size of an adult.

@helenkpeterson @passittobulis Why would you request it be removed?

@passittobulis Daniel, of course you may not know this, but Kailia - the grinning girl from Toddlers and Tiaras, pictured - died by suicide in 2022. I have requested X remove her pic from the gifs list, but so far they have not. 😞

John Shorthouse when there's a stoppage 4:20 into a period:

@ryangerritsen I would like to know what deaf people think of this

Instead of deaf people just watching the actual artists perform, CBC puts a sign language interpreter on to perform air guitar & drum solos for them to watch along side of it. Whats going on in Canada? It’s a 24/7 nut house

@billp97309 @DevinOlsenn @IfindRetards

@DevinOlsenn If the FSD was as perfect as you like to suggest, we would have NO incidents of pedestrians getting hit. But we do have instances. People are getting run over by FSD. Typical propaganda technique is to pick and choose your information. Show us the ones where a FSD hits someone.

This clip really showcases the difference between a human driver and Tesla FSD. FSD sees the (stupid) person crossing the road at night and slows down for them, meanwhile a human driver from the other direction nearly runs down the pedestrian. Should the person not be crossing there? Absolutely! But that’s beside the point - the reality is pedestrians do unpredictable things, and FSD is always watching for that to happen. Nice job robot 🤖🚗 Video Credit: u/Qwertygolol on Reddit

@billp97309 @DevinOlsenn You didn’t post any stats, you made a baseless claim. This is a classic burden of proof fallacy.

@DevinOlsenn I posted the stats, I don't keep ghoul shots. Not my thing. If I could find the stats, you can too. I am not going to dance with everyone who asks.

@Da___Wolf @DavidCarbutt_ @IfindRetards

@DavidCarbutt_ I'm British. I don't want any fucking FSD on a road. If I'm going to be hit while crossing a street looking at my phone, I don't want it to be by a fucking computer thinking that's better than swerving and hitting a tree.

Cmon uk, don’t let the EU get FSD before the UK.

@WilliamShatner Oh Mr. Shatner, you live in an elitist bubble. I see people waiting 20-30 minutes at Costco gas lines when it’s 10¢ cheaper. Could you imagine the gas lines if it was 50% cheaper? Oh wait, that’s electric. I challenge you to try that trip in a Model S.

And for the #teslarites who don’t understand 500 miles. Time is money. How long does it take to pump a tank of gas? 4-5 mins versus 30. Early last week I went up to the Yosemite area (about 300 miles.) I got up there, did my thing and got gas (5 mins) and drove back. With a Tesla. It would be drive up (maybe on one charge) charge up 20-30 mins, do my thing. Drive back, stop along the way to recharge (again probably another 20 mins…) That’s too long. 500 would be one recharge so it’s 10 mins gas versus 29-30 mins which I would consider.🤷🏼

@KarlDHarrison Fuck off. This isn’t political. 93% of the province supports this.

Perpetual DST in B.C. is one of the worst decisions this vile Eby government has inflicted on us.

@kiriller97 @SensFanNL Says someone who objectifies men in a pinned post.

@SensFanNL Reminder that Elliotte is a very staunch Zionist so him making rape jokes is on par for him

wtf is wrong with this guy