Charlie Golf

@BuzzPatterson Thank God this absolute piece of shit didn’t make it back into the White House.

Oh, Hillary. Hillary, Hillary. You ignorant slut. As the Senior Military Aide to President Bill Clinton, YOU’RE military aide — the officer who carried the nuclear football in and out of the White House every single day — I saw the “people’s house” up close alongside you. @HillaryClinton Spare us the sanctimonious lectures. And turn on your replies, coward. When you and Bill left in January 2001, your staff ransacked the place. Remember? “W” keys ripped off every keyboard. Phone lines cut. Desk drawers glued shut. Obscene voicemails and vulgar graffiti left behind. Presidential seals and silverware stolen. Furniture damaged. The GAO confirmed the vandalism and theft. It wasn’t “transition friction” — it was a disgrace. You trashed the People’s House on your way out the door and now you’re clutching pearls over Trump? I remember, Hillary. I was there. Remember? The hypocrisy is Olympic-level, Ms. Clinton. And you know it! You of ALL people know it! The American people have long memories. Especially this one! Me! We remember who actually looted the place.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Shut up and color.

A very sad announcement. I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration. In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least. Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration. In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence. Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth. Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration." You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible. Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it. The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration. Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail. Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win. If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM. If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

@Aussieguy728823 @GuntherEagleman Your terms are acceptable. 👋🏻 🇺🇸

@GuntherEagleman how if, instead of the US being leader of the free world, the free world just gets up and goes off and does its own thing? Maybe the rest of the free world is tired of being bullied and threatened by the scum bag in the White House?

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent WALKS OUT of the G7... Bessent making it crystal clear: Get in line or get left behind.

Counter point: Imagine being an American child. You’re born in the richest country in human history. Your odds of dying in a school shooting are lower than dying from a bee sting. Your daycare worker is overwhelmingly likely to love you. College is a choice, not a requirement. The kid down the street skipped it and makes $140K welding pipe. The plumber who fixed your sink last week owns three houses. You live somewhere people risk their lives to get INTO, not out of. You have running water, A/C, instant access to all human knowledge, and a fridge full of food your ancestors would have considered a miracle. Just a gentle reminder that the only people telling you you’re miserable are the ones who profit from your misery ❤️

The DOJ's deadline to charge Fauci for lying under oath about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan is in 6 days. We can’t allow the statute of limitations to run out. He MUST be charged! Agree? RT.

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history. He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough. RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

US fertility reached 1.57 last year, the lowest ever recorded, and the WSJ explanation is "uncertainty about finances, relationship stability, and the political climate" my great grandma had eleven children during the second world war, in a country being bombed, in a house with no running water, on rations. poor people have always had kids. the poorest people on earth right now still have kids and the financial excuse is a story we tell ourselves because it makes us feel good and the real one is unbearable the real mechanism is that we got rich enough to redefine children as an expense instead of the point. somewhere in the last fifty years the cultural goal inverted and a child stopped being what life is for and became a line item competing with the lifestyle. once you frame it that way the math never works, because the math isnt supposed to work. that's the point we are living in the richest moment in human history and we decided to use the surplus to buy ourselves out of the future. the most prosperous civilization that has ever existed is committing demographic suicide at the altar of personal optimization and comfort, and the official line is that we cant afford it the birthrate is a lagging indicator of a civilization that forgot why it was alive

@AdamHeff @AriFleischer The part where you stated “I’m not a fan of NATO” may be fact. I wouldn’t know. Similar to your knowledge of every other point you made here. You don’t know a damn thing.

@AriFleischer I’m not a fan of NATO, but: >We started the war >We didn't plan thoroughly >We didn't build a coalition >We didn’t warn our allies that we were going to war >They didn't join us in the war But, “They've sold us out!”

My message here clearly struck a nerve. A few friends from when I was press secretary, domestically and abroad, don’t like what I said. Instead of seeing how Western European nations must change, they just want to attack Trump. The reason it struck a nerve is because they recognize that this time NATO nations are being held to account. They know they’ve come up short for decades and by denying us overflight rights, they’ve gone too far. Americans are fed up, especially with France and Spain. Trump won’t stand for it and they know it. They now fear the consequences of their inaction. The UK, unlike its days under Thatcher or Blair, is wishy-washy. They’ve often been a good allie, but this time they want to sit it out and have it both ways. We can use their bases, but only for limited operations. At least the UK spends real money on defense. France, Spain, and Italy are another story. So too is Canada. None of these four contribute seriously to NATO. They’re laggards, trying to get away with it. Spain and France force our pilots to fly thousands of miles out of the way (I thought they didn’t like carbon footprints) en route to Iran. Eastern Europe is a different story. They spend more on defense and they understand power. They lived under Soviet domination and recognize weakness when they see it. They won’t be weak. Western European governments, especially France, are good at issuing communiques and statements. They enjoy hosting conferences. They love to ponder deeply. Getting them to act is another matter, unless it’s to purchase Russian LNG, which they still do. The world is changing. Out of this war will come a new group of younger nations that understand real power and the importance of strength. The UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Eastern Europe will emerge stronger than ever. Western Europe will continue to fall behind. As for Trump, you don’t have to like him. He often says things none of his predecessors would say. But don’t underestimate the fact that US taxpayers are fed up with nations that don’t pull their weight, and then force our pilots to take risks and longer flights so we can rid the world from the menace that is Iran. Today’s Western European leaders would rather mollify Iran and pay them ransoms (trade) than support the US. Things are different today. We all know it. The UK, France, Spain and Italy (despite its Prime Minister) have earned the consequences that will unfold. They could have and should have supported us. Not as a NATO alliance. But as individual free nations. All we wanted was overflight rights and full access to airfields. They’ve made their choices. Soon, they’ll see the results.

@bulletin_n57254 @AriFleischer Western Europe is free to make the decisions they have made which Fleischer made crystal clear, NATO notwithstanding. The U.S. is free to respond to those choices. Pretty simple stuff really. Cue the crying…

@AriFleischer Why would anyone want to be allies with a country that unilaterally starts a war of choice without consulting them, and without any strategy for how to end it? NATO is a defensive alliance, not a pact to follow any country into unwise offensive wars.

@WilliamJohnOwen @MsMelChen @iaeaorg It seems that you have faith in international institutions like the U.N. I did as well at one time. We will not agree on the fundamental issue here.

@CharlieGolf2 @MsMelChen @iaeaorg It was only Once Trump removed American involvement that the Iranians started enrichment to more than 60%. One of Trump's primary objectives of his latest war was to stop the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons this has been repeated several times by the defence secretary.

Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025. But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it. Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions. Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are. Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale. Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is. Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.” If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about? Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy. Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades. They couldn’t even manage that. So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates. If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.

@hfgjyv @0Mantz @LifeofFitz Yes, that’s exactly the idea, you simpleton. Try looking around a corner once in a while.

Why are we bombing the crap out of Iran? It seems many of you have no clue how these radicals overthrew the Iranian government in 1979, let alone the number of times they have attacked the US or its interests. If they built a bomb, it was absolutely going to be used. The only time frame that matters is before they had nukes and after. Thankfully, we may never know the after. This regime is a bully that does not respond to diplomacy. The Islamic Republic's end goals were clearly stated. When they said "Death to America," it wasn't a slogan, it was a promise.

@WilliamJohnOwen @MsMelChen @iaeaorg I mentioned nothing about nukes. Conventional weapons kill very effectively. At every point in your timeline Iran was funding terrorism via their proxies. They were also playing games & enriching beyond the limits of the agreement but that’s not convenient to your narrative.

@CharlieGolf2 @MsMelChen Who said about waiting and doing nothing. There was an agreement with the Iranian government under which they had stopped enriching past the point necessary for power generation they were allowing the @iaeaorg access to verify that they weren't enriching to weapons grade.

@WilliamJohnOwen @MsMelChen So your logic is that the intelligent approach is to wait until Iran, a psychotic actor with an inarguable record or terroristic behavior, has the necessary missile technology to strike Britain. Then after that strike the U.S. would be obligated to defend, and from U.K. bases?

@MsMelChen Interesting read but despite being so long it lacks nuance. For example the USA doesn't rent RAF stations for the USAF it covers the maintenance costs but that's all. If Iran had attacked the USA and the USA had requested help under Artical 5 of the NATO treaty we'd be there...

@BenStiller Ben Stiller confirming my suspension that he’s a huge cunt.

Hey White House, please remove the Tropic Thunder clip. We never gave you permission and have no interest in being a part of your propaganda machine. War is not a movie.

Psychologist Stanley Milgram found that 80% of the population do not have the psychological or moral resources to defy authority’s order, no matter how illegitimate the order is. Therefore only 20% have critical thinking capacity. Which explains a lot.

The Muslim world is divided about Iran: Muslim countries in favor of removing the regime: Jordan 🇯🇴 Kuwait 🇰🇼 UAE 🇦🇪 Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 Oman 🇴🇲 Qatar 🇶🇦 Bahrain 🇧🇭 Muslim countries against the removal of the regime: Great Britain 🇬🇧 France 🇫🇷 Spain 🇪🇸

If this dumbass wasn’t on the wrong side of an 90/10 issue she’d have no idea how to act. It’s just the Dem way in the 2020’s apparently.

If you find yourself NOT rooting for America, it’s important to reflect on how you got here: If your answer is “orange man bad,” or, “the US shouldn’t have borders.” It’s important to realize that you’re actually retarded, and you fell for the nonsensical propaganda.

@EthicalSkeptic Saw this post earlier and immediately thought of TES.

Folleagues Knew... 😎

@pwrhungry CO2 is not a pollutant. It never was, and some of us knew that all along. Get with the program.

Jeff Bezos owns a yacht that’s so big, it has its own yacht. That’s right: Incredible as it sounds, Bezos’ megayacht has a yacht. I’ll give you details on Bezos’s boats in a minute, but remember this number: 7,000 Tons. Superyachts like the one Bezos owns, produce about 7,000 tons of CO2 per year just sitting on standby — that’s equal to the emissions of 1,400 average residents of the planet. For more, check out my latest mini-documentary on my S*bst*ck. #bezos #zuckerberg #yacht robertbryce.substack.com/p/yacht-zee-un…