Ian Harper

PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE 2022 SIGNED CLIMATE DECLARATION: "THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY" CLAUSER & a global network of over 1,900 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message: "Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming - The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming. Warming is far slower than predicted The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change. Climate policy relies on inadequate models Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide. Global warming has not increased natural disasters There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment."

BREAKING: "Dr. Fauci's role in the cover-up was intentional." CIA whistleblower James Erdman III lays out the "cover-up" of the COVID pandemic, claiming scientists and analysts were skewed from the start, all stemming from Dr. Anthony Fauci. "Public health policy would have been very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization M-RNA products."

🚨 BREAKING: FAUCI’S COVID STORY IS COLLAPSING A CIA whistleblower has now testified before the Senate that the lab leak theory was deliberately covered up — and that Anthony Fauci’s role was “intentional.” The testimony alleges: • Intelligence analysts believed COVID most likely came from a lab leak • Senior officials overruled those findings • Scientists privately raised concerns about Wuhan before publicly dismissing the theory • Gain-of-function definitions were allegedly rewritten to keep funding flowing • Analysts supporting the lab leak theory were reportedly retaliated against For years, anyone questioning the official narrative was attacked, censored, mocked, or silenced. Now the cracks are becoming impossible to ignore. If these allegations are proven true, this would represent one of the biggest scientific and political scandals of modern history.

CIA Whistleblower testifies that Anthony Fauci’s role in the Covid 19 cover-up was intentional He says the entire point was to enact emergency powers to authorization mRNA products being mandated Read that again. Literally Crimes Against Humanity You were their lab rats “Public health policy would have been very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency use authorization mRNA products being mandated by the former administration. Dr. Fauci's role in the cover-up was intentional. Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure the IC consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts, public health, health officials, and scientists” What this means is it was always a lie to mandate vaccines to the entire planet and force everyone to get them. All for astronomical profits This is a CIA whistleblower sworn testimony

Professor Angus Dalgleish says he was “the first to pick up that the virus had escaped from a lab” and that “I’ve really lost my faith in the journals.” Here’s why. In early 2020, a paper strongly dismissing the lab-leak hypothesis... “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”... received accelerated review and high-visibility publication in Nature Medicine. On the day it was published (March 17, 2020), Editor-in-Chief João Monteiro publicly endorsed it as helping to put “conspiracy theories” to rest. Monteiro had an indirect but relevant institutional connection to the NIH/Fauci world: From 2009 to 2013, he completed a four-year postdoctoral fellowship at NIAID in the lab of senior scientist Dr. Ronald N. Germain. During that entire period, Anthony Fauci was Director of NIAID. In contrast, when Professor Dalgleish (with Birger Sørensen) submitted evidence of six unnatural inserts in the spike protein — including charge changes that “would NEVER EVER occur in normal evolution”... major journals pushed back. He sent the paper to Nature, Science, The Lancet, Virology, and others, only to receive versions of the same reply: “We have nothing against the science, but it is not in the public interest to publish your paper.”

Today, a CIA whistleblower sat before my committee and confirmed what I've said for years: government officials, including Dr. Fauci, deliberately misled the American people about the origins of COVID-19. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is sworn testimony. 🧵

Britain is a place where a Prime Minister who has lost his authority and who everyone hates is trying to ram through legislation (outlined in the King’s Speech) on something that no one voted for, no one needs and no one wants - digital ID. Absolutely disgraceful abuse of power.