☆*:。Starduster。:*☆

22.2K posts

☆*:。Starduster。:*☆ banner
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆

☆*:。Starduster。:*☆

@ChibiStarduster

✝️ Lon. 1689 // ♀ // Wholesome Kemono 🐾 // 💍@PaxAkbal // Abolish Abortion and IVF🌳🪓// “Ain’t life beautiful and strange?” —🦉🏙

Texas, USA Katılım Ekim 2011
355 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆ retweetledi
『 Kaji 』
『 Kaji 』@Kajackies·
On my way to steal your last chip!
English
121
3.9K
30.1K
646K
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆@ChibiStarduster·
@gmk_julie I hate most sci-fi and am extremely picky with fantasy movies. I also don’t like Lord of the Rings and have tried to watch them but it’s just so boring to me. So you’re not along here. 😂
English
0
0
1
51
Julie_married_to_Thomas_but_not_a_Thomist
well guys I tried. After almost 50 years on this planet, I went and watched my first movie about life on another one because y'all were screaming about how fabulous Project Hail Mary was. I enjoyed exactly 1 thing about my first space/alien movie experience and that was some of the dialogue. 2 things if you count being with my husband, youngest son, and a bunch of friends. My husband the English teacher says it's because I do not possess the "willing suspension of disbelief" required to enjoy any kind of space, or fantasy type movie/story. He may be right, I tried one of the LOTR movies and hated it, also tried a super hero one before and same. Is this just cause I grew up without TV? Does anyone else suffer from this apparent deficiency?
English
41
0
37
5.1K
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆@ChibiStarduster·
@MostlyFox @Shayotita The problem here is overcorrection. I agree that women often get let off the hook for awful things that they do. However, the overcorrection is just as evil as women getting away with things. Degrading a repentant Christian woman in response to feminism is still evil.
English
0
2
3
40
Mostly Peaceful Fox Toons
@Shayotita People are much more skittish to call female predators what they are. Notice the articles saying female teachers “had sex” with male students, whereas they would flat out say the male teachers SA’d the female students. Men are tired of women getting the grace they don’t get.
English
2
0
1
44
Shayotita 🇵🇷
Shayotita 🇵🇷@Shayotita·
⚠️Disclaimer: TMI, vulnerability & long post but important ⚠️ (1/2 🧵) I don’t think people realize how mentally and emotionally damaging this is for Christian men and women. When people who claim to represent Christ become harsh, judgmental, or outright vile toward others because they believe someone’s past sins are ‘worse’ than theirs, it creates a sense of superiority that is completely unbiblical. And let’s be honest — many of the same people who condemn others (especially women) for having a sexual past have struggled with pornography, or lust themselves. I’d almost guarantee it. Some even seem strangely fixated on the topic, to the point where it feels obsessive and creepy. Purity culture has really screwed people up, and it makes me wonder how they view women who were sexually assaulted, abused, 🍇 or those who acted out of trauma, environmental or anything that isn’t malice. I’m not sure I want to know. People who have a sexual past and are now born again in Christ are often already battling shame, guilt, self‑hatred, and deep emotional wounds. Some even struggle with thoughts of not wanting to live anymore. To have others constantly throw their past in their face — calling them horrible names, labeling them ‘unworthy,’ ‘damaged goods,’ or ‘baggage’ — only cuts the wound deeper. Shame is not from Christ. And Christ Himself would never treat His children that way. Ever. I don’t know what Bible some people are reading, but it’s certainly not a biblical one. I’m speaking from experience. I was sexually assaulted multiple times at a young age, which led me into sexual sin and hypersexuality — a trauma response. I eventually had my first (and last) experience with an ex. My entire life, I was acting out of trauma and a desperate desire to feel loved, valued, and wanted. I was taught that to keep someone’s affection, I had to give them what they wanted. Clearly that wasn’t the case. Do you know how much shame, guilt, and self‑hatred that creates? How many times I’ve been called vile things online because of my past? How many nights I cried, or wished I could fall asleep and not wake up? How much I avoided men — and even God — because of the weight of that shame? The list goes on. I’m not saying what I did, or what anyone else did, was right. Sin is sin, and sin has consequences. That’s reality. And it’s okay to have preferences and convictions. But we don’t know what people have lived through. We don’t know their upbringing, their trauma, or the environments that shaped them. Some grew up where certain behaviors were normalized. And we live in a culture that is heavily sexualized — to the point of targeting children. It’s everywhere. Fleeing sexual immorality — especially as a teenager or in a relationship — is not easy. People act like it is, and those who succeed sometimes develop a sense of superiority while looking down on those who didn’t. Yes, we should know better and do better. But we’re also human. We’re imperfect. We fall short. We make mistakes we deeply regret. And that’s exactly why Jesus died for us. Because we are imperfect. Because we will fall short. Because we need Him.
Shayotita 🇵🇷@Shayotita

Yes, sin has consequences and those consequences don’t only affect you — they affect everyone around you. That’s true. But if a man or woman who is a virgin wants to marry a non-virgin, let them. If a virgin wants to marry another virgin, let them too. It is their choice — their personal, God-given, free will choice. Nobody is saying you have to marry a non-virgin. If that’s your preference, that’s fine. But what is NOT fine is shaming people who choose differently, and it is especially not fine to call women “damaged goods” or anything of the sort — because that is unbiblical, full stop. Jesus would never speak about women that way. Ever. A person’s past — including sexual sin — does not define them once they are reborn in Christ. God forgives and forgets when you repent and come to Him. He never said there wouldn’t be consequences, but He does not hang sin over your head, degrade you for it, or leave you to suffer under the weight of it forever. Have we seriously forgotten that? What happened to grace? Mercy? Forgiveness? Compassion? Love? What happened on the Cross? And let’s not forget that all sin is equal in God’s eyes. You are no better than anyone else you’re sitting here judging. None of us are. So sit down. Also, it’s very telling that some of you love to target women for this while giving men a complete pass for the exact same thing. The hypocrisy is showing. I would never hold someone’s past against them — not romantically, not in friendship, not in any capacity. Jesus didn’t, so why would I? As long as someone has truly repented, truly surrendered to the Lord, and is genuinely walking in change, their past is between them and God. You don’t get to impose your personal preferences and convictions onto everyone else. Women and men deserve to find love and have a family too. And if it’s in God’s plans, He’s going to make it happen. There is no biblical law forbidding marriage to a non-virgin. 🤷🏻‍♀️

English
2
5
38
1K
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆@ChibiStarduster·
@Strangeland_Elf This guy sounds like he’d prefer a certain religion that restricts their women by making them completely cover up from head to toe.
English
0
1
7
213
Shayotita 🇵🇷
Shayotita 🇵🇷@Shayotita·
So called “Christians” out of attacking @TrevorSheatz for sharing his wife’s @AshleySheatz testimony about her promiscuity and past life. And honestly, the disappointment I feel toward many of the responses is immeasurable. People are calling him an “idiot,” a “simp,” an “r‑tard,” and “a danger to men.” People are calling her a “whore,” a “slut,” a “grifter,” and “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Some say testimonies shouldn’t be shared online. Some say this is “damaging to the church.” Shame on anyone who calls themselves Christian and speaks/thinks like this. Let’s break this down: • “He shouldn’t share her testimony.” Normally, yes — a husband shouldn’t share his wife’s story without permission. But she had already shared it publicly herself. And he did have permission to share it. He isn’t violating anything by speaking on something she openly posted or agreed too. If it makes people uncomfortable, that’s their issue. • “I didn’t want to see this on my timeline.” You didn’t have to read it. Scroll past. Ignore it. And yes, some things shouldn’t be aired out online — but a testimony of how God transformed someone’s life? That’s something we should be rejoicing over. Chains were broken. Lives were changed. Yet many of you tolerate the filth in modern music and media, but a testimony is somehow “too much.” • “Statistically…” God is not the God of statistics. He is the God of miracles, freedom, salvation, judgment, healing, and transformation. Patterns exist, yes — but so do exceptions. Putting God in a box because of “statistics” is not faith. • “A virgin should marry a virgin.” In a perfect world, sure. But Scripture calls us to be equally yoked, not identical in past experiences. Better to marry a reborn believer who loves God than a virgin who despises Him. • “This is damaging to young men and church values.” No — it’s damaging to your perfection culture. A culture where there is no room for “new creation,” no room for redemption, no room for transformation. How can we claim someone is “the same” when God has radically changed their life? We are commanded to rejoice when someone is made new, not throw stones at them. And if you’re worried about young men (and young women), then step up. Be a mentor. Be a parent. Be an example. Influence them yourself instead of hiding behind online outrage. Your complaints do nothing but reveal the foolishness in your own heart. • “She’ll betray him.” You don’t know them. There is always a possibility of betrayal in any relationship — for any reason. But God knows the heart, and God judges righteously. He deals with deceivers, not you. • “She’s ugly,” “She looks like ___,” “He settled,” etc. Petty insults reveal nothing but the ugliness in your own heart. They serve no purpose except to tear others down so you can feel superior for a moment. • “These are the people we should publicly shame.” You mean condemn. For their past. For sharing a testimony. Terrible news for you: There is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. Their sins are forgiven. Their past is gone. In short: You have no authority to judge anyone’s past. You can share concerns respectfully, but you cannot condemn what God has redeemed. Give God glory for what He has done in their lives. Stop wasting time on conspiracies and “what‑ifs.” If something ever goes wrong, God will judge — not you. Focus on what actually matters. Not internet drama. Not opinions disguised as “discernment.
English
3
22
165
2.8K
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆ retweetledi
Naomi loves yellow 🍋
It truly feels more and more like we are seeing the very real separating of the goats and the sheep.
English
6
1
24
272
Tenth Child
Tenth Child@a_simple_bowman·
If you’re anti-Trump you’re not that conservative tbh.
English
1
0
6
110
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆ retweetledi
Bronymon
Bronymon@Bronymon_·
This only further adds to the “Mormonism is Islam for white people” trope.
Amy Mek@AmyMek

🚨SHOCKING ESCALATION IN UTAH The LDS Church – which donated $25K to build Utah's largest mega-mosque (Utah Islamic Center) and other mosques in the state – is NOW exposed for partnering with Hamas-linked ministries & financing Hamas contractors! New March 23, 2026, reveals LDS Charities (Church's humanitarian arm) has funneled support to terror-aligned Islamic groups – far beyond what was known. Key facts: 🔺LDS Charities partnered with Medglobal, an Illinois-based charity that openly boasted of collaborating directly with Hamas’s Ministry of Health in Gaza (2020 announcement lists LDS Charities alongside Hamas-connected Rahma Worldwide and Taliban-linked Islamic Oasis). Medglobal received $200,000 from LDS in 2017 and $1.9 million in 2019, with support continuing in recent years. 🔺 Rahma Worldwide (Michigan charity) has signed contracts with senior Hamas officials, including designated terrorist Ghazi Hamad (who vowed to repeat the October 7 attacks “time and again”). Internal Hamas documents from 2022 confirm Rahma’s Gaza director is “affiliated with Hamas.” Aid workers in Gaza wore jackets bearing both LDS Charities and Rahma logos — along with the logo of RIHS, a Kuwaiti group designated by the U.S. Treasury for supporting Al-Qaeda. LDS has listed Rahma as a major partner for over a decade, with joint projects in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, and beyond - continuing even after Rahma’s terror ties became public. In March 2026, Rahma released a video of a new joint LDS-Rahma project in Syria. 🔺 LDS Charities funded Bayader Association, a Gaza-based group that coordinates closely with Hamas ministries and whose staff have publicly praised Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists. LDS supported Bayader welfare projects in Gaza (2014–2016), including untraceable cash grants - a method experts say often subsidizes terror recruitment and operations. 🔺 The Church has long collaborated with Islamic Relief (Muslim Brotherhood-linked, designated a terror organization by the UAE), serving as its largest donor after the 2004 tsunami and contributing millions in goods and services. These partnerships persisted years after the groups’ terror connections were reported. When previously challenged, the LDS Church dismissed concerns as “false” without addressing specifics, claiming no aid was diverted - yet the collaborations continued. 🔺 This is the same Church that promotes “interfaith friendship” while funding mosque construction in conservative Utah, where conversions are surging and Republican leaders (Gov. Cox, SLC mayor in hijab at City Hall iftar) are accommodating Islamic events with zero reciprocity from Muslim-majority nations. Utah Mormons: Your tithing dollars are building mega-mosques at home and - indirectly - supporting Hamas-aligned networks abroad. This isn’t compassion. It’s dangerous, one-sided enabling of the ideology now infiltrating red-state Utah. See the full report: meforum.org/church-of-latt…

English
5
8
58
817
Lunethyst🌙💜
Lunethyst🌙💜@Lunethyst_VT·
I kinda want to get this for Tiger as a work shirt or for when he goes somewhere without me haha
Lunethyst🌙💜 tweet media
English
2
1
13
235
⚡️Shawn Coram Deo⚡️
Nothing he said here is biblically inaccurate. He even admitted, essentially, that it would have been better had she been pure (spiritually) AND a virgin. The uproar is unwarranted. The sad fact of the matter is most Christian and nonbelievers are being unrealistic about the times we live in. The average person has had sex with about 3-7 people before marriage. The men, specifically, who don’t, have been addicted to porn at some point or another, which, arguably, CAN BE EVEN MORE DETRIMENTAL to a future marriage. I say this as someone once addicted to porn who is single and would PREFER a virgin to marry but is realistic regarding the current market.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
15
5
63
4.5K
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆
☆*:。Starduster。:*☆@ChibiStarduster·
@Shshshshawnn I thank you sir for your balanced take. 👏 I don’t care if men have their preferences. It’s the degrading of women forgiven in Christ that frustrates me. Also the ignoring of men’s porn problems. Both can have sexual problems and past sins, but let’s not degrade each other.
English
0
0
10
245