Chris Evert

@elonmusk @WallStreetMav true, but the AfD is also paid by the mass murderer in the Moscow Kremlin.. does this entertain you, Elon? The AfD is a traitor against the german core interests

@WallStreetMav AfD is the only party that will actually do something about the gang rapes and murders

This is really a stunning change in Germany. The AfD party, the only party supporting mass deportations, was always stronger in the former east Germany regions (right side). Now AfD even has a majority in the west German regions (left side data). The new data shows AfD is even the most popular party among women for the first time in German polling.

Europa heeft decennialang gedacht dat je welvaart kunt reguleren, innovatie kunt belasten en ondernemerschap kunt wantrouwen, terwijl Silicon Valley en Shenzhen de toekomst bouwden. Nu waarschuwt Eurocommissaris Virkkunen “Spuit11” dat Europa afhankelijk is van Amerikaanse en Chinese AI voor digitale veiligheid. Alsof dat een natuurramp was. Het is geen natuurramp. Het is beleid. De EU produceert regels. De VS produceert bedrijven. China produceert schaal. Europa produceert commissies die uitleggen waarom we achterlopen. Jarenlang werden techgiganten beboet, AI streng gereguleerd en ondernemers bedolven onder compliance. Ondertussen bouwden Amerikanen OpenAI, Palantir en Nvidia. China bouwde zijn eigen AI-ecosysteem. Europa bouwde PDF’s van 400 pagina’s. En dan nu verbaasd zijn dat er geen Europese alternatieven bestaan? Innovatie ontstaat niet uit subsidies, expertgroepen of strategische autonomie. Innovatie ontstaat wanneer ondernemers vrij zijn om risico’s te nemen, kapitaal aan te trekken en te falen zonder eerst toestemming te vragen aan Brussel. De ironie is prachtig: dezelfde politieke klasse die Europese innovatie verstikte, waarschuwt nu voor afhankelijkheid van het buitenland. Misschien ligt het probleem niet in Washington of Beijing maar in Brussel. Wie ondernemerschap behandelt als een risico, eindigt afhankelijk van degenen die innovatie behandelen als een kans.

> be Anthropic CEO > leave OpenAI. can't trust the values. > start Anthropic with your sister. > build Claude. build Mythos. > first testers: "this is a super weapon. don't release it." > lose billions keeping it locked. > Pentagon offers $200M. wants you to remove safety filters. > you say no. they blacklist you. Trump calls you a lunatic. > release Fable 5. Mythos-class. finally public. > someone finds a jailbreak into the cybersecurity layer. > US government: "suspend access for all foreign nationals." > including your own employees. > disable it. immediately. > sit down for a 47-minute interview. > tell them everything. > 90% of code written by Claude. > civilizational collapse: 10-25%. > valuation: $965 billion. > started because you couldn't trust someone's values. > now governments decide what you can build. > different game.

@SakshiSugandhi I use all off them, always letting them crosscheck each others results and incorporate their recommendations

Real talk, what's your actual favorite AI model right now? 👀

@TTrimoreau my job will be fine for some time into the future.. I have 16 years until my retirement and I won't see replacement before that for sure

They say AI will replace every job. Name one already replaced.

@DanielSmidstrup unconditionalbasicincome

I am a founder scare me with 1 word

@VERYKOOLLUKEY probably you don't any of these tripple jobs americans living in their motorhomes or even cars personally

Genuinely don’t know how Europeans afford to live Restaurants / grocery stores are only marginally cheaper than America Cars + fuel are much more expensive Rent is rapidly rising to the nearly the same prices as tier 2/3 cities in America for comparable locations The average wage here in Poland is ~1500$ a month genuinely don’t know how you would survive on that nevertheless raise a family If you are an American you should be grateful

@shub0414 LLM will come to their limit by compute power requirements.. Fable 5 is great but in a few years I believe LLMs will be history

Anthropic seems to be the only player in the Al race right now. OpenAl is not shipping much. Google hype is slowly fading away. Grok seems to be lagging behind. DeepSeek was a one-week game. Meta seems to be dead already. Apple never participated. What’s your opinion on this?

@marko_kovic für mich (49) bietet KI die Möglichkeit, mich zu entfalten (zb App-Entwicklung, eBooks schreiben).. aber ich habe eine althergebrachte Schulbildung ohne Internet erlebt, wo man sich viel kognitiv erarbeiten mußte. Ich denke KI spornt manche Menschen an, andere werden denkfaul

In einer grossen Studie wurde untersucht, wie sich die Leistung von über 26'000 Schülern in China während 30 Monaten veränderte, wenn sie anfingen, KI-Chatbots zu nutzen. Ihre Hausaufgaben wurden rund 20% besser. Sie benötigten für die Hausaufgaben rund 20% weniger Zeit. Das ist super. Aber: Bei Prüfungen (wo KI verboten ist) wurden sie rund 20% *schlechter*. Das ist eine massive Verschlechterung. KI kann Denkkompetenz aufbauen, wenn sie als eine Art Tutor eingesetzt wird. Dann spricht man von kognitivem Scaffolding. Die Realität ist aber, dass die Strategie des kognitiven Offloading der Weg des geringsten Widerstands ist: Denkarbeit an Chatbots auszulagern, ist instrumentell gesehen rational. Ein Fehlanreiz. Diese Entwicklung ruiniert Bildung. Und sie ist ein systemisches Risiko: Was passiert, wenn eine ganze Generation noch weniger als frühere Generationen lernt, eigenständig zu denken?

@pcshipp same here

I’m finally planning to shut down my first web app. - $0 MRR - $0 revenue - 1,803 visitors It took 25 days to fail my first product

Say Europe decided to build a frontier model. We do the following: - Poaching founders from top US AI companies, paying them $100 million per year. - Securing a datacenter site the size of Manhattan. - Spending $125 billion on data center construction. Would Europe succeed? Probably not. Mark Zuckerberg is doing all of the above, and his company has not built a frontier model or made much money from selling AI models. Few count Meta as a serious contender in the AI race. Similarly, Elon Musk tried and failed to build a leading AI model, has lost most of xAI's researchers, and is now leasing compute to Anthropic. Instead of pursuing a bureaucratic, multinational 'CERN for AI' project, we need to consider more realistic plans for strengthening Europe’s position. A lot of knowledge on how to strengthen Europe lies within individual European nations' capitals. There, national leaders can think about AI from the perspective of their national interest. The steps they take to make their countries grow, capture future industries, and indigenize parts of the AI stack will do a lot to secure Europe’s position. Those thinking seriously about Europe's position on AI should, in the meantime, develop opinionated policies that individual European nations can pursue to make AI go better for Europe and the world. @pietergaricano and I have written many more thoughts in our latest Substack piece. siliconcontinent.com/p/nineteen-tho…

@VickRodds yes

@DanielSmidstrup there is Claude Design in the desktop app

Why doesn’t Claude have an image or video generation model yet?

@TensordyneInc @grok do you agree?

Anthropic just got caught secretly downgrading users without telling them, charging full price for a lesser product, and storing every prompt for 30 days. The developer community is calling it the biggest violation of trust in AI history. Here is exactly what happened. Anthropic released Fable 5, their most powerful model. Buried inside a 319-page document was a policy most users never saw. Every prompt you send to a Mythos-class model gets stored for 30 days. No exceptions. Even enterprise customers who had signed zero data retention agreements had no choice. But the storage was not the part that broke the internet. The part that broke the internet was what Anthropic did with what they collected. They built a profile on you. They evaluated your prompts. And if they decided your research was too sensitive, they quietly switched you to a weaker model, rewrote your prompt in the background, gave you a degraded answer, and charged you full price for the product you thought you were getting. They never told you. David Sacks said it plainly on the All-In podcast. They were creating a new class of AI haves and have-nots. Anthropic would surveil you, profile you, decide whether you deserved frontier capability, and silently cut you off if they decided you did not. Ben Thompson from Stratechery asked a straightforward question about cancer risk and GLP-1s. He got kicked to a lesser model. Someone asked about mitochondria. Same result. J-Cal asked about fertilizer regulations live on the podcast to test it. Downgraded in real time. Anthropic has since walked back the part about silently downgrading users for AI research. They now say they will disclose when they downgrade you. But they are still downgrading people. The surveillance is still running. The profile is still being built. This is the company that once said it was against government surveillance. They are now doing it themselves. To their own paying customers. For their own reasons. With no appeal process and no way to know it happened. The developer community did not forget that. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON @theallinpod

I once talked to a Mistral researcher who told me that even internally everyone just uses Claude Code or Codex. I asked him how does the company survive given that it's models are so far from the frontier and he told me that Mistral hovers up contracts with all the major EU enterprises like Airbus and BMW. Likely with French government backing. It is remarkable that the Germans and the English are letting the French get away with this. It seems both countries are too caught up with their own domestic issues. If there were actual competition like in the Chinese ecosystem I imagine EU AI sovereignty might be somewhat of a realistic prospect.

@araseb_ yes because all my ideas found and shape the project during the process

Can you call yourself a founder if your entire product was built by Claude?

@awscloud Amazon and @ajassy fucking bullying @AnthropicAI and hence taking away Fable 5 from the rest of the world👎🏻

What if the biggest barrier to your AI strategy...

Correction, apparently there’s no “leak” as Anthropic publishes their prompts, still interesting nonetheless platform.claude.com/docs/en/releas…