Chris Howell

5.6K posts

Chris Howell banner
Chris Howell

Chris Howell

@ChrisHowellFCA

London based Accountant. Interested in Finance, Tech, Startups, Data Science, Housing, Leasehold Reform, Cycling, Pubs, Criminal Justice, Growth. COYS

London Katılım Eylül 2016
823 Takip Edilen633 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@carolinefff Its really very simple. To avoid making hard choices, as a matter of policy politicians outsourced responsibility for specific areas to judges, experts, quangos, nimbys etc with a remit to consider 1 issue in isolation with no regard for externalised costs. All else follows.
English
2
9
58
10.8K
Chris Howell retweetledi
Fraser Nelson
Fraser Nelson@FraserNelson·
Good question. IMO the no1 problem is the crisis of state capacity: why governments seem unable to deliver promises. Main reason: the rise of lawfare, judicial review, "consultations" etc. A Great Reform Act is needed to cut down legal weeds that choke ministers' ability to act.
Adam Knight@Adam8Knight

Good article but is it really the ideas we’re missing or the ability to implement any idea and get anything done competently? Seems that there’s been broad agreement that we need to build more, invest more and focus on productivity growth yet nothing substantive changes Here’s an idea 6knights.com

English
20
17
122
21.9K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
Building control in houses: Signed off for free by the installer as part of the @FENSAuk scheme. Building control for window replacement in a 8 storey block of flats (even a ground floor flat) - that sounds far too risky - will be a full application to the Building Safety Regulator please. (takes 8 months, c£10k consultancy and BSR fees).
English
0
0
0
3
Sam Dumitriu
Sam Dumitriu@Sam_Dumitriu·
This is a good move. (And to be honest, it should probably be a national policy to require all councils to do this.) I recently wrote up the case of one Maida Vale resident (@ChrisHowellFCA) who was looking at £15,000 bill for replacing two rotting ground floor windows. This would cut the need to fill out an application, pay a fee, and potentially hire a planning consultant. Still need to fix the broken Building Safety Regulator though. samdumitriu.com/p/how-much-doe…
Geoff Barraclough@w9maidavale

If Labour wins @CityWestminster in May: Less red tape. Warmer homes. Lower bills. We’ll work with residents and heritage groups to introduce a Local Development Order - making double glazing in flats easier without planning permission.

English
7
5
51
8.4K
Chris Worrall
Chris Worrall@CJAWorrall·
LDOs for posh windows rather than actual homes shows the pure lack of ambition Westminster Labour have.
Geoff Barraclough@w9maidavale

If Labour wins @CityWestminster in May: Less red tape. Warmer homes. Lower bills. We’ll work with residents and heritage groups to introduce a Local Development Order - making double glazing in flats easier without planning permission.

English
1
0
6
1.1K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@w9maidavale @Sam_Dumitriu @FENSAuk @RNBlake Moving building control for simple changes on higher risk buildings from the BSR back to local authorities is also sensible, but window replacements should be signed off by the installer under the @FENSAuk scheme like every window replacement in a non higher risk building.
English
0
0
0
25
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@w9maidavale @Sam_Dumitriu The specific windows/BSR issue is the competent person schemes like @FENSAuk can legally sign off building control for windows but refuse to do so in higher risk buildings. @RNBlake has assurances from the BSR that they will meet the CPS schemes to resolve but its taking months.
English
1
0
0
32
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@w9maidavale @CityWestminster Thanks Geoff - I would hope there would be cross party support for this - K+C have already led the way introducing a similar LDO and it should be possible to reuse much of their process.
English
0
0
1
127
Chris Howell retweetledi
Geoff Barraclough
Geoff Barraclough@w9maidavale·
If Labour wins @CityWestminster in May: Less red tape. Warmer homes. Lower bills. We’ll work with residents and heritage groups to introduce a Local Development Order - making double glazing in flats easier without planning permission.
English
10
11
49
14.9K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@shivmalik My solution is don't build new towns so badly. They spent 25 years planning this. I suspect they burnt through a lot of the value doing that, another great chunk buying up nomination rights to social housing and other stuff only planners love, with nothing left for nice things.
English
0
0
4
158
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@s8mb That's what you get for 25 years in masterplanning. The main transport stop is surrounded by fields and car park, not high density housing. No pub on the new development - the new 'Tap and Social' is a shed on an industrial park you walk round to get to outside the development.
English
0
0
0
612
Sam Bowman
Sam Bowman@s8mb·
I think everyone excited about New Towns should visit Northstowe, a new New Town outside Cambridge (about 40 mins away), and the largest New Town in England since Milton Keynes. It's been a disaster so far. It's been built very poorly/cheaply made and planned. The housing stock is ugly and cheap. It doesn't have a shop, a GP, or a gym, and it's been kind of a ghost town the times I've been. A lot of the residents are furious and feel totally misled into buying there. And yet *it's probably the most prime place in England to build a New Town*! So what's the problem? Partially it's lots of costs being put on to the new housing, including a 40% affordable requirement, which means developers build cheaply and cut corners to be able to have something to sell at a price people can afford (in the same way high land costs mean new builds are worse quality). Partially it's because Homes England, the Quango delivering it (and likely any future New Towns), is useless. Labour's supposed wave of New Towns (I actually doubt any will happen of any significant size) will suffer from all of these problems. And most won't even have the benefit of being a short commute away from Cambridge!
Sam Bowman tweet mediaSam Bowman tweet mediaSam Bowman tweet mediaSam Bowman tweet media
English
49
78
579
152.4K
Sam Bowman
Sam Bowman@s8mb·
40% affordable means these plans are just dead on arrival. New Towns were already dubious: people want to live in and around existing cities where jobs are. But it’s hard to imagine any of them getting built with 40% affordable housing requirements. Bad, unserious policy.
Hugo Gye@HugoGye

New Angela Rayner will use speech tomorrow to set out 5 criteria for Labour's new towns: - 40% affordable housing - 'characterful design' - high density - comes w good infrastructure - green space Story @theipaper: inews.co.uk/news/politics/…

English
38
41
514
94.1K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@nickhillman The only conclusion you can draw from that salary is that elements of the civil service are desperate to ensure that AI doesn't transform the public sector in the way is should be doing.
English
0
0
1
91
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@John2Win You might as well ask him what colour underpants he's wearing - he'll just ignore the question and come up with some fatuous nonsense about something entirely irrelevant to the question.
English
7
10
176
5.7K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@_HenryBolton The last government spent £134m on IT systems for the never used Rwanda scheme. At some point this level of ripping of the taxpayer must constitute either supplier fraud or civil servant malfeasance in public office. theguardian.com/world/2025/jan…
English
0
0
2
735
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧@_HenryBolton·
We have a problem - Yes, another one. A 🧵 1/10 - I've long wondered why, when we pay increasing amounts of tax and government spends more and more, we get less and less. I've long suspected that IT costs have something to do with it. I've looked into it a bit. We need to act. Failing to act is losing the taxpayer around £60bn per year.
English
18
29
110
8.1K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@jo3hill The ship has sailed - they are ideologically committed to the idea that market pricing isn't signalling anything other than greed and the state needs to step in to prohibit market price transactions across vast swathes of the economy - rent, energy, (youth) employment etc
English
0
0
0
40
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@paulpowlesland The right to enforce a legal remedy to an issue is purely hypothetical for anyone not on legal aid or a multi-millionaire - the rights might as well not exist - there must be ways to resolve issues more cost effectively than the current UK legal system.
English
1
0
3
102
Paul Powlesland
Paul Powlesland@paulpowlesland·
The flip side of this, of course, is that developers can use the threat of sky high costs to strong arm cash-strapped local councils into passing crap development for which there are lawful grounds for refusing. A key contributor to this is the ludicrous costs charged by barristers and solicitors in the UK. I don’t think we talk enough about how the bankruptcy level of costs to have almost any legal dispute determined by a fair & impartial court is undermining democracy & the rule of law in this country.
Sam Coates Sky@SamCoatesSky

EXC Does your council wrongly block projects, and have to pay millions in council tax when the decisions are overturned? We reveal what's going wrong. Investigation by @JoeCookJ and me, interrogating everyone planning council in England

English
6
22
59
3.3K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
@createstreets We need new classes of legal electric vehicles: A legal e-scooter spec, and a smaller, light car class for use in cities with reduced tax/insurance/parking.
English
0
0
1
41
createstreets
createstreets@createstreets·
Cities should have more of these. They work for people who need cars or taxis, can be perfectly comfortable and use a fraction of the space.
createstreets tweet media
English
6
1
28
1.9K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
Two thoughts: If the UK is ever going to fix itself, it will take a new incoming government with a working majority and a sense of urgency and purpose like nothing seen before to fix this mess. And how on earth is it so hard to arrange enough driving tests x.com/redditchrache/…
Rachel Maclean@redditchrache

Very good piece and chimes with many of us who have been ministers. A little story. One Friday night as we were emerging from the pandemic I got a call from my private secretary. I was a junior transport minister. He said that the driving test site which had just re-opened had crashed. If you remember, driving tests couldn't happen during Covid, meaning that people couldn't drive at all - including those who had to get re-tested (older people, HGV drivers etc). There was a huge backlog of people desparate to get tests. Well obviously once it opened, so many people logged on it couldn't cope. The transport secretary had been dealing with it all day but by 10pm he had enough and as the most junior minister I was asked to take over. MPs were shouting at us because their constituents couldn't get tests, couldn't take up jobs, were losing income, etc. I said to my private secretary, get me the Chief Exec of the Driving Test agency on the phone to brief me and tell me what he's doing to fix the problem. "Minister, I can't do that" "Why not?" "Its 10pm on a Friday night". Silence. More silence. "Can you ask him to get on a call with me?" "Minister, we have asked, and he's not minded to" Gentle expostulation on my part. "But I'm working at 10pm on a Friday night. I am certainly not minded to, but it is his agency that is causing us the problem?" "I know minister. But I still can't get him on the call". Cut to the end, I pushed through. He came on the call an hour later. I got him to brief me with regular updates starting at 7am Saturday. We got the thing open and working by lunch time. But really! Without being rude to many of my former colleagues, I know many of them wouldn't have bothered. But more to the point, as a minister, why should you have to! If people were doing their jobs as they should, they should take ownership of precisely these problems. Small story, but repeated time and again. Side note - its not just the core civil service that are the problem but the myriad of ALBs (arms length bodies) and NGAs (non governmental agencies) that are even harder. Civil servants themselves have no control over what those guys are doing let alone ministers.

English
0
0
0
117
Chris Howell retweetledi
Rachel Maclean
Rachel Maclean@redditchrache·
Very good piece and chimes with many of us who have been ministers. A little story. One Friday night as we were emerging from the pandemic I got a call from my private secretary. I was a junior transport minister. He said that the driving test site which had just re-opened had crashed. If you remember, driving tests couldn't happen during Covid, meaning that people couldn't drive at all - including those who had to get re-tested (older people, HGV drivers etc). There was a huge backlog of people desparate to get tests. Well obviously once it opened, so many people logged on it couldn't cope. The transport secretary had been dealing with it all day but by 10pm he had enough and as the most junior minister I was asked to take over. MPs were shouting at us because their constituents couldn't get tests, couldn't take up jobs, were losing income, etc. I said to my private secretary, get me the Chief Exec of the Driving Test agency on the phone to brief me and tell me what he's doing to fix the problem. "Minister, I can't do that" "Why not?" "Its 10pm on a Friday night". Silence. More silence. "Can you ask him to get on a call with me?" "Minister, we have asked, and he's not minded to" Gentle expostulation on my part. "But I'm working at 10pm on a Friday night. I am certainly not minded to, but it is his agency that is causing us the problem?" "I know minister. But I still can't get him on the call". Cut to the end, I pushed through. He came on the call an hour later. I got him to brief me with regular updates starting at 7am Saturday. We got the thing open and working by lunch time. But really! Without being rude to many of my former colleagues, I know many of them wouldn't have bothered. But more to the point, as a minister, why should you have to! If people were doing their jobs as they should, they should take ownership of precisely these problems. Small story, but repeated time and again. Side note - its not just the core civil service that are the problem but the myriad of ALBs (arms length bodies) and NGAs (non governmental agencies) that are even harder. Civil servants themselves have no control over what those guys are doing let alone ministers.
Ameer Kotecha@Ameer_Kotecha

I have made the article free to read here: telegraph.co.uk/gift/4e8b37c20…

English
24
106
594
90.4K
Chris Howell
Chris Howell@ChrisHowellFCA·
This little bit of enshittification had entirely passed me by - thanks HMG!
Chris Howell tweet media
English
0
0
0
39