Chris Davis

@JeanneSuperior @sleepy_devo @nyaraVT There is no “minority” they doesn’t fit. All humans are either male or female.

@sleepy_devo @nyaraVT 1) the fallacy fallacy is a thing 2) you're admitting that your system of classification is vibes-based using the majority and are attempting to apply it to a minority it doesn't fit, which is why she's questioning the boundaries of your classification.

What aspect when it comes to the classification of “biological female” are we using? Gametes? Not reliable enough to make this claim without excluding cìs people Chromosomes? Not reliable enough either HRT gives you changes associated with the opposite sex. Primary sex characteristics can be adjusted. Focusing on reproductive organs would exclude cìs people. Intersex people by default break the black and white thinking and “they’re exceptions” doesn’t really fly. Trans women are women. We don’t “become women.” We may adjust our appearance to match our gender identity more, but that doesn’t mean we weren’t said gender before transitioning. Also being female is not a requirement of being a woman. “biological female” as if trans women are artificial women is also disgusting transphobic language that makes no sense. Trans women are real women. Trans men are real men.

@nulamoonsnail @Gaynotqueer1 He/hims a good boy.

@Gaynotqueer1 The dog is trans!

Yay?

@JuankAstennu @t3mp3rl3y Do you really believe if the roles were reversed? The result would be the same? That an adult male would be knocked out by a female child?

@t3mp3rl3y Ella ataca con todo sin estrategia. El chico logra asestar algunos golpes sin resultado hasta que alcanzó una patada en pleno rostro y logró una victoria justa. NADA MÁS. Pero para algunos bobazos, esto es una muestra de que los hombres somos invencibles UGA UGA

Mujer acepta pelear con un niño: arranca castigándolo con saña. Él absorbe, espera, mide. Cuando decide que basta, una sola patada y se termina. La escena, lejos de épica, resulta casi pedagógica (para quien quiera entender).

@TolaimShelEldad @jasonrope @LindsayM1968 @daniellismore My bad. Ive been using this study. fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-ma…

@Chris_Davis66 @jasonrope @LindsayM1968 @daniellismore That is not true. men who dress up as women are 5 times more dangerous than other men and 500x than women. x.com/TolaimShelElda…

J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets

@jasonrope @LindsayM1968 @daniellismore All males commit sexual assault at the same rates. Regardless of their “gender identity”. Trans isn’t some special category of male that becomes harmless.

@LindsayM1968 @daniellismore What’s “trans culture” and what threat does this culture pose?

@Nolimitzor_X @ViralTimee Not really. Even boys beat trained women.

@ViralTimee He should know better female fighters can beat most of guys who never train

Clavicular’s friend Tarzan got KNOCKED OUT seconds after he underestimated this female MMA fighter 😭💀

@anxietymsgs Bet Buster Douglas

You meet your 18 year old self, you’re allowed 3 words. What do you say?

@Tachardiella @Real_YuanZhang May as well go back to the Salem witch trials and use spectral evidence. Essentially, dreams were allowed as evidence a woman was a witch.

@Real_YuanZhang Gender identity is nothing more than belief. There is no evidence for it beyond "lived experience", which is nothing more than anecdotal evidence. If that is all we need for proof, then demonic possession is real. Ghosts are real. The existence of God is proven.

So, what does “gender affirming care” affirm? Gender identity? Gender expression? Or social gender role?

@DefiantLs How do I know if I have a feminine penis or a masculine penis? I’m so confused.

Man who thinks he’s a woman is now saying women who experienced sexual assault and abuse from men have no right to say they feel uncomfortable seeing a man in women’s spaces. “The feminine penis is different than the masculine penis”

@RustyBud_ @TheWestF3ll It’s quite easy to clock Hunter

@TheWestF3ll I legitimately wouldn’t even know that they’re trans from this picture, they do just look like woman? You’re disproving your own point.

No, I’m not an “agp”, “troon” , or “shemale” I’m a trans woman. And you’ll refer to me as a woman. :P

@FemCondition You’re arguing AGAINST science. You posted an exam showing Imane Khelif has internal testicles, absence of uterus, blind vagina pouch and a micro penis. Imane is male with 5ARD Calling him female isn’t science. It’s activism.

I lose a handful of followers every time I defend DSD people. And you know? Fine. I'm arguing for basic human rights to extend to those born differently. Not defective. Not somehow lesser humans. Not anything but different. I'll never see that as wrong.

@TheGayChrist @FemCondition Femme’s proves Imane is male. “Absence of a unsure” “Presence of testicles” “Blind vagina” “Micro penis”

@FemCondition @Chris_Davis66 Chris needs to give it a rest now. We have heard what he has to say.

Finally! Some publication, at least, printed JK Rowling's insane comments about Imane Khelif and the damage her harassment might be doing...and the general outraged response she got on X. hindustantimes.com/entertainment/…

@deafmade_stuff @ShitMyPaulSays @TheAliceSmith Features? What exactly are you referring to? Features don’t define sex. If you have a reproductive system organized around the production of sperm you’re male.

@Chris_Davis66 @ShitMyPaulSays @TheAliceSmith Aside from being deaf and autistic? None AFAIK, that's why I'm asking what my maleness is likely to be as an AFAB as you're claiming we all share features of both? XD

“There are only two genders.” Wrong. There are only two sexes. There are no genders. The rest is called “personality”. Try it sometime.

@ArielleScarcell Time to stop sniffing glue.

Any advice for this person

@AngelaBelcamino I had no idea you were Asian.

Eric Swalwell is the only sitting Congressman who’s ever DM’d me out of the blue just to wish me a happy birthday—never met or spoken before. Is that normal behavior or… not really?

@koiyakiya @lyssalum @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Gender is based on sex. A woman is an adult female human. It’s meaningless without sex.

@Chris_Davis66 @lyssalum @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT

Trans people are not demanding special privileges. Accepting a trans woman as a woman is just like accepting an intersex woman as a woman, a black woman as a woman, a gay woman as a woman. Letting trans women live as women is not a special privilege. It’s equality.

@lyssalum @PaulRSchmidtTM @koiyakiya @nyaraVT Two sexes. Male and female. No human has ever changed sex. Those are facts. Post proof either are wrong.

@PaulRSchmidtTM @Chris_Davis66 @koiyakiya @nyaraVT "Sex in humans is binary and immutable. Those are facts." - Zero facts here, just scientifically illiterate folks projecting their gender ideology beliefs on biology 🤡

@koiyakiya @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Tell me the difference between the gender man and the gender woman.

@Chris_Davis66 @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT

@lyssalum @koiyakiya @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Sex in humans is binary and immutable. Those are facts. Trans is a religious belief based on fantasy and fetish.

@Chris_Davis66 @koiyakiya @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Absolutely not. And there is nothing "advanced" about it, biology is natural science based on empirical data, not word play around your quasi-religious beliefs like in "sex essence" (reproductive essentialism) - nature is not obligated to make categories cognitively comfortable.

@koiyakiya @PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Sex in humans is still binary an immutable. Even in advanced biology.

@PaulRSchmidtTM @nyaraVT Wait until you hear about advanced biology, something your cattle mind cant even comprehend