Chrispy Lispy🚀🤪🦠

Apparently the most stable marriage arrangement in the Netherlands is between two men. The least stable is between two women.

datacenters in space are silly 100kW isn't even enough to power a single GB200 NVL72 but sure let's spend 100 million just for launching the damn thing, while on earth you could buy like 30 GB200 NVL72 for that price

There it is the first AI Sat concept with solar panels & radiators to scale … 100kw scale.

“zohran’s wife tweeted bad stuff at age 15” ok have you seen what the president of the United States is currently tweeting at age 79

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

Elon Musk just said the AI community is misunderstanding the math of superintelligence by two orders of magnitude. Not slightly off. Not directionally wrong. A hundred times off. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” Everyone is focused on the hardware race. Bigger data centers. More GPUs. Nuclear power plants built to feed the compute. That’s half the equation. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte. That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Read that carefully. Not more hardware. Not more energy. Not more capital. The same machine. A hundred times smarter. Through software alone. That’s before the hardware improvements compound on top of it. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” A thousand percent compounding annual growth rate in raw intelligence. A system that becomes 10x more capable every twelve months doesn’t follow a linear curve. It doesn’t follow an exponential curve that human intuition can track. It follows a curve that human intuition cannot simulate at all. In year one it’s 10x smarter. In year two it’s 100x. In year three it’s 1,000x. At that point, the gap between that system and a human brain is wider than the gap between a human brain and a calculator. This is the math the public isn’t running. The models aren’t just getting better. They are compounding on themselves at a rate that makes every previous technology curve look flat. Musk: “The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” We aren’t approaching superintelligence on the timeline most people imagine. We are already inside the curve.

Helen Andrews issues a stark warning: Mass female workforce entry is triggering two potentially civilization-ending crises at once. First: The "great feminization" of institutions—channeling women of childbearing age into careers has shifted workplaces toward consensus, empathy, and conflict avoidance, eroding merit, debate, and function (think wokeness as a symptom). Second: Plummeting birth rates, as career focus delays or prevents kids—no prior civilization has ever run this experiment at scale. These aren't separate problems—they stem from the same unprecedented shift. Birth rate alarms get attention, but Andrews argues the institutional decay is the overlooked twin threat. Is she onto something profound about modern society's trade-offs—or is this overreach? What do you see as the bigger risk: collapsing fertility or feminized institutions?