@ChudbobsHouse@0xDraxer@Heavenly_Race_ Im unfamiliar with the study, but more than likely the compounds helped her achieve peak performance, allowing her to score higher than she had before. Its not substantial.
Once you hit about a 20-point IQ gap, communication starts to completely break down.
It's not that the lower IQ person is "stupid" (although that can often be the case) or the higher one is arrogant, it's that you're literally operating on different systems.
A 20 point difference (roughly 1.3 standard deviations) means:
Vocabulary and abstraction levels diverge sharply. What feels like crystal clear logic to one side sounds like vague, pretentious word salad to the other. Jokes land flat. Metaphors get taken literally. Complex cause and effect chains get simplified into "this good, that bad."
Different time horizons and pattern recognition. One person thinks in months or years and sees systems, the other is locked into days or immediate rewards. Trying to explain second order effects feels like speaking another language.
Also, processing speed and working memory gaps. The higher IQ person is already three steps ahead, getting impatient. The lower IQ person feels talked down to or overwhelmed.
Both walk away frustrated.
Both have wasted each others time.
Jews use a Japanese forestry technique called Daisugi to control White countries: this practice cuts down the main trunk of a tree, but not enough to kill it. The tree then produces smaller branches which can be harvested indefinitely. Since the Japanese mainly wanted thin, straight timbers for building, this provided a convenient continuous source without needing heavy logging transport or large sawmills.
A unified homogeneous nation is like a thick, tall trunk. It can be felled, but doing so is slow, difficult, and dangerous. So jews fractured this unity via multiculturalism. But branches eventually grow back. Patriotic Whites who love their people rise and form groups to advance their interests. Once a right wing movement reaches a certain size, jews ‘harvest’ it like a branch. They infiltrate the group, gradually getting rid of the true patriots via threats, bribes, or blackmail. The branch becomes wood for the jew’s fire or a mop handle. It is not allowed to grow into a tall strong trunk.
Once the White people realize a party or group is ineffectual or no longer aligned with their interests, a new, promising party appears, a glimmer of hope, but it too will be pruned before getting too powerful. The reason no right wing party ever seems to succeed is because jews are performing Daisugi on our politics.
I’m starting to think that I’m the only right-winger on this platform who believes that climate change is a real phenomenon.
Not saying it hasn’t been exaggerated in the media, but I just don’t see how you can wholesale reject it.
@Groypgru@0xDraxer@Heavenly_Race_ Oh so all the studies where people took tests before and after were just made up.
Katarina Dalton is just a meme.
Ok kiddo
Singer Kelis shows off her black ‘Toy Story’ Woody doll.
“We took a lot of time to make sure all the details were right.”
Toy company ‘Make it Brown’ says it turns toys black so the black community can feel “represented & included.”
@kuLehand33@Heavenly_Race_ Indeed. I think even the trust itself is reliant on having high enough energy though.
It comes back to health as much as it does to intelligence, which is it's own way a health hysteresis
Yeah, tons of studies showing that more left leaning as well as women are "generally" more susceptible to pathos type arguments versus reason/data driven considerations.
Once someone doesn't "feel" like you're a good person, or worse, your arguments make THEM "feel like the bad guy" (if you threaten their sense of "self-worth" based ideology, the ad hominems always come out).
That's why "trust in the core of the other person arguing in good faith" is so important ... especially when feeling at cross purposes either through cognition level differences, linguistic analysis considerations, or lack of accounting for the other persons initial framework as a self-strcuture.
🚨Tesco, we need answers!
Customer emails CEO for 4 weeks straight asking if Tesco sells Religiously Slaughtered meat (beyond labelled Halal) without telling us.
“It’s clear that Tesco’s DO stock Religiously Slaughtered meats on shelves without labelling”
What’s your THOUGHTS?
@TheNorfolkLion Your fools getting the police involved generally.
They are not here for the people. They protect the wealthy, and enforce political agendas. They don't give a shit about you.
This guy had his bike stolen and traced it down to a house. The bike’s been there for over 12 hours, but listen to how the police acted and the attitude! They say they can’t do anything because the back gate is open and there’s no other evidence. He then argues with the man, who clearly just wants justice for his stolen bike. The British police are an absolute joke.
@Heavenly_Race_ The worst part about this post is even if I show it to those lower IQ people they still won’t understand. They will never be able to understand sadly.
Agreed. But this is where longer term "trust relationships" can assist. As long as each party understands that essentially "something is lost in translation" to some degree, then when the lack of connecting the pattern of dots or missing the speakers perspective, each speaking person may be be able to alter their framework to better fit the other's cognition.
Granted, this takes extra effort and the key component is the trust and worth within the relationship. Basically, "is having this other person understand you better worth the effort".
Probably why digital/social media breaks down so quickly because ...
@Heavenly_Race_ When you spend 2 years explaining to a loved one what the renin aldosterone angiotensin system does and how it relates to their state of Ill health and then they call you rude for replying to a question with "its a renin aldosterone angiotensin thing" and refusing to elaborate
This post blew up, and the replies perfectly illustrate the exact point I was making.
The most common pushback is some version of:
“Nuh-uh, intelligent people can still communicate with lower-IQ individuals just fine.”
I shouldn’t have to spell this out, but here we go.
Nobody is claiming you can’t have a basic transactional conversation with a grocery store clerk, order food, or make small talk with your neighbor. Surface level communication works across moderate gaps. You point, you smile, you use simple sentences, it gets the job done.
The real breakdown happens when you move beyond scripts and start exchanging actual ideas.
That’s where the 20-point gap becomes a chasm:
- One person is thinking in systems, incentives, second and third order consequences.
- The other is stuck at first order, immediate, concrete terms.
What feels like a crystal clear, logical argument to the higher IQ person sounds like confusing, overly complicated nonsense to the other.
You’re not speaking the same conceptual language anymore.
This is why high IQ people often feel chronically alienated in normal social or professional environments, and why average people can find very bright individuals exhausting, “weird,” or arrogant.
It’s also why throwing together teams, friendships, marriages, or institutions with massive cognitive mismatches creates persistent friction that “just be nice” rhetoric can’t magically dissolve.
Basic communication? Usually possible.
Deep, accurate exchange of complex ideas? Often not.