Eric Clark

LGR @nyrangers #MyPlayoffsMoment

@Yannis_S_ @THATBOYMMAGURU So 1 or 2 of them is ok?

@THATBOYMMAGURU youtu.be/Cf49XmDieD0 How are these back of the head shots? Maybe 1 or 2 strikes ended up landing there (hard to tell from the angle) but only because Pereira moved into them, they were purely accidental

CIRYL GANE IS A SOULLESS FILTHY CHEAT AND IS THE DIRTIEST FIGHTER IN UFC HISTORY #UFCFreedom250 FIGHTERS DIE! LITERALLY DIE FROM ONE BACK OF THE HEADSHOT IN BOXING AND HE RAINS DOWN 10 TO THE BACK OF ALEX PEREIRA'S HEAD FUCK CIRYL GANE I CANT WAIT FOR HIM TO GET FLATLINE KO'D

@tomandmartys I take all your plays seriously except this Falcons nonsense. I genuinely hope I’m wrong.

DK limited me to $1.97 because they are fucking cowards.

@dj_mitchell94 It ain’t over.

Season ending effort here in France. Fuck man what a joke.

@slizzheadspeaks @LordFiggMMA lol ok

@Clarke3179 @LordFiggMMA Tulio, Dawson, Alvarez, Buckley, Acosta, Van Maybe Gautier

UFC 328: Chimaev vs. Strickland Predictions #mma #UFC #danawhite #ufcnews

@slizzheadspeaks @LordFiggMMA 70% 😂 List the 7-8 predictions that are wrong?

@LordFiggMMA Dogshit predictions. 70% of these lose

@MLB Gardner planted one is an all time call.

Remembering the legendary John Sterling and some of his most famous calls ❤️🎙️

@MaxMurrayX @MLB @HoodieFrazier No surprise, you got ratio’d

I don’t want to throw any cold water, but I thought this tote call of being high and far and gone for every single home run was tedious. He took one of the most exciting moments in the sport and turned it into a mindless chant. I understand he wanted this to be his catchphrase, and many announcers have their own home run catchphrases. I just think such chants waste a moment of drama and excitement. What fun is it if every home run is high and far and gone?? None.

@dj_mitchell94 No clue what I just watched.

Fucking classic

@dj_mitchell94 I blame Ryan Whitney

Carolina might have a month off before Round 3 at this point

Everyone that hyped Tim Elliott this week…

@I_AM_SATURDAY You were right, the line was wrong. Elliott should have been a much bigger dog.

The Tim Elliott line now stands at (+170). I bet it at (+350) on Sunday & got called an idiot. Here’s the crazy part: there’s still great value on the (+170). #UFCPerth

@dj_mitchell94 When he fell and turned the puck over, he should have just stayed on the ice and retired

Trying to imagine the thought process of putting Jamie Benn on the ice there. Woooof

@CodyPucks @heatdaddy69420 @tjkretz1 And puck line. But, that’s baseball.

@heatdaddy69420 @tjkretz1 Or over bettors

Crosby anytime goal bettors are Megan rapino levels of pissed off right now. My goodness.

@dj_mitchell94 Parker with 2 BS as well…

I like the way Alex Bump had 3 shots on goal in the 1st Period

@dj_mitchell94 Looks like they removed Bump from shot props on DK…

Just published: NHL MONDAY PLAYOFF BETS dubclub.win/dj_mitchell94/…

@rzitup @KevinMcCurdy You think he can see the puck from there? It’s blocked by Jarry…

@KevinMcCurdy Your entire argument is void

I haven't commented on this until now. "Logic" all of a sudden enters the equation as a valid means for calling goals "good", despite overwhelming history to the contrary. Some simple facts from this goal: - No official was in position to make this call on the ice, it should have been ruled no goal on the ice. That's just the facts. No ref was below the hash marks or anywhere close enough to conclusively call it in. No signal was made to this effect. Positioning failure should not result in one team being effectively penalized for that. - When such cases are ruled no goal on the ice, you need overwhelming conclusive evidence the puck completely crossed the line. Last I checked AI removals of objects and drawing circles around the puck aren't part of the situation rooms process. - If the league has a additional view that was used in this decision, that should be publicized. - It is my opinion that this puck completely crossed the line, but based on how these calls have historically gone, the process that has been used until now was tossed in the trashcan. So while the calls result is ultimately what we want from the on-ice product, the process that has been used up until now was completely thrown out the window. The league has a bit of soul-searching to do here and I believe this is a reasonable point to be perturbed with from the Oilers perspective. You can get the call right, and the process wrong, which means they need to change the process. Changing it on game 86 of the season is not the time.

@KevinMcCurdy This is spot on, thank you. There’s a lot of casual fans that are referencing geometry instead of understanding how this has consistently been called in the NHL. This particular call is an anomaly and I’m curious to see if it sets a precedent.

@KellenDB @Sportsnet Why would you put a line through the center of the goal line? That’s has zero impact.

Did some AI puck-tracking on that controversial Oilers/Ducks call. As an Oilers fan it pains me to say it, but the math doesn't lie — it's a goal. By 3 pixels. @Sportsnet

@LO_Ducks @EmptyNettersPod Please share. Everything I’ve see has a goalie skate covering the puck.

@Clarke3179 @EmptyNettersPod What are you talking about? There’s two overhead shots where you can see it over the line.

Are there humans who think that didn’t cross the goal line??

@Hoodlum0404 @9Nips9Planets @wyshynski Ref comes into frame moments after this. Those pictures are proving the point that the ref was out of position to make this call.

@9Nips9Planets @Clarke3179 @wyshynski So the ref slated to the puck after it had already been swept back under jarrys pad? What am I looking at here?

NHL Situation Room on ANA OT winner vs. EDM: "The Referee’s initial call on the ice was that the puck completely crossed the goal line. Following video review, the Situation Room determined ***that the puck completely crossed the goal line.***" Not inconclusive. Conclusive.