Pete Wilder #FBPE #FBPPR 💜 #RESPECTGFA 🇺🇦

That's my position on Brexit, full stop. I want to remain but if we have to leave then we must respect GFA. Compatible options: 1 Revoke A50 2 Permanent CU + SM 3 United Ireland

On 23 June 2026, Britain marks ten years since the Brexit referendum. We were promised £350 million a week for the NHS. We were promised the easiest trade deals in history. We were promised sunlit uplands. Research now shows the economy is 6-8% smaller, business investment fell 18% and 63% of us would vote to rejoin. And you want to vote the man that hurt so many of our pockets and got us here? Vote tactically on the 7th of May. Stop Refrom. We deserve better. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧☕️🫖 thedailybritain.co.uk/ten-years-brex…

like and repost if you will not be voting reform on thursday... lets see the true numbers

@joecocker15+ @Cleartheo+ @DentTom666+ @Jekka231+ @GailGailtranter+ @petehingloster+ @lornalane85+ @Hewitt01Mike+ @LooSeeWilson+ @red_rexeh+ @rosavita+ @griega17+ @YourGrowFriend+ @BostonBubbalooo+ @jenjeffiner+ <-- #Top1000 x.com/SydesJokes/sta…

@SydesJokes @joecocker15 @DentTom666 @Jekka231 @GailGailtranter @petehingloster @lornalane85 @Hewitt01Mike @LooSeeWilson @red_rexeh @rosavita @griega17 @YourGrowFriend @BostonBubbalooo @jenjeffiner Thanks Colin 👍

This is what 65%+ disapproval looks like.

Wow! Every single person should listen to @mtgreenee here. She outlines exactly what went down with Trump desperately trying to prevent the Epstein files from getting released.

Hypothetical question: If a President of the USA is a secret Russian asset, what would he do to help Russia? ChatGPT: Interesting thought experiment—and a useful way to think about incentives and power. If someone in that position were secretly acting in another country’s interest, the key wouldn’t be dramatic, obvious betrayals. It would be subtle, deniable, and cumulative. First, they’d likely undermine alliances quietly. The United States’ biggest strategic advantage is its network—especially NATO. So instead of openly pulling out, they might question its value, delay commitments, create distrust among members, or signal unreliability. Even small cracks weaken collective defense. Second, they could shift foreign policy in ways that benefit Russia without looking extreme. That might mean softening sanctions, slowing military aid to countries Russia opposes (like Ukraine), or reframing conflicts to reduce U.S. involvement. None of that needs to look like “helping Russia”—just “putting America first.” Third, damage internal cohesion. A divided country is less effective abroad. Amplifying polarization, discrediting institutions (courts, elections, intelligence agencies), or constantly creating internal crises reduces the ability of the U.S. to act strategically. That’s something adversaries historically benefit from. Fourth, reshape leadership and bureaucracy. Appointing people who are inexperienced, loyal over competent, or sympathetic to certain narratives can gradually shift how decisions are made. Over time, that changes policy outcomes without needing explicit orders. Fifth, control the narrative. Public opinion matters in democracies. Repeating talking points that align with Russian interests—questioning support for allies, portraying adversaries of Russia as corrupt or unworthy—can steer public sentiment in a favorable direction. Finally, they’d avoid anything blatantly illegal or provable. The whole strategy would depend on plausible deniability. If it’s obvious, it fails. The big picture: influence at that level isn’t about one shocking act—it’s about slowly tilting the system so that, over time, outcomes consistently benefit the other side.

Watch one of Nigel Farage’s Reform candidates react as racist tweets from his own X account - including one apparently excusing the rape of a Sikh woman and one that declares white people are “the master race” - are read to him. The footage is from a joint investigation by @murphy_simon , @DailyMirror & @hopenothate that exposes Stuart Prior for a slew of hateful comments. Reform said it was “looking into” posts.

Questions: If two U.S F-15E pilots were rescued, why has there been ZERO interviews with these pilots? Why hasn't @realDonaldTrump paraded them around like a victory trophy? Why haven't their names been released to the media? We're told it's bcos of "security reasons," but we all know damn well, if there's a way to make Trump look like a competent "leader" he wouldn't pass up the opportunity to parade them around. Plus, what "security reasons" could they possibly have? — they're already home. Idk about you, but that sure seems made up, fabricated, and a lie. But that's just me.

PHYSICISTS CREATED NEGATIVE ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE. They found a temperature that exists *beyond* infinity. Absolute zero sits at negative 273.15 degrees Celsius. We've always treated it as the basement of the universe, the point where atoms stop moving entirely and thermal energy disappears. Every high school textbook teaches you that nothing can get colder than that because there's no thermal motion left to remove. What physicists discovered shatters that entire mental model. They created systems with negative absolute temperature. Not negative 300 degrees. Negative in a way that places these systems *hotter* than anything with positive temperature, including the core of stars, including infinite temperature itself. The temperature scale doesn't run in a straight line like we imagined. It wraps around. Picture a circle instead of a thermometer. As you add energy to a normal system, temperature climbs from absolute zero toward infinity. But in certain quantum systems, when you keep adding energy past infinity, you don't break the universe. You loop back around to negative values. Systems at negative temperature are so energetically excited that they violate our basic intuition about heat flow. Put an object at negative temperature next to an object at positive temperature, and heat flows *from* the negative system *to* the positive one. Always. Even if the positive system is a trillion degrees. Even if it's the surface of a star. The negative system is hotter than infinite heat. Let that settle for a moment. This happens because temperature isn't actually about how much energy a system has. Temperature measures how energy is *distributed* among the available states in the system. In normal matter, particles can always jump to higher energy levels when you heat them up. There's no ceiling. You can always stuff more energy in by making particles move faster, vibrate harder, occupy more excited quantum states. But certain quantum systems have a maximum energy level that particles can reach. When most particles in the system occupy the lowest energy states, the system has positive temperature. As you add energy, more particles jump to higher levels, and temperature increases. When exactly half the particles occupy the highest energy states, temperature reaches positive infinity. Keep adding energy past that point, and something unprecedented happens. More than half the particles now sit in the highest energy states available. The energy distribution inverts. The system has so much energy crammed into it that the normal relationship between energy and temperature flips backward. Adding more energy actually *decreases* the temperature as measured by the distribution of particles across energy levels. The system enters negative temperature territory. Scientists achieved this using ultra cold quantum gases trapped in carefully designed energy landscapes. They manipulated magnetic fields to create situations where atoms could only exist in a limited set of energy states, then pumped enough energy into the system to force most atoms into the highest available energy level. The result behaved exactly as the mathematics predicted. Heat flowed from the negative temperature gas to everything around it, despite the surrounding environment being hundreds of degrees warmer in the conventional sense. Applications of this discovery reach far beyond laboratory curiosities. Negative temperature systems represent perfect energy storage devices. They can absorb unlimited amounts of energy without their temperature rising beyond the negative threshold. In fact, the more energy you pump into them, the "cooler" they become, making them more stable. Laser physics immediately benefits from this breakthrough. Population inversion, the mechanism that makes lasers work, naturally occurs in negative temperature systems. Instead of fighting against thermal equilibrium to maintain more particles in excited states than ground states, engineers could build laser systems that prefer the inverted state. These devices would operate with unprecedented efficiency and power output. Quantum computing encounters a similar revolution. Quantum bits need to maintain coherent superposition states while surrounded by thermal noise that constantly tries to decohere them. Negative temperature environments could provide naturally protective conditions where quantum information becomes *more* stable as energy increases rather than less stable. The cosmological implications stretch even further. Some theoretical models suggest regions of spacetime during cosmic inflation might have exhibited negative temperature characteristics. Understanding how matter behaves under these conditions could reveal new mechanisms for the rapid expansion of the early universe. But the philosophical impact might be the deepest. We built our understanding of entropy, thermodynamics, and the arrow of time around the assumption that systems naturally evolve toward maximum disorder and minimum energy concentration. The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in isolated systems. Heat flows from hot to cold. Energy spreads out. Negative temperature systems mock all of these principles. They concentrate energy instead of dispersing it. They create order instead of disorder. They represent regions of spacetime where the normal thermodynamic arrow of time potentially reverses direction. The universe operates by rules more flexible than we assumed. What we called fundamental laws were just descriptions of the most common cases we happened to observe. Temperature doesn't end at infinity. It begins there.

They're always so brave on social media but become cowards when confronted with their own words. A reform candidate was confronted about his racist social media posts.

If there was one clip I would suggest you listen to or watch today it would be the one below. We are told that the Israeli army is the most ‘moral’ army in the world. It was a lie when first uttered and there is nothing to suggest it is an army for whom moral decency long left the building. 🎥 TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZNRpJdmHv/

Worth a watch in full.

We have new footage of the WHCD shooter & it raises more questions than it answers.

UNDISGUISED CYNICISM FROM ACROSS THE OCEAN Listen to what he’s spewing. He’s now openly expressing regret that the war didn’t end right when it began—with a Russian victory. “We helped them with Ukraine. You know, they made a total mess in Ukraine—just complete chaos. And we helped them with Ukraine. Ukraine has nothing to do with us—you understand, we’re separated by an ocean. It’s their issue. For them, it’s basically their own doorstep. We helped them. Biden gave them $350 billion—it was just madness. And that’s one of the reasons the war dragged on.” When helping a victim is called a “mistake,” listening to this is like watching someone wipe their feet on the flag of democracy while trying to look like the “voice of reason.” This isn’t just political rhetoric—it’s distilled, repulsive cynicism mixed with a complete lack of empathy and strategic thinking. 1. “The war dragged on!” Did he seriously say that? The most vile idea in this monologue is the suggestion that helping Ukraine is “madness” because it prevents the war from ending. Let’s call things by their name: behind these words is regret that Ukraine didn’t collapse in three days. For the author of these words, the quick death of an entire nation is “efficiency,” while resistance against an aggressor is “prolonging.” That’s the logic of a looter: why help the victim when you can let the rapist finish faster so everyone can “calm down”? 2. Geography as an excuse for cowardice? “We’re separated by an ocean”—this argument smells like 1930s isolationism. Has history taught nothing? The ocean didn’t save anyone from Pearl Harbor, and it won’t save anyone from global chaos if dictators are allowed to redraw borders by force. To claim that Ukraine “has nothing to do with us” is to sign your own ignorance. This isn’t just “their doorstep”—it’s the doorstep of the civilized world, which the U.S. likes to consider itself a part of. If your neighbor’s doorstep is on fire, your house is next—no matter how many gallons of “ocean” you think you have. 3. “Chaos” and devaluation Calling the tragedy of a nation fighting for survival a “total mess” or “chaos” is the height of arrogance. This is not “chaos”—it is a war of annihilation launched by an aggressor. Blaming the victim—or those helping them—for creating chaos is like blaming firefighters for soaking the furniture while putting out a fire. 4. The price of freedom vs. the price of dollars Manipulating figures about “$350 billion” (which are significantly exaggerated) is a cheap trick aimed at voters who don’t want to look beyond their own pockets. No amount of dollars compares to the price of human lives being given every day so that this “chaos” doesn’t reach the doors of those same comfortable critics. Dear friends, this is not the speech of a leader of the free world, but of a moral degenerate—a bean-counting capitulationist. This rhetoric encourages the aggressor, betrays allies, and puts up for auction the very principles on which Western civilization was built. It’s painful to read. Shameful. Disgusting. And extremely dangerous.

EXPOSED: POWER, PARTIES, AND THE PHOTOS THEY CAN’T ERASE Before the noise starts, here are the facts. This image is widely considered authentic and has circulated for years. It captures a moment in the 1990s when high-profile figures like Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell were part of the same elite social circuit. That overlap isn’t speculation—it’s documented history. What the photo proves is simple: these individuals were in the same rooms, at the same parties, during that era. They deleted 35K followers to bury this” They can’t kill a fact” The truth doesn’t need exaggeration. The image stands on its own—and it raises questions people are still arguing over today.

@DaveBir63369712* @nickteg+ @Cyndibisa* @SouthwoodTerry+ @RedRacer1956* @Cleartheo+ @SGAFella* @BelfastResiden1* @Stephen3Parker+ @factsmatter202* @PhilGiddingz+ @Missional_Media* @chrisdfella* @Elemum+ @hegoeire* x.com/SydesJokes/sta…

@SydesJokes @DaveBir63369712 @nickteg @Cyndibisa @SouthwoodTerry @RedRacer1956 @SGAFella @BelfastResiden1 @Stephen3Parker @factsmatter202 @PhilGiddingz @Missional_Media @chrisdfella @Elemum @hegoeire Thanks Colin 👍

Wow! She cracked the case and boy did she nail it! Whether or not you believe the correspondence dinner shooting narrative, you should listen to her explain all of the moving parts and subsequent events and ask yourself if this is just another coincidence.

Please repost if you want the full restoration of our EU Freedom of Movement, which was stolen from us by the worst abuses of democracy in modern British history. This is the debate that we have to win if the UK is to rejoin the Single Market or the EU. In 2016 the Remain campaign did not defend our Freedom of Movement because its spineless leaders were frightened of the right-wing press. Our freedom was removed without a debate. The wave of migration from Eastern Europe is a thing of the past. Thanks to EU membership, Eastern European countries have greatly reduced the economic gap with the UK. The immigration hysteria of 2016 was a panic about a migration surge that was soon going to end, but the wretched Remain leadership failed to make that point.