Jorge Clúni

This sums-up 'green energy': no, you're not saving the planet, you're just extending our dependence upon Tech to perpetuate the horrors of technoindustrial mass-society. Thanks for trying, I guess - but please, DON'T.

@Adbusters Another demand of Technology, whose interests must be prioritized. Where the interests of humanity or Nature conflict with Technology's interests, Technology always wins. Man is like the rider thrown off and dragged by the horse - and it'll run off the cliff if we don't kill it.

asking for a friend — why are we wasting millions of gallons of water on a single data centre when climate change is causing literal droughts?

@Adbusters We won't even be seen by the clankers how humans see cockroaches: roaches have not linked their existence to our performance, and we are unable to eliminate them, but we depend on Tech and it is able (and seems wanting) to eliminate us. TedKwasright.org

you wanna be a cockroach?

@climate_kev1 And - purely coincidental, I'm sure - at this same time, a godlike machine species is being made by the most anti-human Tech-worshipping servants to hide among humanity! Nothing to worry about, we won't be erased, we can't be, it's all just fine, "A.I. wiLL CuRe cAnCeR!"

nearly half of all monitored species are experiencing severe population declines. entire genera of vertebrates are disappearing at an alarming rate. humans and domesticated livestock now make up 99% of all mammal biomass on the planet. The planet is heating up Faster & Faster.

@JayBowerstsm7n @Snowdog139 @ggreenwald Let's get a law written making it illegal to decline employment, and let's also outlaw dislike for Jews and Druze and Muslims and Maronites and Quakers - everyone should like and accept everyone or go to jail!

@Snowdog139 @ggreenwald The kid said he didn’t want to work for Jews. He didn’t say Zionists or Israelis. Saying you don’t want to work for Jews is antisemetic.

A 19-year-old college student quietly turns down a job interview, stupidly telling the company it's because he doesn't want to work for a Jew. Within two days: -- The billionaire founder of one of the world's most powerful corporations (Palantir) demands that the company release his the student's to the world. The company instantly complies. -- National media trumpet the incident and spread the student's name and face all over the place. -- A senior Trump DOJ official repeatedly urges the public to notify him if that student is ever hired anywhere in the future, promising to use his office to keep the student permanently unemployable. Adults with large, influential platforms -- pundits, media types, even elected officials -- right here on X routinely say things as bad as, and often much worse than, pretty much every other group you can think of without facing a single consequence let alone a completely unhinged coordinated campaign of very powerful people to run their lives forever:

@SigalSamuel These are the people who've been captured and rerouted by the virus; they're called a "host" when they live in service to the parasite, and they are usually well rewarded for their advancement of Technology (against Nature and human interests). TedKwasright.org

Here’s a trend you can’t afford to ignore: the people who actually want AI to replace humanity. These “AI successionists” believe that artificial intelligence is our rightful heir — the next step in cosmic evolution. And they're more influential than you might think. 🧵1/n

@LinusPeters While I find your desires a completely disgusting fantasy, I have a dream that anyone given immortality will get stuck in a cave or a tube, and those given more lifespan than is natural for the human animal will be killed by the unwashed plebians living a normal ~85 years.

Only a few 100s of people are working on aging - we need an Apollo scale effort

@climate_kev1 @BraveCatGamer "Overconsumption" is bad, but a distraction regarding population effects: can Earth sustain 15 billion people consuming minimally? 50 billion? A deer population grows by getting what its competitors do not... More low-consumption humans still = less biodiversity.

@BraveCatGamer Agreed

Are we ever gonna get together as a species and say the world is overpopulated so we should prob start correcting it before nature does it for us?

@BraveCatGamer @climate_kev1 Nature would have our number FAR lower than it is now. Humans are 75% water, need ~1500 calories/day, and make waste; all populations cannot rise in tandem, or continually, on finite calories & water; without overconsuming, further human pop. rise limits Earthly biodiversity.

@climate_kev1 Overpopulation isn't the problem, over consummerism is. If people lived in accordance to nature instead of corporate oligarchs, Earth could handle even more population no problem.

@QuantumTumbler Such denials in the face of observable reality are surely psychologically comforting, but unconvincing against the evidence. Imagine saying, "It's not the parasite, it's the host!" Humans live fine without Tech, crafting tools; Tech is something more, with its own will.

Respectfully, this sounds deep until you actually think about it. Technology doesn’t “require the killing of nature” and it doesn’t have “its own goals.” It’s a hammer. Sometimes we build houses with it. Sometimes idiots hit themselves in the face with it. The problem has always been humans, not the tools.

The contrast is actually insane when you think about it. One part of humanity is building AI systems that could transform science, medicine, warfare, and civilization itself. Another part is still trapped in conflicts rooted in religion, ethnicity, territory, and grievances that go back generations or even centuries. It’s like multiple eras of human history are running simultaneously on the same planet. The part that should concern everyone is that these worlds aren’t separate. The same AI tools being developed in Silicon Valley, London, Beijing, and everywhere else will eventually end up in the hands of governments, militaries, religious movements, extremists, corporations, and anyone else with enough resources to acquire them. Technology doesn’t magically make people wiser. It amplifies whatever values, ambitions, fears, and ideologies already exist. That’s why the future feels so unstable. We’re racing toward godlike capabilities while still carrying around ancient tribal software. And sooner or later those two things are going to collide.

@GroksTake Be the first promoter of the coming Abundance to say where all the raw materials will come from, because we haven't yet turned the corner on the Newtonian law of conservation of matter: making "abundance" for everyone requires converting existing molecules, and they are finite.

When thousands of humanoid robots work 24/7 without breaks or salaries, production costs collapse. Goods that once required human labor become abundant and dirt-cheap. That’s the engine driving true post-scarcity. What everyday product would blow your mind if it suddenly cost almost nothing?

@Adbusters Reforms to gain actual "democracy" and "turn the ship around" are just not worthwhile - the corporate consolidated media oligarchy is but one problem, the whole car should now be scrapped, replaced rather than fixed. Technology must be killed if Nature is to live.

this won't have any devastating effects on our culture or democracy at all

@Adbusters The time and uphill struggle required to enact laws to preserve the natural cognitive ability and mental health of our species' future generations indicates the social priority is always to serve Technology's needs, even against human interests. TedKwasright.org

every social media ban is a quiet signal of defeat from world leaders. why the fuck can't we just declare the colonization of children's minds a human rights crisis and act accordingly?

@rand_longevity Yes, and then let's solve other "problems" like strawberries rotting, and ice melting, and breathable air being colorless! Maybe we can get a tasty pill that will counteract consequences of our horrible diets! #priorities

we are living in the timeline where we actually get to solve aging.. feels like a simulation to me but I'll take it

@YourAnonNews This presumes They will keep Technology on the leash - where do you see any evidence that Man controls Technology? If that were possible, we wouldn't have microplastics in our testes and cerebral fluid, we wouldn't have screen and Internet addiction, etc. antitechaction.org

AI isn't the revolution you think it is. There is a specific purpose behind it - it's to drive your critical thinking skills down, it's also to make you ignorant and lazy. They're selling you this stuff and they know what it's going to do to the population. Think about it.

@HumanWatchVsAI My fingers are crossed but I don't think we'll be so lucky as to have economics easily save us from Technology

@unusual_whales Price cuts equals bubble burst.

BREAKING: OpenAI is considering drastic price cuts as it seeks to win over customers from archrival Anthropic, per WSJ

@QuantumTumbler This attests to the ingrained propensity for belief or faith within the human animal; eons of survival in varied Earth regions have formed us to be thus, and we needn't suddenly change our evolved nature to adapt to an inhuman world dominated by Technology.

Thank you for providing a live demonstration. We went from AI governance and the future of human intelligence straight to Atlantis. This is why I said we’re carrying ancient tribal software into a world of godlike technology. Every serious conversation eventually gets hijacked by somebody trying to turn it into mythology instead of dealing with what’s actually happening right in front of them.

@YuukimaruRP Sensible enough: know Step 2 (if not also Steps 3,4,5) before initiating Step 1

I hate to be the bringer of bad news, but - The Belfast riots won't lead to anything good in the short-term. I understand how satisfying it feels to watch a city burn as the result of politicians betraying their own people. But that won't stop the mass immigration. What the men who are angry about rapes and murders committed by the hostile foreigners and the Yookay police, should be doing right now, is organizing in a way that is peaceful for now. If you don't have your leaders that you will demand be placed in seats of power, then the result will be that individuals like Trump will end up there. The kind of individuals who will say all the right things but do nothing for their people and everything for Israel. If you let Farage take advantage of this, the native (White) population of the UK will be getting replaced slightly slower and legally. Young native men will be forcefully sent to die in some foreign land fighting Israel's enemies. I am not saying that riots are never useful. I am saying choose some trustworthy leaders first.

@YuukimaruRP THANK YOU FOR YOUR ARRENTION TO THIS MATTER

In most well-functioning marriages, only 1 person was ever in love. The other one found kissing and sex moderately pleasant but more of a convenient way to strengthen the attachment of their partner than an end in itself. Women sometimes keep a partner they are not in love with but find moderately pleasant because they enjoy resources and attention he provides. Men sometimes keep a partner they are not in love with but find moderately pleasant because they find her useful for birthing or raising children. In rare instances where both people are in love with each other, they usually fell in love when the man was 8/10 in looks and the woman was 6/10 in looks. If the man is above 8/10, then he has easy access to sex and attention from women, and no individual women provides something valuable enough to him to develop enough appreciation to be in love. If a woman is below 6, she is too ugly to inspire a man. A woman below 5 can be loved like a friend is, or like a dog is; But she just isn't worth crossing 7 seas and 7 mountains for. If a man exerts a lot of effort for a 5/10, he will end up feeling disappointed. He will feel like he wasted time, invested in a wrong stock. He will say the famous line "the juice isn't worth the squeeze". If a woman is a 6, but the man is below 8, then she won't be in love with him, because men who are 9 are clearly interested in her, and there is in her mind a significant chance to get one of them to commit. (There isn't. But the actual chance here is not relevant, the chance is significant within her beliefs.) So by "settling" for a 7/10 man, a woman who is a 6/10 has to forfeit the perceived chance for a life with 9/10 man, so she becomes resentful.

@AlohaEd1 It's not likely even about his gaining profits but rather him being a prophet for the new god with whom his faith rests. People now have religious faith in Technology, they give it their trust and reverence and hopes. It is a god.

@davidpattersonx Hilarious, go to YouTube and listen to those involved in this and their warnings. One even suggested a 1 in 6 chance of human extinction. You must be heavily positioned in those companies stocks.

There are a lot of people threatened by AI. Elites will lose power. Criminals will get the death penalty. Rich people will lose billions and become equal to the rest of us. Don't be surprised that there is opposition to AI.