Cody Correll

419 posts

Cody Correll

@CodyJCorrell

Husband and Father. “The Lord is with me; I will not be afraid. What can mere mortals do to me?” Psalm 118:6

Katılım Eylül 2025

102 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1h

@ArtCandee Liberals burned cities while rioting in the streets, cheered on the assignation of Charlie Kirk and attempts on Trump, support terrorist regimes, and lie constantly No liberal will ever be able to claim the high ground. They showed us exactly who they are and what they support.

English

Art Candee 🍿🥤@ArtCandee·20h

MAGA can say whatever they want about Democrats… But we didn’t storm the Capitol or try to hang Mike Pence. Nor did we defend people who did. They wanna claim a moral high ground after that? Laughable.

English

200

651

3.1K

18.5K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1h

@ABmrJutt No, you can’t kill an unborn child. There is a huge difference between forcing pregnancy and not allowing killing of innocent human life. Nobody, outside of rape, is forcing pregnancy. People do that all on their own

English

jezz@ABmrJutt·7h

You can’t force someone to donate blood to save a life. You can’t force someone to donate a kidney to save a life. But you want to force pregnancy? That’s not pro-life. That’s ownership.

English

137

565

5.3K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1h

@Your_Wrongest @kiwiatheist @southside_mafs Judgements based on person preference and feelings. Not based on facts I can say my favorite color is green (subjective) without it being true. Without a standard to compare morality to, it is up to each person and nothing can truly ever be wrong. Look up the def of subjective

English

Moral Anti-Realist@Your_Wrongest·6h

@CodyJCorrell @kiwiatheist @southside_mafs Do you understand how subjectivity works? Subjectivity is what allows us to make judgments.

English

🐅@southside_mafs·2d

No Atheist will ever say child molestation isn’t wrong.

Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus

Imagine actually advocating for this.

English

298

37.9K

368.8K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·6h

@kiwiatheist @southside_mafs No you can’t. If morality is entire subjective, nothing can truly be condemned as it is up to each person You say it causes suffering, but why is that bad? You have no way of saying suffering is bad Now there is a reason that we all know it is wrong, God wrote it on man’s heart

English

KiwiAtheist@kiwiatheist·15h

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs You can condemn abuse without a theistic morality. Buddhists do it because it causes deep suffering. Atheists do it because it harms a vulnerable human being. Humanists do it because it violates dignity and rights. Compassion and reason are enough to call abuse wrong.

English

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·21h

@JadeK526 I’m sorry you have had bad experiences with Christians. I have too. Please try not to judge God based on sinful, fallen, and broken people. God is not that way and I pray you come to realize that.

English

Iris Thalia@JadeK526·1d

Actually, I'm an Atheist because of abusive Christians. My disdain for religion grows daily. Minute by minute,I become more and more disgusted. You're not going to win so you can stop. Have some boundaries and accept my no. I don't want religion in my life today,tomorrow or ever.

English

300

390

10.9K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·21h

@WalshFreedom That’s when you exclude the left wing violence from the data and not focus on right now. The Data, which is heavily skewed left, still shows leftist violence is greater over the last few years. And studies show that mainstream leftists support violence while the right does not

English

Joe Walsh@WalshFreedom·1d

You’re lying. All the public & private data shows that political violence in this country over the past 30-40 yrs comes primarily from the right. Even with an uptick from late 2025 of political violence from the left. You know you’re lying. But your job is to divide. Shame on u.

Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles

Political violence is not a “both-sides” problem. It’s also not a fringe problem. It comes from the mainstream Left.

English

3.5K

1.8K

8.1K

605.5K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·21h

@greendragonhq lol, not only does this data exclude much of the left wing violence by categorizing it away, but even according to this data, left wing violence is more common today when looking at the last couple years

English

The Green Dragon Tavern@greendragonhq·1d

REMINDER: The Radical Right are responsible for significantly more violent politically motivated crimes! 63% of politically motivated murders have been perpetrated by Right Wingers.

English

130

3.4K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@Boumka01 @southside_mafs That’s a cop out and ignores the revelation he sent in Christ and scripture Again people can claim something. Doesn’t mean it’s true or changes the objective reality

English

Boumka@Boumka01·1d

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs none of you can know gods mind and what he considers moral because everyone can claim revelation.

English

🐅@southside_mafs·2d

If morality is objective, why has Christian morality evolved with society over time?

English

196

5.4K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@shannonrwatts Enforce laws and don’t let criminals back on the street?

English

Shannon Watts@shannonrwatts·1d

Just a reminder that there is actually a way to stop gun violence in this country. The Republicans have simply decided to prevent that from happening.

English

3.4K

984

254.2K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@Boumka01 @southside_mafs That’s fine to believe as an atheist (assuming you are). It’s the only logical extension of that. But I do think there if objectively evil things. I think the evidence for God is there, and he gets to define the morality of the world he created.

English

Boumka@Boumka01·1d

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs There is no such thing as objective morality.

English

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@Boumka01 @southside_mafs You’re not understanding. Objective morality does not change, people can be wrong about it.

English

Boumka@Boumka01·1d

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs But it did change. Morals are not the same right now, cultures from cultures, and everyone thinks they have the good one.

English

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@TheCosmickidsg1 @southside_mafs Let’s assume I agree, his arguement still makes zero sense saying he doesn’t think two people could have populated the earth but a single cell organism could have created all life. That is a much taller order

English

hippro@TheCosmickidsg1·1d

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs cells evolve, we see that, from the same single celled organism is easy to beleive too

English

🐅@southside_mafs·1d

I do not belive Adam and Eve populated this whole planet.

Talk Church@churchtalkative

THE BIBLE IS 100% TRUE.

English

185

181

2.8K

57.3K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@TeaDaDeveloper @southside_mafs I believe they were created by God and passed down through Adam and Eve. I am pointing out that OP saying he doesn’t believe that violates (and actually makes the problem a lot worse for him) his potential worldview of evolution

English

Teaᡣ𐭩@TeaDaDeveloper·1d

@CodyJCorrell @southside_mafs Parent cells came from where?

English

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@DestroyahK69270 @_OKJ__ The mutations are random, and yes an order is applied to passing those on. But the very process is by random chance and time something will happen. This doesn’t change the fact that OP is very wrong

English

King Destroyah@DestroyahK69270·1d

@CodyJCorrell @_OKJ__ Yes, but there's order to the madness. The mutations that are most effective are passed to offspring, who have their own slight varying mutations.

English

Kelvin O johnson@_OKJ__·2d

Evolution isn’t random you idiot .

ICR@ICRscience

Humans are too complex to have formed through random processes.

English

122

1.1K

38.2K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@eZekiel_HB @DaveShapi That’s the point. The calculation above doesn’t factor individual risk levels risk.

English

eZekiel@eZekiel_HB·1d

@CodyJCorrell @DaveShapi EV value of the 200k is less than the 100k you already have. 200k more means earlier retirement, 100k less might mean homelessness/starving.

English

David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·2d

Game theory vs EV. Game theory suggests: click red because it's the only option guaranteed for your survival. If you're wrong and blue wins, you're fine. If you're right, then you survive. All blue choosers die. But, pure prisoners dilemma isn't the only way to estimate what to do in critical situations. There's also EV or Expected Value. Depending on you moral/ethical/utility values you will just automatically pick the highest EV option. In this case, the highest EV option is "everyone lives" because the net loss of choosing red is demented. I would use a stronger word there. But you catch my drift.

Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English

189

443

44.4K

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@CheesyCore66096 @DaveShapi The point is that the ev calc above doesn’t factor in the risking of your life. Most people would value that pretty darn high. I agree risk tolerance changes by person and situation.

English

cheesy core@CheesyCore66096·1d

@CodyJCorrell @DaveShapi If you have 200,001 dollars, take the bet If you have 199,999 dollars, you can't afford it If you have 200,000- make a coin toss- head you toss the coin. Tail you avoid the coin toss

English

Cody Correll@CodyJCorrell·1d

@DanielleFong Except anyone using the game theory model would have survived. Their point stands regardless of the outcome

English

Danielle Fong 🔆@DanielleFong·2d

get game theory mogged once again, game theory advocates. everybody lives, and now you're in copeaganda about how you're not mean and wrong

Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

English

257

1.6K

98.8K

Keşfet

@ArtCandee @ABmrJutt @Your_Wrongest @kiwiatheist @southside_mafs @JadeK526 @WalshFreedom @greendragonhq