Danny Scott ⚡

Very proud and excited to announce @CoinCorner's partnership with @seedgroupme a company of the Private Office of Sheikh Saeed bin Ahmed Al Maktoum to bring #Bitcoin payments to the UAE. Bolt Card incoming ⚡️

Bitcoin building doesn't stop 🔥

Today, @AnchorWatch is launching Multi-Institution Custody. Built on our Trident Vault infrastructure, it lets individuals and companies secure bitcoin without managing keys themselves. We’ve partnered with @CoinCorner and @BitGo as institutional custody providers. Our YubiKey integration adds phishing-resistant authentication and stronger protection against deepfake-enabled social engineering. Available with optional 1:1 insurance coverage through Lloyd’s of London, bringing institutional-grade custody and comprehensive bitcoin protection together in one product.

Everyone's booking holidays right now ☀️ Exchanging pounds for euros. Watching the exchange rate. Paying hidden fees. Maybe there's another way to move money across borders? 👀 #Bitcoin

Bitcoin is leaving exchanges, dominance is climbing, and institutional adoption is focused almost entirely on Bitcoin. @adam3us on why Bitcoin is at a good entry point.

B HODL WEEKLY UPDATE @bitcoinhodlco | AQSE: $HODL | OTCQB: $BHODF | FRA: $F5S Q2 2026 Update Published We've released our comprehensive Q2 2026 shareholder update, consolidating three months of company activity across business development, outreach and market positioning. The digest covers our initiatives and progress in expanding B HODL's profile within the sector and our strategy for growing the business. Read the full update linked in the thread. Strategic Engagement: Feast & Fireside Members of the team, advisers, shareholders and supporters were all welcomed by @HenryBTCchef in Stroud. Quite apart from being treated to a fantastic meal (for which much thanks) this provided a valuable forum for direct engagement with stakeholders and to present on the company directly to them. @Decentrasuze led an in-depth conversation with Mike Crosbie and me on B HODL's strategic direction and long-term vision, followed by detailed Q&A. Doing so in such an intimate setting really allows us to articulate our thesis clearly and address investor questions directly. Huge thanks to Henry and his team for a lovely evening, and to all our guests for making the trip. Share Buyback Programme Initiated Following shareholder approval in February, B HODL has begun executing its share buyback programme. Directors are authorised to repurchase shares when trading at a discount to underlying bitcoin holdings and business value. Why does this matter? Each buyback increases sats per share for remaining shareholders. Combined with our ATM (At-The-Market) programme executed earlier this year, the buyback represents one of our key capital management tools, positioning B HODL alongside the most sophisticated Bitcoin treasury companies in the market. Media & Visibility • We made an appearance in Blink's Weekly Brief (Link below) and were asked for a sound byte on Bitcoin policy and regulation by @TimesRadio • New Podcast Interview — A privacy-focused discussion with @FinCreighton is now live. Link in thread

Same capital. Better outcome. Last week's buyback generated 25% more sats per share than an equivalent Bitcoin purchase using the same capital. #Bitcoin #BHODL

@AWeeWumman @BladeoftheS You really don't realise my post wasn't an opinion? A... Public company.... With public shareholders.... Not a billionaire in control.....

@CoinCornerDanny @BladeoftheS Your opinion. My opinion. If you don't understand that taxpayers having to subsidise a big business is neither moral or logical You shouldn't try to push an agenda on it. Off you go..

Tesco are making £4bn a year in profit. About 50% of their staff are on Universal Credit. Why don't we crackdown on this unneeded benefit for billionaires?

@AWeeWumman @BladeoftheS My opinion? It's a public company with publicly listed shareholders.... If you don't understand business and the economy you shouldn't be trying to push an agenda on it.

@CoinCornerDanny @BladeoftheS In your opinion.. .. Taxpayers shouldn't be subsidising ANY big companies..

@cryptocentre1 @adam3us @peachbitcoin It's literally one of the most obvious entities to ask. Exchanges list coins... Go read Blocksize Wars

@CoinCornerDanny @adam3us @peachbitcoin Why would anyone ask the exchange they use their opinion on a bip? Sounds made up

Peach has a very active telegram group since 4+years. No one ever mentioned BIP 110. People just care about stacking REAL sats.

@adam3us @peachbitcoin CoinCorner have had 1 customer I'm aware of ask about it. It is a nothing burger.

@peachbitcoin 💯 it's a storm in a teacup. some on social media have been misled into thinking 110 might address their concerns (which are ok concerns) but it does not, and so bitcoin's immune system has already rejected it. it's not happening. in one month it will fork off and fizzle.

@glasstyle @BladeoftheS Kinda obvious. Where are these billionaires that own and control Tesco?

@CoinCornerDanny @BladeoftheS im not sure what that has to do with the op's point, maybe you could elaborate

@AWeeWumman @BladeoftheS Subsidising who? It's not billionaires... How much tax payer pension money owns Tesco? The world is not as simplistic as people like to make out, these silly "simple solutions" need to stop.

@CoinCornerDanny @BladeoftheS The point is that taxpayers are subsidising them They should pay their workers decent wages so the taxpayers don't have to top them up.

@YouGov That just shows his followers understand less about finance than he does and that's a challenge.

With former financial trader Gary Stevenson advocating for a wealth tax of 2% on wealth above £10 million in a TV show this week, our poll last year found 75% of Britons would be in favour of such a tax Link in replies

On the filter fork topic. I don't usually have time, but this morning listened to one of the twitter spaces from earlier in the week, with some well meaning relative bitcoin newcomers, that humanized them, and their concerns and thoughts for why they thought that made it logical to support 110. My feeling after listening, is if these are the people with #110 in their handles, I'm sad to see them about to fork off and get disillusioned without understanding why bitcoin rejected 110 robustly. So here's a more empathetic, constructive higher level version of explaining why not. I hope it's high-level and first-principles enough that everyone can follow. They seem to want to understand what makes people tick, and are suspicious of intent. So, if someone asked me why is Bitcoin important and what is it, I'd say my (personal) mission and hope for bitcoin is to build the cypherpunk future, that "Snow Crash" was a blueprint, and work backwards from there. Bitcoin I hope leads to fully free markets via bearer unseizable, hard mathematically dependable money. Not everyone is comfortable with that level of freedom, but that's my view. And at this point, I believe that surprisingly, even now many governments have come to understand and value bitcoin's gold-like mathematical assurance, a positive development. Others may have milder views than myself, but still like hard censorship resistant money. Because of motive suspicion, if it's not obvious: I hate spam with a passion, that's how I came to design hashcash while researching decentralized bearer money with others, and running nodes in privacy related cypherpunk p2p networks nearly three decades ago. People seem upset about the default op return policy change in bitcoin. I will just assert, there are extremely robust and simple reasons for bitcoin changing default relay policy, and most just didn't do their research, so don't know what those are, or maybe not technical enough to fully understand though there have been 1000s of posts trying to explain in various simplified ways. So that lack of understanding lends itself to shared build-up of false narratives. So here's my back-to-basics higher level explanation. The decentralization needed to create cypherpunk money has implications a: side effect of decentralization is that you can't impose your views on others. The very decentralization mechanism that helps that, is working against what BIP 110 wants, which at it's most basic is a quest to police other people. I understand supporters don't see their intent like that, but introspect deeper. You can modify your software, but not anyone else's. Another critical and incredibly robust technical bitcoin immune system is bitcoin can't have people who don't understand technology basics insist on eroding security, decentralization robustness and core properties. That would end badly, fast, and so people will fight you on that. So the message is Bitcoin respectfully says "no" to what you want. Sorry, and bitcoiners do genuinely understand and empathize that you mean well, have high level thoughts that make emotional sense, and articulate sensible bitcoin-defensive high level ideas, but they are not grounded and without you seeing it, the way you propose to achieve your ideas, hard-conflict with free cypherpunk permissionless money. My advice is to listen to more experienced people who understand the system and why it works the way it does, to whatever detail you want to understand the grounded reasons for why this is the implication of decentralization and cypherpunk money. I guarantee you the developer and protocol ecosystem shares and exceeds your views on bearer hard money (and dislike of spam). You may not agree with individual developers choices, views, way of expressing themselves etc, BUT you also need to understand the IETF-like decentralized technical consensus process creates a protective change resistance, that is highly effective at protecting bitcoin mission. The implication of which is no developer can change anything without technical consensus from hundreds of other developers and protocol observers who are pedantic and extremely knowledgeable clever people who won't let any unaddressed technical question past. The protective change resistance is robust and decentralized in an amplifying way because of this technical consensus. And the many highly technical mainline developers' cypherpunk mission mindsets are probably far more determined than you can even handle on clarity of understanding and views about freedoms on permissionless networks, as many of you are probably still subconsciously inured by the matrix, where they have transcended that, and grew up immersed in it decades ago. They think natively in this space, while you are just grappling with the surface. Many wont have internalized or have the experience to know how this internet physics works, where there is no policeman, no policy authority, just mathematics, free market and hard money. That has implications for your views also, unfortunately. Now the tough pill, which is unfortunately true: If you won't listen to reason, educate yourself, learn, the same radical freedom applies to you: your permissionless recourse is to club together and create a fork. But bitcoin won't be joining it. (With respect and no sleight intended.) Please rejoin bitcoin now, or later if you're not convinced and need to experience 110 forking off and fizzling for yourself to start that journey of introspecting and learning. It would be sad if bitcoin lost people disillusioned due to simple lack of understanding of what's going on there, we're all trying to defend bitcoin and keep it on mission. Including btw the 110 technical promoters, just they wandered off plot somehow. Join the cypherpunks on bitcoin, come cypherpunk summer🌞 in a few weeks.

Proud to be the first UK listed and one of the first globally to execute our "Share Buyback Programme" ⚡

End of Q2 update from @bitcoinhodlco is now live! Read our look back at the quarter on our blog below:

It's Friday which means.... FREE SATS!! You guys know the deal... ⚡️ Reply with your #bitcoin lightning address 🧡 We send you sats ⏳ Ends at 1:00pm BST

No. BIP-110 is the first intentional protocol downgrade in Bitcoin's history. It's vibe coded, breaks the Taproot tooling we need for miniscript, vaults and upgrading the lightning network, centralizes the blockspace market, breaks bitcoin's promise of neutrality and censorship resistance, has an activation threshold so low it can only be considered an attack oh and by the way it doesn't even stop or slow down spam since literally every spamming protocol has upgraded to be 110 compliant. I go more into the many, many technical issues with 110 here: x.com/theonevortex/s… But what's most damning of all is the fact that Knots only has ~20% of nodes and 110 has less than 1% signaling so consensus has already spoken. 110 is DOA.

@BTCTimescom @bitcoinhodlco x.com/i/status/20752…

🇬🇧 British #Bitcoin treasury company @bitcoinhodlco announced a share buyback program of up to $134,000 to increase BPS for shareholders.