Anne ..BAIRNS NOT BOMBS

@DanielPriestley @wesstreeting @andyburnham Wealth inequality in the UK has widened over the last decade, with the wealth gap between the highest and lowest households growing significantly.

@DanielPriestley @wesstreeting @andyburnham Well a lot of taxpayer money made its way into the hands of Tory Party cronies in recent years…

@J2H12345 @DanielPriestley @wesstreeting @andyburnham Your understanding is wrong.

@DanielPriestley @wesstreeting @andyburnham My understanding is that 53% of people in Britain are on benefits. So if you work (sucker!) you are supporting your family and it's parasitical twin family! No wonder they can't afford a regular refrigerator and AC.

The UK remains one of the world’s biggest economies, but it’s also deeply unequal. We need more growth engines in more places, with power, wealth and opportunity in every part of the country. @andyburnham’s plans for biggest devolution of power in modern history are spot on.

@DanielPriestley @wesstreeting @andyburnham Nonsense. Govt spending funds the economy. But the wealthy and trans-national corporate entities know how to benefit most and how to keep most of the money they accrue by means of tax avoidance and tax evasion, and not having to pay tax on profits in the UK.

@DanielPriestley @andoniAmu @wesstreeting @andyburnham

@DanielPriestley @andoniAmu @wesstreeting @andyburnham

@andoniAmu @hotwings100 So you'd rather force workers to work for lower wages and live in poverty? That's certainly not freedom ! You're talking about "free market capitalism " .... Wage slavery Workers are entitled to a fair wage for a fair days work.

@AWeeWumman @hotwings100 No, no, no. Forcing isn’t how freedom works. The market sets prices, wages and everything else.

If a large company is making billions in profits, whilst its workers are claiming Universal Credit, then the government needs to legislate to force the company to cover the cost of UC. We should NOT be subsidising the company's profits!

All of this, and once again I have to say it, employers do not employ disabled people when there is a veritable bounty of fit and healthy people desperate to find work. Maybe focus on getting all of them a job first, yeah? After all, they are the people who can actually do it without any support. Just to say, the last bit of this was in no way directed at Catherine. Catherine is awesome.

@BladeoftheS @tommieharve HMRC threatened me some years ago re £200 they thought I owed.. I didn't..I'd to fight them for months!

Michelle Mone owes £188m to the Government, in the last 9 months nothing has been done to collect it. If you owed £188, they would have fined you thousands of pounds and sent the bailiffs round. For the rich they do nothing.

@andoniAmu @hotwings100 Exactly. The companies should be forced to pay a decent living wage.

@AWeeWumman @hotwings100 If the government keeps topping it up, why would those companies ever stop paying such low wages?

@YesterdaysBrit1 Said the Native Americans..The Maoris, and many other countries Britain invaded

"One day, my children, all of this will be invaded by outsiders, and our government will do nothing to prevent it from happening..."

@andoniAmu @hotwings100 A fully employed person should receive decent enough wages that taxpayers don't have to top up their wages. Big companies shouldn't rely on government to top up their employees ' wages. #FairWages

A fully employed person should not need Universal Credit to survive. If someone works full time yet still relies on benefits, we should look at both personal financial choices and the welfare system. Living within your means matters. If you choose a car you cannot afford, have children before you can sustain them, or live somewhere beyond your possibilities, the taxpayer should not be expected to compensate for that. And if the welfare system makes it more profitable to work part time and claim benefits than to work full time, then the welfare system is the problem, not the profits of the employer. People on benefits should have a clear path out of dependency, not be financially rewarded for staying in it.

This seems the most obvious thing in the world to me.🤷‍♂️

There is no evidence that the Home Secretary ordered any reduction in Nigel Farage’s security. Decisions about the level of security is decided independently by RAVEC (Royal and VIP Executive Committee). Importantly the Home Secretary cannot answer questions about individual security arrangements in the commons, and Robert Jenrick knows that. This is Reform UK and Honest Bob playing games with a very important subject. This needs putting to bed, so does rumours that Farage himself refused police protection because of the intrusion and scrutiny that goes with it. I can't understand why can you?

Clacton is poverty stricken. Its MP isn't. That's it, that's the post

So Reform have been told the speculation is upsetting to Ann Widdecombe’s family. So what do they do? Keep on speculating. Just stop.