WeinerDog

1.8K posts

WeinerDog banner
WeinerDog

WeinerDog

@Coldgravy5

Christian Pastor (PCA). Reformed. Richly blessed husband and Dad of 4. Army vet. American patriot. Chicago Cubs fan. Weiner dog named Mo. God is so good!

Tampa, FL Katılım Ekim 2024
1.2K Takip Edilen149 Takipçiler
WeinerDog retweetledi
John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr.
President Trump posted this last night on his Truth Social account. Listen to this. There are NO COINCIDENCES. 🙌🏻✝️🇺🇸❤️ WOW 🥺
English
496
4.9K
18.3K
495.2K
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@kylenabecker You say much truth. But it was biblical and Trinitarian Christianity that provided the heartbeat of it all.
English
0
0
0
25
Kyle Becker
Kyle Becker@kylenabecker·
Western Civilization didn't flourish because "white males" stopped other groups from succeeding. The West thrived because of rational thought, individual rights, and free enterprise. "White males" that invented the steam engine, electric generation, the combustion engine, flight, and space exploration did not do so because they "stole" the ideas of minorities. These inventions helped lift mankind out of ignorance and hardship, improving the quality of life for all of humanity. "White males" didn't oppress the entire world, they helped make it a better place. "White males" didn't oppress everyone's rights, they invented the idea of rights and paid in blood to liberate tens of millions of people. "White males" didn't invent slavery, they ended it. "White males" didn't invent tyranny, they devised a form of government to end it. Destroying Western Civilization isn't about empowering groups that were "oppressed." It is about tearing down civilization itself so that globalist parasites can rule over all of us.
Nancy C@NC7983

@robertsepehr @Greene_Thoughts @BreitbartNews Why isn’t dismantling white male focused societal conventions not a good deal? Why isn’t giving groups, such as women and no -whites more opportunities to maximize their potential. Why is aiming for diversity in groups making decisions bad, as they clearly come up with better2)

English
1.8K
11.6K
51.3K
43M
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@elonmusk Nothing will shape your worldview filled with truth as much as reading the 66 books of the Bible.
English
0
1
1
11
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@jnichols_1997 One, read this.... pcabookstore.com/p-9315-basic-g… 2. Read thru the Overtures and read thru the various online pre GA opinion guides on the Overtures. 3. If able, read any reports of the permanent committees in advance. 4. Enjoy a seminar or two. Enjoy the fellowship. 5. Bring book $$
English
0
0
1
113
Joseph Nichols
Joseph Nichols@jnichols_1997·
Going to my first General Assembly this year as a visitor! Super excited and thankful…. What should I do and not do? #PCA
English
14
0
32
3.6K
WeinerDog retweetledi
Derek Radney
Derek Radney@derekradney·
PCAGA2026 overture commentaries are starting to come out. David Coffin's just dropped & @HowieDonahoe put his out earlier this week. @brothernelson and @SEdburg will be putting theirs out soon. Even @_BenRatliff will be publishing one. Don't miss the @a4mrofficial video discussion coming soon.
English
5
4
32
9.5K
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@JoeConchaTV @troubadour210 Biden couldn't fill a Waffle House for a rally but he supposedly got 81M, 13M or so more than Obama. I will never believe it.
English
0
0
1
51
Joe Concha
Joe Concha@JoeConchaTV·
Obama: 68 million votes, outstanding campaigner, energized the base. Biden: 81 million votes, campaigned from his basement, energized nobody. I keep going back to this and can’t comprehend how the latter got 13 million more votes. No conspiracy. Just math. x.com/Acyn/status/20…
English
1K
1.8K
10.5K
374.8K
WeinerDog retweetledi
DeMyron Haynes
DeMyron Haynes@demyronhaynes·
"Christ wrought most of his miracles upon the Sabbath; so he does still: dead souls are raised and hearts of stone are made flesh. How highly should we esteem and reverence this day! It is more precious than rubies." -Thomas Watson
English
0
4
19
595
WeinerDog retweetledi
‏﮼الأعرابي القديم .
تشارلز ديكنز كان يحارب اكتئابه بالمشي في شوارع لندن ليلاً. في أحد أيام أكتوبر، خرج في الثانية صباحاً ومشى ٣٠ ميلاً كاملة حتى وصل إلى منزله الريفي في كنت. في عام ١٨٦٠ كتب عن سبب نجاح ذلك. استغرق الأمر من علم النفس ١٥٠ عاماً أخرى ليدرك ذلك. كان ديكنز يطلق على نوباته السيئة «أشباح». كانت تعود كلما بدأ رواية جديدة، وأحياناً تستمر لشهور. كان مزاجه ينهار، ونومه يضطرب، والشيء الوحيد الذي كان يخرجه من ذلك هو المشي. شرح طريقته في مقالة بعنوان «Night Walks»، نُشرت في ٢١ يوليو ١٨٦٠ في مجلته الأسبوعية «All the Year Round». جرب مقاومة الأرق من السرير وخسر. لذا غير الخطة. الحل، كما كتب، هو «النهوض فور الاستلقاء، والخروج، والعودة متعباً عند شروق الشمس». العقل القلق لا يمكنه إصلاح نفسه بالقلق أكثر في السرير. عليك النهوض والتحرك. في معظم الليالي كان يمشي من ١٢ إلى ٢٠ ميلاً. وصف صديق ذلك بـ«المشي العنيف». كتب ديكنز أن «الذات المتجولة» كان لديها «أميال وأميال من الشوارع التي تستطيع، وفعلت، أن تسلك طريقها المنفرد». اليوم، المشي هو أحد أقوى الأدوات التي يمتلكها الأطباء ضد الاكتئاب. في عام ٢٠١٢ جمع فريق من الباحثين ثماني دراسات عالية الجودة عن المشي كعلاج للاكتئاب. كان التأثير قوياً مثل مضادات الاكتئاب التي يصفها الأطباء فعلياً. أكبر اختبار جاء من جامعة ديوك. دراسة SMILE أخذت ٢٠٢ بالغاً يعانون من اكتئاب شديد وقسمتهم إلى أربع مجموعات: تمارين تحت إشراف، تمارين في المنزل، الدواء زولوفت، أو حبة وهمية. بعد ١٦ أسبوعاً، كان أداء من مارسوا التمارين جيداً مثل من تناولوا زولوفت. وأكدت مراجعة عام ٢٠٢٤ لـ٧٥ دراسة شملت ٨٦٣٦ مريضاً ذلك. يجب أن يكون المشي من الأشياء الأولى التي يجربها الأطباء. السبب هو الشيء الذي اكتشفه ديكنز في الظلام. يعتمد الاكتئاب على التفكير المتكرر (الرومينيشن)، الأفكار السيئة الدائرية التي تطحن الإنسان في أسوأ الفترات. في عام ٢٠١٥، فحص باحثون من ستانفورد أدمغة الناس قبل وبعد مشي ٩٠ دقيقة في حديقة هادئة. أظهر المشاة نشاطاً أقل في جزء من الدماغ يُدعى القشرة الأمامية تحت الثفنية. هذا المكان، عميق خلف جبهتك، هو حلقة القلق في الدماغ. بعد المشي، هدأت حلقة القلق. قال المشاة إنهم شعروا بأنهم أقل انحباساً داخل رؤوسهم. وافقت صور الدماغ على ذلك. الجسم الذي يمشي يسكت العقل الضاج. الشارع يأخذ الانتباه، وإيقاع المشي يملأ الرأس، وتفقد النوبات المظلمة قبضتها. سمى ديكنز الشوارع علاجه لأنها أعطت دماغه مكاناً آخر يتواجد فيه. يقول العلم بعد ١٥٠ عاماً إنه كان على حق. الاكتئاب يكره الدماغ الذي يتحرك. @anishmoonka
العربية
26
390
1.8K
214K
WeinerDog retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité. Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable. Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.
Français
4K
20.8K
71.1K
55.2M
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@RFupdates Incorrect. You make the sign primarily about what we do and rationalistic. It is a sign of the new covenant and holds before us primarily what God has done for us in Christ, the benefits received by faith alone through the Holy Spirit.
English
0
0
0
116
Reasonable Faith
Reasonable Faith@RFupdates·
Baptism is not a sacrament, it is not a means of saving grace, but rather it is the culmination of our conversion initiation into the body of Christ whereby we express and confess our faith in Jesus Christ and identify with him in his death, burial, and resurrection. shr.link/fnrzi
English
53
2
18
28.7K
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@WallStreetApes This has been known for a very long time. This study is only confirmation.
English
0
0
0
32
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
A paper was published in Nature from researchers at University College London Leading researchers admit that there is no basis whatsoever to think that serotonin has anything to do with depression This directly challenges the long standing rationale for SSRIs correcting a “chemical imbalance” of serotonin The research reads “The main areas of serotonin research provide no consistent evidence of an association between serotonin and depression, and no support for the hypothesis that depression is caused by lowered serotonin activity or concentrations.” This is the exact paper UCL researchers (led by Joanna Moncrieff) published in summer 2022. The review concluded there is no convincing evidence that depression is caused by low serotonin levels or reduced serotonin activity
Wall Street Apes tweet media
English
23
67
196
17.4K
WeinerDog retweetledi
Laura Delano
Laura Delano@LauraDelano·
“I can’t feel love for my own mother, which is the hardest thing on earth.” “To remove someone’s ability to emotionally connect with another human being is a crime against humanity.” @lololizzle is describing a side of Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) that is not often discussed: the loss of emotional capacity itself. The emotional – and even spiritual – capacity to feel bonded to another person is not secondary  to being human. It is the most primal, fundamental part of it. It is what makes love, art, music, friendship, community, and meaning possible.
English
7
67
217
8.7K
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@ForgiatoBlow47 I'm ok wuth higher prices short term. If you want to see high gas prices, let Iran have a nuclear weapon, or worse, use it. With radical Islamic fundamentalists, the issue isn't going away. Former administrations played tootsie with Iran. Time to hammer them. Free the people.
English
0
0
0
13
Trumps Nephew
Trumps Nephew@ForgiatoBlow47·
Are you mad about the price of gas or are you trusting the process?
English
1.4K
83
1K
47.7K
WeinerDog
WeinerDog@Coldgravy5·
@JeffreyPWiesner In addition, Proverbs tells us the wise pay attention to the nature of things. It is human nature to need and follow leaders of influence. To deny that because the term "Senior Pastor" isn't in Scripture is shallow. The WCF speaks of those things common to HUMAN societies.
English
0
0
1
48
Jeff Wiesner
Jeff Wiesner@JeffreyPWiesner·
At the very least, the prudential use of titles such as "Senior Pastor," or "Lead Pastor," or "Teaching Pastor" simply acknowledges the on-the-ground reality that while every elder is equal in authority, they are not equal in influence and responsibility. Getting rid of such titles does not rid an elder board of such distinctions and dynamics. It only leaves them unnamed/unacknowledged, which has its own risks.
Jeff Wiesner@JeffreyPWiesner

The emphasis of the OP is not on the title (hence, the square quotes). All elders are equal in authority. But they are not equal in influence and responsibility. Some elders simply have more influence in both the elder room and the congregation because they have more influence and responsibility. They spend more time than the others thinking, studying, meeting, planning, leading, organizing, etc. Good! While they do not have more authority than other elders (ever vote counts the same), they do have more investment, practically speaking. This means that some elders carry more "weight" in vote-shaping discussions. Denying such a reality exists on elders boards is naive, at best. Use whatever titles you want, or not. But unless every elder in a church is equally a "double honor" guy with the same amount of influence, responsibility, and renumeration, the reality described in the OP is inevitable. Nobody does any good ignoring or denying its reality simply because it doesn't comport with a narrow and wooden application of Scripture. If they do, they a) are really naive, and/or b) has never served on a elder board in any capacity. Moreover, titles like "Senior Pastor" or "Lead Pastor" or "Teaching Pastor" are simply a shorthand way of acknowledging this dynamic. Some titles may be more or less helpful than others. I'm happy to admit that. But, ultimately, whether to use one title over the other, or no titles at all (as my Alexander-Strauch-influenced, Plymouth-Brethren-adjacent friends may prefer), is a debate over Christian prudence. On this point, my church's confession acknowledges that "there are some circumstances concerning the...government of the church, common to human actions and societies, which are to be ordered by the light of nature and Christian prudence, according to the general rules of the Word, which are always to be observed." Distinguishing "double-honor" elders from other elders by the use of particular titles is simply prudential in this way. Given this, the one or more "double honor" men on the board need to be aware of this dynamic and serve the other brothers who don't have their "hands to the plow" in the same way (quantitatively speaking), so they don't functionally undermine the equal and shared authority of others. This will be my last word here. Feel free to have the last comment. Grace to you!

English
10
3
36
7.4K